Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarifying Prosecutorial Immunity and Appellate Jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: A Comprehensive Analysis of Kulwicki v. Dawson

Clarifying Prosecutorial Immunity and Appellate Jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: A Comprehensive Analysis of Kulwicki v. Dawson

Date: Jul 3, 1992
Clarifying Prosecutorial Immunity and Appellate Jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: A Comprehensive Analysis of Kulwicki v. Dawson Introduction The case of Kulwicki v. Dawson (969 F.2d 1454, 1992)...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Sanguigni v. Pittsburgh Board of Public Education

Affirmation of Dismissal in Sanguigni v. Pittsburgh Board of Public Education

Date: Jul 2, 1992
Affirmation of Dismissal in Sanguigni v. Pittsburgh Board of Public Education Introduction Phyllis J. Sanguigni, a tenured health and physical education teacher at Taylor Allderdice High School in...
Third Circuit Sets Limits on Interlocutory Appeals of Denied Substitution Requests under the Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act

Third Circuit Sets Limits on Interlocutory Appeals of Denied Substitution Requests under the Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act

Date: Jun 30, 1992
Third Circuit Sets Limits on Interlocutory Appeals of Denied Substitution Requests under the Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act Introduction The case of Irwin Schrob; and...
Limitations on Combining Arrearages with Cram-Down Under §506(a) in Chapter 13 Plans - Sapos v. Shawmut Mortgage Company

Limitations on Combining Arrearages with Cram-Down Under §506(a) in Chapter 13 Plans - Sapos v. Shawmut Mortgage Company

Date: Jun 27, 1992
Limitations on Combining Arrearages with Cram-Down Under §506(a) in Chapter 13 Plans Sapos v. Shawmut Mortgage Company, 967 F.2d 918 (3d Cir. 1992) Introduction In Sapos v. Shawmut Mortgage Company,...
Establishing Trademark Enforcement Post-Franchise Termination: Insights from Jiffy Lube v. Durst

Establishing Trademark Enforcement Post-Franchise Termination: Insights from Jiffy Lube v. Durst

Date: Jun 24, 1992
Establishing Trademark Enforcement Post-Franchise Termination: Insights from Jiffy Lube v. Durst Introduction The landmark case S R Corporation and Steven Durst v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc.,...
Third Circuit Affirms Firearm Use in Drug Offenses and Upholds Warrantless Parole Searches in Hill v. United States

Third Circuit Affirms Firearm Use in Drug Offenses and Upholds Warrantless Parole Searches in Hill v. United States

Date: Jun 23, 1992
Third Circuit Affirms Firearm Use in Drug Offenses and Upholds Warrantless Parole Searches in Hill v. United States Introduction In United States of America v. James S. Hill, Jr. (967 F.2d 902, 3d...
United States v. McGlory et al.: Affirmation of Drug Conspiracy Convictions and Sentencing Guidelines Interpretation

United States v. McGlory et al.: Affirmation of Drug Conspiracy Convictions and Sentencing Guidelines Interpretation

Date: Jun 20, 1992
United States v. McGlory et al.: Affirmation of Drug Conspiracy Convictions and Sentencing Guidelines Interpretation Introduction The case of United States of America v. Reginald D. McGlory et al....
Trademark Protection of Telephone Number Mnemonics: INJURY-1 Case Commentary

Trademark Protection of Telephone Number Mnemonics: INJURY-1 Case Commentary

Date: Jun 18, 1992
Trademark Protection of Telephone Number Mnemonics: INJURY-1 Case Commentary Introduction The case of Dranoff-Perlstein Associates v. Harris J. Sklar (967 F.2d 852) adjudicated by the United States...
Extension of Statute of Limitations Under the Age Discrimination Claims Assistance Act: Harter v. GAF Corporation

Extension of Statute of Limitations Under the Age Discrimination Claims Assistance Act: Harter v. GAF Corporation

Date: Jun 17, 1992
Extension of Statute of Limitations Under the Age Discrimination Claims Assistance Act: Harter v. GAF Corporation Introduction Harter v. GAF Corporation, 967 F.2d 846 (3d Cir. 1992), is a pivotal...
Enforcement of Subpoenas in Labor Practice Proceedings: NLRB v. Frazier

Enforcement of Subpoenas in Labor Practice Proceedings: NLRB v. Frazier

Date: Jun 16, 1992
Enforcement of Subpoenas in Labor Practice Proceedings: NLRB v. Frazier Introduction The case National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) v. Gary Frazier, decided on June 15, 1992, by the United States...
Third-Party Standing and Judicial Admissions in Disability Benefit Disputes: Insights from Langer v. Monarch Life Insurance Co.

Third-Party Standing and Judicial Admissions in Disability Benefit Disputes: Insights from Langer v. Monarch Life Insurance Co.

Date: Jun 12, 1992
Third-Party Standing and Judicial Admissions in Disability Benefit Disputes: Insights from Langer v. Monarch Life Insurance Co. Introduction The case of TERRY LANGER, M.D. AND JOAN LANGER v. MONARCH...
Judicial Discretion and Magistrate Authority: Insights from Mindek v. Rigatti

Judicial Discretion and Magistrate Authority: Insights from Mindek v. Rigatti

Date: May 30, 1992
Judicial Discretion and Magistrate Authority: Insights from Mindek v. Rigatti Introduction Mindek v. Rigatti is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on...
Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Multi-Unit Dwellings: United States v. Acosta et al.

Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Multi-Unit Dwellings: United States v. Acosta et al.

Date: May 28, 1992
Clarifying Fourth Amendment Protections in Multi-Unit Dwellings: United States v. Acosta et al. Introduction In United States v. Acosta et al., decided on May 27, 1992, the United States Court of...
Shapiro v. UJB Financial Corp.: Clarifying Particularity Standards for Securities Fraud Claims

Shapiro v. UJB Financial Corp.: Clarifying Particularity Standards for Securities Fraud Claims

Date: May 21, 1992
Shapiro v. UJB Financial Corp.: Clarifying Particularity Standards for Securities Fraud Claims Introduction In the landmark case Shapiro v. UJB Financial Corp., adjudicated by the United States Court...
Expanding CERCLA Liability: No Quantitative Threshold and Flexible Causation in United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.

Expanding CERCLA Liability: No Quantitative Threshold and Flexible Causation in United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.

Date: May 15, 1992
Expanding CERCLA Liability: No Quantitative Threshold and Flexible Causation in United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Alcan Aluminum Corp. serves...
Clarifying Affirmative Act Requirements in Tax Evasion Cases: United States v. McGill

Clarifying Affirmative Act Requirements in Tax Evasion Cases: United States v. McGill

Date: May 14, 1992
Clarifying Affirmative Act Requirements in Tax Evasion Cases: United States v. McGill Introduction United States of America v. Thomas L. McGill, Jr., 964 F.2d 222 (3d Cir. 1992), is a significant...
Recognizing the Public Policy Exception to Employment-at-Will: Borse v. Piece Goods Shop, Inc.

Recognizing the Public Policy Exception to Employment-at-Will: Borse v. Piece Goods Shop, Inc.

Date: May 14, 1992
Recognizing the Public Policy Exception to Employment-at-Will: Borse v. Piece Goods Shop, Inc. Introduction In the case of Sarah Borse v. Piece Goods Shop, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals...
Reevaluation of Hearsay Exceptions and RICO Applications in Pelullo v. United States

Reevaluation of Hearsay Exceptions and RICO Applications in Pelullo v. United States

Date: May 13, 1992
Reevaluation of Hearsay Exceptions and RICO Applications in Pelullo v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Leonard A. Pelullo, 964 F.2d 193 (3d Cir. 1992), presents a significant...
Indemnification Limits Under Contractual Agreements: Conrail v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Indemnification Limits Under Contractual Agreements: Conrail v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Date: May 13, 1992
Indemnification Limits Under Contractual Agreements: Conrail v. Consolidated Rail Corp. Introduction The case of Susan E. Clement, Administratrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Thomas Allen...
Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in United States v. Herrold

Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in United States v. Herrold

Date: May 7, 1992
Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in United States v. Herrold Introduction United States v. Gene Allen Herrold, 962 F.2d 1131 (3rd Cir. 1992), is a pivotal case that explores the boundaries of the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert