Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Exclusive Enforcement Authority of State Director Affirmed in Township of Lyndhurst v. Priceline.com Inc.

Exclusive Enforcement Authority of State Director Affirmed in Township of Lyndhurst v. Priceline.com Inc.

Date: Sep 15, 2011
Exclusive Enforcement Authority of State Director Affirmed in Township of Lyndhurst v. Priceline.com Inc. Introduction In The Township of Lyndhurst, New Jersey on behalf of itself and all similarly...
Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Barron Walker: Expanding the Hobbs Act's Reach in Drug Trafficking Cases

Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Barron Walker: Expanding the Hobbs Act's Reach in Drug Trafficking Cases

Date: Sep 14, 2011
Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Barron Walker: Expanding the Hobbs Act's Reach in Drug Trafficking Cases Introduction Case Overview The case of United States of America v. Barron Walker,...
Choice-of-Law Principles in Multi-State Insurance Contracts: Amica Mutual Insurance Company v. Edward Fogel

Choice-of-Law Principles in Multi-State Insurance Contracts: Amica Mutual Insurance Company v. Edward Fogel

Date: Sep 9, 2011
Choice-of-Law Principles in Multi-State Insurance Contracts: Amica Mutual Insurance Company v. Edward Fogel Introduction The case of Amica Mutual Insurance Company v. Edward Fogel, decided by the...
Affirmation of Pentobarbital Use in Lethal Injection Protocols under Eighth Amendment Standards

Affirmation of Pentobarbital Use in Lethal Injection Protocols under Eighth Amendment Standards

Date: Sep 8, 2011
Affirmation of Pentobarbital Use in Lethal Injection Protocols under Eighth Amendment Standards Introduction The case of Robert W. Jackson, III v. Carl C. Danberg et al., adjudicated by the United...
Defining Standing and Retroactive Date Interpretation in Insurance Declaratory Judgments: A Commentary on American Automobile Insurance Co. v. Murray

Defining Standing and Retroactive Date Interpretation in Insurance Declaratory Judgments: A Commentary on American Automobile Insurance Co. v. Murray

Date: Sep 8, 2011
Defining Standing and Retroactive Date Interpretation in Insurance Declaratory Judgments: A Commentary on American Automobile Insurance Co. v. Murray Introduction The case of American Automobile...
Limitations on Mandatory Pre-Removal Detention: Diop v. ICE Establishes Reasonableness Requirement

Limitations on Mandatory Pre-Removal Detention: Diop v. ICE Establishes Reasonableness Requirement

Date: Sep 2, 2011
Limitations on Mandatory Pre-Removal Detention: Diop v. ICE Establishes Reasonableness Requirement Introduction In the landmark case of Cheikh Diop v. ICE/Homeland Security, the United States Court...
Relation Back Doctrine in FLSA §216(b) Collective Actions: Symczyk v. Genesis Healthcare Reversed

Relation Back Doctrine in FLSA §216(b) Collective Actions: Symczyk v. Genesis Healthcare Reversed

Date: Sep 1, 2011
Relation Back Doctrine in FLSA §216(b) Collective Actions: Symczyk v. Genesis Healthcare Reversed Introduction In Symczyk v. Genesis Healthcare Corporation, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Honest Services Fraud and Bribery Convictions: Key Insights from United States v. Bryant and Gallagher

Affirmation of Honest Services Fraud and Bribery Convictions: Key Insights from United States v. Bryant and Gallagher

Date: Aug 26, 2011
Affirmation of Honest Services Fraud and Bribery Convictions: Key Insights from United States v. Bryant and Gallagher Introduction United States of America v. Wayne R. Bryant and R. Michael Gallagher...
Liberal Construction of Pro Se Appeals Ensures Fair Review in Immigration Proceedings: Higgs v. Attorney General of the United States

Liberal Construction of Pro Se Appeals Ensures Fair Review in Immigration Proceedings: Higgs v. Attorney General of the United States

Date: Aug 26, 2011
Liberal Construction of Pro Se Appeals Ensures Fair Review in Immigration Proceedings: Higgs v. Attorney General of the United States Introduction The case of Carlen Uriel Higgs, also known as Cardel...
New Precedent on §1983 Claims for Charter Schools Established in Pocono Mountain Charter School v. Pocono Mountain School District

New Precedent on §1983 Claims for Charter Schools Established in Pocono Mountain Charter School v. Pocono Mountain School District

Date: Aug 26, 2011
New Precedent on §1983 Claims for Charter Schools Established in Pocono Mountain Charter School v. Pocono Mountain School District Introduction In the landmark case of Pocono Mountain Charter School...
Comcast Antitrust Class Action: Established Standards for Class Certification under Rule 23(b)(3)

Comcast Antitrust Class Action: Established Standards for Class Certification under Rule 23(b)(3)

Date: Aug 24, 2011
Comcast Antitrust Class Action: Established Standards for Class Certification under Rule 23(b)(3) Introduction In the seminal case of Caroline Behrend et al. v. Comcast Corporation, 655 F.3d 182 (3d...
Affirmation of Fiduciary Duty Standards in ERISA Plans: Renfro v. Unisys Corporation

Affirmation of Fiduciary Duty Standards in ERISA Plans: Renfro v. Unisys Corporation

Date: Aug 20, 2011
Affirmation of Fiduciary Duty Standards in ERISA Plans: Renfro v. Unisys Corporation Introduction In Renfro v. Unisys Corporation, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed...
Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment on Eighth Amendment Medical Negligence Claims in Prisoner Litigation

Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment on Eighth Amendment Medical Negligence Claims in Prisoner Litigation

Date: Aug 19, 2011
Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment on Eighth Amendment Medical Negligence Claims in Prisoner Litigation Introduction The case of Daniel Woods v. First Correctional Medical Inc. and others...
Imputed Retaliatory Animus in Employment Termination: Insights from McKENNA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

Imputed Retaliatory Animus in Employment Termination: Insights from McKENNA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

Date: Aug 18, 2011
Imputed Retaliatory Animus in Employment Termination: Insights from McKENNA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA Introduction In Michael McKenna; William K. McKenna; Raymond Carnation v. City of Philadelphia, the...
Reinterpreting the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act: A New Substantive Merits Limitation

Reinterpreting the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act: A New Substantive Merits Limitation

Date: Aug 18, 2011
Reinterpreting the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act: A New Substantive Merits Limitation Introduction The case of Animal Science Products, Inc. v. China Minmetals Corporation involves...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Wilcher v. USPS Establishes Rigorous Burden-Shifting Standards in Title VII Discrimination Cases

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Wilcher v. USPS Establishes Rigorous Burden-Shifting Standards in Title VII Discrimination Cases

Date: Aug 10, 2011
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Wilcher v. USPS Establishes Rigorous Burden-Shifting Standards in Title VII Discrimination Cases Introduction The case of Charles L. Wilcher v. Postmaster General;...
Pernod Ricard USA v. Bacardi U.S.A.: Clarifying False Advertising Under the Lanham Act

Pernod Ricard USA v. Bacardi U.S.A.: Clarifying False Advertising Under the Lanham Act

Date: Aug 5, 2011
Pernod Ricard USA v. Bacardi U.S.A.: Clarifying False Advertising Under the Lanham Act Introduction Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. Bacardi U.S.A., Inc., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirmation of District Court's Denial to Proceed Anonymously in Doe v. Megless

Affirmation of District Court's Denial to Proceed Anonymously in Doe v. Megless

Date: Aug 2, 2011
Affirmation of District Court's Denial to Proceed Anonymously in Doe v. Megless Introduction Doe v. Megless is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections for Material Witnesses: SCHNEYDER v. SMITH

Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections for Material Witnesses: SCHNEYDER v. SMITH

Date: Jul 30, 2011
Enhancing Fourth Amendment Protections for Material Witnesses: SCHNEYDER v. SMITH Introduction SCHNEYDER v. SMITH, Appellant (653 F.3d 313), adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Third Circuit Affirms FCRA Requirement for Consumer Reporting Agency Notification Prior to Suing Furnishers

Third Circuit Affirms FCRA Requirement for Consumer Reporting Agency Notification Prior to Suing Furnishers

Date: Jul 29, 2011
Third Circuit Affirms FCRA Requirement for Consumer Reporting Agency Notification Prior to Suing Furnishers Introduction The case of Michele M. SimmsParris v. Countrywide Financial Corp.; Countrywide...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert