Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Janus v. AFSCME: Mootness of Pennsylvania's Agency Fee Statute Affirmed

Janus v. AFSCME: Mootness of Pennsylvania's Agency Fee Statute Affirmed

Date: Jun 26, 2020
Janus v. AFSCME: Mootness of Pennsylvania's Agency Fee Statute Affirmed Introduction The case of Hartnett et al. v. Pennsylvania State Education Association et al. (963 F.3d 301) addresses the...
Affirming Strict Requirements for Equitable Tolling under the Federal Tort Claims Act: D.J.S.-W. v. United States

Affirming Strict Requirements for Equitable Tolling under the Federal Tort Claims Act: D.J.S.-W. v. United States

Date: Jun 23, 2020
Affirming Strict Requirements for Equitable Tolling under the Federal Tort Claims Act: D.J.S.-W. v. United States Introduction The case of D.J.S.-W., a minor, by her natural mother and legal...
Third Circuit Upholds Rule of Reason in Antitrust Conspiracy to Reduce Egg Supply

Third Circuit Upholds Rule of Reason in Antitrust Conspiracy to Reduce Egg Supply

Date: Jun 23, 2020
Third Circuit Upholds Rule of Reason in Antitrust Conspiracy to Reduce Egg Supply Introduction The case of In re: Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation addressed significant antitrust issues...
Enhancing Disclosure Obligations in Securities Fraud Class Actions: Insights from Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corp.

Enhancing Disclosure Obligations in Securities Fraud Class Actions: Insights from Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corp.

Date: Jun 19, 2020
Enhancing Disclosure Obligations in Securities Fraud Class Actions: Insights from Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corp. Introduction The case of Jaroslawicz v. M&T Bank Corp. represents a significant...
Davis v. Samuels: Third Circuit Extends 42 U.S.C. §1985(3) to Include Federal and Private Prison Actors

Davis v. Samuels: Third Circuit Extends 42 U.S.C. §1985(3) to Include Federal and Private Prison Actors

Date: Jun 12, 2020
Expanding Conspiracy Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1985(3) to Include Federal Actors and Private Prison Operators: Davis v. Samuels Introduction Davis v. Samuels is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Effective Assistance of Appellate Counsel in Sentencing Matters: United States v. Scripps

Effective Assistance of Appellate Counsel in Sentencing Matters: United States v. Scripps

Date: Jun 11, 2020
Effective Assistance of Appellate Counsel in Sentencing Matters: United States v. Scripps Introduction United States of America v. Michael Scripps, 961 F.3d 626 (3d Cir. 2020) establishes a...
ACCA Enhancements Affirmed: Conspiracy Convictions Recognized as Separate Predicate Offenses

ACCA Enhancements Affirmed: Conspiracy Convictions Recognized as Separate Predicate Offenses

Date: Jun 6, 2020
ACCA Enhancements Affirmed: Conspiracy Convictions Recognized as Separate Predicate Offenses Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Michael E. Torres, the United States Court of...
State Sovereign Immunity Reinforced in Waterfront Commission v. Governor of New Jersey

State Sovereign Immunity Reinforced in Waterfront Commission v. Governor of New Jersey

Date: Jun 6, 2020
State Sovereign Immunity Reinforced in Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor v. Governor of New Jersey Introduction The case Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor v. Governor of New Jersey,...
Expansion of Judicial Discretion in Compassionate Release: United States v. Tamika Somerville

Expansion of Judicial Discretion in Compassionate Release: United States v. Tamika Somerville

Date: May 30, 2020
Expansion of Judicial Discretion in Compassionate Release: United States v. Tamika Somerville Introduction United States of America v. Tamika Somerville, decided by the United States District Court...
Clarifying the Distinction Between 'Transitory' and 'Minor' Impairments in ADA 'Regarded As' Claims: Eshleman v. Patrick Industries

Clarifying the Distinction Between 'Transitory' and 'Minor' Impairments in ADA 'Regarded As' Claims: Eshleman v. Patrick Industries

Date: May 30, 2020
Clarifying the Distinction Between 'Transitory' and 'Minor' Impairments in ADA 'Regarded As' Claims: Eshleman v. Patrick Industries Introduction Eshleman v. Patrick Industries, Inc. (961 F.3d 242) is...
Third Circuit Upholds Lawful Extension of Traffic Stop Based on Reasonable Suspicion

Third Circuit Upholds Lawful Extension of Traffic Stop Based on Reasonable Suspicion

Date: May 30, 2020
Third Circuit Upholds Lawful Extension of Traffic Stop Based on Reasonable Suspicion Introduction In United States of America v. Tykei Garner and Jerry Fruit (961 F.3d 264, 3rd Cir. 2020), the United...
Third Circuit Reverses Dismissal in Title IX Sexual Discrimination Case, Emphasizing Procedural Fairness

Third Circuit Reverses Dismissal in Title IX Sexual Discrimination Case, Emphasizing Procedural Fairness

Date: May 30, 2020
Third Circuit Reverses Dismissal in Title IX Sexual Discrimination Case, Emphasizing Procedural Fairness Introduction In the case of John Doe v. University of the Sciences (961 F.3d 203), the United...
Stipulation of Jurisdictional Elements and Sixth Amendment Rights: Insights from United States v. Wilson

Stipulation of Jurisdictional Elements and Sixth Amendment Rights: Insights from United States v. Wilson

Date: May 23, 2020
Stipulation of Jurisdictional Elements and Sixth Amendment Rights: Insights from United States v. Wilson Introduction United States of America v. Marquis Wilson is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Enhancing Misrepresentation Standards in Prison Grievance Processes: Hardy v. Shaikh

Enhancing Misrepresentation Standards in Prison Grievance Processes: Hardy v. Shaikh

Date: May 21, 2020
Enhancing Misrepresentation Standards in Prison Grievance Processes: Insights from Hardy v. Shaikh Introduction The case of Steven Patrick Hardy v. Arif Shaikh et al., decided by the United States...
Reaffirming Article III Standing Requirements in Federal Intervention: Wayne Land v. Delaware River Basin Commission

Reaffirming Article III Standing Requirements in Federal Intervention: Wayne Land v. Delaware River Basin Commission

Date: May 20, 2020
Reaffirming Article III Standing Requirements in Federal Intervention: Wayne Land v. Delaware River Basin Commission Introduction The case of Wayne Land and Mineral Group, LLC v. Delaware River Basin...
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Car Rental Agreements: Insights from Bacon v. Avis Budget Group

Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Car Rental Agreements: Insights from Bacon v. Avis Budget Group

Date: May 19, 2020
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Car Rental Agreements: Insights from Bacon v. Avis Budget Group Introduction In the landmark case of Bacon et al. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc., the United...
TCPA Jurisprudence Expanded: Unsolicited Fax Advertisements in Market Research Surveys

TCPA Jurisprudence Expanded: Unsolicited Fax Advertisements in Market Research Surveys

Date: May 16, 2020
TCPA Jurisprudence Expanded: Unsolicited Fax Advertisements in Market Research Surveys Introduction The case of Dr. Richard E. Fischbein, Appellant v. Olson Research Group, Inc. et al. presents a...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the PLRA: Rhonshawn Jackson v. Defendants

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the PLRA: Rhonshawn Jackson v. Defendants

Date: May 15, 2020
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the PLRA: Rhonshawn Jackson v. Defendants Introduction The case of Rhonshawn Jackson v. Carter et al. was adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation and Vacatur in Prisoner's First Amendment Retaliation Claim: Palmore v. Hornberger

Affirmation and Vacatur in Prisoner's First Amendment Retaliation Claim: Palmore v. Hornberger

Date: May 13, 2020
Affirmation and Vacatur in Prisoner's First Amendment Retaliation Claim: Palmore v. Hornberger Introduction In the case of Darold Palmore v. Jeff Hornberger, Warden; David Sprankle, Deputy Warden;...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Coit v. Garman Establishes Rigorous Standards for Prisoner Claims Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Coit v. Garman Establishes Rigorous Standards for Prisoner Claims Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Date: May 6, 2020
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Coit v. Garman Establishes Rigorous Standards for Prisoner Claims Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction In Kevin Coit v. Mr. Garman et al., the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert