Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Mootness Doctrine Applied in NJ Turnpike Authority v. Jersey Central Power

Mootness Doctrine Applied in NJ Turnpike Authority v. Jersey Central Power

Date: Sep 7, 1985
Mootness Doctrine Applied in NJ Turnpike Authority v. Jersey Central Power Introduction New Jersey Turnpike Authority (NJTA) filed an appeal against Jersey Central Power and Light (JCP&L) and General...
Supremacy Clause Preempts Local Bans on Radioactive Waste Storage: Analysis of Jersey Central Power Light Company v. Township of Lacey

Supremacy Clause Preempts Local Bans on Radioactive Waste Storage: Analysis of Jersey Central Power Light Company v. Township of Lacey

Date: Sep 7, 1985
Supremacy Clause Preempts Local Bans on Radioactive Waste Storage: Analysis of Jersey Central Power Light Company v. Township of Lacey Introduction The case of Jersey Central Power Light Company v....
Abstention Doctrine Upheld in Equal Protection Parole Procedures Challenge

Abstention Doctrine Upheld in Equal Protection Parole Procedures Challenge

Date: Sep 6, 1985
Abstention Doctrine Upheld in Equal Protection Parole Procedures Challenge Introduction The case of Anthony Georgevich v. Judge Samuel Strauss et al. addresses a significant equal protection...
Strict Enforcement of Norris-LaGuardia Act Procedures in Injunctive Relief: Third Circuit Rules in United Telegraph Workers v. Western Union

Strict Enforcement of Norris-LaGuardia Act Procedures in Injunctive Relief: Third Circuit Rules in United Telegraph Workers v. Western Union

Date: Aug 27, 1985
Strict Enforcement of Norris-LaGuardia Act Procedures in Injunctive Relief: Third Circuit Rules in United Telegraph Workers v. Western Union Introduction The case of United Telegraph Workers,...
Third Circuit Establishes Flexible Res Judicata Application in Disability Claims Involving Alcoholism

Third Circuit Establishes Flexible Res Judicata Application in Disability Claims Involving Alcoholism

Date: Aug 17, 1985
Third Circuit Establishes Flexible Res Judicata Application in Disability Claims Involving Alcoholism Introduction The case of Charles Purter v. Margaret Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human...
Riehl v. Travelers Insurance Co.: Clarifying Insurance Coverage for Environmental Cleanup

Riehl v. Travelers Insurance Co.: Clarifying Insurance Coverage for Environmental Cleanup

Date: Aug 13, 1985
Riehl v. Travelers Insurance Co.: Clarifying Insurance Coverage for Environmental Cleanup Introduction In the landmark case of Ralph R. Riehl, Jr., Appellee, v. Travelers Insurance Co., Appellant,...
Doe Defendants and Diversity Jurisdiction: Abels v. State Farm Fire Casualty Company Establishes Critical Precedent

Doe Defendants and Diversity Jurisdiction: Abels v. State Farm Fire Casualty Company Establishes Critical Precedent

Date: Aug 9, 1985
Doe Defendants and Diversity Jurisdiction: Abels v. State Farm Fire Casualty Company Establishes Critical Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of Charles E. Abels and Irene C. Abels v. State...
Accrual of Claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Insights from Zeleznik v. United States

Accrual of Claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Insights from Zeleznik v. United States

Date: Aug 3, 1985
Accrual of Claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act: Insights from Zeleznik v. United States Introduction The case of Zeleznik, Carter, Administrator of the Estate of Arnold Frank Zeleznik, Deceased,...
Presumption of Correctness in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Smith v. Zimmerman

Presumption of Correctness in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Smith v. Zimmerman

Date: Jul 17, 1985
Presumption of Correctness in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Smith v. Zimmerman Introduction The case of Robert Smith v. Charles Zimmerman is a pivotal decision from the United States Court of...
Third Circuit Clarifies 'Related to' Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy Cases: Bobroff v. Continental Bank

Third Circuit Clarifies 'Related to' Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy Cases: Bobroff v. Continental Bank

Date: Jul 6, 1985
Third Circuit Clarifies 'Related to' Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy Cases: Bobroff v. Continental Bank Introduction In the landmark case In re Bobroff, Charles T., Debtor, decided on July 5, 1985, the...
Maxfield v. Sinclair International: Establishing New ADEA Precedents on Mandatory Retirement and Damages

Maxfield v. Sinclair International: Establishing New ADEA Precedents on Mandatory Retirement and Damages

Date: Jul 4, 1985
Maxfield v. Sinclair International: Establishing New ADEA Precedents on Mandatory Retirement and Damages Introduction The landmark case of James L. Maxfield v. Sinclair International and David H....
Revisiting Misleading Projections in Securities Fraud: The Third Circuit's Analysis in Eisenberg & Nissen v. Gagnon et al.

Revisiting Misleading Projections in Securities Fraud: The Third Circuit's Analysis in Eisenberg & Nissen v. Gagnon et al.

Date: Jun 29, 1985
Revisiting Misleading Projections in Securities Fraud: The Third Circuit's Analysis in Eisenberg & Nissen v. Gagnon et al. Introduction In MARTIN EISENBERG AND ARTHUR NISSEN, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES...
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Linn: Expanding the Duty to Defend in Professional Liability Insurance

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Linn: Expanding the Duty to Defend in Professional Liability Insurance

Date: Jun 28, 1985
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Linn: Expanding the Duty to Defend in Professional Liability Insurance Introduction Pacific Indemnity Company v. Linn is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Expanding State Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: The Estate of Aleta V. Bailey Case

Expanding State Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: The Estate of Aleta V. Bailey Case

Date: Jun 28, 1985
Expanding State Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: The Estate of Aleta V. Bailey Case Introduction The case Estate of Aleta V. Bailey v. County of York et al., decided by the United States Court of...
UCC Supremacy in Commercial Sale: Restraint of Negligence and Strict Liability Claims for Economic Loss - Heide v. WRH Products Co.

UCC Supremacy in Commercial Sale: Restraint of Negligence and Strict Liability Claims for Economic Loss - Heide v. WRH Products Co.

Date: Jun 28, 1985
UCC Supremacy in Commercial Sale: Restraint of Negligence and Strict Liability Claims for Economic Loss - Heide v. WRH Products Co. Introduction Heide v. WRH Products Co., Inc., 766 F.2d 105 (3d Cir....
Establishing the Necessity of Bad Faith in Imposing Attorney Fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927

Establishing the Necessity of Bad Faith in Imposing Attorney Fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927

Date: Jun 15, 1985
Establishing the Necessity of Bad Faith in Imposing Attorney Fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 Introduction In the landmark case of Baker Industries, Inc. v. Cerberus Limited, the United States Court of...
Smith v. City of Pittsburgh: Establishing Two-Year Statute of Limitations for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Due Process Claims

Smith v. City of Pittsburgh: Establishing Two-Year Statute of Limitations for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Due Process Claims

Date: Jun 13, 1985
Smith v. City of Pittsburgh: Establishing Two-Year Statute of Limitations for 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Due Process Claims Introduction The case of Lester Smith v. City of Pittsburgh (764 F.2d 188) represents...
Enhanced Disclosure Requirements for Margin Accounts: Third Circuit Expands Scope under Rule 10b-5 and Affirms Private Rights under Rule 10b-16

Enhanced Disclosure Requirements for Margin Accounts: Third Circuit Expands Scope under Rule 10b-5 and Affirms Private Rights under Rule 10b-16

Date: Jun 13, 1985
Enhanced Disclosure Requirements for Margin Accounts: Third Circuit Expands Scope under Rule 10b-5 and Affirms Private Rights under Rule 10b-16 Introduction The legal landscape governing securities...
Establishing Prima Facie Disability in SSI Claims: Insights from Ferguson v. Schweiker

Establishing Prima Facie Disability in SSI Claims: Insights from Ferguson v. Schweiker

Date: Jun 12, 1985
Establishing Prima Facie Disability in SSI Claims: Insights from Ferguson v. Schweiker Introduction The case of Elizabeth L. Ferguson v. Richard S. Schweiker, decided by the United States Court of...
Clarifying the Burden of Proof and Expert Testimony in Legal Malpractice Summary Judgment: Gans v. Mundy (1985)

Clarifying the Burden of Proof and Expert Testimony in Legal Malpractice Summary Judgment: Gans v. Mundy (1985)

Date: Jun 1, 1985
Clarifying the Burden of Proof and Expert Testimony in Legal Malpractice Summary Judgment: Gans v. Mundy (1985) Introduction The case of Gans v. Mundy, James F., and the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert