Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

RLEA v. Pittsburgh Lake Erie RR: Defining the Boundaries of Removal Jurisdiction and Preemption under the RLA and ICA

RLEA v. Pittsburgh Lake Erie RR: Defining the Boundaries of Removal Jurisdiction and Preemption under the RLA and ICA

Date: Oct 15, 1988
RLEA v. Pittsburgh Lake Erie RR: Defining the Boundaries of Removal Jurisdiction and Preemption under the RLA and ICA Introduction Railway Labor Executives Association (RLEA) v. Pittsburgh Lake Erie...
Choice of Law and Issue Preclusion in Negligence Cases: Shuder v. McDonald's Corporation

Choice of Law and Issue Preclusion in Negligence Cases: Shuder v. McDonald's Corporation

Date: Oct 5, 1988
Choice of Law and Issue Preclusion in Negligence Cases: Shuder v. McDonald's Corporation Introduction Shuder v. McDonald's Corporation (859 F.2d 266) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Dawson v. United States: Establishing Remand Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Dawson v. United States: Establishing Remand Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Date: Sep 22, 1988
Dawson v. United States: Establishing Remand Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Introduction In the landmark case United States v. Lonnie Dawson, 857 F.2d 923 (1988), the United States...
Exemption of CERCLA Enforcement Actions from Bankruptcy Automatic Stay: United States v. Nicolet, Inc.

Exemption of CERCLA Enforcement Actions from Bankruptcy Automatic Stay: United States v. Nicolet, Inc.

Date: Sep 17, 1988
Exemption of CERCLA Enforcement Actions from Bankruptcy Automatic Stay: United States v. Nicolet, Inc. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Nicolet, Inc. and Turner and Newall, PLC...
Vincenti v. Union County: Enhanced Considerations in Rule 11 Sanctions

Vincenti v. Union County: Enhanced Considerations in Rule 11 Sanctions

Date: Sep 15, 1988
Vincenti v. Union County: Enhanced Considerations in Rule 11 Sanctions Introduction The case of Vincenti v. Union County Board of Chosen Freeholders et al. (857 F.2d 191) represents a significant...
Landano v. Rafferty: Upholding State Court Credibility Findings in Habeas Corpus Applications

Landano v. Rafferty: Upholding State Court Credibility Findings in Habeas Corpus Applications

Date: Sep 10, 1988
Landano v. Rafferty: Upholding State Court Credibility Findings in Habeas Corpus Applications Introduction The case of Vincent James Landano versus John J. Rafferty, Superintendent of Rahway State...
Ripeness Determination in First Amendment Challenges to State Attorney Advertising Regulations

Ripeness Determination in First Amendment Challenges to State Attorney Advertising Regulations

Date: Sep 1, 1988
Ripeness Determination in First Amendment Challenges to State Attorney Advertising Regulations Introduction The case of Felmeister v. Office of Attorney Ethics presents a significant examination of...
Clarification of Rule 11 Sanctions and Appeal Procedures in Napier v. Appellees

Clarification of Rule 11 Sanctions and Appeal Procedures in Napier v. Appellees

Date: Sep 1, 1988
Clarification of Rule 11 Sanctions and Appeal Procedures in Napier v. Appellees Introduction Napier v. Appellees is a significant appellate decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Third Circuit Establishes Limits on Opt-In Class Actions under ADEA in LUSARDI v. XEROX CORP.

Third Circuit Establishes Limits on Opt-In Class Actions under ADEA in LUSARDI v. XEROX CORP.

Date: Sep 1, 1988
Third Circuit Establishes Limits on Opt-In Class Actions under ADEA in LUSARDI v. XEROX CORP. Introduction In LUSARDI v. XEROX CORP., the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit...
Validating Waivers and Amending Complaints under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Insights from Coventry v. United States Steel Corporation

Validating Waivers and Amending Complaints under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Insights from Coventry v. United States Steel Corporation

Date: Aug 27, 1988
Validating Waivers and Amending Complaints under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Insights from Coventry v. United States Steel Corporation Introduction Coventry v. United States Steel...
Affirmation of Probable Cause in Civil Rights Actions: Dowling v. City of Philadelphia

Affirmation of Probable Cause in Civil Rights Actions: Dowling v. City of Philadelphia

Date: Aug 27, 1988
Affirmation of Probable Cause in Civil Rights Actions: Dowling v. City of Philadelphia Introduction The case of Patricia Dowling v. City of Philadelphia et al. (855 F.2d 136) presents a critical...
NANAVATI v. BURDETTE TOMLIN MEMORIAL HOSPital: Defamation, Pendent Jurisdiction, and Antitrust Implications in Medical Workplace Conflicts

NANAVATI v. BURDETTE TOMLIN MEMORIAL HOSPital: Defamation, Pendent Jurisdiction, and Antitrust Implications in Medical Workplace Conflicts

Date: Aug 25, 1988
NANAVATI v. BURDETTE TOMLIN MEMORIAL HOSPital: Defamation, Pendent Jurisdiction, and Antitrust Implications in Medical Workplace Conflicts Introduction NANAVATI v. BURDETTE TOMLIN MEMORIAL HOSPital...
Peterkin v. Jeffes: Upholding Eighth Amendment Confinement Standards and Enhancing Legal Access for Death Row Prisoners

Peterkin v. Jeffes: Upholding Eighth Amendment Confinement Standards and Enhancing Legal Access for Death Row Prisoners

Date: Aug 24, 1988
Peterkin v. Jeffes: Upholding Eighth Amendment Confinement Standards and Enhancing Legal Access for Death Row Prisoners Introduction Peterkin, Otis H. et al. v. Jeffes, Glenn et al. is a seminal case...
Freedman v. City of Allentown: Establishing Standards for §1983 Claims in Jailhouse Suicides

Freedman v. City of Allentown: Establishing Standards for §1983 Claims in Jailhouse Suicides

Date: Aug 11, 1988
Freedman v. City of Allentown: Establishing Standards for §1983 Claims in Jailhouse Suicides Introduction Freedman v. City of Allentown is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Enforceability of Mutual Releases in Franchise Agreements: Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie

Enforceability of Mutual Releases in Franchise Agreements: Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie

Date: Jul 29, 1988
Enforceability of Mutual Releases in Franchise Agreements: Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie Introduction The case of Erie Telecommunications, Inc., Appellant, v. City of Erie,...
Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16: Reinforcing the "Meaningful Benefit" Standard in Free Appropriate Public Education

Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16: Reinforcing the "Meaningful Benefit" Standard in Free Appropriate Public Education

Date: Jul 27, 1988
Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16: Reinforcing the "Meaningful Benefit" Standard in Free Appropriate Public Education Introduction Polk v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16 is a...
Jury Supremacy and Collateral Estoppel in Racial Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Roebuck v. Drexel University

Jury Supremacy and Collateral Estoppel in Racial Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Roebuck v. Drexel University

Date: Jul 27, 1988
Jury Supremacy and Collateral Estoppel in Racial Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Roebuck v. Drexel University Introduction In the seminal case of Roebuck v. Drexel University, decided by the...
Strict Jurisdictional Timelines in Rule 59(e) Motions for Pro Se Prisoners: Smith v. Evans

Strict Jurisdictional Timelines in Rule 59(e) Motions for Pro Se Prisoners: Smith v. Evans

Date: Jul 22, 1988
Strict Jurisdictional Timelines in Rule 59(e) Motions for Pro Se Prisoners: Smith v. Evans Introduction Case: Meral Smith, Appellant, v. Melvin H. Evans, et al., Appellees. Court: United States Court...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Martin v. Merrell Dow: Establishing the Critical Period Doctrine in Teratology Cases

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Martin v. Merrell Dow: Establishing the Critical Period Doctrine in Teratology Cases

Date: Jul 21, 1988
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Martin v. Merrell Dow: Establishing the Critical Period Doctrine in Teratology Cases Introduction Martin v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a pivotal case in...
Lifting the Automatic Stay in Government Defense Contracts: West Electronics Inc. v. USAF

Lifting the Automatic Stay in Government Defense Contracts: West Electronics Inc. v. USAF

Date: Jul 20, 1988
Lifting the Automatic Stay in Government Defense Contracts: West Electronics Inc. v. USAF Introduction West Electronics Inc. v. United States Air Force (852 F.2d 79) is a pivotal case decided by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert