Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Expanding the Scope of Safety Appliance Acts to Dual-Purpose Rail and Highway Vehicles: Beissel v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Co.

Expanding the Scope of Safety Appliance Acts to Dual-Purpose Rail and Highway Vehicles: Beissel v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Co.

Date: Sep 16, 1986
Expanding the Scope of Safety Appliance Acts to Dual-Purpose Rail and Highway Vehicles: Beissel v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Co. Introduction The case of Donald E. Beissel v. The Pittsburgh and...
Discovery Rule and Statute of Limitations under FELA: Kichline v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Discovery Rule and Statute of Limitations under FELA: Kichline v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Date: Sep 12, 1986
Discovery Rule and Statute of Limitations under FELA: Kichline v. Consolidated Rail Corporation Introduction The case of Dale R. Kichline v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, decided by the United...
Salamone v. United States: Prohibiting Affiliation-Based Juror Exclusions to Safeguard Impartiality

Salamone v. United States: Prohibiting Affiliation-Based Juror Exclusions to Safeguard Impartiality

Date: Sep 10, 1986
Salamone v. United States: Prohibiting Affiliation-Based Juror Exclusions to Safeguard Impartiality Introduction Salvatore Salamone v. United States, 800 F.2d 1216 (3d Cir. 1986), is a landmark case...
Balancing Public Access and Settlement Confidentiality: Insights from Bank of America v. Hotel Rittenhouse Associates

Balancing Public Access and Settlement Confidentiality: Insights from Bank of America v. Hotel Rittenhouse Associates

Date: Sep 9, 1986
Balancing Public Access and Settlement Confidentiality: Insights from Bank of America v. Hotel Rittenhouse Associates Introduction The case of Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association...
ERISA Section 510: No Exhaustion of Internal Remedies Required – Zipf v. AT&T

ERISA Section 510: No Exhaustion of Internal Remedies Required – Zipf v. AT&T

Date: Aug 28, 1986
ERISA Section 510: No Exhaustion of Internal Remedies Required – Zipf v. AT&T Introduction Monica M. Zipf v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Establishing Probable Cause Through Indictment: Insights from UNITED STATES v. FRANK SUPPA

Establishing Probable Cause Through Indictment: Insights from UNITED STATES v. FRANK SUPPA

Date: Aug 28, 1986
Establishing Probable Cause Through Indictment: Insights from UNITED STATES v. FRANK SUPPA Introduction The case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FRANK SUPPA, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Equitable Gas Co. v. Equibank: Broadening Recoverable Claims Under § 506(c) of the Bankruptcy Code

Equitable Gas Co. v. Equibank: Broadening Recoverable Claims Under § 506(c) of the Bankruptcy Code

Date: Aug 27, 1986
Equitable Gas Co. v. Equibank: Broadening Recoverable Claims Under § 506(c) of the Bankruptcy Code Introduction The case of Equitable Gas Co. v. Equibank N.A., Condec Corporation ([799 F.2d...
Limits of the Laches Defense in Retaliation Claims under Title VII

Limits of the Laches Defense in Retaliation Claims under Title VII

Date: Aug 26, 1986
Limits of the Laches Defense in Retaliation Claims under Title VII Introduction The case of Peyton R. Waddell v. Small Tube Products, Inc. (799 F.2d 69) presented before the United States Court of...
Strict Compliance with Service of Process: Insights from Stranahan Gear Co. v. NL Industries, Inc.

Strict Compliance with Service of Process: Insights from Stranahan Gear Co. v. NL Industries, Inc.

Date: Aug 23, 1986
Strict Compliance with Service of Process: Insights from Stranahan Gear Co. v. NL Industries, Inc. Introduction Stranahan Gear Company, Inc. v. NL Industries, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
STONE v. POWELL: Limiting Federal Habeas Corpus Review of Harmless Fourth Amendment Errors

STONE v. POWELL: Limiting Federal Habeas Corpus Review of Harmless Fourth Amendment Errors

Date: Aug 23, 1986
STONE v. POWELL: Limiting Federal Habeas Corpus Review of Harmless Fourth Amendment Errors Introduction Charles Gilmore v. Ronald Marks, Commissioner and the Attorney General of the State of...
Limits on Retroactive Approval for Creditors Committee Counsel in Chapter 11 Proceedings

Limits on Retroactive Approval for Creditors Committee Counsel in Chapter 11 Proceedings

Date: Aug 14, 1986
Limits on Retroactive Approval for Creditors Committee Counsel in Chapter 11 Proceedings Introduction The case of Arkansas Company, Inc. vs. Benenson Scher, P.A., adjudicated by the United States...
Limiting Factors for Pretrial Detention: Analysis of United States v. Harry Himler, Jr.

Limiting Factors for Pretrial Detention: Analysis of United States v. Harry Himler, Jr.

Date: Aug 7, 1986
Limiting Factors for Pretrial Detention: Analysis of United States v. Harry Himler, Jr. Introduction United States of America v. Harry Himler, Jr., 797 F.2d 156 (3d Cir. 1986), presents a critical...
Expanding Copyright Protection to Computer Program Structures

Expanding Copyright Protection to Computer Program Structures

Date: Aug 5, 1986
Expanding Copyright Protection to Computer Program Structures: A Comprehensive Analysis of Whelan Associates, Inc. v. Jaslow Dental Laboratory, Inc. Introduction The case of Whelan Associates, Inc....
Affirmation of Reasonable Religious Accommodation and Limitation on Compensatory Damages Under Title VII: Protos v. Volkswagen

Affirmation of Reasonable Religious Accommodation and Limitation on Compensatory Damages Under Title VII: Protos v. Volkswagen

Date: Jul 30, 1986
Affirmation of Reasonable Religious Accommodation and Limitation on Compensatory Damages Under Title VII: Protos v. Volkswagen Introduction The case of Angeline S. Protos v. Volkswagen of America,...
Administrative Search Exception Validated for Warrantless Alcohol and Drug Testing in Regulated Horse Racing Industry

Administrative Search Exception Validated for Warrantless Alcohol and Drug Testing in Regulated Horse Racing Industry

Date: Jul 11, 1986
Administrative Search Exception Validated for Warrantless Alcohol and Drug Testing in Regulated Horse Racing Industry Introduction In the landmark case of WILLIAM SHOEMAKER et al. v. HAL HANDEL et...
Substantial Evidence and Credibility of Subjective Complaints in Disability Determinations: Dorf v. Bowen

Substantial Evidence and Credibility of Subjective Complaints in Disability Determinations: Dorf v. Bowen

Date: Jul 10, 1986
Substantial Evidence and Credibility of Subjective Complaints in Disability Determinations: Dorf v. Bowen Introduction Dorf v. Bowen is a seminal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Specificity in Civil Rights Pleadings: Third Circuit Reverses Dismissal in District Council 47 Case

Specificity in Civil Rights Pleadings: Third Circuit Reverses Dismissal in District Council 47 Case

Date: Jul 10, 1986
Specificity in Civil Rights Pleadings: Third Circuit Reverses Dismissal in District Council 47 Case Introduction The case of District Council 47, American Federation of State, County and Municipal...
Strict Adherence to Expert Testimony Deadlines Affirmed in Summary Judgment: Koplove v. Ford Motor Company

Strict Adherence to Expert Testimony Deadlines Affirmed in Summary Judgment: Koplove v. Ford Motor Company

Date: Jul 9, 1986
Strict Adherence to Expert Testimony Deadlines Affirmed in Summary Judgment: Koplove v. Ford Motor Company Introduction The case of Lynne Koplove and Jay S. Koplove v. Ford Motor Company, decided by...
Enforceability of a Letter of Intent to Negotiate in Good Faith Under Pennsylvania Law: Channel Home Centers v. Grossman

Enforceability of a Letter of Intent to Negotiate in Good Faith Under Pennsylvania Law: Channel Home Centers v. Grossman

Date: Jul 1, 1986
Enforceability of a Letter of Intent to Negotiate in Good Faith Under Pennsylvania Law: Channel Home Centers v. Grossman Introduction Channel Home Centers, Division of Grace Retail Corporation v....
Establishing Evidentiary Standards in Racial Discrimination Claims: Pollock v. AT&T

Establishing Evidentiary Standards in Racial Discrimination Claims: Pollock v. AT&T

Date: Jul 1, 1986
Establishing Evidentiary Standards in Racial Discrimination Claims: Pollock v. AT&T Introduction Pollock v. AT&T is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert