Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Ensuring Comprehensive Evaluation in Settlement Agreements: Insights from Hensley v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.

Ensuring Comprehensive Evaluation in Settlement Agreements: Insights from Hensley v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.

Date: Jan 23, 2002
Ensuring Comprehensive Evaluation in Settlement Agreements: Insights from Hensley v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc. Introduction The case of Robert C. Hensley v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc. serves as a...
Martinez v. United States: Affirmation of Rule 11 Standards and Upholding 21 U.S.C. §841 Post-Apprendi

Martinez v. United States: Affirmation of Rule 11 Standards and Upholding 21 U.S.C. §841 Post-Apprendi

Date: Jan 18, 2002
Martinez v. United States: Affirmation of Rule 11 Standards and Upholding 21 U.S.C. §841 Post-Apprendi Introduction In Martinez v. United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
Ensuring Due Process for Pro Se Habeas Petitioners: Hill v. Braxton

Ensuring Due Process for Pro Se Habeas Petitioners: Hill v. Braxton

Date: Jan 15, 2002
Ensuring Due Process for Pro Se Habeas Petitioners: Hill v. Braxton Introduction In the landmark case of Sherwood L. Hill v. D.A. Braxton, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
Fourth Circuit Upholds Admissibility of Testimony from FBI Informant with Contingent Compensation in United States v. Levenite et al.

Fourth Circuit Upholds Admissibility of Testimony from FBI Informant with Contingent Compensation in United States v. Levenite et al.

Date: Jan 11, 2002
Fourth Circuit Upholds Admissibility of Testimony from FBI Informant with Contingent Compensation in United States v. Levenite et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Michael Alan...
Affirmation of AECA Enforcement and the Affirmative Defense of Scrap Exemption in United States v. Sun et al

Affirmation of AECA Enforcement and the Affirmative Defense of Scrap Exemption in United States v. Sun et al

Date: Jan 11, 2002
Affirmation of AECA Enforcement and the Affirmative Defense of Scrap Exemption in United States v. Sun et al Introduction The case of United States of America v. Bing Sun; Patte Sun; All Ports,...
Interpreting "Damages" in Insurance Contracts: The Ellett Brothers Decision

Interpreting "Damages" in Insurance Contracts: The Ellett Brothers Decision

Date: Dec 29, 2001
Interpreting "Damages" in Insurance Contracts: The Ellett Brothers Decision Introduction The case of Ellett Brothers, Incorporated v. United States Fidelity Guaranty Company, adjudicated by the...
Retaliatory Search and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Trulock v. Freeh

Retaliatory Search and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Trulock v. Freeh

Date: Dec 29, 2001
Retaliatory Search and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Trulock v. Freeh Introduction The case of Notra Trulock, III; Linda Conrad v. Louis J. Freeh addresses complex intersections between the...
Statute of Limitations Tolling in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Cal v. Allen (4th Cir. 2001)

Statute of Limitations Tolling in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Cal v. Allen (4th Cir. 2001)

Date: Dec 28, 2001
Statute of Limitations Tolling in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Cal v. Allen (4th Cir. 2001) Introduction Cal v. n O'Neil ALLEN, 276 F.3d 183 (4th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Automatic Stay Exceptions in Environmental Regulatory Enforcement

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Automatic Stay Exceptions in Environmental Regulatory Enforcement

Date: Dec 20, 2001
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Automatic Stay Exceptions in Environmental Regulatory Enforcement Introduction In the landmark case Safety-Kleen, Inc. v. South Carolina...
Fourth Circuit Upholds 'Professional Judgment' Standard for §1983 Medical Care Claims in Involuntary Commitment

Fourth Circuit Upholds 'Professional Judgment' Standard for §1983 Medical Care Claims in Involuntary Commitment

Date: Dec 19, 2001
Fourth Circuit Upholds 'Professional Judgment' Standard for §1983 Medical Care Claims in Involuntary Commitment Introduction In the case of Thomas Edward Patten, III v. Stephen Nichols, MD; June...
Affirming Proper Venue for §924(j) Charges in Continuing Offenses: Robinson v. United States

Affirming Proper Venue for §924(j) Charges in Continuing Offenses: Robinson v. United States

Date: Dec 18, 2001
Affirming Proper Venue for §924(j) Charges in Continuing Offenses: Robinson v. United States Introduction Robinson v. United States is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Defalcation and Non-Dischargeable Debts in Bankruptcy: Insights from In re Aloys Uwimana and Emma D. Uwimana

Defalcation and Non-Dischargeable Debts in Bankruptcy: Insights from In re Aloys Uwimana and Emma D. Uwimana

Date: Dec 15, 2001
Defalcation and Non-Dischargeable Debts in Bankruptcy: Insights from In re Aloys Uwimana and Emma D. Uwimana Introduction The legal case of In re Aloys Uwimana and Emma D. Uwimana, Debtors. Republic...
Government Discretion in Substantial Assistance Motions Upheld in United States v. Butler

Government Discretion in Substantial Assistance Motions Upheld in United States v. Butler

Date: Dec 4, 2001
Government Discretion in Substantial Assistance Motions Upheld in United States v. Butler Introduction In United States v. Butler, 272 F.3d 683 (4th Cir. 2001), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirmation of Maryland's Death Penalty Procedures in Burch v. Corcoran

Affirmation of Maryland's Death Penalty Procedures in Burch v. Corcoran

Date: Nov 29, 2001
Affirmation of Maryland's Death Penalty Procedures in Burch v. Corcoran Introduction The case of Heath William Burch v. Thomas R. Corcoran, Warden; J. Joseph Curran, Jr. explores the...
Affirmation of Mail Fraud and Money Laundering Convictions in Fourth Circuit

Affirmation of Mail Fraud and Money Laundering Convictions in Fourth Circuit

Date: Nov 28, 2001
Affirmation of Mail Fraud and Money Laundering Convictions in Fourth Circuit Introduction The case of United States of America v. George B. Godwin, Jr. and Willa L. Curry-Robinson presents a...
Enforceability of Dispute Resolution Procedures: Insights from Hightower v. GMRI, Inc.

Enforceability of Dispute Resolution Procedures: Insights from Hightower v. GMRI, Inc.

Date: Nov 15, 2001
Enforceability of Dispute Resolution Procedures: Insights from Hightower v. GMRI, Inc. Introduction The case Eddie L. Hightower, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GMRI, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellant,...
Duty to Preserve Evidence: Insights from Silvestri v. General Motors

Duty to Preserve Evidence: Insights from Silvestri v. General Motors

Date: Nov 15, 2001
Duty to Preserve Evidence: Insights from Silvestri v. General Motors Introduction SILVESTRI v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPoration is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
McAllister v. United States: Fourth Circuit Clarifies Application of Apprendi to §841 and Sentencing Enhancements

McAllister v. United States: Fourth Circuit Clarifies Application of Apprendi to §841 and Sentencing Enhancements

Date: Nov 9, 2001
McAllister v. United States: Fourth Circuit Clarifies Application of Apprendi to §841 and Sentencing Enhancements Introduction McAllister v. United States, 272 F.3d 228 (4th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal...
Maryland Fourth Circuit Establishes Precedent on Gender Discrimination in Nurturing Leave: Affirmation of Equal Protection Rights

Maryland Fourth Circuit Establishes Precedent on Gender Discrimination in Nurturing Leave: Affirmation of Equal Protection Rights

Date: Nov 8, 2001
Maryland Fourth Circuit Establishes Precedent on Gender Discrimination in Nurturing Leave: Affirmation of Equal Protection Rights 1. Introduction In the landmark case Howard Kevin Knussman v....
Pye v. United States: Affirming Standing for Adjacent Historic Property Owners under the National Historic Preservation Act

Pye v. United States: Affirming Standing for Adjacent Historic Property Owners under the National Historic Preservation Act

Date: Oct 23, 2001
Pye v. United States: Affirming Standing for Adjacent Historic Property Owners under the National Historic Preservation Act Introduction Pye v. United States of America; United States Army Corps of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert