Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Gardner v. City of Baltimore: Reinforcing Municipal Discretion in Land-Use Decisions

Gardner v. City of Baltimore: Reinforcing Municipal Discretion in Land-Use Decisions

Date: Jul 7, 1992
Gardner v. City of Baltimore: Reinforcing Municipal Discretion in Land-Use Decisions Introduction Gardner v. City of Baltimore ([969 F.2d...
Reaffirming ERISA's Primacy: Limits on Estoppel and Fiduciary Duties in Group Health Insurance Plans

Reaffirming ERISA's Primacy: Limits on Estoppel and Fiduciary Duties in Group Health Insurance Plans

Date: Jul 2, 1992
Reaffirming ERISA's Primacy: Limits on Estoppel and Fiduciary Duties in Group Health Insurance Plans Introduction The case of Joanne W. Coleman v. Nationwide Life Insurance Company, adjudicated by...
Deliberate Indifference and Qualified Immunity in Jail Suicide: Gordon v. Defendants

Deliberate Indifference and Qualified Immunity in Jail Suicide: Gordon v. Defendants

Date: Jul 2, 1992
Deliberate Indifference and Qualified Immunity in Jail Suicide: Gordon v. Defendants Introduction The case of Gordon v. [Defendants], adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
Clarifying Rule 26(b)(3) Work Product Immunity: National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Murray Sheet Metal Co.

Clarifying Rule 26(b)(3) Work Product Immunity: National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Murray Sheet Metal Co.

Date: Jun 20, 1992
Clarifying Rule 26(b)(3) Work Product Immunity: National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Murray Sheet Metal Co. Introduction The case of National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.,...
Sovereign Immunity and the Limits of the Alien Tort Statute: Analysis of Goldstar v. United States

Sovereign Immunity and the Limits of the Alien Tort Statute: Analysis of Goldstar v. United States

Date: Jun 17, 1992
Sovereign Immunity and the Limits of the Alien Tort Statute: Analysis of Goldstar v. United States Introduction The case of Goldstar (Panama) S.A. et al. v. United States of America serves as a...
Purity-Adjusted Controlled Substance Quantities and Sentencing Guidelines Departures: Rusher v. USA

Purity-Adjusted Controlled Substance Quantities and Sentencing Guidelines Departures: Rusher v. USA

Date: Jun 4, 1992
Purity-Adjusted Controlled Substance Quantities and Sentencing Guidelines Departures: Rusher v. USA 1. Introduction The case of United States of America v. David Lee Rusher, decided by the United...
Fourth Circuit Upholds CERCLA Liability for Facility Owners Amid Passive Hazardous Waste Disposal

Fourth Circuit Upholds CERCLA Liability for Facility Owners Amid Passive Hazardous Waste Disposal

Date: May 30, 1992
Fourth Circuit Upholds CERCLA Liability for Facility Owners Amid Passive Hazardous Waste Disposal Introduction In the landmark case of NURAD, Incorporated v. William E. Hooper Sons Company et al.,...
Maintaining Counsel Integrity in Class Actions: Shaffer v. Farm Fresh, Inc. Analysis

Maintaining Counsel Integrity in Class Actions: Shaffer v. Farm Fresh, Inc. Analysis

Date: May 23, 1992
Maintaining Counsel Integrity in Class Actions: Shaffer v. Farm Fresh, Inc. Analysis Introduction Shaffer v. Farm Fresh, Inc. (966 F.2d 142, United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, 1992) is a...
Lifting Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy Proceedings for State Equitable Distribution Cases: In Re Robbins

Lifting Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy Proceedings for State Equitable Distribution Cases: In Re Robbins

Date: May 20, 1992
Lifting Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy Proceedings for State Equitable Distribution Cases: In Re Robbins Introduction The case of In Re Harry C. Robbins addresses the intersection of bankruptcy...
Affirmation of Miranda Waiver and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Standards: Poyner v. Murray

Affirmation of Miranda Waiver and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Standards: Poyner v. Murray

Date: May 9, 1992
Affirmation of Miranda Waiver and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Standards: Poyner v. Murray Introduction In the landmark case Syvasky Lafayette Poyner v. Edward W. Murray, the United States Court...
Non-Retroactive Application of the Civil Rights Act of 1991: Analysis of Wallace v. Housing Authority of Columbia

Non-Retroactive Application of the Civil Rights Act of 1991: Analysis of Wallace v. Housing Authority of Columbia

Date: May 9, 1992
Non-Retroactive Application of the Civil Rights Act of 1991: Analysis of Wallace v. Housing Authority of Columbia Introduction In Meredith A. Wallace v. Housing Authority of the City of Columbia, 791...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Sentencing Enhancements and Government's Evidentiary Rights in Resentencing: United States v. Kincaid

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Sentencing Enhancements and Government's Evidentiary Rights in Resentencing: United States v. Kincaid

Date: May 8, 1992
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Sentencing Enhancements and Government's Evidentiary Rights in Resentencing: United States v. Kincaid Introduction In United States v. William F. Kincaid, Jr., the United...
Strict Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3568 in Federal Sentencing: No Credit for State Custody Time

Strict Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3568 in Federal Sentencing: No Credit for State Custody Time

Date: May 2, 1992
Strict Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3568 in Federal Sentencing: No Credit for State Custody Time Introduction In the landmark case Lewis Thomas v. Patrick Whalen, the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in RGI v. Unified Industries Establishes Rigorous Standards for Proving Damages in Breach of Contract and Conspiracy Claims

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in RGI v. Unified Industries Establishes Rigorous Standards for Proving Damages in Breach of Contract and Conspiracy Claims

Date: Apr 30, 1992
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in RGI v. Unified Industries Establishes Rigorous Standards for Proving Damages in Breach of Contract and Conspiracy Claims Introduction The case of RGI, Incorporated...
Expanding Debtor Rights Under 11 USC § 521(2)(A): In Re Belanger Case Analysis

Expanding Debtor Rights Under 11 USC § 521(2)(A): In Re Belanger Case Analysis

Date: Apr 28, 1992
Expanding Debtor Rights Under 11 USC § 521(2)(A): In Re Belanger Case Analysis Introduction The case of Home Owners Funding Corporation of America v. Budd George Belanger and Janice Leigh Belanger...
Enforcement of the Absolute Priority Rule in Chapter 11 Reorganizations: A Comprehensive Analysis of IN RE BRYSON PROPERTIES XVIII

Enforcement of the Absolute Priority Rule in Chapter 11 Reorganizations: A Comprehensive Analysis of IN RE BRYSON PROPERTIES XVIII

Date: Apr 21, 1992
Enforcement of the Absolute Priority Rule in Chapter 11 Reorganizations: A Comprehensive Analysis of IN RE BRYSON PROPERTIES XVIII Introduction IN RE BRYSON PROPERTIES XVIII is a landmark case...
Chesapeake City Jail Not a "Person" under Section 1983: Implications for Civil Rights Litigation

Chesapeake City Jail Not a "Person" under Section 1983: Implications for Civil Rights Litigation

Date: Apr 14, 1992
Chesapeake City Jail Not a "Person" under Section 1983: Implications for Civil Rights Litigation Introduction In the landmark case of Lonnie P. McCoy v. Chesapeake Correctional Center, adjudicated by...
Waiver of Appellate Rights in Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Marin

Waiver of Appellate Rights in Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Marin

Date: Apr 14, 1992
Waiver of Appellate Rights in Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Marin Introduction United States of America v. Herbert John Marin is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Fourth Circuit Decision in Anheuser-Busch v. L.L. Wings: Clarifying Parody and Consumer Confusion in Trademark Law

Fourth Circuit Decision in Anheuser-Busch v. L.L. Wings: Clarifying Parody and Consumer Confusion in Trademark Law

Date: Apr 11, 1992
Fourth Circuit Decision in Anheuser-Busch v. L.L. Wings: Clarifying Parody and Consumer Confusion in Trademark Law Introduction The case of Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. L.L. Wings, Inc. adjudicated by the...
Constitutional Validation of Mandatory DNA Blood Sampling for Felons and Ex Post Facto Considerations in Jones v. Murray

Constitutional Validation of Mandatory DNA Blood Sampling for Felons and Ex Post Facto Considerations in Jones v. Murray

Date: Apr 8, 1992
Constitutional Validation of Mandatory DNA Blood Sampling for Felons and Ex Post Facto Considerations in Jones v. Murray Introduction In Lawrence R. Jones et al. v. Edward W. Murray et al. (962 F.2d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert