Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Bonham v. Dresser Industries: ADEA's 180-Day Filing Period as a Statute of Limitations Subject to Equitable Tolling

Bonham v. Dresser Industries: ADEA's 180-Day Filing Period as a Statute of Limitations Subject to Equitable Tolling

Date: Dec 28, 1977
Bonham v. Dresser Industries: ADEA's 180-Day Filing Period as a Statute of Limitations Subject to Equitable Tolling Introduction In the landmark case of Bonham v. Dresser Industries, Inc.,...
Jurisdictional Strictness in Appeals: Elfman Motors Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.

Jurisdictional Strictness in Appeals: Elfman Motors Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.

Date: Dec 20, 1977
Jurisdictional Strictness in Appeals: Elfman Motors Inc. v. Chrysler Corp. Introduction The case of Elfman Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler Corporation addresses crucial procedural aspects concerning the...
Jennings v. Shuman: Clarifying Malicious Abuse of Process and Statute of Limitations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Jennings v. Shuman: Clarifying Malicious Abuse of Process and Statute of Limitations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Date: Dec 1, 1977
Jennings v. Shuman: Clarifying Malicious Abuse of Process and Statute of Limitations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction In Robert F. Jennings v. Arthur Shuman, Jr., Robert J. Conway, Gustave Naring,...
Coleco Industries v. Royal All-Aluminum Swimming Pool Corp.: A Comprehensive Analysis of Securities Fraud and Contractual Breaches

Coleco Industries v. Royal All-Aluminum Swimming Pool Corp.: A Comprehensive Analysis of Securities Fraud and Contractual Breaches

Date: Nov 26, 1977
Coleco Industries v. Royal All-Aluminum Swimming Pool Corp.: A Comprehensive Analysis of Securities Fraud and Contractual Breaches Introduction Coleco Industries, Inc. v. Abe Berman et al. is a...
Invalidation of EPA's Interim Final Regulations for Specialty Steel Industry under APA Compliance

Invalidation of EPA's Interim Final Regulations for Specialty Steel Industry under APA Compliance

Date: Sep 15, 1977
Invalidation of EPA's Interim Final Regulations for Specialty Steel Industry under APA Compliance Introduction In the seminal case of American Iron and Steel Institute, et al. v. Environmental...
Reaffirming the Strict Standards for Rule 60(b)(6) Relief in Martinez-McBean v. Government of the Virgin Islands

Reaffirming the Strict Standards for Rule 60(b)(6) Relief in Martinez-McBean v. Government of the Virgin Islands

Date: Sep 1, 1977
Reaffirming the Strict Standards for Rule 60(b)(6) Relief in Martinez-McBean v. Government of the Virgin Islands Introduction The case of Luis Martinez-McBean v. Government of the Virgin Islands, 562...
Third Circuit Affirms Title VIII Remedies for Racially Discriminatory Housing Practices in Philadelphia Case

Third Circuit Affirms Title VIII Remedies for Racially Discriminatory Housing Practices in Philadelphia Case

Date: Sep 1, 1977
Third Circuit Affirms Title VIII Remedies for Racially Discriminatory Housing Practices in Philadelphia Case Introduction The case of Resident Advisory Board by Rose Wylie et al. v. Frank Rizzo et...
Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. §1981: Analysis of Mahone v. Waddle and Implications for Civil Rights Enforcement

Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. §1981: Analysis of Mahone v. Waddle and Implications for Civil Rights Enforcement

Date: Aug 25, 1977
Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. §1981: Analysis of Mahone v. Waddle and Implications for Civil Rights Enforcement Introduction In the landmark case of Glenn R. Mahone and Harvey L. Mahone v....
Ensuring Full and Fair State Litigation for Fourth Amendment Claims: Petillo v. New Jersey

Ensuring Full and Fair State Litigation for Fourth Amendment Claims: Petillo v. New Jersey

Date: Aug 24, 1977
Ensuring Full and Fair State Litigation for Fourth Amendment Claims: Petillo v. New Jersey Introduction The case of United States of America ex rel. Frank Petillo v. State of New Jersey presents a...
Affirmation of Dual Sovereignty in Double Jeopardy: United States v. Frumento et al. (1977)

Affirmation of Dual Sovereignty in Double Jeopardy: United States v. Frumento et al. (1977)

Date: Aug 19, 1977
Affirmation of Dual Sovereignty in Double Jeopardy: United States v. Frumento et al. (1977) Introduction United States of America v. Rocco Frumento, Andrew J. Millhouse, George W. Collitt, John R....
Executing Fraud Through Routine Business Mailings: Insights from United States v. Tarnopol (1977)

Executing Fraud Through Routine Business Mailings: Insights from United States v. Tarnopol (1977)

Date: Aug 10, 1977
Executing Fraud Through Routine Business Mailings: Insights from United States v. Tarnopol (1977) Introduction United States of America v. Nat Tarnopol, et al., 561 F.2d 466 (3d Cir. 1977), is a...
Jurisdictional Boundaries for Contribution Claims under Title VII: Insights from Glus v. Murphy

Jurisdictional Boundaries for Contribution Claims under Title VII: Insights from Glus v. Murphy

Date: Aug 9, 1977
Jurisdictional Boundaries for Contribution Claims under Title VII: Insights from Glus v. Murphy Introduction The landmark case Joanne Glus et al. v. G. C. Murphy Company (562 F.2d 880) addressed...
Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Forsythe et al. (560 F.2d 1127)

Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Forsythe et al. (560 F.2d 1127)

Date: Aug 5, 1977
RICO Enforcement and the Scope of Association: Analysis of United States v. Forsythe et al. Introduction United States of America v. Forsythe, Robert E., Franciscus, Charles J., Blaskovich, John J.,...
Third Circuit Establishes Criteria for Class Certification in Antitrust Tie-In Litigation under Sherman Act §1

Third Circuit Establishes Criteria for Class Certification in Antitrust Tie-In Litigation under Sherman Act §1

Date: Jul 22, 1977
Third Circuit Establishes Criteria for Class Certification in Antitrust Tie-In Litigation under Sherman Act §1 Introduction In the landmark case of PAUL J. BOGOSIAN, On Behalf of Himself and All...
Affirmation of Waiver of Jury Trial Rights in Employment Discrimination Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1981

Affirmation of Waiver of Jury Trial Rights in Employment Discrimination Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1981

Date: Jul 19, 1977
Affirmation of Waiver of Jury Trial Rights in Employment Discrimination Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1981 Introduction The case of Carol J. Walton v. Eaton Corporation addresses pivotal issues surrounding...
MAYBERRY v. MARONEY: Upholding the Finality of Consent Judgments under Rule 60(b)

MAYBERRY v. MARONEY: Upholding the Finality of Consent Judgments under Rule 60(b)

Date: Jul 8, 1977
MAYBERRY v. MARONEY: Upholding the Finality of Consent Judgments under Rule 60(b) Introduction MAYBERRY v. MARONEY is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Meyers v. Pennypack: Expanding Standing and Extending Statute of Limitations in Housing Discrimination Cases

Meyers v. Pennypack: Expanding Standing and Extending Statute of Limitations in Housing Discrimination Cases

Date: Jul 7, 1977
Meyers v. Pennypack: Expanding Standing and Extending Statute of Limitations in Housing Discrimination Cases Introduction Meyers v. Pennypack Woods Home Ownership Association and Marion A. Steinbronn...
Affirmation of Partial Verdicts and Double Jeopardy Protections in Government of the Virgin Islands v. Smith

Affirmation of Partial Verdicts and Double Jeopardy Protections in Government of the Virgin Islands v. Smith

Date: Jul 7, 1977
Affirmation of Partial Verdicts and Double Jeopardy Protections in Government of the Virgin Islands v. Smith Introduction Government of the Virgin Islands v. Sonville Austin Smith, 558 F.2d 691 (3d...
Meeting of the Minds Required for Complete Release under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Macy v. United States

Meeting of the Minds Required for Complete Release under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Macy v. United States

Date: Jul 6, 1977
Meeting of the Minds Required for Complete Release under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Macy v. United States Introduction Carol A. Macy v. United States of America, 557 F.2d 391 (3d Cir. 1977), is a...
Fair Allocation of Attorneys' Fees in Class Action Settlements: Insights from Prandini v. National Tea Company

Fair Allocation of Attorneys' Fees in Class Action Settlements: Insights from Prandini v. National Tea Company

Date: Jun 30, 1977
Fair Allocation of Attorneys' Fees in Class Action Settlements: Insights from Prandini v. National Tea Company Introduction The case of Jean H. Prandini, Individually, and on Behalf of All Other...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert