Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Enhancing Deference to Foreign Plaintiff’s Choice of Forum in Forum Non Conveniens Cases

Enhancing Deference to Foreign Plaintiff’s Choice of Forum in Forum Non Conveniens Cases

Date: Oct 3, 1989
Enhancing Deference to Foreign Plaintiff’s Choice of Forum in Forum Non Conveniens Cases Introduction In the case of Adolf Lony, Appellant, v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours Company, adjudicated by the...
Third Circuit Establishes Criteria for Partial In Forma Pauperis Status in Transcript Funding Requests

Third Circuit Establishes Criteria for Partial In Forma Pauperis Status in Transcript Funding Requests

Date: Sep 28, 1989
Third Circuit Establishes Criteria for Partial In Forma Pauperis Status in Transcript Funding Requests Introduction In the landmark case Russell F. Walker v. People Express Airlines, Inc., the United...
Expanded Standing Under RICO: Shearin v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.

Expanded Standing Under RICO: Shearin v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.

Date: Sep 21, 1989
Expanded Standing Under RICO: Shearin v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc. Introduction The case of K. Kay Shearin v. The E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Sufficient Evidence Standards in Child Pornography Cases: Analysis of United States v. Villard

Sufficient Evidence Standards in Child Pornography Cases: Analysis of United States v. Villard

Date: Sep 20, 1989
Sufficient Evidence Standards in Child Pornography Cases: Analysis of United States v. Villard Introduction The case of United States of America v. Robert David Villard, reported at 885 F.2d 117,...
Enforcement of Pre-Petition Arbitration Agreements by Bankruptcy Trustees: Hays v. Merrill Lynch

Enforcement of Pre-Petition Arbitration Agreements by Bankruptcy Trustees: Hays v. Merrill Lynch

Date: Sep 16, 1989
Enforcement of Pre-Petition Arbitration Agreements by Bankruptcy Trustees: Hays v. Merrill Lynch Introduction The case of Hays and Company, as Trustee for Monge Oil Corporation v. Merrill Lynch,...
Application of Younger Abstention Doctrine in Confession of Judgment Procedures

Application of Younger Abstention Doctrine in Confession of Judgment Procedures

Date: Sep 16, 1989
Application of Younger Abstention Doctrine in Confession of Judgment Procedures Introduction In the case of Theresa Schall v. John P. Joyce et al., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Eighth Amendment and § 1983 Liability for Prison Officials: Insights from Sample v. Diecks et al.

Eighth Amendment and § 1983 Liability for Prison Officials: Insights from Sample v. Diecks et al.

Date: Sep 13, 1989
Eighth Amendment and § 1983 Liability for Prison Officials: Insights from Sample v. Diecks et al. Introduction Joseph B. Sample v. Ernest E. Diecks, et al. is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in Educational Institutions: STONEKING v. BRADFORD AREA SCHOOL DISTrict

Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in Educational Institutions: STONEKING v. BRADFORD AREA SCHOOL DISTrict

Date: Sep 13, 1989
Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in Educational Institutions: STONEKING v. BRADFORD AREA SCHOOL DISTrict Introduction STONEKING v. BRADFORD AREA SCHOOL DISTrict, 882 F.2d 720 (3d Cir....
Expanding Boundaries of Legislative Immunity: Insights from Lunderstadt v. Colafella

Expanding Boundaries of Legislative Immunity: Insights from Lunderstadt v. Colafella

Date: Sep 12, 1989
Expanding Boundaries of Legislative Immunity: Insights from Lunderstadt v. Colafella Introduction Lunderstadt, Scott, and Bernardo v. Colafella et al. is a pivotal judicial decision from the United...
Restricting Frivolous Litigation: Analysis of Ceritano v. Packer Avenue Associates

Restricting Frivolous Litigation: Analysis of Ceritano v. Packer Avenue Associates

Date: Sep 9, 1989
Restricting Frivolous Litigation: Analysis of Ceritano v. Packer Avenue Associates Introduction The case of Ceritano v. Packer Avenue Associates addresses the critical balance between a litigant's...
Bailey v. Sullivan: Affirming the Consideration of Combined Nonsevere Impairments in Disability Determinations

Bailey v. Sullivan: Affirming the Consideration of Combined Nonsevere Impairments in Disability Determinations

Date: Sep 7, 1989
Bailey v. Sullivan: Affirming the Consideration of Combined Nonsevere Impairments in Disability Determinations Introduction In Bailey v. Sullivan, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Limits on District Court's Discretion in Reducing Attorneys' Fees in ERISA Cases: Bell v. United Princeton Properties

Limits on District Court's Discretion in Reducing Attorneys' Fees in ERISA Cases: Bell v. United Princeton Properties

Date: Sep 6, 1989
Limits on District Court's Discretion in Reducing Attorneys' Fees in ERISA Cases: Bell v. United Princeton Properties Introduction In the landmark case of Joyce C. Bell v. United Princeton...
Ensuring Fair Medicaid Reimbursement: Insights from West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Officials

Ensuring Fair Medicaid Reimbursement: Insights from West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Officials

Date: Sep 6, 1989
Ensuring Fair Medicaid Reimbursement: Insights from West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Officials Introduction The case of West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Robert...
Consent and Waiver Standards Affirmed, Conspiracy Conviction Reversed in Velasquez Case

Consent and Waiver Standards Affirmed, Conspiracy Conviction Reversed in Velasquez Case

Date: Sep 2, 1989
Consent and Waiver Standards Affirmed, Conspiracy Conviction Reversed in Velasquez Case Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Francisca Rosa Velasquez, the United States Court...
Establishing Admissibility of Party-Opponent Statements in Federal Civil Rights Cases

Establishing Admissibility of Party-Opponent Statements in Federal Civil Rights Cases

Date: Sep 1, 1989
Establishing Admissibility of Party-Opponent Statements in Federal Civil Rights Cases Introduction The case of John Savarese and Edward Flaxman v. William Agriss et al. et al., adjudicated by the...
Third Circuit Establishes Limits on Procedural and Substantive Due Process in Contractual Disputes

Third Circuit Establishes Limits on Procedural and Substantive Due Process in Contractual Disputes

Date: Aug 25, 1989
Third Circuit Establishes Limits on Procedural and Substantive Due Process in Contractual Disputes Introduction In the landmark case of Samuel J. Reich v. Patricia Beharry, an Individual and the...
Reaffirming the Necessity of Irreparable Harm and Bond Requirements for Preliminary Injunctions in Contract Disputes

Reaffirming the Necessity of Irreparable Harm and Bond Requirements for Preliminary Injunctions in Contract Disputes

Date: Aug 18, 1989
Reaffirming the Necessity of Irreparable Harm and Bond Requirements for Preliminary Injunctions in Contract Disputes Introduction The case Instant Air Freight Co., a Corporation of the State of New...
Preliminary Injunctive Relief in Arbitrable Disputes under the Federal Arbitration Act

Preliminary Injunctive Relief in Arbitrable Disputes under the Federal Arbitration Act

Date: Aug 18, 1989
Preliminary Injunctive Relief in Arbitrable Disputes under the Federal Arbitration Act Introduction The case Orthopharmaceutical Corporation v. Amgen, Inc. addresses a pivotal issue in the interplay...
Statute of Limitations for Title IX Claims: Bougher v. University of Pittsburgh

Statute of Limitations for Title IX Claims: Bougher v. University of Pittsburgh

Date: Aug 16, 1989
Statute of Limitations for Title IX Claims in Educational Discrimination: Bougher v. University of Pittsburgh Introduction Bougher v. University of Pittsburgh, 882 F.2d 74 (3rd Cir. 1989), is a...
Scienter Requirement Affirmed and Expanded in Securities Fraud and RICO Claims: Insights from In re Phillips Petroleum Securities Litigation

Scienter Requirement Affirmed and Expanded in Securities Fraud and RICO Claims: Insights from In re Phillips Petroleum Securities Litigation

Date: Aug 10, 1989
Scienter Requirement Affirmed and Expanded in Securities Fraud and RICO Claims: Insights from In re Phillips Petroleum Securities Litigation Introduction In re Phillips Petroleum Securities...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert