Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Trademark Protection of Telephone Number Mnemonics: INJURY-1 Case Commentary

Trademark Protection of Telephone Number Mnemonics: INJURY-1 Case Commentary

Date: Jun 18, 1992
Trademark Protection of Telephone Number Mnemonics: INJURY-1 Case Commentary Introduction The case of Dranoff-Perlstein Associates v. Harris J. Sklar (967 F.2d 852) adjudicated by the United States...
Extension of Statute of Limitations Under the Age Discrimination Claims Assistance Act: Harter v. GAF Corporation

Extension of Statute of Limitations Under the Age Discrimination Claims Assistance Act: Harter v. GAF Corporation

Date: Jun 17, 1992
Extension of Statute of Limitations Under the Age Discrimination Claims Assistance Act: Harter v. GAF Corporation Introduction Harter v. GAF Corporation, 967 F.2d 846 (3d Cir. 1992), is a pivotal...
Enforcement of Subpoenas in Labor Practice Proceedings: NLRB v. Frazier

Enforcement of Subpoenas in Labor Practice Proceedings: NLRB v. Frazier

Date: Jun 16, 1992
Enforcement of Subpoenas in Labor Practice Proceedings: NLRB v. Frazier Introduction The case National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) v. Gary Frazier, decided on June 15, 1992, by the United States...
Third-Party Standing and Judicial Admissions in Disability Benefit Disputes: Insights from Langer v. Monarch Life Insurance Co.

Third-Party Standing and Judicial Admissions in Disability Benefit Disputes: Insights from Langer v. Monarch Life Insurance Co.

Date: Jun 12, 1992
Third-Party Standing and Judicial Admissions in Disability Benefit Disputes: Insights from Langer v. Monarch Life Insurance Co. Introduction The case of TERRY LANGER, M.D. AND JOAN LANGER v. MONARCH...
Judicial Discretion and Magistrate Authority: Insights from Mindek v. Rigatti

Judicial Discretion and Magistrate Authority: Insights from Mindek v. Rigatti

Date: May 30, 1992
Judicial Discretion and Magistrate Authority: Insights from Mindek v. Rigatti Introduction Mindek v. Rigatti is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on...
Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Multi-Unit Dwellings: United States v. Acosta et al.

Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Multi-Unit Dwellings: United States v. Acosta et al.

Date: May 28, 1992
Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Multi-Unit Dwellings: United States v. Acosta et al. Introduction In United States v. Acosta et al., decided on May 27, 1992, the United States Court of...
Shapiro v. UJB Financial Corp.: Clarifying Particularity Standards for Securities Fraud Claims

Shapiro v. UJB Financial Corp.: Clarifying Particularity Standards for Securities Fraud Claims

Date: May 21, 1992
Shapiro v. UJB Financial Corp.: Clarifying Particularity Standards for Securities Fraud Claims Introduction In the landmark case Shapiro v. UJB Financial Corp., adjudicated by the United States Court...
Expanding CERCLA Liability: No Quantitative Threshold and Flexible Causation in United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.

Expanding CERCLA Liability: No Quantitative Threshold and Flexible Causation in United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.

Date: May 15, 1992
Expanding CERCLA Liability: No Quantitative Threshold and Flexible Causation in United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Alcan Aluminum Corp. serves...
Clarifying Affirmative Act Requirements in Tax Evasion Cases: United States v. McGill

Clarifying Affirmative Act Requirements in Tax Evasion Cases: United States v. McGill

Date: May 14, 1992
Clarifying Affirmative Act Requirements in Tax Evasion Cases: United States v. McGill Introduction United States of America v. Thomas L. McGill, Jr., 964 F.2d 222 (3d Cir. 1992), is a significant...
Recognizing the Public Policy Exception to Employment-at-Will: Borse v. Piece Goods Shop, Inc.

Recognizing the Public Policy Exception to Employment-at-Will: Borse v. Piece Goods Shop, Inc.

Date: May 14, 1992
Recognizing the Public Policy Exception to Employment-at-Will: Borse v. Piece Goods Shop, Inc. Introduction In the case of Sarah Borse v. Piece Goods Shop, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals...
Reevaluation of Hearsay Exceptions and RICO Applications in Pelullo v. United States

Reevaluation of Hearsay Exceptions and RICO Applications in Pelullo v. United States

Date: May 13, 1992
Reevaluation of Hearsay Exceptions and RICO Applications in Pelullo v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Leonard A. Pelullo, 964 F.2d 193 (3d Cir. 1992), presents a significant...
Indemnification Limits Under Contractual Agreements: Conrail v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Indemnification Limits Under Contractual Agreements: Conrail v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Date: May 13, 1992
Indemnification Limits Under Contractual Agreements: Conrail v. Consolidated Rail Corp. Introduction The case of Susan E. Clement, Administratrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Thomas Allen...
Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in United States v. Herrold

Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in United States v. Herrold

Date: May 7, 1992
Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in United States v. Herrold Introduction United States v. Gene Allen Herrold, 962 F.2d 1131 (3rd Cir. 1992), is a pivotal case that explores the boundaries of the...
Void for Vagueness Doctrine Upheld in San Filippo v. Rutgers University

Void for Vagueness Doctrine Upheld in San Filippo v. Rutgers University

Date: Apr 23, 1992
Void for Vagueness Doctrine Upheld in San Filippo v. Rutgers University Introduction San Filippo v. Rutgers University is a landmark case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Defining the Boundaries of Judicial Immunity in Section 1983 Litigation: A Comprehensive Review of McArdle v. Tronetti and Reilly

Defining the Boundaries of Judicial Immunity in Section 1983 Litigation: A Comprehensive Review of McArdle v. Tronetti and Reilly

Date: Apr 18, 1992
Defining the Boundaries of Judicial Immunity in Section 1983 Litigation: A Comprehensive Review of McArdle v. Tronetti and Reilly Introduction McArdle v. Tronetti and Reilly, 961 F.2d 1083 (3d Cir....
Third Circuit Affirms Strict Application of Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Election Ballot Access Challenge

Third Circuit Affirms Strict Application of Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Election Ballot Access Challenge

Date: Apr 15, 1992
Third Circuit Affirms Strict Application of Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Election Ballot Access Challenge Introduction In the landmark case of Philip F. Valenti et al. v. Brenda K. Mitchell et al.,...
Ripeness Doctrine Reinforced: Armstrong World Industries v. Adams and the Constitutionality of Pennsylvania's Anti-Takeover Act

Ripeness Doctrine Reinforced: Armstrong World Industries v. Adams and the Constitutionality of Pennsylvania's Anti-Takeover Act

Date: Apr 11, 1992
Ripeness Doctrine Reinforced: Armstrong World Industries v. Adams and the Constitutionality of Pennsylvania's Anti-Takeover Act Introduction The legal landscape of corporate governance and...
Establishing Specific Personal Jurisdiction Through Business Interactions: Mellon Bank (East) PSFS v. Farino et al.

Establishing Specific Personal Jurisdiction Through Business Interactions: Mellon Bank (East) PSFS v. Farino et al.

Date: Apr 8, 1992
Establishing Specific Personal Jurisdiction Through Business Interactions: Mellon Bank (East) PSFS v. Farino et al. Introduction The case of Mellon Bank (East) PSFS, National Association v. Kenneth...
Deliberate Indifference in Eighth Amendment Prison Claims: Young v. Defendants

Deliberate Indifference in Eighth Amendment Prison Claims: Young v. Defendants

Date: Apr 2, 1992
Deliberate Indifference in Eighth Amendment Prison Claims: Young v. Defendants Introduction Young v. Defendants is a landmark appellate decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Clarification of ERISA's 'Actual Knowledge' and 'Partial Termination' Standards in Unisys Corporation Pension Plan Litigation

Clarification of ERISA's 'Actual Knowledge' and 'Partial Termination' Standards in Unisys Corporation Pension Plan Litigation

Date: Apr 1, 1992
Clarification of ERISA's 'Actual Knowledge' and 'Partial Termination' Standards in Unisys Corporation Pension Plan Litigation Introduction The case of Simon E. Gluck et al. v. Unisys Corporation et...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert