Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Reaffirmation of Certificate of Appealability Standards under AEDPA

Reaffirmation of Certificate of Appealability Standards under AEDPA

Date: Jul 24, 2001
Reaffirmation of Certificate of Appealability Standards under AEDPA Based on Christopher James Beck v. Ronald Angelone, 261 F.3d 377 (4th Cir. 2001) Introduction The case of Christopher James Beck v....
Fraudulent Transfer of Potentially Exempt Property in Bankruptcy: Tavenner v. Smoot

Fraudulent Transfer of Potentially Exempt Property in Bankruptcy: Tavenner v. Smoot

Date: Jul 17, 2001
Fraudulent Transfer of Potentially Exempt Property in Bankruptcy: Tavenner v. Smoot Introduction Tavenner v. Smoot, 257 F.3d 401 (4th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case in bankruptcy law that addresses...
Crawley v. Catoe: Federal Certiorari Petitions Do Not Toll AEDPA's One-Year Limitations Period

Crawley v. Catoe: Federal Certiorari Petitions Do Not Toll AEDPA's One-Year Limitations Period

Date: Jul 17, 2001
Crawley v. Catoe: Federal Certiorari Petitions Do Not Toll AEDPA's One-Year Limitations Period Introduction In the landmark case of Crawley v. Catoe, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies FCRA Requirements for Accurate Consumer Reports and Procedural Standards

Fourth Circuit Clarifies FCRA Requirements for Accurate Consumer Reports and Procedural Standards

Date: Jul 17, 2001
Fourth Circuit Clarifies FCRA Requirements for Accurate Consumer Reports and Procedural Standards Introduction The case of Richard J. Dalton v. Capital Associated Industries, Inc. ([257 F.3d...
Fourth Circuit Establishes Enhanced Protections Against Retaliation Under the ADA in Rhoads v. FDIC

Fourth Circuit Establishes Enhanced Protections Against Retaliation Under the ADA in Rhoads v. FDIC

Date: Jul 13, 2001
Fourth Circuit Establishes Enhanced Protections Against Retaliation Under the ADA in Rhoads v. FDIC Introduction In Lori Rhoads v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Rigorous Standards for Expert Testimony in Medical Device Litigation: Cooper v. Smith & Nephew

Affirmation of Rigorous Standards for Expert Testimony in Medical Device Litigation: Cooper v. Smith & Nephew

Date: Jul 10, 2001
Affirmation of Rigorous Standards for Expert Testimony in Medical Device Litigation: Cooper v. Smith & Nephew Introduction Cooper v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. is a landmark case adjudicated by the United...
Venue Standards and Multiplicity in Money Laundering: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Stewart et al.

Venue Standards and Multiplicity in Money Laundering: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Stewart et al.

Date: Jul 7, 2001
Venue Standards and Multiplicity in Money Laundering: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Stewart et al. Introduction The case of United States v. Stewart et al. ([256 F.3d...
Affirmation of Denial for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Disability Claims Under Social Security Act Standards

Affirmation of Denial for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Disability Claims Under Social Security Act Standards

Date: Jul 6, 2001
Affirmation of Denial for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Disability Claims Under Social Security Act Standards Introduction The case of Patricia A. Mastro v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social...
Enforcing Apprendi: Treated Drug Quantities as Elements in Aggravated Trafficking Offenses

Enforcing Apprendi: Treated Drug Quantities as Elements in Aggravated Trafficking Offenses

Date: Jun 30, 2001
Enforcing Apprendi: Treated Drug Quantities as Elements in Aggravated Trafficking Offenses Introduction In the appellate case United States of America v. Marion Promise, 255 F.3d 150 (4th Cir. 2001),...
Adoption of a Sliding-Scale Five-Factor Test for Rule 23(f) Petitions in Class Action Certification

Adoption of a Sliding-Scale Five-Factor Test for Rule 23(f) Petitions in Class Action Certification

Date: Jun 27, 2001
Adoption of a Sliding-Scale Five-Factor Test for Rule 23(f) Petitions in Class Action Certification Introduction The case of Robert B. Lienhart et al. v. Dryvit Systems, Inc. addresses pivotal issues...
Preponderance Standard Affirmed for Amount in Controversy in McCoy v. Erie Insurance Company

Preponderance Standard Affirmed for Amount in Controversy in McCoy v. Erie Insurance Company

Date: Jun 19, 2001
Preponderance Standard Affirmed for Amount in Controversy in McCoy v. Erie Insurance Company Introduction In Diana G. McCoy v. Erie Insurance Company, et al., 147 F. Supp. 2d 481 (S.D. W. Va. 2001),...
Broad Interpretation of Arbitration Clauses: Choice Hotels International v. BSR Tropicana Resort Establishes Critical Precedent

Broad Interpretation of Arbitration Clauses: Choice Hotels International v. BSR Tropicana Resort Establishes Critical Precedent

Date: Jun 9, 2001
Broad Interpretation of Arbitration Clauses: Choice Hotels International v. BSR Tropicana Resort Establishes Critical Precedent Introduction The case of Choice Hotels International, Incorporated v....
Federal Forfeiture Supersedes State Law Protections: Insights from United States v. Bollin

Federal Forfeiture Supersedes State Law Protections: Insights from United States v. Bollin

Date: Jun 8, 2001
Federal Forfeiture Supersedes State Law Protections: Insights from United States v. Bollin Introduction United States of America v. Gary D. Bollin et al. is a significant case adjudicated by the...
Clarifying Dormant Commerce Clause Standards: Waste Management Holdings Inc. v. Governor Gilmore

Clarifying Dormant Commerce Clause Standards: Waste Management Holdings Inc. v. Governor Gilmore

Date: Jun 5, 2001
Clarifying Dormant Commerce Clause Standards: Waste Management Holdings Inc. v. Governor Gilmore Introduction Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. Governor Gilmore (252 F.3d 316) is a landmark decision...
Denial of "Strip Off" for Allowed Unsecured Liens in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: Ryan v. Homecomings Financial Network

Denial of "Strip Off" for Allowed Unsecured Liens in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: Ryan v. Homecomings Financial Network

Date: Jun 2, 2001
Denial of "Strip Off" for Allowed Unsecured Liens in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: Ryan v. Homecomings Financial Network Introduction The case of Donald E. Ryan and Harley A. Ryan v. Homecomings Financial...
Affirming Pretextual Retaliation Claims under the FMLA: Nichols v. Ashland Hospital Corporation

Affirming Pretextual Retaliation Claims under the FMLA: Nichols v. Ashland Hospital Corporation

Date: May 26, 2001
Affirming Pretextual Retaliation Claims under the FMLA: Nichols v. Ashland Hospital Corporation Introduction The case of Delores Nichols v. Ashland Hospital Corporation centers on allegations of...
Enhancing Federal Habeas Review of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Analysis of Rose v. Lee (2001)

Enhancing Federal Habeas Review of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Analysis of Rose v. Lee (2001)

Date: May 25, 2001
Enhancing Federal Habeas Review of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Analysis of Rose v. Lee (2001) Introduction John Hardy Rose v. R.C. Lee, 252 F.3d 676 (4th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ADA Discrimination and Retaliation Case: Haulbrook v. Michelin North America

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ADA Discrimination and Retaliation Case: Haulbrook v. Michelin North America

Date: May 25, 2001
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ADA Discrimination and Retaliation Case: Haulbrook v. Michelin North America Introduction The case of William R. Haulbrook v. Michelin North America, Inc. serves as...
Enhanced Protections Under ERISA: Analysis of Warner v. Buck Creek Nursery, Inc.

Enhanced Protections Under ERISA: Analysis of Warner v. Buck Creek Nursery, Inc.

Date: May 22, 2001
Enhanced Protections Under ERISA: Analysis of Warner v. Buck Creek Nursery, Inc. Introduction In the case of David W. Warner v. Buck Creek Nursery, Inc., et al., decided on May 21, 2001, the United...
Excessive Use of Force and Unlawful Arrest: A Comprehensive Analysis of Park v. Shiflett & Simms

Excessive Use of Force and Unlawful Arrest: A Comprehensive Analysis of Park v. Shiflett & Simms

Date: May 18, 2001
Excessive Use of Force and Unlawful Arrest: A Comprehensive Analysis of Park v. Shiflett & Simms Introduction In the landmark case of Brenda S. Park; Tony D. Park v. Stephen R. Shiflett; Jeff Simms,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert