Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Timely Removal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446: Insights from Lovern v. General Motors

Timely Removal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446: Insights from Lovern v. General Motors

Date: Aug 15, 1997
Timely Removal Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446: Insights from Lovern v. General Motors Introduction Lovern v. General Motors Corporation is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Administrative Segregation and Liberty Interests: Analyzing Beverati v. Smith

Administrative Segregation and Liberty Interests: Analyzing Beverati v. Smith

Date: Aug 12, 1997
Administrative Segregation and Liberty Interests: Analyzing Beverati v. Smith Introduction In the case of Brian Beverati and Emil Van Aelst v. Sewall Smith et al., adjudicated by the United States...
Political Dismissal of Deputy Sheriffs in the Fourth Circuit: Jenkins v. Medford

Political Dismissal of Deputy Sheriffs in the Fourth Circuit: Jenkins v. Medford

Date: Aug 8, 1997
Political Dismissal of Deputy Sheriffs in the Fourth Circuit: Jenkins v. Medford Introduction The case of Steven Douglas Jenkins et al. v. Bobby Lee Medford et al. (1997) centers around the dismissal...
Materiality in Brady Violations and Impeachment Standards: United States v. Ellis

Materiality in Brady Violations and Impeachment Standards: United States v. Ellis

Date: Aug 7, 1997
Materiality in Brady Violations and Impeachment Standards: United States v. Ellis Introduction United States of America v. Leroy Ellis, 121 F.3d 908 (4th Cir. 1997), serves as a pivotal case in...
Divestiture of District Court Jurisdiction Upon Administrative Forfeiture Proceedings Initiation

Divestiture of District Court Jurisdiction Upon Administrative Forfeiture Proceedings Initiation

Date: Jul 31, 1997
Divestiture of District Court Jurisdiction Upon Administrative Forfeiture Proceedings Initiation Introduction The case of Maria Jimena Ibarra v. United States of America; Unknown Government Officers...
Affirmation of Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Limiting Federal Review of State Court Injunctions on Political Speech

Affirmation of Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Limiting Federal Review of State Court Injunctions on Political Speech

Date: Jul 29, 1997
Affirmation of Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Limiting Federal Review of State Court Injunctions on Political Speech Introduction The case of Vern T. Jordahl; Mary-Beth LaRock; Virginia Leadership...
Federal Supremacy in Felon Firearm Possession: Upholding 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Over State Authorization

Federal Supremacy in Felon Firearm Possession: Upholding 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Over State Authorization

Date: Jul 25, 1997
Federal Supremacy in Felon Firearm Possession: Upholding 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Over State Authorization Introduction The case of United States of America v. Andre Cardell King and Chalmers Lavette...
Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Bankruptcy Code: Insights from In Re: Creative Goldsmiths of Washington, D.C., Inc.

Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Bankruptcy Code: Insights from In Re: Creative Goldsmiths of Washington, D.C., Inc.

Date: Jul 23, 1997
Eleventh Amendment Immunity and the Bankruptcy Code: A Comprehensive Analysis of In Re: Creative Goldsmiths of Washington, D.C., Inc. Introduction The case of In Re: Creative Goldsmiths of...
Affirmation of North Carolina's Parental Consent Act for Unemancipated Minor's Abortion

Affirmation of North Carolina's Parental Consent Act for Unemancipated Minor's Abortion

Date: Jul 12, 1997
Affirmation of North Carolina's Parental Consent Act for Unemancipated Minor's Abortion Introduction In the case of Manning v. Hunt, decided on July 11, 1997, the United States Court of Appeals for...
ERISA Section 515 Enforces Uniform Contribution Obligations in Multi-Employer Pension Funds: Insights from Bakery and Confectionery Union v. Ralph's Grocery Company

ERISA Section 515 Enforces Uniform Contribution Obligations in Multi-Employer Pension Funds: Insights from Bakery and Confectionery Union v. Ralph's Grocery Company

Date: Jul 10, 1997
ERISA Section 515 Enforces Uniform Contribution Obligations in Multi-Employer Pension Funds: Insights from Bakery and Confectionery Union v. Ralph's Grocery Company Introduction The case of Bakery...
Deference to Local Educational Decisions Under IDEA: Insights from Hartmann v. Loudoun County Board of Education

Deference to Local Educational Decisions Under IDEA: Insights from Hartmann v. Loudoun County Board of Education

Date: Jul 9, 1997
Deference to Local Educational Decisions Under IDEA: Insights from Hartmann v. Loudoun County Board of Education Introduction The case of Hartmann v. Loudoun County Board of Education is a seminal...
Enhancing Legal Standards for Obstruction of Tax Administration: The United States v. Douglas D. Wilson Decision

Enhancing Legal Standards for Obstruction of Tax Administration: The United States v. Douglas D. Wilson Decision

Date: Jul 3, 1997
Enhancing Legal Standards for Obstruction of Tax Administration: The United States v. Douglas D. Wilson Decision Introduction The case of United States of America v. Douglas D. Wilson (118 F.3d 228,...
United States v. Carlos Sanchez: Broad Admissibility of 404(b) Evidence and Upholding Polygraph Test Exclusion

United States v. Carlos Sanchez: Broad Admissibility of 404(b) Evidence and Upholding Polygraph Test Exclusion

Date: Jul 1, 1997
United States v. Carlos Sanchez: Broad Admissibility of 404(b) Evidence and Upholding Polygraph Test Exclusion Introduction In United States of America v. Carlos Sanchez, 118 F.3d 192 (4th Cir....
Enhancing EEOC Investigations: Upholding Subpoena Enforcement for Computerized Personnel Data

Enhancing EEOC Investigations: Upholding Subpoena Enforcement for Computerized Personnel Data

Date: Jun 27, 1997
Enhancing EEOC Investigations: Upholding Subpoena Enforcement for Computerized Personnel Data Introduction The case Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, Aero Naval...
De Minimis Standards in Excessive Force Claims: RILEY v. DORTON, 115 F.3d 1159 (4th Cir. 1997)

De Minimis Standards in Excessive Force Claims: RILEY v. DORTON, 115 F.3d 1159 (4th Cir. 1997)

Date: Jun 17, 1997
De Minimis Standards in Excessive Force Claims: RILEY v. DORTON, 115 F.3d 1159 (4th Cir. 1997) Introduction In the case of Charles Richard Riley v. James M. Dorton, the United States Court of Appeals...
Defining 'New Constitutional Rule' for Successive Section 2255 Motions: Insights from In re Avery W. Vial

Defining 'New Constitutional Rule' for Successive Section 2255 Motions: Insights from In re Avery W. Vial

Date: Jun 17, 1997
Defining 'New Constitutional Rule' for Successive Section 2255 Motions: Insights from In re Avery W. Vial Introduction In the realm of federal postconviction relief, the case of In re Avery W. Vial,...
Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) in Relation to Drug Trafficking Crimes: Analysis of Wilson v. United States

Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) in Relation to Drug Trafficking Crimes: Analysis of Wilson v. United States

Date: Jun 17, 1997
Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) in Relation to Drug Trafficking Crimes: Analysis of Wilson v. United States Introduction Wilson v. United States is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
SEC Affirms Independent Sanctions Following NASD Actions: Implications on Res Judicata and Double Jeopardy

SEC Affirms Independent Sanctions Following NASD Actions: Implications on Res Judicata and Double Jeopardy

Date: Jun 17, 1997
SEC Affirms Independent Sanctions Following NASD Actions: Implications on Res Judicata and Double Jeopardy Introduction The case of Ivan D. Jones, Jr. v. Securities Exchange Commission, decided by...
Strict Standards for Bankruptcy Trustees Seeking Relief under Rule 60(b): Heyman v. M.L. Marketing

Strict Standards for Bankruptcy Trustees Seeking Relief under Rule 60(b): Heyman v. M.L. Marketing

Date: Jun 17, 1997
Strict Standards for Bankruptcy Trustees Seeking Relief under Rule 60(b): Heyman v. M.L. Marketing Introduction Heyman v. M.L. Marketing Company is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court...
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements under the FAA: O'Neil v. Hilton Head Hospital

Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements under the FAA: O'Neil v. Hilton Head Hospital

Date: Jun 14, 1997
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements under the FAA: O'Neil v. Hilton Head Hospital Introduction The case of Diane O'Neil v. Hilton Head Hospital delves into the enforceability of arbitration...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert