Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

James A. Dennis v. Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections: Comprehensive Brady Violation Commentary

James A. Dennis v. Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections: Comprehensive Brady Violation Commentary

Date: Aug 24, 2016
James A. Dennis v. Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections: Comprehensive Brady Violation Commentary Introduction The case of James A. Dennis v. Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of...
Probable Cause Standards in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Dempsey v. Bucknell University

Probable Cause Standards in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Dempsey v. Bucknell University

Date: Aug 23, 2016
Probable Cause Standards in Civil Rights Litigation: Insights from Dempsey v. Bucknell University Introduction The case of Reed C. Dempsey and Shelley Dempsey v. Bucknell University and Associated...
Third Circuit Establishes Limits on Inmate Body-Cavity Searches under the Fourth Amendment: Parkell v. Commissioner of Prisons

Third Circuit Establishes Limits on Inmate Body-Cavity Searches under the Fourth Amendment: Parkell v. Commissioner of Prisons

Date: Aug 18, 2016
Third Circuit Establishes Limits on Inmate Body-Cavity Searches under the Fourth Amendment: Parkell v. Commissioner of Prisons Introduction In Donald D. Parkell v. Carl Danberg, Commissioner of...
Rejection of Price Inflation Theories in Class Certification under Rule 23(b)(3): Widener University v. Harnish et al.

Rejection of Price Inflation Theories in Class Certification under Rule 23(b)(3): Widener University v. Harnish et al.

Date: Aug 17, 2016
Rejection of Price Inflation Theories in Class Certification under Rule 23(b)(3): Widener University v. Harnish et al. Introduction In John Harnish; Justin Schluth; Robert Klein; Gregory Emond; Ayla...
Mootness in Appeals: The Unsealing of Cosby's Deposition Documents

Mootness in Appeals: The Unsealing of Cosby's Deposition Documents

Date: Aug 16, 2016
Mootness in Appeals: The Unsealing of Cosby's Deposition Documents Introduction Andréa Constand v. William H. Cosby, Jr. is a notable case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Cheney v. Daily News L.P.: Affirming Defamation and False Light Claims

Cheney v. Daily News L.P.: Affirming Defamation and False Light Claims

Date: Jul 20, 2016
Cheney v. Daily News L.P.: Affirming Defamation and False Light Claims Introduction In the case of Francis X. Cheney, II v. Daily News L.P., the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit...
Preservation of Class Action Certification Under the Picking Off Exception: Richardson v. Director Federal Bureau of Prisons

Preservation of Class Action Certification Under the Picking Off Exception: Richardson v. Director Federal Bureau of Prisons

Date: Jul 16, 2016
Preservation of Class Action Certification Under the Picking Off Exception: Richardson v. Director Federal Bureau of Prisons Introduction The case of Sebastian Richardson v. Director Federal Bureau...
Affirming Retaliation Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Comprehensive Commentary on Hill v. Barnacle et al.

Affirming Retaliation Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Comprehensive Commentary on Hill v. Barnacle et al.

Date: Jul 6, 2016
Affirming Retaliation Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Comprehensive Commentary on Hill v. Barnacle et al. Introduction Donna M. Hill, a prisoners' rights advocate, initiated legal action against...
Narrow Interpretation of the Video Privacy Protection Act and Upholding Intrusion upon Seclusion in In re Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy Litigation

Narrow Interpretation of the Video Privacy Protection Act and Upholding Intrusion upon Seclusion in In re Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy Litigation

Date: Jun 28, 2016
Narrow Interpretation of the Video Privacy Protection Act and Upholding Intrusion upon Seclusion in In re Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy Litigation Introduction In the case titled In re: Nickelodeon...
Third Circuit Revisits Buffer Zone Ordinances in the Wake of McCullen v. Coakley: Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh

Third Circuit Revisits Buffer Zone Ordinances in the Wake of McCullen v. Coakley: Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh

Date: Jun 2, 2016
Third Circuit Revisits Buffer Zone Ordinances in the Wake of McCullen v. Coakley: Bruni v. City of Pittsburgh Introduction The case of Nikki Bruni et al. v. City of Pittsburgh et al., decided on June...
Distinguishing Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) Motions: Insights from Michael Earl Davis v. Wells Fargo

Distinguishing Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) Motions: Insights from Michael Earl Davis v. Wells Fargo

Date: May 28, 2016
Distinguishing Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) Motions: Insights from Michael Earl Davis v. Wells Fargo Introduction In the case of Michael Earl Davis v. Wells Fargo, U.S. Bank National Association,...
Apparent Authority Upholds Security Interest Priority in EAGLEBANK v. Van Hoecke

Apparent Authority Upholds Security Interest Priority in EAGLEBANK v. Van Hoecke

Date: May 21, 2016
Apparent Authority Upholds Security Interest Priority in EAGLEBANK v. Van Hoecke Introduction The case of EAGLEBANK, Attorney-in-fact for Virginia Investment Partnership v. Robert G. Van Hoecke...
Third Circuit Reaffirms Plausibility Standard for Breach of Contract Claims in McDermott v. Clondalkin Group

Third Circuit Reaffirms Plausibility Standard for Breach of Contract Claims in McDermott v. Clondalkin Group

Date: May 19, 2016
Third Circuit Reaffirms Plausibility Standard for Breach of Contract Claims in McDermott v. Clondalkin Group Introduction In the case of Norbert McDermott v. Clondalkin Group, Inc., decided on May...
Procedural Missteps in Preemption Claims: Analyzing In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI)

Procedural Missteps in Preemption Claims: Analyzing In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI)

Date: May 17, 2016
Procedural Missteps in Preemption Claims: Analyzing In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI) Introduction The litigation In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. VI),...
Sanofi's Antitrust Defense in Eisai v. Sanofi: A Comprehensive Analysis

Sanofi's Antitrust Defense in Eisai v. Sanofi: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: May 5, 2016
Sanofi's Antitrust Defense in Eisai v. Sanofi: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case Eisai, Inc. v. Sanofi Aventis U.S., LLC represents a significant examination of antitrust laws within the...
Affirmation of Probable Cause in False Arrest Claims: Johnson v. Provenzano

Affirmation of Probable Cause in False Arrest Claims: Johnson v. Provenzano

Date: Apr 15, 2016
Affirmation of Probable Cause in False Arrest Claims: Johnson v. Provenzano Introduction In the case of James Johnson v. Police Officer Frank Provenzano; Ewing Township Police Department; Ewing...
Dismissing False Arrest Claims: Insights from Mikhaeil v. Santos et al.

Dismissing False Arrest Claims: Insights from Mikhaeil v. Santos et al.

Date: Apr 14, 2016
Dismissing False Arrest Claims: Insights from Mikhaeil v. Santos et al. Introduction Case: ADEL MIKHAEIL, Appellant v. ANGEL SANTOS; PHILLIP P.G. WEBB; DEALREE BROADY; CRISTINO FELIX; JERSEY CITY...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Mercantanti v. WCI Operations LLC

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Mercantanti v. WCI Operations LLC

Date: Apr 2, 2016
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Mercantanti v. WCI Operations LLC Introduction The case of Lisa Mercantanti v. WCI Operations LLC revolves around allegations of age...
RICO Applicability to Repossession Practices: Goldenstein v. Repossessors Inc.

RICO Applicability to Repossession Practices: Goldenstein v. Repossessors Inc.

Date: Mar 11, 2016
RICO Applicability to Repossession Practices: Goldenstein v. Repossessors Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Heiko Goldenstein v. Repossessors Inc., adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Third Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity for Child Protection Caseworkers in Substantive Due Process Claim

Third Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity for Child Protection Caseworkers in Substantive Due Process Claim

Date: Feb 20, 2016
Third Circuit Affirms Qualified Immunity for Child Protection Caseworkers in Substantive Due Process Claim Introduction The case of Michelle Mammarro v. New Jersey Division of Child Protection and...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert