Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Matrix Capital Management v. BearingPoint: Clarifying Scienter Standards and Amendment Procedures under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

Matrix Capital Management v. BearingPoint: Clarifying Scienter Standards and Amendment Procedures under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

Date: Aug 1, 2009
Matrix Capital Management v. BearingPoint: Clarifying Scienter Standards and Amendment Procedures under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Introduction The case of Matrix Capital Management...
Qualified Immunity Upholds Animal Control Officer’s Seizure of Hybrid Wolf Under Fourth Amendment

Qualified Immunity Upholds Animal Control Officer’s Seizure of Hybrid Wolf Under Fourth Amendment

Date: Jul 31, 2009
Qualified Immunity Upholds Animal Control Officer’s Seizure of Hybrid Wolf Under Fourth Amendment Introduction In the appellate case Robert Walker; Courtney Walker v. Prince George's County,...
Standard Indemnity Reinsurance and Equitable Contribution: Insights from ERI v. CAMC Decision

Standard Indemnity Reinsurance and Equitable Contribution: Insights from ERI v. CAMC Decision

Date: Jul 31, 2009
Standard Indemnity Reinsurance and Equitable Contribution: Insights from ERI v. CAMC Decision Introduction The case of Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc. (ERI) v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc....
Affirmation of Standing Requirements in Voter Amendment Challenges: Bishop v. Bartlett

Affirmation of Standing Requirements in Voter Amendment Challenges: Bishop v. Bartlett

Date: Jul 30, 2009
Affirmation of Standing Requirements in Voter Amendment Challenges: Bishop v. Bartlett Introduction In Bishop, Moore, Joyce, & Donahoe v. Bartlett, 575 F.3d 419 (4th Cir. 2009), four North Carolina...
Trademark Infringement and the Importance of Secondary Meaning: George Co. v. Imagination Entertainment

Trademark Infringement and the Importance of Secondary Meaning: George Co. v. Imagination Entertainment

Date: Jul 28, 2009
Trademark Infringement and the Importance of Secondary Meaning: George Co. v. Imagination Entertainment Introduction The case of George Company, LLC v. Imagination Entertainment Limited delves into...
Establishing Employer Liability for Hostile Work Environment under Title VII: EEOC v. Central Wholesalers, Inc.

Establishing Employer Liability for Hostile Work Environment under Title VII: EEOC v. Central Wholesalers, Inc.

Date: Jul 22, 2009
Establishing Employer Liability for Hostile Work Environment under Title VII: EEOC v. Central Wholesalers, Inc. Introduction The case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. Central...
State Liquor Regulation Preempted by Sherman Act: TFWS, Inc. v. Maryland

State Liquor Regulation Preempted by Sherman Act: TFWS, Inc. v. Maryland

Date: Jul 16, 2009
State Liquor Regulation Preempted by Sherman Act: TFWS, Inc. v. Maryland Introduction The case of TFWS, Inc., d/b/a Beltway Fine Wine and Spirits v. Peter Franchot et al. revolves around the...
State Action Requirement for § 1983 Claims in Privatized Hospitals: PHILIPS v. PITT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

State Action Requirement for § 1983 Claims in Privatized Hospitals: PHILIPS v. PITT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

Date: Jul 14, 2009
State Action Requirement for § 1983 Claims in Privatized Hospitals: PHILIPS v. PITT COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Introduction The case of Sherif Philips, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pitt County...
Adverse Jury Instruction for Spoliation in GOODMAN v. PRAXAIR Services, Inc.

Adverse Jury Instruction for Spoliation in GOODMAN v. PRAXAIR Services, Inc.

Date: Jul 8, 2009
Adverse Jury Instruction for Spoliation in GOODMAN v. PRAXAIR Services, Inc. Introduction GOODMAN v. PRAXAIR Services, Inc. is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States District Court for the...
Gomis v. Holder: Fourth Circuit Reinforces Substantial Evidence Standard and Jurisdictional Limits in FGM-Related Asylum Claims

Gomis v. Holder: Fourth Circuit Reinforces Substantial Evidence Standard and Jurisdictional Limits in FGM-Related Asylum Claims

Date: Jul 7, 2009
Gomis v. Holder: Fourth Circuit Reinforces Substantial Evidence Standard and Jurisdictional Limits in FGM-Related Asylum Claims Introduction Gomis v. Holder is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Functional Equivalent of Interrogation and EDWARDS v. ARIZONA: An Analysis of United States v. Leeander Jerome Blake

Functional Equivalent of Interrogation and EDWARDS v. ARIZONA: An Analysis of United States v. Leeander Jerome Blake

Date: Jul 3, 2009
Functional Equivalent of Interrogation and EDWARDS v. ARIZONA: An Analysis of United States v. Leeander Jerome Blake Introduction United States of America v. Leeander Jerome Blake, 571 F.3d 331 (4th...
Fourth Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Habeas Corpus Petition on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim Involving Alleged Conflict of Interest

Fourth Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Habeas Corpus Petition on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim Involving Alleged Conflict of Interest

Date: Jul 1, 2009
Fourth Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Habeas Corpus Petition on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim Involving Alleged Conflict of Interest Introduction The case of Davy Gene Stephens v. Gerald J....
Fourth Circuit Establishes Limitations on RLUIPA Claims for Damages Against Correctional Officials

Fourth Circuit Establishes Limitations on RLUIPA Claims for Damages Against Correctional Officials

Date: Jun 26, 2009
Fourth Circuit Establishes Limitations on RLUIPA Claims for Damages Against Correctional Officials Introduction In the case Scott Rendelman v. Nancy Rouse et al., the United States Court of Appeals...
Federal Officer Removal Requires Causal Nexus: Carter v. Monsanto

Federal Officer Removal Requires Causal Nexus: Carter v. Monsanto

Date: Jun 20, 2009
Federal Officer Removal Requires Causal Nexus: Carter v. Monsanto Introduction In the landmark case Robert C. Carter v. Monsanto Company, et al. (635 F. Supp.2d 479), the United States District Court...
Affirmation of SORNA's Applicability: United States v. Gould

Affirmation of SORNA's Applicability: United States v. Gould

Date: Jun 19, 2009
Affirmation of SORNA's Applicability: United States v. Gould Introduction The case of United States of America v. Brian Lee Gould (568 F.3d 459) addressed the application of the Sex Offender...
Affirmation of Conspiracy and Firearm Offenses in Drug Trafficking Under 21 U.S.C. §846 and 18 U.S.C. §924(c): Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Marc Anthony Jeffers

Affirmation of Conspiracy and Firearm Offenses in Drug Trafficking Under 21 U.S.C. §846 and 18 U.S.C. §924(c): Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Marc Anthony Jeffers

Date: Jun 18, 2009
Affirmation of Conspiracy and Firearm Offenses in Drug Trafficking Under 21 U.S.C. §846 and 18 U.S.C. §924(c): Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Marc Anthony Jeffers Introduction In United...
Rigorous Identity Verification Required for Sentencing Enhancements Under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A): Analysis of United States v. Kellam

Rigorous Identity Verification Required for Sentencing Enhancements Under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A): Analysis of United States v. Kellam

Date: Jun 4, 2009
Rigorous Identity Verification Required for Sentencing Enhancements Under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A): Analysis of United States v. Kellam Introduction United States v. Kellam, 568 F.3d 125 (4th Cir....
Affirmation of Federal Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a): No Reasonable Mistake of Age Defense

Affirmation of Federal Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a): No Reasonable Mistake of Age Defense

Date: May 29, 2009
Affirmation of Federal Conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a): No Reasonable Mistake of Age Defense Introduction The case UNITED STATES of America v. Michael Malloy (568 F.3d 166) adjudicated by the...
Territorial Coverage Limits in Insurance Policies: CACI International v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

Territorial Coverage Limits in Insurance Policies: CACI International v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company

Date: May 28, 2009
Territorial Coverage Limits in Insurance Policies: CACI International v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Introduction The case CACI International, Incorporated; CACI, Incorporated —...
McLean v. United States: Interpretation of PLRA’s Three Strikes Provision

McLean v. United States: Interpretation of PLRA’s Three Strikes Provision

Date: May 22, 2009
McLean v. United States: Interpretation of PLRA’s Three Strikes Provision Introduction The case of Quentin McLean v. United States, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert