Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Application of Bankruptcy Rule 8001(a) in Addressing Late Filings: Insights from In Re SPR Corporation

Application of Bankruptcy Rule 8001(a) in Addressing Late Filings: Insights from In Re SPR Corporation

Date: Jan 26, 1995
Application of Bankruptcy Rule 8001(a) in Addressing Late Filings: Insights from In Re SPR Corporation Introduction The case of Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) v. SPR Corporation serves as a...
Timely Service of Process: Upholding Rule 4(m) in Mendez v. Elliot

Timely Service of Process: Upholding Rule 4(m) in Mendez v. Elliot

Date: Jan 26, 1995
Timely Service of Process: Upholding Rule 4(m) in Mendez v. Elliot Introduction Mendez v. Elliot, 45 F.3d 75 (4th Cir. 1995), is a seminal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirmation of Indictment Sufficiency in Money Laundering Cases: United States v. Smith

Affirmation of Indictment Sufficiency in Money Laundering Cases: United States v. Smith

Date: Jan 26, 1995
Affirmation of Indictment Sufficiency in Money Laundering Cases: United States v. Smith Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Harvey Keith Smith et al., decided by the...
Fourth Circuit Establishes One-Year Limitation on Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims in Singer v. Dungan et al.

Fourth Circuit Establishes One-Year Limitation on Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims in Singer v. Dungan et al.

Date: Jan 24, 1995
Fourth Circuit Establishes One-Year Limitation on Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims in Singer v. Dungan et al. Introduction In the case of Singer v. Dungan, Flammey, & The Cambridge Institute, Inc.,...
Reaffirming At-Will Employment in Virginia: Nguyen v. CNA Corporation

Reaffirming At-Will Employment in Virginia: Nguyen v. CNA Corporation

Date: Jan 21, 1995
Reaffirming At-Will Employment in Virginia: Nguyen v. CNA Corporation Introduction Hung P. Nguyen, the plaintiff-appellant, initiated a legal action against his former employer, CNA Corporation, the...
Affirmation of Daubert Standards: Exclusion of Non-Commensurate Expert Testimony in Dorsey v. United States

Affirmation of Daubert Standards: Exclusion of Non-Commensurate Expert Testimony in Dorsey v. United States

Date: Jan 19, 1995
Affirmation of Daubert Standards: Exclusion of Non-Commensurate Expert Testimony in Dorsey v. United States Introduction Dorsey v. United States, 45 F.3d 809 (4th Cir. 1995), presents a pivotal...
Clarifying the Role of Incontestable Trademarks and Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Infringement: Lone Star Steakhouse v. Alpha of Virginia

Clarifying the Role of Incontestable Trademarks and Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Infringement: Lone Star Steakhouse v. Alpha of Virginia

Date: Jan 12, 1995
Clarifying the Role of Incontestable Trademarks and Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Infringement Introduction The legal landscape of trademark infringement and unfair competition was...
Revisiting Sexual Molestation Claims under Nevada Law: Analysis of Labram v. Havel

Revisiting Sexual Molestation Claims under Nevada Law: Analysis of Labram v. Havel

Date: Jan 11, 1995
Revisiting Sexual Molestation Claims under Nevada Law: Analysis of Labram v. Havel Introduction Case: Susan Labram; Bart Labram, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. James Havel, Defendant-Appellee. Court:...
Expanding 'Under Color of State Law' to Authorize Private Physicians in State Prisons: Insights from Conner v. Donnelly (4th Cir. 1994)

Expanding 'Under Color of State Law' to Authorize Private Physicians in State Prisons: Insights from Conner v. Donnelly (4th Cir. 1994)

Date: Dec 21, 1994
Expanding 'Under Color of State Law' to Authorize Private Physicians in State Prisons: Insights from Conner v. Donnelly (4th Cir. 1994) Introduction Conner v. Donnelly is a landmark case adjudicated...
Strict Standards for Materiality in Securities Fraud: Hillson Partners v. Adage, Inc.

Strict Standards for Materiality in Securities Fraud: Hillson Partners v. Adage, Inc.

Date: Dec 14, 1994
Strict Standards for Materiality in Securities Fraud: Hillson Partners v. Adage, Inc. Introduction The case of Hillson Partners Limited Partnership v. Adage, Incorporated et al. addressed critical...
Power v. Arlington Hospital: Limiting EMTALA Damages to Virginia's Malpractice Cap

Power v. Arlington Hospital: Limiting EMTALA Damages to Virginia's Malpractice Cap

Date: Dec 13, 1994
Power v. Arlington Hospital: Limiting EMTALA Damages to Virginia's Malpractice Cap Introduction Power v. Arlington Hospital is a seminal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Establishing the Boundaries of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims: Rowland v. Perry

Establishing the Boundaries of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims: Rowland v. Perry

Date: Nov 30, 1994
Establishing the Boundaries of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Claims: Rowland v. Perry Introduction Rowland v. Perry, 41 F.3d 167 (4th Cir. 1994), is a significant case that delves into the...
Frivolous Claims under In Forma Pauperis: Adams v. Rice et al. Establishes Strict Standards

Frivolous Claims under In Forma Pauperis: Adams v. Rice et al. Establishes Strict Standards

Date: Nov 17, 1994
Frivolous Claims under In Forma Pauperis: Adams v. Rice et al. Establishes Strict Standards Introduction Adams v. Rice et al. is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Constructive Amendment of an Indictment: Floresca v. United States

Constructive Amendment of an Indictment: Floresca v. United States

Date: Oct 28, 1994
Constructive Amendment of an Indictment: Floresca v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Jose P. Floresca, 38 F.3d 706 (4th Cir. 1994), the United States...
Affirmation of Younger Abstention and Non-Preemption of State Discrimination Claims in Martin Marietta Corp. v. MCHR

Affirmation of Younger Abstention and Non-Preemption of State Discrimination Claims in Martin Marietta Corp. v. MCHR

Date: Oct 28, 1994
Affirmation of Younger Abstention and Non-Preemption of State Discrimination Claims in Martin Marietta Corp. v. MCHR Introduction In Martin Marietta Corporation, Aero Naval Systems v. Maryland...
Scope of Waiver of Appeal Rights in Plea Agreements: United States v. Attar

Scope of Waiver of Appeal Rights in Plea Agreements: United States v. Attar

Date: Oct 28, 1994
Scope of Waiver of Appeal Rights in Plea Agreements: United States v. Attar Introduction United States of America v. Amir James Attar (38 F.3d 727, 4th Cir. 1994) is a pivotal case that delves into...
Administrative Hold Violates Automatic Stay: In Re David Strumpf

Administrative Hold Violates Automatic Stay: In Re David Strumpf

Date: Oct 14, 1994
Administrative Hold Violates Automatic Stay: In Re David Strumpf Introduction The case of In Re David Strumpf, Debtor v. Citizens Bank of Maryland is a pivotal decision by the United States Court of...
Jurisdictional Boundaries Under FSIA: Schlumberger Industries v. National Surety Corporation and Others

Jurisdictional Boundaries Under FSIA: Schlumberger Industries v. National Surety Corporation and Others

Date: Oct 8, 1994
Jurisdictional Boundaries Under FSIA: Schlumberger Industries v. National Surety Corporation and Others Introduction Schlumberger Industries, Inc. v. National Surety Corporation; Fireman's Fund...
Defining Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering Activity under 18 U.S.C. § 1959: Analysis of United States v. Fiel et al.

Defining Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering Activity under 18 U.S.C. § 1959: Analysis of United States v. Fiel et al.

Date: Oct 1, 1994
Defining Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering Activity under 18 U.S.C. § 1959: Analysis of United States v. Fiel et al. Introduction United States of America v. Ronald Allyn Fiel et al. is a...
Reaffirmation of the Continuing Violation Doctrine Under the Equal Pay Act in Brinkley-Obu v. Hughes Training, Inc.

Reaffirmation of the Continuing Violation Doctrine Under the Equal Pay Act in Brinkley-Obu v. Hughes Training, Inc.

Date: Sep 27, 1994
Reaffirmation of the Continuing Violation Doctrine Under the Equal Pay Act in Brinkley-Obu v. Hughes Training, Inc. Introduction The case of Sharon D. Brinkley-Obu v. Hughes Training, Incorporated...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert