Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Recognition of Federal Employee Unions as Covered Entities Under the ADA and Title VII

Recognition of Federal Employee Unions as Covered Entities Under the ADA and Title VII

Date: Sep 11, 1999
Recognition of Federal Employee Unions as Covered Entities Under the ADA and Title VII Introduction The case of Robert E. Jones v. American Postal Workers Union, National; American Postal Workers...
Legitimate Penological Interests Uphold Constitutional Outgoing Mail Inspections in Fourth Circuit

Legitimate Penological Interests Uphold Constitutional Outgoing Mail Inspections in Fourth Circuit

Date: Sep 8, 1999
Legitimate Penological Interests Uphold Constitutional Outgoing Mail Inspections in Fourth Circuit Introduction In the landmark case of Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. v. George Deeds et al., decided by the...
Definition of "In Use" Under the Federal Safety Appliance Act: Phillips v. CSX Transportation

Definition of "In Use" Under the Federal Safety Appliance Act: Phillips v. CSX Transportation

Date: Sep 4, 1999
Definition of "In Use" Under the Federal Safety Appliance Act: Phillips v. CSX Transportation Introduction Phillips v. CSX Transportation, Incorporated is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Government Immunity Exempt from 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2): Analysis of United States v. Richardson

Government Immunity Exempt from 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2): Analysis of United States v. Richardson

Date: Sep 4, 1999
Government Immunity Exempt from 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2): Analysis of United States v. Richardson Introduction The case of United States of America v. Willie James Richardson (195 F.3d 192, 4th Cir....
Differentiating Jurisdictional Value and Sentencing Loss in Stolen Property Cases: Insights from United States v. Robert Ruhe

Differentiating Jurisdictional Value and Sentencing Loss in Stolen Property Cases: Insights from United States v. Robert Ruhe

Date: Sep 1, 1999
Differentiating Jurisdictional Value and Sentencing Loss in Stolen Property Cases: Insights from United States v. Robert Ruhe Introduction The case of United States of America v. Robert Ruhe,...
Strengthening the Admissibility Standards for Technical Expert Testimony: Analysis of Oglesby v. General Motors

Strengthening the Admissibility Standards for Technical Expert Testimony: Analysis of Oglesby v. General Motors

Date: Sep 1, 1999
Strengthening the Admissibility Standards for Technical Expert Testimony: Analysis of Oglesby v. General Motors Introduction Oglesby v. General Motors, 190 F.3d 244 (4th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal...
Substantiality Doctrine Reinforced in Lovern v. Edwards: Implications for Federal Jurisdiction

Substantiality Doctrine Reinforced in Lovern v. Edwards: Implications for Federal Jurisdiction

Date: Sep 1, 1999
Substantiality Doctrine Reinforced in Lovern v. Edwards: Implications for Federal Jurisdiction Introduction The case of Michael Lovern, Sr. v. Mark A. Edwards ([190 F.3d...
Limits of Supplemental Jurisdiction in Conversion Claims: Insights from Pinkley v. City of Frederick

Limits of Supplemental Jurisdiction in Conversion Claims: Insights from Pinkley v. City of Frederick

Date: Sep 1, 1999
Limits of Supplemental Jurisdiction in Conversion Claims: Insights from Pinkley v. City of Frederick Introduction The case of Pinkley, Incorporated, T/A Bradley Books v. City of Frederick, Maryland...
Limits on Arbitrator Subpoena Power Over Third-Party Government Agencies Under FAA: COMSAT Corp. v. NSF

Limits on Arbitrator Subpoena Power Over Third-Party Government Agencies Under FAA: COMSAT Corp. v. NSF

Date: Aug 24, 1999
Limits on Arbitrator Subpoena Power Over Third-Party Government Agencies Under FAA: COMSAT Corp. v. NSF Introduction The case of COMSAT Corporation v. National Science Foundation (NSF) addresses the...
Procedural Default and Habeas Corpus Limitations in Royal v. Taylor (4th Cir. 1999)

Procedural Default and Habeas Corpus Limitations in Royal v. Taylor (4th Cir. 1999)

Date: Aug 17, 1999
Procedural Default and Habeas Corpus Limitations in Royal v. Taylor (4th Cir. 1999) Introduction Thomas Lee Royal Jr. v. John B. Taylor, Warden, Sussex I State Prison is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Discretion in Supervised Release Modifications: United States v. Pregent

Affirmation of Discretion in Supervised Release Modifications: United States v. Pregent

Date: Aug 11, 1999
Affirmation of Discretion in Supervised Release Modifications: United States v. Pregent Introduction United States of America v. George Lloyd Pregent, 190 F.3d 279 (4th Cir. 1999), presents a...
Proximate Cause and Foreseeability in Jones Act Negligence Claims: Hernandez v. Trawler Miss Vertie Mae, Inc.

Proximate Cause and Foreseeability in Jones Act Negligence Claims: Hernandez v. Trawler Miss Vertie Mae, Inc.

Date: Aug 7, 1999
Proximate Cause and Foreseeability in Jones Act Negligence Claims: Hernandez v. Trawler Miss Vertie Mae, Inc. Introduction Cruz O. Hernandez v. Trawler Miss Vertie Mae, Incorporated is a notable case...
Limits of Bivens and Privacy Act Claims in National Security Context: Reinbold v. Evers

Limits of Bivens and Privacy Act Claims in National Security Context: Reinbold v. Evers

Date: Aug 6, 1999
Limits of Bivens and Privacy Act Claims in National Security Context: Reinbold v. Evers Introduction In Reinbold v. Evers, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit addressed...
Possibility of Recovery in Assessing Fraudulent Joinder: Hartley v. CSX Transportation

Possibility of Recovery in Assessing Fraudulent Joinder: Hartley v. CSX Transportation

Date: Aug 5, 1999
Possibility of Recovery in Assessing Fraudulent Joinder: Hartley v. CSX Transportation Introduction The case of Lidy J. Hartley v. CSX Transportation, Inc. involves a South Carolina citizen, Lidy J....
Owens-Illinois v. Respondents: Affirming the Necessity of Diverse Parties Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 19

Owens-Illinois v. Respondents: Affirming the Necessity of Diverse Parties Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 19

Date: Aug 3, 1999
Owens-Illinois v. Respondents: Affirming the Necessity of Diverse Parties Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 19 Introduction The case of Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. David L. Meade et al. is a pivotal decision rendered...
Interpreting AEDPA’s Tolling Provision: Insights from Norris Carlton Taylor v. R.C. Lee

Interpreting AEDPA’s Tolling Provision: Insights from Norris Carlton Taylor v. R.C. Lee

Date: Jul 30, 1999
Interpreting AEDPA’s Tolling Provision: Insights from Norris Carlton Taylor v. R.C. Lee Introduction Norris Carlton Taylor v. R.C. Lee is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Abrogation of Eleventh Amendment Immunity via Title IX Funding: Litman v. George Mason University

Abrogation of Eleventh Amendment Immunity via Title IX Funding: Litman v. George Mason University

Date: Jul 29, 1999
Abrogation of Eleventh Amendment Immunity via Title IX Funding: Litman v. George Mason University Introduction Litman v. George Mason University is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States...
Redefining Defamation Protections for Private Individuals: Insights from 'Wells v. Liddy'

Redefining Defamation Protections for Private Individuals: Insights from 'Wells v. Liddy'

Date: Jul 29, 1999
Redefining Defamation Protections for Private Individuals: Insights from Wells v. Liddy Introduction Wells v. Liddy, 186 F.3d 505 (4th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case in American defamation law that...
Champion International Corp. v. Cherry: Reinforcing the Presumptive Award of Costs under Rule 54(d)(1)

Champion International Corp. v. Cherry: Reinforcing the Presumptive Award of Costs under Rule 54(d)(1)

Date: Jul 28, 1999
Champion International Corp. v. Cherry: Reinforcing the Presumptive Award of Costs under Rule 54(d)(1) Introduction The case of Nancy C. Cherry v. Champion International Corporation addresses the...
Reversal of Sentence Reduction in Mikalajunas v. United States: Implications for Sentencing Guidelines

Reversal of Sentence Reduction in Mikalajunas v. United States: Implications for Sentencing Guidelines

Date: Jul 22, 1999
Reversal of Sentence Reduction in Mikalajunas v. United States: Implications for Sentencing Guidelines Introduction United States of America v. Michael J. Mikalajunas is a pivotal case decided by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert