Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Non-Class Members’ Inability to Intervene in Class Action Settlements: Fourth Circuit Affirmation

Non-Class Members’ Inability to Intervene in Class Action Settlements: Fourth Circuit Affirmation

Date: Aug 17, 1989
Non-Class Members’ Inability to Intervene in Class Action Settlements: Fourth Circuit Affirmation Introduction In the landmark case of Gould et al. v. Alleco, Inc. et al. (883 F.2d 281, Fourth...
Revene v. Charles County Commissioners: Establishing State Action Beyond Official Duties

Revene v. Charles County Commissioners: Establishing State Action Beyond Official Duties

Date: Aug 15, 1989
Revene v. Charles County Commissioners: Establishing State Action Beyond Official Duties Introduction Monica Revene, acting as the personal representative for her deceased husband's estate, brought...
Enforcement of Maryland's Statute of Repose in Asbestos Removal Claims: USG Protected Under §5-108(a) Against CERCLA Preemption

Enforcement of Maryland's Statute of Repose in Asbestos Removal Claims: USG Protected Under §5-108(a) Against CERCLA Preemption

Date: Aug 11, 1989
Enforcement of Maryland's Statute of Repose in Asbestos Removal Claims: USG Protected Under §5-108(a) Against CERCLA Preemption Introduction In the landmark case of First United Methodist Church of...
Dismissal of Due Process Claims in Habeas Corpus and Section 1983 Actions: Ballard v. Carlson

Dismissal of Due Process Claims in Habeas Corpus and Section 1983 Actions: Ballard v. Carlson

Date: Aug 11, 1989
Dismissal of Due Process Claims in Habeas Corpus and Section 1983 Actions: Ballard v. Carlson Introduction Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93 (4th Cir. 1989), is a pivotal case addressing the dismissal...
Transfer of Venue in Contract Disputes: Insights from DATASOUTH Computer Corp. v. THREE DIMENSIONAL TECHNOLOGIES, Inc.

Transfer of Venue in Contract Disputes: Insights from DATASOUTH Computer Corp. v. THREE DIMENSIONAL TECHNOLOGIES, Inc.

Date: Aug 8, 1989
Transfer of Venue in Contract Disputes: Insights from DATASOUTH Computer Corp. v. THREE DIMENSIONAL TECHNOLOGIES, Inc. Introduction The case of DATASOUTH Computer Corp. v. THREE DIMENSIONAL...
Resentencing Procedures and the Ex Post Facto Clause: An In-Depth Analysis of Evans v. Thompson

Resentencing Procedures and the Ex Post Facto Clause: An In-Depth Analysis of Evans v. Thompson

Date: Aug 3, 1989
Resentencing Procedures and the Ex Post Facto Clause: An In-Depth Analysis of Evans v. Thompson Introduction Evans v. Thompson is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Clarifying Statute of Frauds Requirements for Quantity Terms: Lorillard v. Kline

Clarifying Statute of Frauds Requirements for Quantity Terms: Lorillard v. Kline

Date: Jul 1, 1989
Clarifying Statute of Frauds Requirements for Quantity Terms: Lorillard v. Kline Introduction In Thomas J. Kline, Inc. v. Lorillard, Inc., 878 F.2d 791 (4th Cir. 1989), the United States Court of...
Reversing Social Security Disability Denial: The Joseph Luckey Precedent

Reversing Social Security Disability Denial: The Joseph Luckey Precedent

Date: Jun 29, 1989
Reversing Social Security Disability Denial: The Joseph Luckey Precedent Introduction The case of Joseph Luckey v. U.S. Department of Health Human Services, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Paroline v. Unisys: Expanding Employer Liability in Sexual Harassment Under Title VII

Paroline v. Unisys: Expanding Employer Liability in Sexual Harassment Under Title VII

Date: Jun 27, 1989
Paroline v. Unisys: Expanding Employer Liability in Sexual Harassment Under Title VII Introduction The case of Elizabeth M. Paroline v. Unisys Corporation; Edgar L. Moore (879 F.2d 100) adjudicated...
Establishing Standards for Adequate Disclosure and Voting Procedures in Chapter 11: IN RE A.H. ROBINS CO., INC.

Establishing Standards for Adequate Disclosure and Voting Procedures in Chapter 11: IN RE A.H. ROBINS CO., INC.

Date: Jun 17, 1989
Establishing Standards for Adequate Disclosure and Voting Procedures in Chapter 11: IN RE A.H. ROBINS CO., INC. Introduction The case of In Re A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Debtor presents a...
Aetna Liability as Joint Tortfeasor in Dalkon Shield Litigation

Aetna Liability as Joint Tortfeasor in Dalkon Shield Litigation

Date: Jun 17, 1989
Aetna Liability as Joint Tortfeasor in Dalkon Shield Litigation Introduction In the landmark case, In re A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Debtor (880 F.2d 709), the United States Court of Appeals...
Balancing Defendant Rights and Judicial Order: Key Rulings in United States v. West et al.

Balancing Defendant Rights and Judicial Order: Key Rulings in United States v. West et al.

Date: Jun 9, 1989
Balancing Defendant Rights and Judicial Order: Key Rulings in United States v. West et al. Introduction United States of America v. Charles Frances West, Jr., Bradley David Thomas, Matthew Mervin...
Reaffirmation of Sentencing Guidelines: Acceptance of Responsibility and Participant Culpability in United States v. White & Jackson

Reaffirmation of Sentencing Guidelines: Acceptance of Responsibility and Participant Culpability in United States v. White & Jackson

Date: May 23, 1989
Reaffirmation of Sentencing Guidelines: Acceptance of Responsibility and Participant Culpability in United States v. White & Jackson Introduction In the landmark decision of United States of America...
Establishing Juror Impartiality Standards in Medical Malpractice Cases: The Poynter v. Ratcliff & Haddox Decision

Establishing Juror Impartiality Standards in Medical Malpractice Cases: The Poynter v. Ratcliff & Haddox Decision

Date: May 13, 1989
Establishing Juror Impartiality Standards in Medical Malpractice Cases: The Poynter v. Ratcliff & Haddox Decision Introduction Poynter v. Ratcliff & Haddox, MD (874 F.2d 219, 4th Cir. 1989) is a...
Role in Offense Sentencing: Minimal and Minor Participant Reductions Clarified

Role in Offense Sentencing: Minimal and Minor Participant Reductions Clarified

Date: May 12, 1989
Role in Offense Sentencing: Minimal and Minor Participant Reductions Clarified Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Kenneth Wayne Daughtrey (874 F.2d 213), the United States Court...
Claim Preclusion in Statute of Limitations Dismissals: Shoup v. Bell Howell Co.

Claim Preclusion in Statute of Limitations Dismissals: Shoup v. Bell Howell Co.

Date: Apr 27, 1989
Claim Preclusion in Statute of Limitations Dismissals: Shoup v. Bell Howell Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Mary Shoup; Larry R. Shoup, Sr., Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Bell Howell Company,...
Federal Employee Immunity from State Subpoenas: Insights from Boron Oil Co. v. Downie

Federal Employee Immunity from State Subpoenas: Insights from Boron Oil Co. v. Downie

Date: Apr 25, 1989
Federal Employee Immunity from State Subpoenas: Insights from Boron Oil Co. v. Downie Introduction The case of Boron Oil Company; Vito Cutrone, Sr.; Fonda Cutrone; Sharon Lewis v. Jack L. Downie is a...
Enforcement of Discovery Orders: Establishing a Rigorous Standard in Default Judgment

Enforcement of Discovery Orders: Establishing a Rigorous Standard in Default Judgment

Date: Apr 11, 1989
Enforcement of Discovery Orders: Establishing a Rigorous Standard in Default Judgment Introduction The case of Mutual Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Richards Associates, Inc., reported as...
Exhaustion of Plan Remedies Under ERISA: Makar v. CareFirst and Provident

Exhaustion of Plan Remedies Under ERISA: Makar v. CareFirst and Provident

Date: Apr 8, 1989
Exhaustion of Plan Remedies Under ERISA: Makar v. CareFirst and Provident Introduction The case of Dorothy T. Makar; Anthony L. Makar v. Health Care Corporation of the Mid-Atlantic (CareFirst);...
State Action Requirements in §1983 Claims: Milburn v. Anne Arundel County DSS

State Action Requirements in §1983 Claims: Milburn v. Anne Arundel County DSS

Date: Apr 1, 1989
State Action Requirements in §1983 Claims: Milburn v. Anne Arundel County DSS Introduction The case Charles Milburn, Jr., a Minor, v. Anne Arundel County Department of Social Services is a pivotal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert