Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Paraguay v. Allen: Affirmation of Sovereign Immunity in Treaty Violation Claims

Paraguay v. Allen: Affirmation of Sovereign Immunity in Treaty Violation Claims

Date: Jan 23, 1998
Paraguay v. Allen: Affirmation of Sovereign Immunity in Treaty Violation Claims Introduction The case of Republic of Paraguay v. George F. Allen et al. represents a significant judicial examination...
Fourth Circuit Establishes Clear Standards for Excessive Force Claims in Correctional Settings

Fourth Circuit Establishes Clear Standards for Excessive Force Claims in Correctional Settings

Date: Jan 22, 1998
Fourth Circuit Establishes Clear Standards for Excessive Force Claims in Correctional Settings Introduction Ste v. C. Stanley is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Establishing Standards for Jury Selection Procedure Deviations under Fed.R.Crim.P. 24(c): United States v. Love and Sheppard

Establishing Standards for Jury Selection Procedure Deviations under Fed.R.Crim.P. 24(c): United States v. Love and Sheppard

Date: Jan 21, 1998
Establishing Standards for Jury Selection Procedure Deviations under Fed.R.Crim.P. 24(c): United States v. Love and Sheppard Introduction United States of America v. Rex Eugene Love and Jerry Wayne...
Procedural Default and Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Analysis of Breard v. Prueett

Procedural Default and Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Analysis of Breard v. Prueett

Date: Jan 21, 1998
Procedural Default and Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Analysis of Breard v. Prueett Introduction Breard v. Prueett, 134 F.3d 615 (4th Cir. 1998) is a pivotal case in the realm...
ADA Preemption of Contract and Tort Claims in Airline Boarding Procedures: Smith v. Comair

ADA Preemption of Contract and Tort Claims in Airline Boarding Procedures: Smith v. Comair

Date: Jan 16, 1998
ADA Preemption of Contract and Tort Claims in Airline Boarding Procedures: Smith v. Comair Introduction In James W. Smith v. Comair, Inc.; Delta Airlines, Inc., 134 F.3d 254 (4th Cir. 1998), the...
S.P. v. City of Takoma Park: Reaffirming Qualified Immunity and Defining State Action in Fourth Amendment Mental Health Seizures

S.P. v. City of Takoma Park: Reaffirming Qualified Immunity and Defining State Action in Fourth Amendment Mental Health Seizures

Date: Jan 16, 1998
S.P. v. City of Takoma Park: Reaffirming Qualified Immunity and Defining State Action in Fourth Amendment Mental Health Seizures Introduction In the case of S.P., a Citizen of Takoma Park, Maryland,...
Clarifying 'Use' under 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c)(1): Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Phillips

Clarifying 'Use' under 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c)(1): Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Phillips

Date: Jan 15, 1998
Clarifying 'Use' under 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c)(1): Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Phillips 1. Introduction United States v. Phillips is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Enforcement of ERISA Plan Information Obligations: Braswell Services Group Inc. v. Sedlack

Enforcement of ERISA Plan Information Obligations: Braswell Services Group Inc. v. Sedlack

Date: Jan 13, 1998
Enforcement of ERISA Plan Information Obligations: Braswell Services Group Inc. v. Sedlack Introduction Robert E. Sedlack, a former employee of Braswell Services Group, Incorporated, initiated a...
Establishing the Standards for Proof in Pregnancy Discrimination Cases: DeJarnette v. Corning Inc.

Establishing the Standards for Proof in Pregnancy Discrimination Cases: DeJarnette v. Corning Inc.

Date: Jan 6, 1998
Establishing the Standards for Proof in Pregnancy Discrimination Cases: DeJarnette v. Corning Inc. Introduction Regina W. DeJarnette v. Corning Incorporated is a seminal case adjudicated by the...
Legitimate Implementation of Drug Testing Policies Under the NLRA: Insights from Eldeco, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Legitimate Implementation of Drug Testing Policies Under the NLRA: Insights from Eldeco, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Date: Dec 30, 1997
Legitimate Implementation of Drug Testing Policies Under the NLRA: Insights from Eldeco, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board Introduction Eldeco, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board is a...
Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence to Establish Intent Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b): An Analysis of Queen v. United States

Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence to Establish Intent Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b): An Analysis of Queen v. United States

Date: Dec 30, 1997
Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence to Establish Intent Under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b): An Analysis of Queen v. United States Introduction Queen v. United States, 132 F.3d 991 (4th Cir....
Employer Liability for Hostile Work Environment Under Title VII: Harris & Prasky v. L L Wings, Inc.

Employer Liability for Hostile Work Environment Under Title VII: Harris & Prasky v. L L Wings, Inc.

Date: Dec 25, 1997
Employer Liability for Hostile Work Environment Under Title VII: Harris & Prasky v. L L Wings, Inc. Introduction The case of Diane Sue Harris and Marina L. Prasky v. L L Wings, Incorporated (132 F.3d...
Establishing the Boundaries of Whistleblower Protections under the False Claims Act: Zahodnick v. IBM and Lockheed Martin

Establishing the Boundaries of Whistleblower Protections under the False Claims Act: Zahodnick v. IBM and Lockheed Martin

Date: Dec 23, 1997
Establishing the Boundaries of Whistleblower Protections under the False Claims Act: Zahodnick v. IBM and Lockheed Martin Introduction The case of George Zahodnick v. International Business Machines...
Qualified Immunity in Eighth Amendment Claims: Rish et al. v. Johnson

Qualified Immunity in Eighth Amendment Claims: Rish et al. v. Johnson

Date: Dec 19, 1997
Qualified Immunity in Eighth Amendment Claims: Rish et al. v. Johnson Introduction In the landmark case of Rish et al. v. Johnson, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit addressed...
Fourth Circuit Upholds Procedural Default: No Habeas Relief for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Collateral Proceedings

Fourth Circuit Upholds Procedural Default: No Habeas Relief for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Collateral Proceedings

Date: Dec 19, 1997
Fourth Circuit Upholds Procedural Default: No Habeas Relief for Ineffective Assistance Claims in Collateral Proceedings Introduction TONY ALBERT MACKALL, the petitioner-appellant, challenged his...
Fourth Circuit Limits Numerical Weighting of Medical Opinions in Black Lung Benefits Claims

Fourth Circuit Limits Numerical Weighting of Medical Opinions in Black Lung Benefits Claims

Date: Dec 18, 1997
Fourth Circuit Limits Numerical Weighting of Medical Opinions in Black Lung Benefits Claims Introduction The case of Sterling Smokeless Coal Company v. Tammy Akers (131 F.3d 438) serves as a pivotal...
Standing in Establishment Clause Cases: Suhre v. Haywood County Sets New Precedent

Standing in Establishment Clause Cases: Suhre v. Haywood County Sets New Precedent

Date: Dec 13, 1997
Standing in Establishment Clause Cases: Suhre v. Haywood County Sets New Precedent Introduction The case of Richard Suhre v. Haywood County examines the intricate issue of legal standing within the...
Affirmation of Employer’s Legitimate Justifications in Retaliation Claims: Beall v. Abbott Laboratories

Affirmation of Employer’s Legitimate Justifications in Retaliation Claims: Beall v. Abbott Laboratories

Date: Dec 3, 1997
Affirmation of Employer’s Legitimate Justifications in Retaliation Claims: Beall v. Abbott Laboratories Introduction Beall v. Abbott Laboratories, 130 F.3d 614 (4th Cir. 1997), is a pivotal case...
Descriptive and Weak Marks in Trademark Infringement: Insights from Petro Stopping Centers v. James River Petroleum

Descriptive and Weak Marks in Trademark Infringement: Insights from Petro Stopping Centers v. James River Petroleum

Date: Nov 27, 1997
Descriptive and Weak Marks in Trademark Infringement: Insights from Petro Stopping Centers, L.P. v. James River Petroleum, Inc. Introduction The case of Petro Stopping Centers, L.P. v. James River...
Clarifying "Deliberate Indifference" Under the Eighth Amendment: Insights from Rich v. Bruce

Clarifying "Deliberate Indifference" Under the Eighth Amendment: Insights from Rich v. Bruce

Date: Nov 14, 1997
Clarifying "Deliberate Indifference" Under the Eighth Amendment: Insights from Rich v. Bruce Introduction Rich v. Bruce is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert