Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarifying Conspiracy Charge Elements and Jury Instructions: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. James Price et al.

Clarifying Conspiracy Charge Elements and Jury Instructions: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. James Price et al.

Date: Jan 11, 1994
Clarifying Conspiracy Charge Elements and Jury Instructions: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. James Price et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. James Price and...
Interpretation of the 'Small Newspaper' Exemption under FLSA: Gateway Press v. Reich

Interpretation of the 'Small Newspaper' Exemption under FLSA: Gateway Press v. Reich

Date: Jan 7, 1994
Interpretation of the 'Small Newspaper' Exemption under FLSA: Gateway Press v. Reich Introduction Gateway Press, Inc. v. Robert Reich, Secretary of Labor is a landmark case adjudicated by the United...
Limiting Spoliation Sanctions: Insights from ERIC SCHMID v. MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPORATION

Limiting Spoliation Sanctions: Insights from ERIC SCHMID v. MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPORATION

Date: Jan 4, 1994
Limiting Spoliation Sanctions: Insights from Eric Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Introduction Eric Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, 13 F.3d 76 (3d Cir. 1994), presents a...
Requiring Evidentiary Hearings for Rule 25(c) Successor Substitution When Material Facts Are Contested: Luxliner v. Sturgis

Requiring Evidentiary Hearings for Rule 25(c) Successor Substitution When Material Facts Are Contested: Luxliner v. Sturgis

Date: Dec 31, 1993
Requiring Evidentiary Hearings for Rule 25(c) Successor Substitution When Material Facts Are Contested: Luxliner v. Sturgis Introduction Luxliner P.L. Export, Co., P.L. Custom Body Equipment Co.,...
Bixler v. Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Health Welfare Fund: Establishing Direct ERISA Fiduciary Claims

Bixler v. Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Health Welfare Fund: Establishing Direct ERISA Fiduciary Claims

Date: Dec 29, 1993
Bixler v. Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Health Welfare Fund: Establishing Direct ERISA Fiduciary Claims Introduction Bixler v. Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Health Welfare Fund (12 F.3d 1292, 1993)...
Affirmation of RICO Enterprise Requirements and Business Record Admissibility Standards in Console v. United States

Affirmation of RICO Enterprise Requirements and Business Record Admissibility Standards in Console v. United States

Date: Dec 23, 1993
Affirmation of RICO Enterprise Requirements and Business Record Admissibility Standards in Console v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Richard P. Console, Appellant is a pivotal...
Defining 'Particular Social Group' and 'Persecution' in Asylum Claims: Insights from Parastoo Fatin v. INS

Defining 'Particular Social Group' and 'Persecution' in Asylum Claims: Insights from Parastoo Fatin v. INS

Date: Dec 21, 1993
Defining 'Particular Social Group' and 'Persecution' in Asylum Claims: Insights from Parastoo Fatin v. INS Introduction Parastoo Fatin v. Immigration Naturalization Service (INS), 12 F.3d 1233,...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment: Standards for Granting Reconsideration under Rule 60(b)(1)

Affirmation of Summary Judgment: Standards for Granting Reconsideration under Rule 60(b)(1)

Date: Dec 11, 1993
Affirmation of Summary Judgment: Standards for Granting Reconsideration under Rule 60(b)(1) Introduction The case of Michael and Mary Lorenzo v. Andrew Griffith; William Grogan, d/b/a Barnacle...
Joinder of Parties under Federal Rule 19: Insights from Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc. v. Shepard Niles, Inc.

Joinder of Parties under Federal Rule 19: Insights from Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc. v. Shepard Niles, Inc.

Date: Dec 9, 1993
Joinder of Parties under Federal Rule 19: Insights from Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc. v. Shepard Niles, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc. v. Shepard Niles, Inc.,...
Commerce Clause Constraints on State Banking Regulations: Insights from Arab African International Bank v. Epstein

Commerce Clause Constraints on State Banking Regulations: Insights from Arab African International Bank v. Epstein

Date: Dec 1, 1993
Commerce Clause Constraints on State Banking Regulations: Insights from Arab African International Bank v. Epstein Introduction The case of Arab African International Bank v. Epstein adjudicated by...
Double Jeopardy Unapplied to Prison Disciplinary Sanctions: Insights from United States v. Newby and Barber

Double Jeopardy Unapplied to Prison Disciplinary Sanctions: Insights from United States v. Newby and Barber

Date: Dec 1, 1993
Double Jeopardy Unapplied to Prison Disciplinary Sanctions: Insights from United States v. Newby and Barber Introduction United States of America v. Gene Francis Newby and Raynaldo Barber is a...
Reassignment of Cases to Ensure Judicial Impartiality: Analysis of Alexander v. Primerica Holdings

Reassignment of Cases to Ensure Judicial Impartiality: Analysis of Alexander v. Primerica Holdings

Date: Nov 30, 1993
Reassignment of Cases to Ensure Judicial Impartiality: Analysis of Alexander v. Primerica Holdings Introduction In the landmark case of ALEXANDER v. PRIMERICA HOLDINGS, INC., decided by the United...
Summary Judgment Standards in Life Insurance Misrepresentation: Insights from Coolspring Stone Supply, Inc. v. American States Life Insurance Co.

Summary Judgment Standards in Life Insurance Misrepresentation: Insights from Coolspring Stone Supply, Inc. v. American States Life Insurance Co.

Date: Nov 25, 1993
Summary Judgment Standards in Life Insurance Misrepresentation: Insights from Coolspring Stone Supply, Inc. v. American States Life Insurance Co. Introduction Coolspring Stone Supply, Inc., a...
Affirming the Limits of Public Policy Exceptions in At-Will Employment: Clark v. Modern Group Ltd. (9 F.3d 321)

Affirming the Limits of Public Policy Exceptions in At-Will Employment: Clark v. Modern Group Ltd. (9 F.3d 321)

Date: Nov 19, 1993
Affirming the Limits of Public Policy Exceptions in At-Will Employment: Clark v. Modern Group Ltd. (9 F.3d 321) Introduction The appellate case William N. Clark v. Modern Group Ltd.; John F. Smith,...
Reversing the "Cause and Prejudice" Standard in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: An Analysis of United States v. DeRewal

Reversing the "Cause and Prejudice" Standard in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: An Analysis of United States v. DeRewal

Date: Nov 10, 1993
Reversing the "Cause and Prejudice" Standard in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: An Analysis of United States v. DeRewal Introduction The case of United States of America v. Manfred DeRewal,...
Enforceability of Orally Modified Contract Terms and Limitations of UCC §2-207: Olefins Trading, Inc. v. Han Yang Chem. Corp.

Enforceability of Orally Modified Contract Terms and Limitations of UCC §2-207: Olefins Trading, Inc. v. Han Yang Chem. Corp.

Date: Nov 10, 1993
Enforceability of Orally Modified Contract Terms and Limitations of UCC §2-207 Introduction Olefins Trading, Inc. v. Han Yang Chem. Corp., 9 F.3d 282 (3d Cir. 1993), is a landmark case that delves...
Consideration of Pro Se Arguments and Restoration of Civil Rights in Firearms Legislation: Insights from United States v. Essig

Consideration of Pro Se Arguments and Restoration of Civil Rights in Firearms Legislation: Insights from United States v. Essig

Date: Nov 2, 1993
Consideration of Pro Se Arguments and Restoration of Civil Rights in Firearms Legislation: Insights from United States v. Essig Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. James...
Third Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment and Imposes Rule 38 Damages for Frivolous Appeal in Derivative Action Case

Third Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment and Imposes Rule 38 Damages for Frivolous Appeal in Derivative Action Case

Date: Oct 26, 1993
Third Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment and Imposes Rule 38 Damages for Frivolous Appeal in Derivative Action Case Introduction In the case of Mary Nagle et al. v. David E. Alspach et al. (8 F.3d 141,...
Third Circuit Overrules Barrowclough: Statutory ERISA Claims Now Arbitrable under FAA

Third Circuit Overrules Barrowclough: Statutory ERISA Claims Now Arbitrable under FAA

Date: Oct 16, 1993
Third Circuit Overrules Barrowclough: Statutory ERISA Claims Now Arbitrable under FAA Introduction In the landmark case ELI PRITZKER; SOL COOPERSTEIN; JACK LEVIN, as Trustees of PENN ELECTRIC SUPPLY...
Affirmation of the "Bespeaks Caution" Doctrine in Securities Litigation: In Re Donald J. Trump Casino Securities Litigation — Taj Mahal Litigation

Affirmation of the "Bespeaks Caution" Doctrine in Securities Litigation: In Re Donald J. Trump Casino Securities Litigation — Taj Mahal Litigation

Date: Oct 15, 1993
Affirmation of the "Bespeaks Caution" Doctrine in Securities Litigation: In Re Donald J. Trump Casino Securities Litigation — Taj Mahal Litigation Introduction The case of In Re Donald J. Trump...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert