Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

States Granted Unrestricted Discretion Over Tobacco Settlement Funds: Fourth Circuit Affirms Prohibition on Individual Medicaid Recovery Claims

States Granted Unrestricted Discretion Over Tobacco Settlement Funds: Fourth Circuit Affirms Prohibition on Individual Medicaid Recovery Claims

Date: May 23, 2002
States Granted Unrestricted Discretion Over Tobacco Settlement Funds: Fourth Circuit Affirms Prohibition on Individual Medicaid Recovery Claims Introduction The case of Strawser et al. v. Atkins et...
Deference of Civil Courts to Hierarchical Ecclesiastical Authority: Dixon v. Edwards (4th Cir. 2002)

Deference of Civil Courts to Hierarchical Ecclesiastical Authority: Dixon v. Edwards (4th Cir. 2002)

Date: May 23, 2002
Deference of Civil Courts to Hierarchical Ecclesiastical Authority: Dixon v. Edwards (4th Cir. 2002) Introduction Jane Holmes Dixon, serving as the Bishop Pro Tempore of the Diocese of Washington...
Apprendi v. San-Miguel & Young: Non-Retroactivity of New Criminal Procedure Rules on Collateral Review

Apprendi v. San-Miguel & Young: Non-Retroactivity of New Criminal Procedure Rules on Collateral Review

Date: May 22, 2002
Apprendi v. San-Miguel & Young: Non-Retroactivity of New Criminal Procedure Rules on Collateral Review Introduction In the landmark case of Carlos Pagan San-Miguel, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dan L....
Fullwood v. Warden: Standards for Third-Party Juror Influence and Extraneous Jury Information

Fullwood v. Warden: Standards for Third-Party Juror Influence and Extraneous Jury Information

Date: May 22, 2002
Fullwood v. Warden: Standards for Third-Party Juror Influence and Extraneous Jury Information Introduction Fullwood v. Warden is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Denis v. Columbia Colleton Medical Center: Affirming Gender Discrimination Protections under Title VII

Denis v. Columbia Colleton Medical Center: Affirming Gender Discrimination Protections under Title VII

Date: May 17, 2002
Denis v. Columbia Colleton Medical Center: Affirming Gender Discrimination Protections under Title VII Introduction The case of Joyce K. Dennis v. Columbia Colleton Medical Center, Incorporated,...
Severability and Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements under the FAA: Insights from Snowden v. CheckPoint Check Cashing

Severability and Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements under the FAA: Insights from Snowden v. CheckPoint Check Cashing

Date: May 16, 2002
Severability and Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements under the FAA: Insights from Snowden v. CheckPoint Check Cashing Introduction The case of Snowden v. CheckPoint Check Cashing; Elite...
Limits of Due Process in University Disciplinary Proceedings under §1983: Tigrett and Kintz v. University of Virginia

Limits of Due Process in University Disciplinary Proceedings under §1983: Tigrett and Kintz v. University of Virginia

Date: May 15, 2002
Limits of Due Process in University Disciplinary Proceedings under §1983: Tigrett and Kintz v. University of Virginia Introduction The appellate case of Tigrett and Kintz v. University of Virginia...
Murray v. United Food Commercial Workers: Unconscionability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Disputes

Murray v. United Food Commercial Workers: Unconscionability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Disputes

Date: May 11, 2002
Murray v. United Food Commercial Workers: Unconscionability of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Disputes Introduction Daniel C. Murray, a 42-year-old white male, initiated a lawsuit against his...
Governmental Immunity under the Discretionary Function Exception: An Analysis of Smith v. WMATA

Governmental Immunity under the Discretionary Function Exception: An Analysis of Smith v. WMATA

Date: May 11, 2002
Governmental Immunity under the Discretionary Function Exception: An Analysis of Smith v. WMATA Introduction In the landmark case of Richard Lee Smith, Individually and as Personal Representative of...
Jurisdictional Barriers in Federal Arbitration Enforcement: Friedman’s Inc. v. Dunlap and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine

Jurisdictional Barriers in Federal Arbitration Enforcement: Friedman’s Inc. v. Dunlap and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine

Date: May 10, 2002
Jurisdictional Barriers in Federal Arbitration Enforcement: Friedman’s Inc. v. Dunlap and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Introduction Friedman’s, Inc. d/b/a American Bankers Insurance Company of...
EX PARTE YOUNG Exception Affirmed in Medicaid Compliance Case

EX PARTE YOUNG Exception Affirmed in Medicaid Compliance Case

Date: May 10, 2002
EX PARTE YOUNG Exception Affirmed in Medicaid Compliance Case Introduction In the landmark case of Samuel ANTRICAN, minor; Alana Antrican, minor, by their next friend Angela Antrican, et al. v....
Notice Requirements for Recharacterizing Post-Conviction Motions under § 2255

Notice Requirements for Recharacterizing Post-Conviction Motions under § 2255

Date: May 8, 2002
Notice Requirements for Recharacterizing Post-Conviction Motions under § 2255 Introduction The case of United States of America v. Shahborn Emmanuel (288 F.3d 644) adjudicated by the United States...
Basden v. Lee: Upholding Brady Materiality and Procedural Barriers in Postconviction Relief

Basden v. Lee: Upholding Brady Materiality and Procedural Barriers in Postconviction Relief

Date: May 4, 2002
Basden v. Lee: Upholding Brady Materiality and Procedural Barriers in Postconviction Relief Introduction In Basden v. Lee, 290 F.3d 602 (4th Cir. 2002), the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Limitation on Third-Party Negligence Claims Against Healthcare Providers: Iodice v. United States

Limitation on Third-Party Negligence Claims Against Healthcare Providers: Iodice v. United States

Date: May 3, 2002
Limitation on Third-Party Negligence Claims Against Healthcare Providers: Iodice v. United States Introduction In the case of Iodice v. United States, the plaintiffs—Aline Joan Iodice, James Iodice,...
Affirmation of Limited Standing for Individual Employees in Enforcing Arbitration Awards Under Collective Bargaining Agreements: Bryant v. Bell Atlantic Maryland

Affirmation of Limited Standing for Individual Employees in Enforcing Arbitration Awards Under Collective Bargaining Agreements: Bryant v. Bell Atlantic Maryland

Date: Apr 30, 2002
Affirmation of Limited Standing for Individual Employees in Enforcing Arbitration Awards Under Collective Bargaining Agreements: Bryant v. Bell Atlantic Maryland Introduction In Joseph Bryant, Sr.,...
Fourth Circuit Affirms Federal Jurisdiction and Enforces Policy Limitations in Battle v. Seibels Bruce Insurance Co.

Fourth Circuit Affirms Federal Jurisdiction and Enforces Policy Limitations in Battle v. Seibels Bruce Insurance Co.

Date: Apr 30, 2002
Fourth Circuit Affirms Federal Jurisdiction and Enforces Policy Limitations in Battle v. Seibels Bruce Insurance Co. Introduction Joseph Battle v. Seibels Bruce Insurance Company is a landmark case...
Claim Preclusion under Res Judicata through Default Judgment: Insights from Orca Yachts v. Mollicam

Claim Preclusion under Res Judicata through Default Judgment: Insights from Orca Yachts v. Mollicam

Date: Apr 23, 2002
Claim Preclusion under Res Judicata through Default Judgment: Insights from Orca Yachts v. Mollicam Introduction Orca Yachts, L.L.C., a North Carolina corporation, engaged in manufacturing long-range...
Impeachment Evidence and Expert Testimony in 18 U.S.C.A. § 1001 Violations: Insights from United States v. Michael Barile

Impeachment Evidence and Expert Testimony in 18 U.S.C.A. § 1001 Violations: Insights from United States v. Michael Barile

Date: Apr 19, 2002
Impeachment Evidence and Expert Testimony in 18 U.S.C.A. § 1001 Violations: Insights from United States v. Michael Barile Introduction United States v. Michael Barile, 286 F.3d 749 (4th Cir. 2002),...
Strict Application of Colorado River Abstention Doctrine in Parallel Litigation: Gannett Corp. v. Clark Constr.

Strict Application of Colorado River Abstention Doctrine in Parallel Litigation: Gannett Corp. v. Clark Constr.

Date: Apr 19, 2002
Strict Application of Colorado River Abstention Doctrine in Parallel Litigation: Gannett Corp. v. Clark Constr. Introduction The case of Gannett Company, Incorporated v. The Clark Construction Group,...
No Constitutionally Protected Liberty Interest in Work Release Under Virginia Law: Kitchen v. Upshaw

No Constitutionally Protected Liberty Interest in Work Release Under Virginia Law: Kitchen v. Upshaw

Date: Apr 10, 2002
No Constitutionally Protected Liberty Interest in Work Release Under Virginia Law: Kitchen v. Upshaw Introduction Ronnell Gray Kitchen brought a lawsuit against Douglas L. Upshaw, Janulyn Y. Lennon,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert