Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Ordinance 288: Balancing Commercial Speech and Public Welfare in Alcohol Advertising

Affirmation of Ordinance 288: Balancing Commercial Speech and Public Welfare in Alcohol Advertising

Date: Sep 1, 1995
Affirmation of Ordinance 288: Balancing Commercial Speech and Public Welfare in Alcohol Advertising Introduction The case of Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Schmoke (1995) addresses the constitutional...
Defining "Separate and Distinct Criminal Episodes" Under the ACCA: Letterlough v. United States

Defining "Separate and Distinct Criminal Episodes" Under the ACCA: Letterlough v. United States

Date: Aug 29, 1995
Defining "Separate and Distinct Criminal Episodes" Under the ACCA: Letterlough v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Vincent Jay Letterlough, 63 F.3d 332...
Specific Factual Findings Required for Perjury-Related Sentencing Enhancements: United States v. Smith

Specific Factual Findings Required for Perjury-Related Sentencing Enhancements: United States v. Smith

Date: Aug 22, 1995
Specific Factual Findings Required for Perjury-Related Sentencing Enhancements: United States v. Smith Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, 1995 Introduction The case of United States of America v....
Interpretation of "Knowingly" in Felon-In-Possession Statutes: United States v. Langley

Interpretation of "Knowingly" in Felon-In-Possession Statutes: United States v. Langley

Date: Aug 15, 1995
Interpretation of "Knowingly" in Felon-In-Possession Statutes: United States v. Langley Introduction United States of America v. Richard Langley (62 F.3d 602) is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Implications of Retrospective Amendments to Sentencing Guidelines: United States v. Capers

Implications of Retrospective Amendments to Sentencing Guidelines: United States v. Capers

Date: Aug 11, 1995
Implications of Retrospective Amendments to Sentencing Guidelines: United States v. Capers Introduction The case of United States of America v. Anthony J. Capers, decided by the United States Court...
Collateral Estoppel and Non-Dischargeability of Punitive Damages under 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(6): An In-Depth Analysis of In re James B. McNallen

Collateral Estoppel and Non-Dischargeability of Punitive Damages under 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(6): An In-Depth Analysis of In re James B. McNallen

Date: Aug 11, 1995
Collateral Estoppel and Non-Dischargeability of Punitive Damages under 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(6): An In-Depth Analysis of In re James B. McNallen Introduction The case of In re: James B. McNallen, Debtor...
Fourth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Henson v. Liggett Group

Fourth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Henson v. Liggett Group

Date: Aug 10, 1995
Fourth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Henson v. Liggett Group Introduction In the landmark case of Shirley S. Henson v. Liggett Group, Inc., the United States Court of...
Enforcing Court Orders: The Precedent Set in In Re General Motors Corporation

Enforcing Court Orders: The Precedent Set in In Re General Motors Corporation

Date: Aug 9, 1995
Enforcing Court Orders: The Precedent Set in In Re General Motors Corporation Introduction The case In Re General Motors Corporation (61 F.3d 256), adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Proper Sentencing Enhancements and Consecutive Sentencing Under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Puckett

Affirmation of Proper Sentencing Enhancements and Consecutive Sentencing Under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Puckett

Date: Aug 5, 1995
Affirmation of Proper Sentencing Enhancements and Consecutive Sentencing Under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. Puckett Introduction The case of United States of America v. Pamela Adele...
Establishing Standards for Constructive Discharge and Equitable Relief in National Origin Harassment Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Amirmokri v. BGE

Establishing Standards for Constructive Discharge and Equitable Relief in National Origin Harassment Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Amirmokri v. BGE

Date: Aug 4, 1995
Establishing Standards for Constructive Discharge and Equitable Relief in National Origin Harassment Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of Amirmokri v. BGE Introduction The case of Homi N. Amirmokri v....
ADA Non-Applicability to State Prisons Confirmed: Staples v. Virginia Department of Corrections

ADA Non-Applicability to State Prisons Confirmed: Staples v. Virginia Department of Corrections

Date: Jul 20, 1995
ADA Non-Applicability to State Prisons Confirmed: Staples v. Virginia Department of Corrections Introduction The case of William A. Staples v. Virginia Department of Corrections, decided on July 19,...
Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts Evidence in Sexual Abuse Cases: United States v. Grady William Powers

Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts Evidence in Sexual Abuse Cases: United States v. Grady William Powers

Date: Jul 15, 1995
Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts Evidence in Sexual Abuse Cases: United States v. Grady William Powers Introduction The case of United States of America v. Grady William Powers (59 F.3d 1460, 4th Cir....
Unconstitutional Prior Restraint: The Fourth Circuit’s Decision in Warwick Books v. Prince George's County

Unconstitutional Prior Restraint: The Fourth Circuit’s Decision in Warwick Books v. Prince George's County

Date: Jul 6, 1995
Unconstitutional Prior Restraint: The Fourth Circuit’s Decision in Warwick Books v. Prince George's County Introduction The case of 11126 Baltimore Boulevard, Inc. v. Prince George's County, Maryland...
Qualified Immunity in Disability Accommodation Claims: Torcasio v. Murray

Qualified Immunity in Disability Accommodation Claims: Torcasio v. Murray

Date: Jun 30, 1995
Qualified Immunity in Disability Accommodation Claims: Torcasio v. Murray Introduction Anthony Torcasio, a morbidly obese inmate, filed a lawsuit against officials of the Virginia Department of...
Barnes v. Thompson: Upholding Procedural Default and Clarifying Brady Materiality in Capital Sentencing

Barnes v. Thompson: Upholding Procedural Default and Clarifying Brady Materiality in Capital Sentencing

Date: Jun 30, 1995
Barnes v. Thompson: Upholding Procedural Default and Clarifying Brady Materiality in Capital Sentencing Introduction Barnes v. Thompson is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: Brice v. Virginia Beach Correctional Center

Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: Brice v. Virginia Beach Correctional Center

Date: Jun 29, 1995
Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: Brice v. Virginia Beach Correctional Center Introduction Brice v. Virginia Beach Correctional Center is a significant judicial decision rendered by the...
Revisiting Supplemental Jurisdiction in Diversity Cases: Shanaghan v. Cahill Associates

Revisiting Supplemental Jurisdiction in Diversity Cases: Shanaghan v. Cahill Associates

Date: Jun 29, 1995
Revisiting Supplemental Jurisdiction in Diversity Cases: Shanaghan v. Cahill Associates Introduction The case of Shanaghan v. Cahill Associates, 58 F.3d 106 (4th Cir. 1995), addresses a pivotal issue...
Affirmation of Enforceability of Exclusive Representation Contracts in Cable Advertising under Sherman Act

Affirmation of Enforceability of Exclusive Representation Contracts in Cable Advertising under Sherman Act

Date: Jun 28, 1995
Affirmation of Enforceability of Exclusive Representation Contracts in Cable Advertising under Sherman Act Introduction In the landmark case of Thompson Everett, Inc. v. National Cable Advertising,...
Affirmation of Denied Habeas Corpus and Rule 60(b) Relief: Insights into Ineffective Assistance and Successive Habeas Petitions in Hunt v. Maryland

Affirmation of Denied Habeas Corpus and Rule 60(b) Relief: Insights into Ineffective Assistance and Successive Habeas Petitions in Hunt v. Maryland

Date: Jun 28, 1995
Affirmation of Denied Habeas Corpus and Rule 60(b) Relief: Insights into Ineffective Assistance and Successive Habeas Petitions in Hunt v. Maryland Introduction In the landmark case of Flint Gregory...
Preservation of Secured Creditor Liens in Chapter 13 Confirmations: Insights from CEN-PEN Corp. v. Hansons

Preservation of Secured Creditor Liens in Chapter 13 Confirmations: Insights from CEN-PEN Corp. v. Hansons

Date: Jun 23, 1995
Preservation of Secured Creditor Liens in Chapter 13 Confirmations: Insights from CEN-PEN Corp. v. Hansons Introduction The case of CEN-PEN Corporation v. Walter E. Hanson; Lorainne P. Hanson,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert