Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Admiralty Jurisdiction Clarified in Berkshire Fashions v. Hakusan II

Admiralty Jurisdiction Clarified in Berkshire Fashions v. Hakusan II

Date: Jan 24, 1992
Admiralty Jurisdiction Clarified in Berkshire Fashions v. Hakusan II Introduction The case Berkshire Fashions, Inc. v. The M.V. Hakusan II addresses critical questions regarding the scope of federal...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Lanham Act False Advertising Claim: Ditri v. Coldwell Banker

Affirmation of Dismissal in Lanham Act False Advertising Claim: Ditri v. Coldwell Banker

Date: Jan 23, 1992
Affirmation of Dismissal in Lanham Act False Advertising Claim: Ditri v. Coldwell Banker Introduction The case of Louis Ditri and Marie K. Ostenrieder v. Coldwell Banker Residential Affiliates, Inc....
Fraudulent Inducement and Employment Contracts in Bankruptcy Proceedings: In Re Allegheny International, Inc. v. J. Daniel Snyder

Fraudulent Inducement and Employment Contracts in Bankruptcy Proceedings: In Re Allegheny International, Inc. v. J. Daniel Snyder

Date: Jan 22, 1992
Fraudulent Inducement and Employment Contracts in Bankruptcy Proceedings In Re Allegheny International, Inc. et al. v. J. Daniel Snyder Citation: 954 F.2d 167 (3d Cir. 1992) Court: United States...
Flanagan v. Shively: Reinforcing the Standards for Bivens Actions and Qualified Immunity

Flanagan v. Shively: Reinforcing the Standards for Bivens Actions and Qualified Immunity

Date: Jan 17, 1992
Flanagan v. Shively: Reinforcing the Standards for Bivens Actions and Qualified Immunity Introduction In the landmark case of John W. Flanagan v. William C. Shively, et al. (783 F. Supp. 922, United...
Carteret Savings Bank v. Shushan: Expanding Personal Jurisdiction in Legal Malpractice Cases

Carteret Savings Bank v. Shushan: Expanding Personal Jurisdiction in Legal Malpractice Cases

Date: Jan 14, 1992
Carteret Savings Bank v. Shushan: Expanding Personal Jurisdiction in Legal Malpractice Cases Introduction The case of Carteret Savings Bank, FA v. Shushan et al. (954 F.2d 141) adjudicated by the...
Procedural Default and Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Caswell v. Ryan

Procedural Default and Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Caswell v. Ryan

Date: Jan 14, 1992
Procedural Default and Exhaustion of State Remedies in Federal Habeas Corpus: Caswell v. Ryan Introduction William Caswell, a state prisoner in Pennsylvania, sought relief through a federal habeas...
SEPTA v. Bolden: Eleventh Amendment Immunity Denied and Unconstitutional Drug Testing

SEPTA v. Bolden: Eleventh Amendment Immunity Denied and Unconstitutional Drug Testing

Date: Jan 1, 1992
SEPTA v. Bolden: Eleventh Amendment Immunity Denied and Unconstitutional Drug Testing Introduction The case of Russell Bolden vs. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) presents...
Ford Motor Co. v. Tunis Brothers Company: A Landmark in Antitrust and Fraud Litigation

Ford Motor Co. v. Tunis Brothers Company: A Landmark in Antitrust and Fraud Litigation

Date: Dec 28, 1991
Ford Motor Co. v. Tunis Brothers Company: A Landmark in Antitrust and Fraud Litigation Introduction The case of Tunis Brothers Company, Inc.; Richard N. de la Rigaudiere; and David C. Smith v. Ford...
Defining RICO Requirements: Insights from Glessner v. Kenny et al. – Third Circuit Analysis

Defining RICO Requirements: Insights from Glessner v. Kenny et al. – Third Circuit Analysis

Date: Dec 24, 1991
Defining RICO Requirements: Insights from Glessner v. Kenny et al. – Third Circuit Analysis <section id="introduction"> Introduction In the landmark case Glessner v. Kenny et al., the United States...
Broad Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in Insurance Coverage Disputes: Nationwide Insurance Co. v. Marcie Patterson

Broad Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in Insurance Coverage Disputes: Nationwide Insurance Co. v. Marcie Patterson

Date: Dec 24, 1991
Broad Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in Insurance Coverage Disputes: Nationwide Insurance Co. v. Marcie Patterson Introduction The case Nationwide Insurance Company of Columbus, Ohio v. Marcie...
Effective Service of Process and Automatic Stay: Lampe v. Xouth, Inc.

Effective Service of Process and Automatic Stay: Lampe v. Xouth, Inc.

Date: Dec 21, 1991
Effective Service of Process and Automatic Stay: Lampe v. Xouth, Inc. Introduction Lampe v. Xouth, Inc. is a significant appellate decision rendered by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Reaffirmation of the Parol Evidence Rule and Limitations on Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claims under Pennsylvania Law: Mellon Bank v. First Union

Reaffirmation of the Parol Evidence Rule and Limitations on Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claims under Pennsylvania Law: Mellon Bank v. First Union

Date: Dec 20, 1991
Reaffirmation of the Parol Evidence Rule and Limitations on Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claims under Pennsylvania Law: Mellon Bank v. First Union 1. Introduction Mellon Bank Corporation and Mellon...
Complete Waiver of Privileges upon Government Disclosure: Westinghouse v. Republic of the Philippines

Complete Waiver of Privileges upon Government Disclosure: Westinghouse v. Republic of the Philippines

Date: Dec 20, 1991
Complete Waiver of Privileges upon Government Disclosure: Westinghouse v. Republic of the Philippines Introduction Westinghouse Electric Corporation and Westinghouse International Projects Company...
Affirming Issue Preclusion in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy: In re Rosemary Brown

Affirming Issue Preclusion in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy: In re Rosemary Brown

Date: Dec 17, 1991
Affirming Issue Preclusion in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy: In re Rosemary Brown Introduction The case of First Jersey National Bank v. Rosemary Brown, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Social Security Disability Decision in Jones v. Sullivan Establishes Substantial Evidence Standard

Affirmation of Social Security Disability Decision in Jones v. Sullivan Establishes Substantial Evidence Standard

Date: Dec 17, 1991
Affirmation of Social Security Disability Decision in Jones v. Sullivan Establishes Substantial Evidence Standard Introduction James H. Jones v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human...
Bohus v. Beloff: Expanding the Discovery Rule and Fraudulent Concealment in Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations

Bohus v. Beloff: Expanding the Discovery Rule and Fraudulent Concealment in Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations

Date: Dec 14, 1991
Bohus v. Beloff: Expanding the Discovery Rule and Fraudulent Concealment in Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations Introduction Bohus v. Beloff is a significant medical malpractice case...
Clarifying the Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements and Business Records in Immunity Testimonies: United States v. Casoni

Clarifying the Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements and Business Records in Immunity Testimonies: United States v. Casoni

Date: Dec 13, 1991
Clarifying the Admissibility of Prior Consistent Statements and Business Records in Immunity Testimonies: United States v. Casoni Introduction United States of America v. Harry P. Casoni is a notable...
Reaffirming Employer's Management Authority in ERISA Plans: Nazay v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

Reaffirming Employer's Management Authority in ERISA Plans: Nazay v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

Date: Dec 7, 1991
Reaffirming Employer's Management Authority in ERISA Plans: Nazay v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. Introduction In the landmark case of Richard Nazay, Sr. v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, the United States...
Determining Prevailing Party Status for Attorneys' Fees under EHA: Analysis of Wheeler v. Towanda Area School District

Determining Prevailing Party Status for Attorneys' Fees under EHA: Analysis of Wheeler v. Towanda Area School District

Date: Dec 6, 1991
Determining Prevailing Party Status for Attorneys' Fees under the Education of the Handicapped Act: Analysis of Wheeler v. Towanda Area School District Introduction Wheeler v. Towanda Area School...
Disqualification of Bankruptcy Trustee Due to Conflict of Interest in Joint Bankruptcy Proceedings: In Re BH P Inc., 949 F.2d 1300 (3d Cir. 1991)

Disqualification of Bankruptcy Trustee Due to Conflict of Interest in Joint Bankruptcy Proceedings: In Re BH P Inc., 949 F.2d 1300 (3d Cir. 1991)

Date: Dec 6, 1991
Disqualification of Bankruptcy Trustee Due to Conflict of Interest in Joint Bankruptcy Proceedings In Re BH P Inc., A New Jersey Corporation; Philip Alan Herman, Bruce Berkow, Debtors. Appeal of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert