Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Functus Officio Doctrine Enforced: Limitations on Arbitration Panels in Reexamining Final Awards

Functus Officio Doctrine Enforced: Limitations on Arbitration Panels in Reexamining Final Awards

Date: Sep 6, 1991
Functus Officio Doctrine Enforced: Limitations on Arbitration Panels in Reexamining Final Awards Introduction The case of Colonial Penn Insurance Company v. The Omaha Indemnity Company addresses...
Reaffirmation of the Distinct Enterprise Requirement in RICO §1962(c): Brittingham v. Mobil Corporation

Reaffirmation of the Distinct Enterprise Requirement in RICO §1962(c): Brittingham v. Mobil Corporation

Date: Aug 24, 1991
Reaffirmation of the Distinct Enterprise Requirement in RICO §1962(c): Brittingham v. Mobil Corporation Introduction The case R.R. Brittingham, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly...
Exclusion of Jurors Based on Mere Acquaintance Violates Jury Selection Act

Exclusion of Jurors Based on Mere Acquaintance Violates Jury Selection Act

Date: Aug 22, 1991
Exclusion of Jurors Based on Mere Acquaintance Violates Jury Selection Act Introduction United States of America v. Merchie C. Calabrese, Jr. et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Jurisdictional Authority of Bankruptcy Courts in Conflicting Orders: Insights from In Re Marcus Hook Development Park, Inc.

Jurisdictional Authority of Bankruptcy Courts in Conflicting Orders: Insights from In Re Marcus Hook Development Park, Inc.

Date: Aug 20, 1991
Jurisdictional Authority of Bankruptcy Courts in Conflicting Orders: Insights from In Re Marcus Hook Development Park, Inc. Introduction The case of In Re Marcus Hook Development Park, Inc. delves...
Third Circuit Affirms No Speedy Trial Violation When Counsel Waives Right Without Defendant's Consent

Third Circuit Affirms No Speedy Trial Violation When Counsel Waives Right Without Defendant's Consent

Date: Aug 17, 1991
Third Circuit Affirms No Speedy Trial Violation When Counsel Waives Right Without Defendant's Consent Introduction The appellate case of Richard K. Wells v. George Petsock, adjudicated by the United...
Excusing State Remedy Exhaustion Due to Inordinate Delay: Hankins v. Fulcomer

Excusing State Remedy Exhaustion Due to Inordinate Delay: Hankins v. Fulcomer

Date: Aug 14, 1991
Excusing State Remedy Exhaustion Due to Inordinate Delay: Hankins v. Fulcomer Introduction Hankins v. Fulcomer, 941 F.2d 246 (3d Cir. 1991), is a pivotal case in the realm of federal habeas corpus...
Clarifying "Sudden and Accidental" in Pollution Exclusions: Northern Insurance Co. of New York v. Aardvark Associates

Clarifying "Sudden and Accidental" in Pollution Exclusions: Northern Insurance Co. of New York v. Aardvark Associates

Date: Aug 9, 1991
Clarifying "Sudden and Accidental" in Pollution Exclusions: Northern Insurance Co. of New York v. Aardvark Associates Introduction The case Northern Insurance Company of New York v. Aardvark...
Non-Exemption of Inside Salespersons Under FLSA's Administrative Exemption: Cooper Electric Supply Co. v. Martin

Non-Exemption of Inside Salespersons Under FLSA's Administrative Exemption: Cooper Electric Supply Co. v. Martin

Date: Aug 9, 1991
Non-Exemption of Inside Salespersons Under FLSA's Administrative Exemption: Cooper Electric Supply Co. v. Martin Introduction In the landmark case Cooper Electric Supply Co., Inc. v. Martin, the...
Bona Fide Purchaser Standards in Forfeiture: United States v. Lavin WMOT Enterprises

Bona Fide Purchaser Standards in Forfeiture: United States v. Lavin WMOT Enterprises

Date: Aug 7, 1991
Bona Fide Purchaser Standards in Forfeiture: United States v. Lavin WMOT Enterprises Introduction United States of America v. Lawrence W. Lavin WMOT Enterprises, Inc. (942 F.2d 177) is a seminal case...
Limits on Federal Courts’ Collateral Review of State Forfeiture Judgments: An Analysis of In re Norma Y. James

Limits on Federal Courts’ Collateral Review of State Forfeiture Judgments: An Analysis of In re Norma Y. James

Date: Aug 2, 1991
Limits on Federal Courts’ Collateral Review of State Forfeiture Judgments: An Analysis of In re Norma Y. James Introduction In re Norma Y. James is a seminal case adjudicated by the United States...
Affirmation of Werme's Conspiracy Conviction under the Travel Act and the Harmlessness of Guilty Plea Evidence

Affirmation of Werme's Conspiracy Conviction under the Travel Act and the Harmlessness of Guilty Plea Evidence

Date: Jul 31, 1991
Affirmation of Werme's Conspiracy Conviction under the Travel Act and the Harmlessness of Guilty Plea Evidence Introduction United States of America v. Russell A. Werme is a landmark appellate...
Third Circuit Affirms Invalidity of Medicaid Payment Rates Due to Failure to Make Required Findings Under Title XIX

Third Circuit Affirms Invalidity of Medicaid Payment Rates Due to Failure to Make Required Findings Under Title XIX

Date: Jul 31, 1991
Third Circuit Affirms Invalidity of Medicaid Payment Rates Due to Failure to Make Required Findings Under Title XIX Introduction In the landmark case of Temple University v. White, the United States...
Enforcement of Box-Top License Disclaimers Under UCC §2-207: Step-Saver v. Wyse Technology

Enforcement of Box-Top License Disclaimers Under UCC §2-207: Step-Saver v. Wyse Technology

Date: Jul 30, 1991
Enforcement of Box-Top License Disclaimers Under UCC §2-207: Step-Saver v. Wyse Technology Introduction In Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology and The Software Link, Inc., the United...
Possession and Use Under Supervised Release: United States v. Blackston

Possession and Use Under Supervised Release: United States v. Blackston

Date: Jul 30, 1991
Possession and Use Under Supervised Release: United States v. Blackston Introduction United States of America v. Theophilus Blackston, 940 F.2d 877 (3rd Cir. 1991), revolves around the revocation of...
Establishing Federal Jurisdiction in Nuclear Liability: In re TMI Litigation Cases Consolidated II

Establishing Federal Jurisdiction in Nuclear Liability: In re TMI Litigation Cases Consolidated II

Date: Jul 27, 1991
Establishing Federal Jurisdiction in Nuclear Liability: In re TMI Litigation Cases Consolidated II Introduction The case of In re TMI Litigation Cases Consolidated II, decided by the United States...
Affirmation of Directed Verdict in ADEA Age Discrimination Case

Affirmation of Directed Verdict in ADEA Age Discrimination Case

Date: Jul 26, 1991
Affirmation of Directed Verdict in ADEA Age Discrimination Case: Establishing Pretext Standards Introduction The case of Lewis H. Billet, Jr. v. Cigna Corporation and Connecticut General Life...
Bennun v. Rutgers State University: Affirmation on Title VII but Reversal on §1981 Claims

Bennun v. Rutgers State University: Affirmation on Title VII but Reversal on §1981 Claims

Date: Jul 26, 1991
Bennun v. Rutgers State University: Affirmation on Title VII but Reversal on §1981 Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Bennun v. Rutgers State University, the United States Court of Appeals...
Obstruction and False Statements in Defense Contract Fraud: Analysis of United States v. Leo and Badolato

Obstruction and False Statements in Defense Contract Fraud: Analysis of United States v. Leo and Badolato

Date: Jul 26, 1991
Obstruction and False Statements in Defense Contract Fraud: Analysis of United States v. Leo and Badolato Introduction In United States of America v. Gerald A. Leo, A/K/A "Bud," and James Badolato...
Clarifying Procedural Due Process in Involuntary Military Separations: Karr v. Castle

Clarifying Procedural Due Process in Involuntary Military Separations: Karr v. Castle

Date: Jul 20, 1991
Clarifying Procedural Due Process in Involuntary Military Separations: Karr v. Castle Introduction Jon T. Karr v. The Honorable Michael N. Castle is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Public Duty Doctrine Reinforced: WAPA Not Liable for Negligent Street Lighting in Turbe Case

Public Duty Doctrine Reinforced: WAPA Not Liable for Negligent Street Lighting in Turbe Case

Date: Jul 12, 1991
Public Duty Doctrine Reinforced: WAPA Not Liable for Negligent Street Lighting in Turbe Case Introduction In the case of Roger Turbe v. Government of the Virgin Islands, Virgin Islands Water and...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert