Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Defining 'Adverse Employment Action' in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Von Gunten v. Maryland Department of Environment

Defining 'Adverse Employment Action' in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Von Gunten v. Maryland Department of Environment

Date: Mar 21, 2001
Defining 'Adverse Employment Action' in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Insights from Von Gunten v. Maryland Department of Environment Introduction The case of Barbara von Gunten v. State of Maryland,...
Sears Roebuck Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: Establishing New Precedent in National Origin Discrimination

Sears Roebuck Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: Establishing New Precedent in National Origin Discrimination

Date: Mar 17, 2001
Sears Roebuck Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: Establishing New Precedent in National Origin Discrimination Introduction In the landmark case Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v....
Lyons Partnership v. Morris Costumes: Establishing the Importance of Intended Audience in Trademark and Copyright Infringement

Lyons Partnership v. Morris Costumes: Establishing the Importance of Intended Audience in Trademark and Copyright Infringement

Date: Mar 17, 2001
Lyons Partnership v. Morris Costumes: Establishing the Importance of Intended Audience in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Introduction Lyons Partnership, L.P., a Texas limited partnership and...
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements Without Specific Fee Provisions: A Comprehensive Commentary on SYDNOR v. Conseco

Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements Without Specific Fee Provisions: A Comprehensive Commentary on SYDNOR v. Conseco

Date: Mar 8, 2001
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements Without Specific Fee Provisions: A Comprehensive Commentary on SYDNOR v. Conseco Introduction The case of Irma H. Sydnor and Vivian E. Wyatt vs. Conseco...
Reversing Eleventh Amendment Immunity for Local School Boards: Cash v. Granville County Board of Education

Reversing Eleventh Amendment Immunity for Local School Boards: Cash v. Granville County Board of Education

Date: Mar 2, 2001
Reversing Eleventh Amendment Immunity for Local School Boards: Cash v. Granville County Board of Education Introduction In Mary Cash v. Granville County Board of Education, 242 F.3d 219 (4th Cir....
Affirmative Defense Standards for Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation Claims under §1981 and Title VII: 4th Circuit in SPRIGGS v. DIAMOND AUTO GLASS

Affirmative Defense Standards for Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation Claims under §1981 and Title VII: 4th Circuit in SPRIGGS v. DIAMOND AUTO GLASS

Date: Feb 23, 2001
Affirmative Defense Standards for Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation Claims under §1981 and Title VII: 4th Circuit in SPRIGGS v. DIAMOND AUTO GLASS Introduction In the case of James H. SPRIGGS...
Conflict of Interest and Sixth Amendment Rights: Analysis of MICKENS v. TAYLOR

Conflict of Interest and Sixth Amendment Rights: Analysis of MICKENS v. TAYLOR

Date: Feb 17, 2001
Conflict of Interest and Sixth Amendment Rights: Analysis of MICKENS v. TAYLOR Introduction Walter Mickens, Jr. v. John B. Taylor, Warden, Sussex I State Prison is a pivotal case decided by the...
Eleventh Amendment Immunity and State Governors: A Comprehensive Analysis of Da v. d Lytle

Eleventh Amendment Immunity and State Governors: A Comprehensive Analysis of Da v. d Lytle

Date: Feb 17, 2001
Eleventh Amendment Immunity and State Governors: A Comprehensive Analysis of Da v. d Lytle Introduction Da v. d Lytle; Jeanette Lytle; Joan Maguire, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Charles D. Griffith, Jr.,...
Doris Miller v. William Miller: Reinforcing International Child Abduction Protocols Under the Hague Convention

Doris Miller v. William Miller: Reinforcing International Child Abduction Protocols Under the Hague Convention

Date: Feb 17, 2001
Doris Miller v. William Miller: Reinforcing International Child Abduction Protocols Under the Hague Convention Introduction Doris Miller v. William Miller, 240 F.3d 392 (4th Cir. 2001), addresses the...
Affirmation of the Suicide Bar and Deliberate Indifference in §1983 Claims: Brown v. Harris et al.

Affirmation of the Suicide Bar and Deliberate Indifference in §1983 Claims: Brown v. Harris et al.

Date: Feb 17, 2001
Affirmation of the Suicide Bar and Deliberate Indifference in §1983 Claims: Brown v. Harris et al. Introduction In the appellate case of James BROWN, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Brown,...
Unreasonable Failure to Report: Affirmation of Faragher/Ellerth Defense in Title VII Sexual Harassment Case

Unreasonable Failure to Report: Affirmation of Faragher/Ellerth Defense in Title VII Sexual Harassment Case

Date: Feb 14, 2001
Unreasonable Failure to Report: Affirmation of Faragher/Ellerth Defense in Title VII Sexual Harassment Case Introduction In Barrett v. Applied Radiant Energy Corporation, the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Untimely Habeas Corpus Petition under AEDPA: Limits on Equitable Tolling

Affirmation of Untimely Habeas Corpus Petition under AEDPA: Limits on Equitable Tolling

Date: Feb 8, 2001
Affirmation of Untimely Habeas Corpus Petition under AEDPA: Limits on Equitable Tolling Introduction The case of Clifton E. Spencer v. Ernest Sutton addresses the critical issue of the timeliness of...
Admissibility of Co-Conspirator Statements and Supervised Release Terms under Apprendi: United States v. Pratt

Admissibility of Co-Conspirator Statements and Supervised Release Terms under Apprendi: United States v. Pratt

Date: Feb 8, 2001
Admissibility of Co-Conspirator Statements and Supervised Release Terms under Apprendi: United States v. Pratt Introduction United States v. Pratt (239 F.3d 640, 4th Cir. 2001) is a pivotal case...
Race-Based Discrimination in Prison Religious Accommodations: Morrison v. Garraghty

Race-Based Discrimination in Prison Religious Accommodations: Morrison v. Garraghty

Date: Feb 8, 2001
Race-Based Discrimination in Prison Religious Accommodations: Morrison v. Garraghty Introduction Morrison v. Garraghty, 239 F.3d 648 (4th Cir. 2001), addresses the critical intersection of religious...
Supplemental Jurisdiction and Remand Authority: Insights from Hinson v. Norwest Financial South Carolina

Supplemental Jurisdiction and Remand Authority: Insights from Hinson v. Norwest Financial South Carolina

Date: Feb 7, 2001
Supplemental Jurisdiction and Remand Authority: Insights from Hinson v. Norwest Financial South Carolina Introduction Hinson v. Norwest Financial South Carolina is a pivotal case decided by the...
Amended Complaints and Waiver of Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Young v. Mount Rainier

Amended Complaints and Waiver of Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Young v. Mount Rainier

Date: Feb 1, 2001
Amended Complaints and Waiver of Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Young v. Mount Rainier Introduction Young v. Mount Rainier, 238 F.3d 567 (4th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case that addresses the...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies §1983 Limitations on Enforcing Policy Letters Post Boren Amendment Repeal

Fourth Circuit Clarifies §1983 Limitations on Enforcing Policy Letters Post Boren Amendment Repeal

Date: Jan 24, 2001
Fourth Circuit Clarifies §1983 Limitations on Enforcing Policy Letters Post Boren Amendment Repeal Introduction In the case of HCMF Corporation et al. v. Claude A. Allen et al., the United States...
Establishing Bad Faith Intent in Cybersquatting: Virtual Works v. Volkswagen

Establishing Bad Faith Intent in Cybersquatting: Virtual Works v. Volkswagen

Date: Jan 23, 2001
Establishing Bad Faith Intent in Cybersquatting: Virtual Works v. Volkswagen Introduction The case of Virtual Works, Incorporated v. Volkswagen of America, Incorporated, adjudicated by the United...
Enforceability of Fee-Splitting Provisions in Mandatory Arbitration: Insights from Bradford v. Rockwell Semiconductor Systems

Enforceability of Fee-Splitting Provisions in Mandatory Arbitration: Insights from Bradford v. Rockwell Semiconductor Systems

Date: Jan 23, 2001
Enforceability of Fee-Splitting Provisions in Mandatory Arbitration: Insights from Bradford v. Rockwell Semiconductor Systems Introduction The case of John Bruce Bradford v. Rockwell Semiconductor...
Griggs v. DuPont: Clarifying ERISA Fiduciary Duties and Equitable Remedies

Griggs v. DuPont: Clarifying ERISA Fiduciary Duties and Equitable Remedies

Date: Jan 10, 2001
Griggs v. DuPont: Clarifying ERISA Fiduciary Duties and Equitable Remedies Introduction Griggs v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours Company (237 F.3d 371, 4th Cir. 2001) is a significant judicial decision that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert