Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Enhancing Judicial Integrity: The Brady Violation in JOHNSON v. FOLINO

Enhancing Judicial Integrity: The Brady Violation in JOHNSON v. FOLINO

Date: Jan 17, 2013
Enhancing Judicial Integrity: The Brady Violation in JOHNSON v. FOLINO Introduction JOHNSON v. FOLINO, 705 F.3d 117 (3rd Cir. 2013), serves as a pivotal case in understanding the application of BRADY...
Statutory Tolling of AEDPA’s Limitation Period Recognized for Properly Filed State Collateral Relief: Jenkins v. Superintendent of Laurel Highlands

Statutory Tolling of AEDPA’s Limitation Period Recognized for Properly Filed State Collateral Relief: Jenkins v. Superintendent of Laurel Highlands

Date: Jan 16, 2013
Statutory Tolling of AEDPA’s Limitation Period Recognized for Properly Filed State Collateral Relief: Jenkins v. Superintendent of Laurel Highlands Introduction The case of Robert Jenkins v....
No Constitutional Right of Media Access to Polling Places: PG Publishing Co. v. Aichele

No Constitutional Right of Media Access to Polling Places: PG Publishing Co. v. Aichele

Date: Jan 16, 2013
No Constitutional Right of Media Access to Polling Places: PG Publishing Co. v. Aichele Introduction In the case of PG Publishing Company d/b/a The Pittsburgh Post–Gazette, Appellant v. Carol...
Clarifying the Continuing Violation Doctrine in Hostile Work Environment Claims: Mandel v. M&Q Packaging

Clarifying the Continuing Violation Doctrine in Hostile Work Environment Claims: Mandel v. M&Q Packaging

Date: Jan 15, 2013
Clarifying the Continuing Violation Doctrine in Hostile Work Environment Claims: Mandel v. M&Q Packaging Corp. Introduction Mandel v. M&Q Packaging Corp. is a significant appellate decision from the...
Affirmation of Finality Rule in Zoning Ordinance Challenges: CMR D.N. Corp. v. City of Philadelphia

Affirmation of Finality Rule in Zoning Ordinance Challenges: CMR D.N. Corp. v. City of Philadelphia

Date: Jan 15, 2013
Affirmation of Finality Rule in Zoning Ordinance Challenges: CMR D.N. Corp. v. City of Philadelphia Introduction In the case CMR D.N. Corp. and Marina Towers Ltd., t/a Waterfront Renaissance...
Due Process and Absolute Immunity in Child Custody Transfers: B.S. v. Somerset County

Due Process and Absolute Immunity in Child Custody Transfers: B.S. v. Somerset County

Date: Jan 9, 2013
Due Process and Absolute Immunity in Child Custody Transfers: B.S. v. Somerset County Introduction The case of B.S., and B.S. as guardian and parent of T.S., G.S., and N.S. versus Somerset County...
Limitations on Bivens Actions for Procedural Due Process Violations in Prisoner Discipline

Limitations on Bivens Actions for Procedural Due Process Violations in Prisoner Discipline

Date: Dec 14, 2012
Limitations on Bivens Actions for Procedural Due Process Violations in Prisoner Discipline Introduction In the case of ClARENCE D. SCHREANE, Appellant v. J. SEANA, Correctional Officer and others,...
Third Circuit Establishes Right to Intervention in Remedy Stage of ADA Compliance Litigation

Third Circuit Establishes Right to Intervention in Remedy Stage of ADA Compliance Litigation

Date: Dec 13, 2012
Third Circuit Establishes Right to Intervention in Remedy Stage of ADA Compliance Litigation Introduction In the landmark decision of Benjamin et al. v. Department of Public Welfare of Pennsylvania,...
No Right to Jury Trial in Admiralty Cases Without Diversity and Limited Assistance for Pro Se Litigants: Mala v. Crown Bay Marina

No Right to Jury Trial in Admiralty Cases Without Diversity and Limited Assistance for Pro Se Litigants: Mala v. Crown Bay Marina

Date: Dec 4, 2012
No Right to Jury Trial in Admiralty Cases Without Diversity and Limited Assistance for Pro Se Litigants: Mala v. Crown Bay Marina Introduction Mala v. Crown Bay Marina, Inc. (704 F.3d 239) is a...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in §1983 False Arrest and False Imprisonment Claims: Analysis of James v. City of Wilkes–Barre

Qualified Immunity Affirmed in §1983 False Arrest and False Imprisonment Claims: Analysis of James v. City of Wilkes–Barre

Date: Nov 30, 2012
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in §1983 False Arrest and False Imprisonment Claims: Analysis of James v. City of Wilkes–Barre Introduction Cheryl James; Warren James; Nicole James v. The City of...
Affirmation of Conviction in United States v. Pavulak: Standards for Probable Cause in Child Pornography Cases

Affirmation of Conviction in United States v. Pavulak: Standards for Probable Cause in Child Pornography Cases

Date: Nov 22, 2012
Affirmation of Conviction in United States v. Pavulak: Standards for Probable Cause in Child Pornography Cases Introduction United States of America v. Paul E. Pavulak, 700 F.3d 651 (3d Cir. 2012),...
Third Circuit Clarifies ERISA Preemption and Non-Fiduciary Liability under §502(a)(3) in Tax Avoidance Scheme Case

Third Circuit Clarifies ERISA Preemption and Non-Fiduciary Liability under §502(a)(3) in Tax Avoidance Scheme Case

Date: Nov 9, 2012
Third Circuit Clarifies ERISA Preemption and Non-Fiduciary Liability under §502(a)(3) in Tax Avoidance Scheme Case Introduction In the case of National Security Systems, Inc.; Steven Cappello;...
Affirmation of Denial of Administrative Expense Claims in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Affirmation of Denial of Administrative Expense Claims in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Date: Oct 26, 2012
Affirmation of Denial of Administrative Expense Claims in Bankruptcy Proceedings Introduction The case of In re PHILADELPHIA NEWSPAPERS, LLC, et al., Debtors versus Vahan H. Gureghian, Danielle...
Binding Plea Agreements and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Relief: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Weatherspoon

Binding Plea Agreements and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Relief: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Weatherspoon

Date: Oct 11, 2012
Binding Plea Agreements and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Relief: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Weatherspoon Introduction The case of United States of America v. Kevin Weatherspoon, 696...
Application of Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Claims: Ficca v. Astrue

Application of Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Claims: Ficca v. Astrue

Date: Sep 29, 2012
Application of Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Claims: Ficca v. Astrue Introduction The case Christopher Ficca v. Michael J. Astrue, 901 F. Supp. 2d 533 (2012), adjudicated in the United...
Affirming Rule of Reason in Exclusive Dealing Claims: ZF MERITOR LLC v. EATON CORPORATION

Affirming Rule of Reason in Exclusive Dealing Claims: ZF MERITOR LLC v. EATON CORPORATION

Date: Sep 29, 2012
Affirming Rule of Reason in Exclusive Dealing Claims: ZF MERITOR LLC v. EATON CORPORATION Introduction ZF Meritor LLC and Meritor Transmission Corporation (collectively, Plaintiffs) filed an...
Enhanced Due Process Protections for Pretrial Detainees: Insights from Peter Bistrian v. FDC Philadelphia

Enhanced Due Process Protections for Pretrial Detainees: Insights from Peter Bistrian v. FDC Philadelphia

Date: Sep 25, 2012
Enhanced Due Process Protections for Pretrial Detainees: Insights from Peter Bistrian v. FDC Philadelphia Introduction The case of Peter Bistrian v. Warden Troy Levi et al., adjudicated by the United...
Third Circuit Clarifies §2255 Extension Jurisdiction in United States v. Corbin Thomas

Third Circuit Clarifies §2255 Extension Jurisdiction in United States v. Corbin Thomas

Date: Sep 25, 2012
Third Circuit Clarifies §2255 Extension Jurisdiction in United States v. Corbin Thomas Introduction United States of America v. Corbin Thomas, 713 F.3d 165 (3rd Cir. 2012), addresses critical...
3rd Circuit Confirms Narrow Scope of Rule 16(a)(1)(C) Discovery for Corporate Defendants in Environmental and Safety Violation Cases

3rd Circuit Confirms Narrow Scope of Rule 16(a)(1)(C) Discovery for Corporate Defendants in Environmental and Safety Violation Cases

Date: Sep 18, 2012
3rd Circuit Confirms Narrow Scope of Rule 16(a)(1)(C) Discovery for Corporate Defendants in Environmental and Safety Violation Cases Introduction In the case of UNITED STATES of America v. Jeffrey...
Skidmore Deference Affirmed in Social Security Disability Cessation Determination

Skidmore Deference Affirmed in Social Security Disability Cessation Determination

Date: Sep 15, 2012
Skidmore Deference Affirmed in Social Security Disability Cessation Determination Introduction In the case of Mark W. Hagans v. Commissioner of Social Security (694 F.3d 287), the United States Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert