Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Cardwell v. Greene: Defining Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Under AEDPA

Cardwell v. Greene: Defining Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Under AEDPA

Date: Aug 12, 1998
Cardwell v. Greene: Defining Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Under AEDPA Introduction Cardwell v. Greene, 152 F.3d 331 (4th Cir. 1998), is a pivotal case from the United States Court of Appeals for...
Defamation Protection of Opinion in Stock Analysis: Insights from Biospherics v. Forbes

Defamation Protection of Opinion in Stock Analysis: Insights from Biospherics v. Forbes

Date: Aug 12, 1998
Defamation Protection of Opinion in Stock Analysis: Insights from Biospherics v. Forbes Introduction Biospherics, Incorporated v. Forbes, Incorporated; Caroline Waxler is a significant appellate case...
Defining "In Use" Under the Federal Safety Appliances Act: Insights from Deans v. CSX Transportation

Defining "In Use" Under the Federal Safety Appliances Act: Insights from Deans v. CSX Transportation

Date: Aug 12, 1998
Defining "In Use" Under the Federal Safety Appliances Act: Insights from Deans v. CSX Transportation Introduction Deans v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 152 F.3d 326 (4th Cir. 1998), is a pivotal case...
Effective Service of Process Under the Hague Service Convention: Insights from Koehler v. Dodwell

Effective Service of Process Under the Hague Service Convention: Insights from Koehler v. Dodwell

Date: Aug 5, 1998
Effective Service of Process Under the Hague Service Convention: Insights from Koehler v. Dodwell Introduction Lee N. Koehler v. A. David Dodwell is a seminal case adjudicated by the United States...
Enhancement Criteria in Drug-Related Firearm Possession: Insights from United States v. Williams

Enhancement Criteria in Drug-Related Firearm Possession: Insights from United States v. Williams

Date: Jul 31, 1998
Enhancement Criteria in Drug-Related Firearm Possession: Insights from United States v. Williams Introduction United States of America v. Michael Crandale Williams, 152 F.3d 294 (4th Cir. 1998), is a...
Fourth Circuit Affirms Denial of Federal Habeas Relief in Dwayne Allen Wright Case Under AEDPA

Fourth Circuit Affirms Denial of Federal Habeas Relief in Dwayne Allen Wright Case Under AEDPA

Date: Jul 17, 1998
Fourth Circuit Affirms Denial of Federal Habeas Relief in Dwayne Allen Wright Case Under AEDPA Introduction The case of Dwayne Allen Wright v. Ronald J. Angelone (151 F.3d 151) presents a significant...
Havird Oil Co. v. Marathon Oil Co.: Interpretation of South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act § 39-5-330 and Appeal Timeliness Rules

Havird Oil Co. v. Marathon Oil Co.: Interpretation of South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act § 39-5-330 and Appeal Timeliness Rules

Date: Jul 16, 1998
Havird Oil Co. v. Marathon Oil Co.: Interpretation of South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act § 39-5-330 and Appeal Timeliness Rules Introduction The case of Havird Oil Company, Incorporated,...
Reversing AEDPA’s One-Year Limitation: Ensuring Habeas Corpus Rights Post-Enactment

Reversing AEDPA’s One-Year Limitation: Ensuring Habeas Corpus Rights Post-Enactment

Date: Jul 15, 1998
Reversing AEDPA’s One-Year Limitation: Ensuring Habeas Corpus Rights Post-Enactment Introduction In the landmark case of Brown v. Angelone and Pritchard v. Angelone, the United States Court of...
Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts Under Federal Rules: United States v. Van Metre

Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts Under Federal Rules: United States v. Van Metre

Date: Jul 11, 1998
Admissibility of Prior Bad Acts Under Federal Rules: United States v. Van Metre Introduction United States of America v. James Howard Van Metre, 150 F.3d 339 (4th Cir. 1998), is a pivotal case...
Affirming Pacific Insurance's Coverage Exclusion Under TRLA: An In-Depth Analysis of PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY v. AMERICAN NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

Affirming Pacific Insurance's Coverage Exclusion Under TRLA: An In-Depth Analysis of PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY v. AMERICAN NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

Date: Jul 8, 1998
Affirming Pacific Insurance's Coverage Exclusion Under TRLA: An In-Depth Analysis of PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY v. AMERICAN NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY Introduction The case of Pacific Insurance...
Multiplicity of Firearm Possession Charges under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g): Dunford v. United States

Multiplicity of Firearm Possession Charges under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g): Dunford v. United States

Date: Jul 3, 1998
Multiplicity of Firearm Possession Charges under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g): Dunford v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Douglas Lee Dunford, Sr., the United...
Retaliatory Termination under Title VII: Insights from Laughlin v. MWAA

Retaliatory Termination under Title VII: Insights from Laughlin v. MWAA

Date: Jul 3, 1998
Retaliatory Termination under Title VII: Insights from Laughlin v. Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority Introduction In Laughlin v. Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA), 149 F.3d...
Attorney-Client Privilege and Burden of Proof: Insights from Hawkins v. Stables (4th Cir. 1998)

Attorney-Client Privilege and Burden of Proof: Insights from Hawkins v. Stables (4th Cir. 1998)

Date: Jul 2, 1998
Attorney-Client Privilege and Burden of Proof: Insights from Hawkins v. Stables (4th Cir. 1998) Introduction Hawkins v. Stables (148 F.3d 379) is a pivotal case heard by the United States Court of...
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Applications: Insights from Johnson v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.

Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Applications: Insights from Johnson v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.

Date: Jul 2, 1998
Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Applications: Insights from Johnson v. Circuit City Stores, Inc. Introduction The case of De Mekka Johnson v. Circuit City Stores, Inc. (148...
Sumner v. Parole Board: Establishing Limits on Inmate Civil Rights Claims Under PLRA

Sumner v. Parole Board: Establishing Limits on Inmate Civil Rights Claims Under PLRA

Date: Jun 26, 1998
Sumner v. Parole Board: Establishing Limits on Inmate Civil Rights Claims Under PLRA Introduction The case of Marvin Sumner v. E. Montgomery Tucker, et al. (9 F. Supp. 2d 641) heard in the United...
Bid-Rigging Conspiracy and Interstate Commerce Nexus: Insights from Romer v. United States

Bid-Rigging Conspiracy and Interstate Commerce Nexus: Insights from Romer v. United States

Date: Jun 25, 1998
Bid-Rigging Conspiracy and Interstate Commerce Nexus: Insights from Romer v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Mija S. Romer (148 F.3d 359), the United...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Bankruptcy Proceedings under the Negotiated Rates Act Established in IN RE BULLDOG TRUCKING, INC.

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Bankruptcy Proceedings under the Negotiated Rates Act Established in IN RE BULLDOG TRUCKING, INC.

Date: Jun 23, 1998
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Bankruptcy Proceedings under the Negotiated Rates Act Established in IN RE BULLDOG TRUCKING, INC. Introduction The case of In re: Bulldog Trucking, Incorporated...
Axel Johnson v. Carroll Carolina Oil: Clarifying Limits of Supplemental Jurisdiction Over State Law Claims

Axel Johnson v. Carroll Carolina Oil: Clarifying Limits of Supplemental Jurisdiction Over State Law Claims

Date: Jun 5, 1998
Axel Johnson v. Carroll Carolina Oil: Clarifying Limits of Supplemental Jurisdiction Over State Law Claims Introduction The case of Axel Johnson, Incorporated v. Carroll Carolina Oil Company,...
Clarifying Retaliation and State Action Standards: Insights from Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley

Clarifying Retaliation and State Action Standards: Insights from Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley

Date: Jun 4, 1998
Clarifying Retaliation and State Action Standards: Insights from Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley Introduction The case of Gloria W. Dowe v. Total Action Against Poverty in...
Vaughan v. MetraHealth: Reinforcing the Pretext-Plus Standard in ADEA Litigation

Vaughan v. MetraHealth: Reinforcing the Pretext-Plus Standard in ADEA Litigation

Date: May 30, 1998
Vaughan v. MetraHealth: Reinforcing the Pretext-Plus Standard in ADEA Litigation Introduction In the landmark case of Janet D. Vaughan v. The MetraHealth Companies, Inc., the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert