Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Non-Appealability of Orders Denying Court-Appointed Counsel in Civil Rights Cases

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Non-Appealability of Orders Denying Court-Appointed Counsel in Civil Rights Cases

Date: Mar 27, 1987
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Non-Appealability of Orders Denying Court-Appointed Counsel in Civil Rights Cases Introduction In the seminal case of James Henry Miller v. R.D. Simmons et al., decided on...
Affirmation of Bank Fraud Convictions and Social Security Misrepresentation: United States v. Robert E. Bales

Affirmation of Bank Fraud Convictions and Social Security Misrepresentation: United States v. Robert E. Bales

Date: Mar 19, 1987
Affirmation of Bank Fraud Convictions and Social Security Misrepresentation: United States v. Robert E. Bales Introduction The case of United States of America v. Robert E. Bales, adjudicated by the...
Fourth Circuit Establishes Clear Liability Standards for Police Indifference Under §1983

Fourth Circuit Establishes Clear Liability Standards for Police Indifference Under §1983

Date: Mar 19, 1987
Fourth Circuit Establishes Clear Liability Standards for Police Indifference Under §1983 Introduction In the landmark case of Paul Anthony Cooper v. Officers Dyke, Markert, and Morseberger, the...
Strict Requirements for Relief from Default Judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) - Lexington Insurance Case Commentary

Strict Requirements for Relief from Default Judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) - Lexington Insurance Case Commentary

Date: Mar 4, 1987
Strict Requirements for Relief from Default Judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) – Lexington Insurance Case Commentary Introduction The case of PARK CORPORATION, A NEVADA CORPORATION AND PARK...
RICO Standing for Securities Fraud Limited to Actual Purchasers and Sellers

RICO Standing for Securities Fraud Limited to Actual Purchasers and Sellers

Date: Feb 21, 1987
RICO Standing for Securities Fraud Limited to Actual Purchasers and Sellers Introduction The case of International Data Bank, Ltd. v. Eugene Zepkin; Harold Grossman; Southern Investment Corporation;...
Judicial Impartiality and Disqualification: Insights from In re Diana R. Beard Case

Judicial Impartiality and Disqualification: Insights from In re Diana R. Beard Case

Date: Feb 12, 1987
Judicial Impartiality and Disqualification: Insights from In re Diana R. Beard Case Introduction The case In re Diana R. Beard, et al., Petitioners (811 F.2d 818) adjudicated by the United States...
Ambiguity in Right of First Refusal Offers: Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment on Breach of Contract Claim in Pulliam v. Cameo Properties

Ambiguity in Right of First Refusal Offers: Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment on Breach of Contract Claim in Pulliam v. Cameo Properties

Date: Feb 10, 1987
Ambiguity in Right of First Refusal Offers: Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment on Breach of Contract Claim in Pulliam v. Cameo Properties Introduction The case of Pulliam Investment Co., Inc....
Establishment of Strict Rule 11 Sanctions: Cabell v. Petty et al.

Establishment of Strict Rule 11 Sanctions: Cabell v. Petty et al.

Date: Feb 6, 1987
Establishment of Strict Rule 11 Sanctions: Cabell v. Petty et al. (810 F.2d 463) Introduction The case of Cabell v. Petty et al. is a significant judicial decision rendered by the United States Court...
Access to Legal Resources in Temporary Correctional Facilities: Insights from Magee v. Waters

Access to Legal Resources in Temporary Correctional Facilities: Insights from Magee v. Waters

Date: Feb 5, 1987
Access to Legal Resources in Temporary Correctional Facilities: Insights from Magee v. Waters Introduction The case of Joseph Emmett Magee v. G.W. Waters, Sheriff, Portsmouth City Jail presents a...
Reversing Substantial Evidence: Murphy v. Bowen Establishes Rigorous Standards for Disability Determinations

Reversing Substantial Evidence: Murphy v. Bowen Establishes Rigorous Standards for Disability Determinations

Date: Jan 31, 1987
Reversing Substantial Evidence: Murphy v. Bowen Establishes Rigorous Standards for Disability Determinations Introduction In Murphy v. Bowen, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit...
First Amendment Access Rights Extended to Plea and Sentencing Hearings: In re Washington Post Company

First Amendment Access Rights Extended to Plea and Sentencing Hearings: In re Washington Post Company

Date: Dec 12, 1986
First Amendment Access Rights Extended to Plea and Sentencing Hearings: In re Washington Post Company Introduction In re Washington Post Company is a landmark case decided by the United States Court...
Waiver of Exhaustion Requirements and Equitable Tolling in Disability Claims: HYATT v. HECKLER Analysis

Waiver of Exhaustion Requirements and Equitable Tolling in Disability Claims: HYATT v. HECKLER Analysis

Date: Dec 6, 1986
Waiver of Exhaustion Requirements and Equitable Tolling in Disability Claims: HYATT v. HECKLER Analysis Introduction The case of Patrick H. Hyatt, Herman O. Caudle, and Mary P. Lovingood, on behalf...
Exhaustion of State Remedies Mandated in Habeas Corpus Actions for Civil Contempt Imprisonment

Exhaustion of State Remedies Mandated in Habeas Corpus Actions for Civil Contempt Imprisonment

Date: Nov 11, 1986
Exhaustion of State Remedies Mandated in Habeas Corpus Actions for Civil Contempt Imprisonment Introduction The case of Leonard and Casselbury v. Hammond and Neely addresses critical issues...
Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court's Authority to Impose Sanctions for Automatic Stay Violations under 11 U.S.C. § 362(h)

Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court's Authority to Impose Sanctions for Automatic Stay Violations under 11 U.S.C. § 362(h)

Date: Nov 4, 1986
Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court's Authority to Impose Sanctions for Automatic Stay Violations under 11 U.S.C. § 362(h) in Budget Services Company v. Better Homes of Virginia Introduction In the case...
U.C.C. §25-9-206 Upholds Assignee's Rights in Equipment Lease Disputes

U.C.C. §25-9-206 Upholds Assignee's Rights in Equipment Lease Disputes

Date: Oct 31, 1986
U.C.C. §25-9-206 Upholds Assignee's Rights in Equipment Lease Disputes Introduction The case of Leasing Service Corporation v. Fred Lee Crane, William Donald Crane, and Crane Brothers Well Drilling,...
Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus: Whitley v. Bair, Fourth Circuit, 1986

Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus: Whitley v. Bair, Fourth Circuit, 1986

Date: Oct 7, 1986
Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus: Whitley v. Bair, Fourth Circuit, 1986 Introduction The case of Richard L. Whitley v. Toni V. Bair, Warden, Mecklenburg Correctional Center adjudicated by...
Balancing Conflicting Injunctions and Intervention Rights in Labor Certification: Feller v. Brock

Balancing Conflicting Injunctions and Intervention Rights in Labor Certification: Feller v. Brock

Date: Oct 3, 1986
Balancing Conflicting Injunctions and Intervention Rights in Labor Certification: Feller v. Brock Introduction The case of Homer Feller, D/B/A Mount Levels Orchards and Farms, Appellee v. William E....
Fourth Circuit Affirms Drug Conspiracy Convictions While Reversing Perjury Conviction in Tedder v. USA

Fourth Circuit Affirms Drug Conspiracy Convictions While Reversing Perjury Conviction in Tedder v. USA

Date: Sep 30, 1986
Fourth Circuit Affirms Drug Conspiracy Convictions While Reversing Perjury Conviction in Tedder v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. David L. Tedder,...
Res Judicata in Corporate Fraud Cases: Insights from Harnett v. Billman et al.

Res Judicata in Corporate Fraud Cases: Insights from Harnett v. Billman et al.

Date: Sep 17, 1986
Res Judicata in Corporate Fraud Cases: Insights from Harnett v. Billman et al. Introduction The case of William J. Harnett v. Tom J. Billman, Clayton C. McCuistion, et al., adjudicated by the United...
Assault and Battery Exception under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Analysis of Thigpen and Kramber v. United States

Assault and Battery Exception under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Analysis of Thigpen and Kramber v. United States

Date: Sep 11, 1986
Assault and Battery Exception under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Analysis of Thigpen and Kramber v. United States Introduction Thigpen and Kramber v. United States is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert