Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Bail Reform Act's Preventive Detention Under Constitutional Scrutiny - United States v. Perry

Affirmation of Bail Reform Act's Preventive Detention Under Constitutional Scrutiny - United States v. Perry

Date: Apr 8, 1986
Affirmation of Bail Reform Act's Preventive Detention Under Constitutional Scrutiny Introduction United States of America v. Howard Perry et al., 788 F.2d 100 (3d Cir. 1986), is a landmark decision...
Legal Commentary: Due Process Violation in Public Employment Termination

Legal Commentary: Due Process Violation in Public Employment Termination

Date: Apr 8, 1986
Legal Commentary: Due Process Violation in Public Employment Termination Introduction The case of Brown v. Trench et al., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in...
Ensuring Fairness in Pension Plan Withdrawals: Third Circuit Upholds Due Process Rights under MPPAA

Ensuring Fairness in Pension Plan Withdrawals: Third Circuit Upholds Due Process Rights under MPPAA

Date: Apr 1, 1986
Ensuring Fairness in Pension Plan Withdrawals: Third Circuit Upholds Due Process Rights under MPPAA Introduction The case of United Retail Wholesale Employees Teamsters Union Local No. 115 Pension...
Discretionary Function Exception Affirmed in FTCA Claims: Pooler v. United States

Discretionary Function Exception Affirmed in FTCA Claims: Pooler v. United States

Date: Mar 28, 1986
Discretionary Function Exception Affirmed in FTCA Claims: Pooler v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of Ronald Pooler and Ronnie Bradley v. United States of America, the United States...
Hornsby v. United States Postal Service: Establishing Standards for Notice in Title VII Actions

Hornsby v. United States Postal Service: Establishing Standards for Notice in Title VII Actions

Date: Mar 27, 1986
Hornsby v. United States Postal Service: Establishing Standards for Notice in Title VII Actions Introduction Donald Oliver Hornsby, a former employee of the United States Postal Service (USPS),...
Third Circuit Affirms Civil Penalties and Inspection Authority Under Magnuson Act in Lovgren Enterprises v. Byrne

Third Circuit Affirms Civil Penalties and Inspection Authority Under Magnuson Act in Lovgren Enterprises v. Byrne

Date: Mar 27, 1986
Third Circuit Affirms Civil Penalties and Inspection Authority Under Magnuson Act in Lovgren Enterprises v. Byrne Introduction The case of Gosta (Sweede) Lovgren v. John V. Byrne involves Lovgren...
Third Circuit Reverses Disability Benefits Denial in Gilliland v. Heckler: A Landmark on Medical Evidence Evaluation

Third Circuit Reverses Disability Benefits Denial in Gilliland v. Heckler: A Landmark on Medical Evidence Evaluation

Date: Mar 20, 1986
Third Circuit Reverses Disability Benefits Denial in Gilliland v. Heckler: A Landmark on Medical Evidence Evaluation Introduction Robert L. Gilliland appealed the decision of the United States...
Substantial Evidence and the Primacy of Treating Physicians in Social Security Disability Appeals: Brewster v. Heckler

Substantial Evidence and the Primacy of Treating Physicians in Social Security Disability Appeals: Brewster v. Heckler

Date: Mar 19, 1986
Substantial Evidence and the Primacy of Treating Physicians in Social Security Disability Appeals: Brewster v. Heckler Introduction Brewster v. Heckler, 786 F.2d 581 (3d Cir. 1986), is a pivotal case...
Establishing Precedents in Antitrust and Franchise Law: Arnold Pontiac-GMC, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation

Establishing Precedents in Antitrust and Franchise Law: Arnold Pontiac-GMC, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation

Date: Mar 15, 1986
Establishing Precedents in Antitrust and Franchise Law: Arnold Pontiac-GMC, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation Introduction The case of Arnold Pontiac-GMC, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation (786...
Affirmation of Denial of Rule 60(b) Relief in SSI Benefit Recoupment Challenge

Affirmation of Denial of Rule 60(b) Relief in SSI Benefit Recoupment Challenge

Date: Mar 15, 1986
Affirmation of Denial of Rule 60(b) Relief in SSI Benefit Recoupment Challenge Introduction The case of Page, Helen M. v. Schweiker, Richard E., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Protective Orders in Civil Discovery: Cipollone v. Liggett Group Establishes New Precedent

Protective Orders in Civil Discovery: Cipollone v. Liggett Group Establishes New Precedent

Date: Mar 13, 1986
Protective Orders in Civil Discovery: Cipollone v. Liggett Group Establishes New Precedent Introduction The case of Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. et al., decided by the United States Court of...
Impact of Government Conduct on Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas: Analysis of United States v. Martinez

Impact of Government Conduct on Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas: Analysis of United States v. Martinez

Date: Mar 11, 1986
Impact of Government Conduct on Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas: Analysis of United States v. Martinez Introduction United States of America v. Julio Martinez, 785 F.2d 111 (3d Cir. 1986), presents a...
Third Circuit Establishes Refined Specificity Standards for Civil Rights Class Actions in Frazier v. SEPTA

Third Circuit Establishes Refined Specificity Standards for Civil Rights Class Actions in Frazier v. SEPTA

Date: Mar 5, 1986
Third Circuit Establishes Refined Specificity Standards for Civil Rights Class Actions in Frazier et al. v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Introduction In Frazier et al. v....
Sun Ship Inc. v. Matson Navigation Co.: Clarifying Arbitration Authority and Sanctions for Frivolous Appeals

Sun Ship Inc. v. Matson Navigation Co.: Clarifying Arbitration Authority and Sanctions for Frivolous Appeals

Date: Mar 5, 1986
Sun Ship Inc. v. Matson Navigation Co.: Clarifying Arbitration Authority and Sanctions for Frivolous Appeals Introduction Sun Ship, Inc. v. Matson Navigation Co. is a pivotal case decided by the...
Al-Khazraji v. Saint Francis College: Expanding Section 1981 Protections to Ethnically Distinct Groups

Al-Khazraji v. Saint Francis College: Expanding Section 1981 Protections to Ethnically Distinct Groups

Date: Mar 4, 1986
Al-Khazraji v. Saint Francis College: Expanding Section 1981 Protections to Ethnically Distinct Groups Introduction In the landmark case of Al-Khazraji v. Saint Francis College, heard by the United...
United States v. Accetturo et al.: Third Circuit Reinforces Bail Reform Act Standards, Limits Use of In Camera Evidence

United States v. Accetturo et al.: Third Circuit Reinforces Bail Reform Act Standards, Limits Use of In Camera Evidence

Date: Feb 15, 1986
United States v. Accetturo et al.: Third Circuit Reinforces Bail Reform Act Standards, Limits Use of In Camera Evidence Introduction In United States of America v. Accetturo, Anthony, Taccetta,...
Improper Removal of State Law Bank Merger Case: United Jersey Banks v. Mary Little Parell

Improper Removal of State Law Bank Merger Case: United Jersey Banks v. Mary Little Parell

Date: Feb 15, 1986
Improper Removal of State Law Bank Merger Case: United Jersey Banks v. Mary Little Parell Introduction United Jersey Banks; United Jersey Bank/Southwest et al. v. Mary Little Parell, Commissioner of...
Bartholomew v. Fischl: Establishing Monell Liability for Municipal Retaliation and the Two-Year Statute of Limitations Under WILSON v. GARCIA

Bartholomew v. Fischl: Establishing Monell Liability for Municipal Retaliation and the Two-Year Statute of Limitations Under WILSON v. GARCIA

Date: Feb 8, 1986
Bartholomew v. Fischl: Establishing Monell Liability for Municipal Retaliation and the Two-Year Statute of Limitations Under WILSON v. GARCIA Introduction In the landmark case of Bartholomew v....
Reaffirmation of PHRA Exclusivity in Wrongful Discharge Cases: Murray v. Commercial Union

Reaffirmation of PHRA Exclusivity in Wrongful Discharge Cases: Murray v. Commercial Union

Date: Feb 1, 1986
Reaffirmation of PHRA Exclusivity in Wrongful Discharge Cases: Murray v. Commercial Union Introduction In the case of Harry C. Murray and Jean M. Murray v. Commercial Union Insurance Company,...
Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction under 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2312: United States v. Briggs

Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction under 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2312: United States v. Briggs

Date: Jan 28, 1986
Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction under 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 2312: United States v. Briggs Introduction In The United States v. Shirl F. Kapp, Ronald Klinger, Robert Lewis, Robert Miller and Paul...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert