Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Deary v. V.I. Officers: Probable Cause to Be Determined by Jury in Section 1983 Actions

Deary v. V.I. Officers: Probable Cause to Be Determined by Jury in Section 1983 Actions

Date: Oct 13, 1984
Deary v. V.I. Officers: Probable Cause to Be Determined by Jury in Section 1983 Actions Introduction In the landmark case of Celeste R. Deary v. Three Un-Named Police Officers et al., adjudicated by...
Third Circuit Reaffirms Legality of Insurer's UCR Reimbursement System: Antitrust Claims against Blue Shield Dismissed

Third Circuit Reaffirms Legality of Insurer's UCR Reimbursement System: Antitrust Claims against Blue Shield Dismissed

Date: Oct 2, 1984
Third Circuit Reaffirms Legality of Insurer's UCR Reimbursement System: Antitrust Claims against Blue Shield Dismissed Introduction In the landmark case of Pennsylvania Dental Association et al. v....
Podedworny v. Harris: Clarifying the Transferability of Skills in Social Security Disability Determinations

Podedworny v. Harris: Clarifying the Transferability of Skills in Social Security Disability Determinations

Date: Sep 29, 1984
Podedworny v. Harris: Clarifying the Transferability of Skills in Social Security Disability Determinations Introduction Podedworny v. Harris is a landmark decision by the United States Court of...
Right-to-Sue Letter Not a Jurisdictional Prerequisite in Title VII Claims: Gooding v. Warner-Lambert Company

Right-to-Sue Letter Not a Jurisdictional Prerequisite in Title VII Claims: Gooding v. Warner-Lambert Company

Date: Sep 29, 1984
Right-to-Sue Letter Not a Jurisdictional Prerequisite in Title VII Claims: Gooding v. Warner-Lambert Company Introduction In the landmark case of Vivian B. Gooding, Appellant, v. Warner-Lambert...
Third Circuit Upholds Per Se Antitrust Violation for Medical Staff's Exclusion of Osteopathic Physicians

Third Circuit Upholds Per Se Antitrust Violation for Medical Staff's Exclusion of Osteopathic Physicians

Date: Sep 28, 1984
Third Circuit Upholds Per Se Antitrust Violation for Medical Staff's Exclusion of Osteopathic Physicians Introduction In the landmark appellate decision of Malcolm Weiss v. York Hospital and...
Clarifying the Scope of Automatic Stay: Post-Petition Claims Not Barred by Pre-Petition Acts – Frenville Co. Case Analysis

Clarifying the Scope of Automatic Stay: Post-Petition Claims Not Barred by Pre-Petition Acts – Frenville Co. Case Analysis

Date: Sep 18, 1984
Clarifying the Scope of Automatic Stay: Post-Petition Claims Not Barred by Pre-Petition Acts – Frenville Co. Case Analysis Introduction The case of Avellino Bienes (A B) v. M. Frenville Co., Inc.,...
Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege: The Klitzman v. Krut Case

Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege: The Klitzman v. Krut Case

Date: Sep 18, 1984
Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege: The Klitzman v. Krut Case Introduction The case of Klitzman, Klitzman and Gallagher v. Krut et al., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Early v. Heckler: Upholding Presumptive Disability in Social Security Termination Cases

Early v. Heckler: Upholding Presumptive Disability in Social Security Termination Cases

Date: Sep 15, 1984
Early v. Heckler: Upholding Presumptive Disability in Social Security Termination Cases Introduction In the case of James Early v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services, the...
Seville v. Southmost: Affirming Notice Pleading Standards in RICO Claims

Seville v. Southmost: Affirming Notice Pleading Standards in RICO Claims

Date: Sep 7, 1984
Seville v. Southmost: Affirming Notice Pleading Standards in RICO Claims Introduction In Seville Industrial Machinery Corp. v. Southmost Machinery Corp., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Limits of Federal Bankruptcy Jurisdiction: In Re Pacor, Inc. v. Higgins

Limits of Federal Bankruptcy Jurisdiction: In Re Pacor, Inc. v. Higgins

Date: Aug 28, 1984
Limits of Federal Bankruptcy Jurisdiction: In Re Pacor, Inc. v. Higgins Introduction In Re Pacor, Inc., v. John Higgins, Jr. and Louise Higgins is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
State Action Affirmed in University Settings: Krynicky v. University of Pittsburgh and Schier v. Temple University

State Action Affirmed in University Settings: Krynicky v. University of Pittsburgh and Schier v. Temple University

Date: Aug 24, 1984
State Action Affirmed in University Settings: Krynicky v. University of Pittsburgh and Schier v. Temple University Introduction The consolidated appeals of Harry T. Krynicky, Jr. v. University of...
Denial of Court-Appointed Counsel: A Landmark Decision in Collateral Order Doctrine

Denial of Court-Appointed Counsel: A Landmark Decision in Collateral Order Doctrine

Date: Aug 24, 1984
Denial of Court-Appointed Counsel: A Landmark Decision in Collateral Order Doctrine Introduction In the case of Robert Smith-Bey v. George Petsock et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Third Circuit Affirms Employer's Pension Contribution Obligations to Classified Employee Owner-Operators and Enforces Three-Year Statute of Limitations under Pennsylvania Law

Third Circuit Affirms Employer's Pension Contribution Obligations to Classified Employee Owner-Operators and Enforces Three-Year Statute of Limitations under Pennsylvania Law

Date: Aug 11, 1984
Third Circuit Affirms Employer's Pension Contribution Obligations to Classified Employee Owner-Operators and Enforces Three-Year Statute of Limitations under Pennsylvania Law Introduction In the...
Broad Interpretation of 'Extension of Credit' Under 18 U.S.C. § 894(a): United States v. DiPasquale et al.

Broad Interpretation of 'Extension of Credit' Under 18 U.S.C. § 894(a): United States v. DiPasquale et al.

Date: Aug 1, 1984
Broad Interpretation of 'Extension of Credit' Under 18 U.S.C. § 894(a): United States v. DiPasquale et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Anthony DiPasquale et al., decided by...
Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions in Drug Importation Case: United States v. Leon et al.

Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions in Drug Importation Case: United States v. Leon et al.

Date: Jul 13, 1984
Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions in Drug Importation Case: United States v. Leon et al. Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Leon, Pablo, William Case, David Mark...
Pringle v. Cumberland County: Clarifying Exhaustion Requirements for Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions

Pringle v. Cumberland County: Clarifying Exhaustion Requirements for Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Jul 6, 1984
Pringle v. Cumberland County: Clarifying Exhaustion Requirements for Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction Pringle v. Cumberland County, 744 F.2d 297 (3d Cir. 1984), is a pivotal case...
Bankruptcy Protections for Social Security Benefits: Insights from Lillie Lee v. Schweiker

Bankruptcy Protections for Social Security Benefits: Insights from Lillie Lee v. Schweiker

Date: Jun 30, 1984
Bankruptcy Protections for Social Security Benefits: Insights from Lillie Lee v. Schweiker Introduction Case Citation: Lillie Lee, Appellant, v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human...
Third Circuit Clarifies Work Product Doctrine's Supremacy over Expert Discovery in Antitrust Class Action

Third Circuit Clarifies Work Product Doctrine's Supremacy over Expert Discovery in Antitrust Class Action

Date: Jun 29, 1984
Third Circuit Clarifies Work Product Doctrine's Supremacy over Expert Discovery in Antitrust Class Action Introduction In the landmark case of Paul Bogosian and Louis Parisi v. Gulf Oil Corporation...
Adams v. Gould Inc.: Establishing Extended Statute of Limitations for Pension Rights Claims

Adams v. Gould Inc.: Establishing Extended Statute of Limitations for Pension Rights Claims

Date: Jun 29, 1984
Adams v. Gould Inc.: Establishing Extended Statute of Limitations for Pension Rights Claims Introduction Adams v. Gould Inc. is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Expansion of Automobile Search Authority Under Federal Law: Analysis of United States v. Rickus

Expansion of Automobile Search Authority Under Federal Law: Analysis of United States v. Rickus

Date: Jun 19, 1984
Expansion of Automobile Search Authority Under Federal Law: Analysis of United States v. Rickus Introduction The case of United States of America v. Rickus, Robert F., decided on June 18, 1984, by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert