Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Limits on Civil Rights Claims Under 42 U.S.C.A. § 290dd-2: Doe v. Broderick

Limits on Civil Rights Claims Under 42 U.S.C.A. § 290dd-2: Doe v. Broderick

Date: Aug 30, 2000
Limits on Civil Rights Claims Under 42 U.S.C.A. § 290dd-2: Doe v. Broderick Introduction In the landmark case of John Doe v. Garrett G. Broderick, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Defining "Related Person": Fourth Circuit Clarifies Successor Liability under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act

Defining "Related Person": Fourth Circuit Clarifies Successor Liability under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act

Date: Aug 30, 2000
Defining "Related Person": Fourth Circuit Clarifies Successor Liability under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act Introduction The case of Sigmon Coal Company, Incorporated; Jericol Mining,...
Hernandez v. Caldwell: Redefining Statute of Limitations for Federal Habeas Petitions under AEDPA

Hernandez v. Caldwell: Redefining Statute of Limitations for Federal Habeas Petitions under AEDPA

Date: Aug 29, 2000
Hernandez v. Caldwell: Redefining Statute of Limitations for Federal Habeas Petitions under AEDPA Introduction Case Citation: Petra E. Hernandez v. Carol Caldwell; Mack Jarvis, 225 F.3d 435 (4th Cir....
Summary Judgment in Ashann-Ra v. Commonwealth of Virginia: Eighth Amendment Claims and Grooming Policy Upheld

Summary Judgment in Ashann-Ra v. Commonwealth of Virginia: Eighth Amendment Claims and Grooming Policy Upheld

Date: Aug 23, 2000
Summary Judgment in Ashann-Ra v. Commonwealth of Virginia: Eighth Amendment Claims and Grooming Policy Upheld Introduction Ashann-Ra v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al. (112 F. Supp. 2d 559) is a...
Bowens v. United States: Proper Venue in Harboring Convictions Affirmed Conspiracy Charge

Bowens v. United States: Proper Venue in Harboring Convictions Affirmed Conspiracy Charge

Date: Aug 19, 2000
Bowens v. United States: Proper Venue in Harboring Convictions Affirmed Conspiracy Charge Introduction In Bowens v. United States, 224 F.3d 302 (4th Cir. 2000), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirming FISA-Authorized Surveillance and Co-Conspirator Evidence Admissibility in Espionage Convictions: United States v. Squillacote and Stand

Affirming FISA-Authorized Surveillance and Co-Conspirator Evidence Admissibility in Espionage Convictions: United States v. Squillacote and Stand

Date: Aug 12, 2000
Affirming FISA-Authorized Surveillance and Co-Conspirator Evidence Admissibility in Espionage Convictions: United States v. Squillacote and Stand Introduction In the landmark case of United States of...
Fourth Circuit Establishes §1983 Malicious Prosecution Must Arise from Constitutional Violation

Fourth Circuit Establishes §1983 Malicious Prosecution Must Arise from Constitutional Violation

Date: Aug 8, 2000
Fourth Circuit Establishes §1983 Malicious Prosecution Must Arise from Constitutional Violation Introduction In Lambert v. Williams, 223 F.3d 257 (4th Cir. 2000), the United States Court of Appeals...
Strict Enforcement of the Sum Certain Requirement Under the FTCA: Kokotis v. United States Postal Service

Strict Enforcement of the Sum Certain Requirement Under the FTCA: Kokotis v. United States Postal Service

Date: Aug 4, 2000
Strict Enforcement of the Sum Certain Requirement Under the FTCA: Kokotis v. United States Postal Service Introduction In the landmark case of Evelyn Mae Kokotis v. United States Postal Service,...
Face-to-Face Informant Tips Establish Reasonable Suspicion for Terry Stops

Face-to-Face Informant Tips Establish Reasonable Suspicion for Terry Stops

Date: Aug 3, 2000
Face-to-Face Informant Tips Establish Reasonable Suspicion for Terry Stops Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Joseph Christmas, 222 F.3d 141 (4th Cir. 2000), the United States...
Qualified Immunity and Police Duty in Exculpatory Evidence Disclosure: JEAN v. COLLINS

Qualified Immunity and Police Duty in Exculpatory Evidence Disclosure: JEAN v. COLLINS

Date: Aug 1, 2000
Qualified Immunity and Police Duty in Exculpatory Evidence Disclosure: JEAN v. COLLINS Introduction The case of Lesly Jean v. Delma Collins, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Tolling of §2255 Statute of Limitations in Post-Conviction Motions: Insights from United States v. Prescott

Tolling of §2255 Statute of Limitations in Post-Conviction Motions: Insights from United States v. Prescott

Date: Aug 1, 2000
Tolling of §2255 Statute of Limitations in Post-Conviction Motions: Insights from United States v. Prescott Introduction United States of America v. John Fitzgerald Prescott is a pivotal case...
Federal Court Jurisdiction Under Title VII Limited to Substantive Enforcement Actions: Analysis of Chris v. Tenet

Federal Court Jurisdiction Under Title VII Limited to Substantive Enforcement Actions: Analysis of Chris v. Tenet

Date: Jul 28, 2000
Federal Court Jurisdiction Under Title VII Limited to Substantive Enforcement Actions: Analysis of Chris v. Tenet Introduction The case of Kelly Jean Chris v. George J. Tenet, Director, Central...
Maryland's Failure to Satisfy AEDPA's Opt-In Requirements: A Comprehensive Analysis of Baker v. Corcoran

Maryland's Failure to Satisfy AEDPA's Opt-In Requirements: A Comprehensive Analysis of Baker v. Corcoran

Date: Jul 20, 2000
Maryland's Failure to Satisfy AEDPA's Opt-In Requirements: A Comprehensive Analysis of Baker v. Corcoran Introduction The case of Wesley Eugene Baker v. Thomas R. Corcoran serves as a pivotal...
Limitation of Successive §2255 Motions and the Role of Habeas Corpus: Insights from In Re: Byron Jones

Limitation of Successive §2255 Motions and the Role of Habeas Corpus: Insights from In Re: Byron Jones

Date: Jul 19, 2000
Limitation of Successive §2255 Motions and the Role of Habeas Corpus: Insights from In Re: Byron Jones Introduction The case In Re: Byron Jones, a/k/a Carl Lee, a/k/a B, Movant, 226 F.3d 328 (4th...
Fourth Circuit Upholds Death Sentence: Key Insights from Evans v. Smith

Fourth Circuit Upholds Death Sentence: Key Insights from Evans v. Smith

Date: Jul 18, 2000
Fourth Circuit Upholds Death Sentence: Key Insights from Evans v. Smith Introduction In Vernon Lee Evans, Jr. v. Willie Smith, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta; J. Joseph Curran, Jr.,...
State Action and First Amendment Protections in Volunteer Fire Departments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Goldstein v. Chestnut Ridge Volunteer Fire Company

State Action and First Amendment Protections in Volunteer Fire Departments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Goldstein v. Chestnut Ridge Volunteer Fire Company

Date: Jul 13, 2000
State Action and First Amendment Protections in Volunteer Fire Departments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Goldstein v. Chestnut Ridge Volunteer Fire Company Introduction The case of Scott Goldstein...
Attorney-Witness Communications Under Federal Rule of Evidence 615: Insights from United States v. Rhynes

Attorney-Witness Communications Under Federal Rule of Evidence 615: Insights from United States v. Rhynes

Date: Jul 11, 2000
Attorney-Witness Communications Under Federal Rule of Evidence 615: Insights from United States v. Rhynes Introduction United States of America v. Michael Sevane Rhynes, 218 F.3d 310 (4th Cir. 2000),...
Ashcraft v. Conoco: Reinforcing Procedural Integrity in Sealed Settlements and Contempt Proceedings

Ashcraft v. Conoco: Reinforcing Procedural Integrity in Sealed Settlements and Contempt Proceedings

Date: Jul 7, 2000
Ashcraft v. Conoco: Reinforcing Procedural Integrity in Sealed Settlements and Contempt Proceedings Introduction Ashcraft v. Conoco is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Punitive Damages Cap and RICO Claim Limitations in Fraudulent Fiduciary Cases

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Punitive Damages Cap and RICO Claim Limitations in Fraudulent Fiduciary Cases

Date: Jul 1, 2000
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Punitive Damages Cap and RICO Claim Limitations in Fraudulent Fiduciary Cases Introduction In the case of Kawther Al-Abood v. Nimat Mohammed Tayeb El-Shamari and Hisham Abdul...
Regulation of State Employees' Access to Sexually Explicit Material: 4th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law

Regulation of State Employees' Access to Sexually Explicit Material: 4th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law

Date: Jun 24, 2000
Regulation of State Employees' Access to Sexually Explicit Material: 4th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Introduction In the landmark case of Urofsky et al. v. Gilmore, the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert