Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Rule 11 Sanctions Post Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2): Establishing New Precedent in Fourth Circuit

Rule 11 Sanctions Post Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2): Establishing New Precedent in Fourth Circuit

Date: Sep 19, 1990
Rule 11 Sanctions Post Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2): Establishing New Precedent in Fourth Circuit Introduction The case of In Re William M. Kunstler, Barry Nakell, Lewis Pitts et al., v. Joe Freeman...
Qualified Immunity for Prison Officials in Eighth Amendment Claims: Inmates' §1983 Actions Dismissed

Qualified Immunity for Prison Officials in Eighth Amendment Claims: Inmates' §1983 Actions Dismissed

Date: Sep 18, 1990
Qualified Immunity for Prison Officials in Eighth Amendment Claims: Inmates' §1983 Actions Dismissed Introduction In the landmark case of David Lopez et al. v. Bishop L. Robinson et al., decided on...
Establishing Probable Cause in Forfeiture Proceedings: United States v. Thomas

Establishing Probable Cause in Forfeiture Proceedings: United States v. Thomas

Date: Sep 18, 1990
Establishing Probable Cause in Forfeiture Proceedings: United States v. Thomas Introduction United States of America v. Amaryllis Thomas; Zenworth Thomas is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Clozza v. Murray: Implications for Capital Sentencing and Ineffective Assistance Claims

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Clozza v. Murray: Implications for Capital Sentencing and Ineffective Assistance Claims

Date: Sep 14, 1990
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Clozza v. Murray: Implications for Capital Sentencing and Ineffective Assistance Claims Introduction The case of Albert J. Clozza versus Edward W. Murray, Director,...
Reinforcing Standards for Reasonably Equivalent Value in Bankruptcy Transfers: In Re Morris Communications NC, Inc.

Reinforcing Standards for Reasonably Equivalent Value in Bankruptcy Transfers: In Re Morris Communications NC, Inc.

Date: Sep 14, 1990
Reinforcing Standards for Reasonably Equivalent Value in Bankruptcy Transfers: In Re Morris Communications NC, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of In Re Morris Communications NC, Inc., the...
Excessive Force in Correctional Settings: The MILLER v. LEATHERS Decision

Excessive Force in Correctional Settings: The MILLER v. LEATHERS Decision

Date: Sep 14, 1990
Excessive Force in Correctional Settings: The MILLER v. LEATHERS Decision Introduction Nathan Miller, a North Carolina inmate, initiated legal action against Emery Leathers, a state prison officer,...
Res Judicata in Environmental Liability: Aliff v. Joy Technologies

Res Judicata in Environmental Liability: Aliff v. Joy Technologies

Date: Sep 13, 1990
Res Judicata in Environmental Liability: Aliff v. Joy Technologies Introduction The case of Elwin E. Aliff; Lin-Elco Corporation v. Joy Manufacturing Company, decided by the United States Court of...
Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction in Uninsured Motorist Insurance Cases: White v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.

Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction in Uninsured Motorist Insurance Cases: White v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.

Date: Sep 11, 1990
Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction in Uninsured Motorist Insurance Cases: White v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Nancy D. White v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of...
Defining "Prior Convictions" for Mandatory Sentencing Enhancements: United States v. Blackwood

Defining "Prior Convictions" for Mandatory Sentencing Enhancements: United States v. Blackwood

Date: Sep 5, 1990
Defining "Prior Convictions" for Mandatory Sentencing Enhancements: United States v. Blackwood Introduction United States of America v. Joel Roy Blackwood is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Preclusion of Judicial Review for EPA Compliance Orders Under the Clean Water Act: Southern Pines Associates v. EPA

Preclusion of Judicial Review for EPA Compliance Orders Under the Clean Water Act: Southern Pines Associates v. EPA

Date: Aug 31, 1990
Preclusion of Judicial Review for EPA Compliance Orders Under the Clean Water Act: Southern Pines Associates v. EPA Introduction The case of Southern Pines Associates, A Virginia Limited Partnership,...
Recognition of Inmate's Religious Name: Ali v. Dixon Establishes Precedent for Free Exercise in Prisons

Recognition of Inmate's Religious Name: Ali v. Dixon Establishes Precedent for Free Exercise in Prisons

Date: Aug 29, 1990
Recognition of Inmate's Religious Name: Ali v. Dixon Establishes Precedent for Free Exercise in Prisons Introduction The case of Rabah Muhammad Ali, a.k.a. Robert Lee Thacker v. Gary T. Dixon and...
Dismissal of Incredulous Claims in Inmate Civil Rights Litigation: Morrison v. Martin

Dismissal of Incredulous Claims in Inmate Civil Rights Litigation: Morrison v. Martin

Date: Aug 17, 1990
Dismissal of Incredulous Claims in Inmate Civil Rights Litigation: Morrison v. Martin Introduction Case: Kenneth Morrison v. Jim Martin, et al., No. 89-461-CRT-F Court: United States District Court,...
Establishing Copyright Misuse as a Defense: Analysis of Lasercomb America v. Job Reynolds

Establishing Copyright Misuse as a Defense: Analysis of Lasercomb America v. Job Reynolds

Date: Aug 17, 1990
Establishing Copyright Misuse as a Defense: Analysis of Lasercomb America, Inc. v. Job Reynolds Introduction The legal landscape of intellectual property (IP) continually evolves as courts interpret...
Conspiracy in Medical Practice: Oksanen v. Page Memorial Hospital Establishes New Antitrust Precedent

Conspiracy in Medical Practice: Oksanen v. Page Memorial Hospital Establishes New Antitrust Precedent

Date: Aug 10, 1990
Conspiracy in Medical Practice: Oksanen v. Page Memorial Hospital Establishes New Antitrust Precedent Introduction The case of Oksanen v. Page Memorial Hospital, decided by the United States Court of...
Enhanced Interpretation of "Intentional Self-Inflicted Injury" Under ERISA: Reinking v. Philadelphia American Life Insurance Company

Enhanced Interpretation of "Intentional Self-Inflicted Injury" Under ERISA: Reinking v. Philadelphia American Life Insurance Company

Date: Aug 9, 1990
Enhanced Interpretation of "Intentional Self-Inflicted Injury" Under ERISA: Reinking v. Philadelphia American Life Insurance Company Introduction The case of Reinking v. Philadelphia American Life...
Conspiratorial Capacity of Corporate Siblings under Antitrust Laws: Analysis of Advanced Health-Care Services, Inc. v. Radford Community Hospital

Conspiratorial Capacity of Corporate Siblings under Antitrust Laws: Analysis of Advanced Health-Care Services, Inc. v. Radford Community Hospital

Date: Aug 8, 1990
Conspiratorial Capacity of Corporate Siblings under Antitrust Laws: Analysis of Advanced Health-Care Services, Inc. v. Radford Community Hospital Introduction The case of Advanced Health-Care...
Affirmation of Deliberate Indifference Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Buffington v. Baltimore County

Affirmation of Deliberate Indifference Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Buffington v. Baltimore County

Date: Aug 1, 1990
Affirmation of Deliberate Indifference Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Buffington v. Baltimore County Introduction Buffington v. Baltimore County, decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions and Application of the Pinkerton Doctrine in United States v. Chorman and Erdman

Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions and Application of the Pinkerton Doctrine in United States v. Chorman and Erdman

Date: Aug 1, 1990
Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions and Application of the Pinkerton Doctrine in United States v. Chorman and Erdman Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Charles Donald...
Statute of Limitations under RICO §1962(a): Control of the Use and Investment of Illicit Income

Statute of Limitations under RICO §1962(a): Control of the Use and Investment of Illicit Income

Date: Jul 27, 1990
Statute of Limitations under RICO §1962(a): Control of the Use and Investment of Illicit Income Introduction In United States of America v. David Jack Vogt, Jr., 910 F.2d 1184 (4th Cir. 1990), the...
Doctrine of Laches Applied to Voting Rights Act Section 2 Claims in White v. Daniel

Doctrine of Laches Applied to Voting Rights Act Section 2 Claims in White v. Daniel

Date: Jul 24, 1990
Doctrine of Laches Applied to Voting Rights Act Section 2 Claims in White v. Daniel Introduction White v. Daniel et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert