Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Admission of Guilt Requirements in Parole Processes: Insights from Newman v. Beard

Admission of Guilt Requirements in Parole Processes: Insights from Newman v. Beard

Date: Aug 17, 2010
Admission of Guilt Requirements in Parole Processes: Insights from Newman v. Beard Introduction Newman v. Beard, 617 F.3d 775 (3d Cir. 2010), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Clarifying RICO's Enterprise and Conduct Elements: A Comprehensive Analysis of IN RE INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Clarifying RICO's Enterprise and Conduct Elements: A Comprehensive Analysis of IN RE INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Date: Aug 17, 2010
Clarifying RICO's Enterprise and Conduct Elements: A Comprehensive Analysis of IN RE INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit...
Trans Union v. Cortez: Establishing Reckless Disregard Standards under the Fair Credit Reporting Act

Trans Union v. Cortez: Establishing Reckless Disregard Standards under the Fair Credit Reporting Act

Date: Aug 14, 2010
Trans Union v. Cortez: Establishing Reckless Disregard Standards under the Fair Credit Reporting Act Introduction In the appellate case Sandra Cortez v. Trans Union, LLC, 617 F.3d 688 (3rd Cir....
Affirmation of Safe Harbor Protection for Forward-Looking Statements in Securities Litigation: In re Aetna, Inc. Securities Litigation

Affirmation of Safe Harbor Protection for Forward-Looking Statements in Securities Litigation: In re Aetna, Inc. Securities Litigation

Date: Aug 12, 2010
Affirmation of Safe Harbor Protection for Forward-Looking Statements in Securities Litigation: In re Aetna, Inc. Securities Litigation Introduction The case "In re Aetna, Inc. Securities Litigation...
United States v. Green: Defining Intrinsic Evidence and Its Admissibility under Rule 404(b)

United States v. Green: Defining Intrinsic Evidence and Its Admissibility under Rule 404(b)

Date: Aug 10, 2010
United States v. Green: Defining Intrinsic Evidence and Its Admissibility under Rule 404(b) Introduction In the case of United States of America v. David Green, adjudicated by the United States Court...
Waiver of Unraised Suppression Arguments in Fourth Amendment Cases: United States v. Dupree

Waiver of Unraised Suppression Arguments in Fourth Amendment Cases: United States v. Dupree

Date: Aug 7, 2010
Waiver of Unraised Suppression Arguments in Fourth Amendment Cases: United States v. Dupree Introduction In United States of America v. Maurice Ray Dupree, 617 F.3d 724 (3d Cir. 2010), the United...
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Pleading Standards in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Great Western Mining Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLP

Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Pleading Standards in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Great Western Mining Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLP

Date: Aug 6, 2010
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Pleading Standards in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Great Western Mining Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLP Introduction The case of Great Western Mining Mineral Company v. Fox...
Reedy v. Evanson: Reinforcing Probable Cause Standards and Limiting Consent in Fourth Amendment Searches

Reedy v. Evanson: Reinforcing Probable Cause Standards and Limiting Consent in Fourth Amendment Searches

Date: Aug 3, 2010
Reedy v. Evanson: Reinforcing Probable Cause Standards and Limiting Consent in Fourth Amendment Searches Introduction In Sara R. Reedy v. Frank S. Evanson, et al., the United States Court of Appeals...
Narrow Tailoring of Federal Firearm Regulations: Insights from United States v. Michael Marzzarella

Narrow Tailoring of Federal Firearm Regulations: Insights from United States v. Michael Marzzarella

Date: Jul 30, 2010
Narrow Tailoring of Federal Firearm Regulations: Insights from United States v. Michael Marzzarella Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Michael Marzzarella, 614 F.3d 85 (3rd Cir....
Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship Standard in Cancellation of Removal Cases

Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship Standard in Cancellation of Removal Cases

Date: Jul 30, 2010
Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship Standard in Cancellation of Removal Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Blanca Barrales Pareja v. Attorney General of the United States, adjudicated...
Enhanced Discovery Rights under 28 U.S.C. § 1782: Insights from Heraeus KULZER GmbH v. ESSCHEM, Inc.

Enhanced Discovery Rights under 28 U.S.C. § 1782: Insights from Heraeus KULZER GmbH v. ESSCHEM, Inc.

Date: Jul 29, 2010
Enhanced Discovery Rights under 28 U.S.C. § 1782: Insights from Heraeus KULZER GmbH v. ESSCHEM, Inc. Introduction The case of Heraeus KULZER GmbH v. ESSCHEM, Inc. (390 F. App'x 88) deliberated by the...
Refining the Standard for Injunctive Relief in Trade Secret Misappropriation: Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Chris Botticella

Refining the Standard for Injunctive Relief in Trade Secret Misappropriation: Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Chris Botticella

Date: Jul 28, 2010
Refining the Standard for Injunctive Relief in Trade Secret Misappropriation: Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Chris Botticella Introduction In the case of Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Chris Botticella,...
Preemption of State Product Liability Claims and Antitrust Implications in Cornett v. Johnson and Cordis Corp.

Preemption of State Product Liability Claims and Antitrust Implications in Cornett v. Johnson and Cordis Corp.

Date: Jul 24, 2010
Preemption of State Product Liability Claims and Antitrust Implications in Cornett v. Johnson and Cordis Corp. Introduction The case of Cornett v. Johnson and Cordis Corp. consolidated several...
Establishing Context-Sensitive Standards for Zoning Codes: Melrose, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh

Establishing Context-Sensitive Standards for Zoning Codes: Melrose, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh

Date: Jul 21, 2010
Establishing Context-Sensitive Standards for Zoning Codes: Melrose, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh Introduction In Melrose, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh (613 F.3d 380), the United States Court of Appeals...
Strengthening the Burden of Proof in Inmate Retaliation Claims: Analysis of DeFranco v. Superintendent Wolfe

Strengthening the Burden of Proof in Inmate Retaliation Claims: Analysis of DeFranco v. Superintendent Wolfe

Date: Jul 15, 2010
Strengthening the Burden of Proof in Inmate Retaliation Claims: Analysis of DeFranco v. Superintendent Wolfe Introduction DeFranco v. Superintendent Wolfe is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Upholding Rule 404(b) Evidence Admissibility and Correct Sentencing Practices in United States v. Joseph R. Lee

Upholding Rule 404(b) Evidence Admissibility and Correct Sentencing Practices in United States v. Joseph R. Lee

Date: Jul 15, 2010
Upholding Rule 404(b) Evidence Admissibility and Correct Sentencing Practices in United States v. Joseph R. Lee Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Joseph R. Lee, 612 F.3d 170 (3d...
Third Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Inmate's Civil Rights Claims for Lack of Substantial Question in Mimms v. U.N.I.C.O.R.

Third Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Inmate's Civil Rights Claims for Lack of Substantial Question in Mimms v. U.N.I.C.O.R.

Date: Jul 14, 2010
Third Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Inmate's Civil Rights Claims for Lack of Substantial Question in Mimms v. U.N.I.C.O.R. Introduction Case: Reginald Mimms, Appellant v. U.N.I.C.O.R., A.Government...
Enforcing Fundamental Rights in Removal Proceedings: Ne v. Leslie Syl. - Comprehensive Commentary

Enforcing Fundamental Rights in Removal Proceedings: Ne v. Leslie Syl. - Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Jul 9, 2010
Enforcing Fundamental Rights in Removal Proceedings: Ne v. Leslie Syl. - Comprehensive Commentary Introduction Ne v. Leslie Syl. (611 F.3d 171) is a landmark decision by the United States Court of...
Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections in Vehicular Searches: Insights from Gomez v. Markley

Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections in Vehicular Searches: Insights from Gomez v. Markley

Date: Jul 2, 2010
Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections in Vehicular Searches: Insights from Gomez v. Markley Introduction The case of John Paul Gomez v. Officer James Markley, adjudicated by the United States Court...
ERISA Section 510: Limits on Protection for Unsolicited Internal Complaints

ERISA Section 510: Limits on Protection for Unsolicited Internal Complaints

Date: Jun 25, 2010
ERISA Section 510: Limits on Protection for Unsolicited Internal Complaints Introduction The case of Shirley Edwards v. A.H. Cornell and Son, Inc. revolves around the interpretation of the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert