Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Redefining 'Willful and Malicious Injury' under Bankruptcy Code: In re Dominick P. Conte

Redefining 'Willful and Malicious Injury' under Bankruptcy Code: In re Dominick P. Conte

Date: Aug 31, 1994
Redefining 'Willful and Malicious Injury' under Bankruptcy Code: In re Dominick P. Conte Introduction The case of In re Dominick P. Conte, 33 F.3d 303 (1994), presents a pivotal interpretation of the...
Renner v. Lanard Toys Ltd.: Clarifying the 'Stream of Commerce' Theory in Personal Jurisdiction

Renner v. Lanard Toys Ltd.: Clarifying the 'Stream of Commerce' Theory in Personal Jurisdiction

Date: Aug 26, 1994
Renner v. Lanard Toys Ltd.: Clarifying the 'Stream of Commerce' Theory in Personal Jurisdiction Introduction The case of David J. Renner and Darcy L. Renner v. Lanard Toys Limited adjudicated by the...
Jurisdictional Clarity in Postal Service Litigation: Insights from Licata v. United States Postal Service

Jurisdictional Clarity in Postal Service Litigation: Insights from Licata v. United States Postal Service

Date: Aug 25, 1994
Jurisdictional Clarity in Postal Service Litigation: Insights from Licata v. United States Postal Service Introduction The case of Stephen B. Licata v. United States Postal Service, decided by the...
Enhancing ERISA Litigation: Standards for Awarding Attorneys' Fees in McPherson v. Employees' Pension Plan

Enhancing ERISA Litigation: Standards for Awarding Attorneys' Fees in McPherson v. Employees' Pension Plan

Date: Aug 24, 1994
Enhancing ERISA Litigation: Standards for Awarding Attorneys' Fees in McPherson v. Employees' Pension Plan Introduction The legal landscape governing the awarding of attorneys' fees in Employee...
Limits on Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege in Insurance Coverage Litigation

Limits on Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege in Insurance Coverage Litigation

Date: Aug 18, 1994
Limits on Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege in Insurance Coverage Litigation Introduction The case of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. and Armour Pharmaceutical Company v. The Home Indemnity Company...
Corporate Fiduciary Obligations Under ERISA: Insights from Curcio v. John Hancock

Corporate Fiduciary Obligations Under ERISA: Insights from Curcio v. John Hancock

Date: Aug 18, 1994
Corporate Fiduciary Obligations Under ERISA: Insights from Curcio v. John Hancock Introduction The case of Marita L. Curcio; The Estate of Frederick Curcio, III v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance...
Federal Appellate Jurisdiction in Concurrent Litigation: Insights from Trent v. Dial Medical

Federal Appellate Jurisdiction in Concurrent Litigation: Insights from Trent v. Dial Medical

Date: Aug 13, 1994
Federal Appellate Jurisdiction in Concurrent Litigation: Insights from Trent v. Dial Medical Introduction The case of Earl Trent, et al. v. Dial Medical of Florida, Inc., et al. (33 F.3d 217)...
Clarifying the Shifting Burden in Age Discrimination Cases: McKenna v. Pacific Rail Service

Clarifying the Shifting Burden in Age Discrimination Cases: McKenna v. Pacific Rail Service

Date: Aug 12, 1994
Clarifying the Shifting Burden in Age Discrimination Cases: McKenna v. Pacific Rail Service Introduction The case of McKenna et al. v. Pacific Rail Service, decided by the United States Court of...
Federal Abstention in Administrative Proceedings: Analysis of O'Neill and Goodman v. City of Philadelphia

Federal Abstention in Administrative Proceedings: Analysis of O'Neill and Goodman v. City of Philadelphia

Date: Aug 6, 1994
Federal Abstention in Administrative Proceedings: Analysis of O'Neill and Goodman v. City of Philadelphia Introduction The case of John O'Neill and Samuel R. Goodman v. City of Philadelphia addressed...
Clarifying Prosecutorial Immunity: Distinguishing Absolute and Qualified Immunity in Investigatory Conduct

Clarifying Prosecutorial Immunity: Distinguishing Absolute and Qualified Immunity in Investigatory Conduct

Date: Aug 5, 1994
Clarifying Prosecutorial Immunity: Distinguishing Absolute and Qualified Immunity in Investigatory Conduct Introduction The case of James J. Giuffre v. Nicholas Bissell et al., decided by the United...
Consumer Fraud Act Applicability in Franchise Transactions: Insights from J R Ice Cream Corp. v. California Smoothie Licensing Corp.

Consumer Fraud Act Applicability in Franchise Transactions: Insights from J R Ice Cream Corp. v. California Smoothie Licensing Corp.

Date: Aug 5, 1994
Consumer Fraud Act Applicability in Franchise Transactions: Insights from J R Ice Cream Corp. v. California Smoothie Licensing Corp. Introduction J R Ice Cream Corporation v. California Smoothie...
Fuentes v. Perskie: Establishing Standards for Summary Judgment in Title VII Discrimination Claims

Fuentes v. Perskie: Establishing Standards for Summary Judgment in Title VII Discrimination Claims

Date: Aug 2, 1994
Fuentes v. Perskie: Establishing Standards for Summary Judgment in Title VII Discrimination Claims Introduction In Fuentes v. Perskie, 32 F.3d 759 (3rd Cir. 1994), the United States Court of Appeals...
Armbruster Group v. Unisys: Third Circuit Expands Pretext Theory in ADEA Age Discrimination

Armbruster Group v. Unisys: Third Circuit Expands Pretext Theory in ADEA Age Discrimination

Date: Aug 2, 1994
Armbruster Group v. Unisys: Third Circuit Expands Pretext Theory in ADEA Age Discrimination Introduction In Armbruster Group v. Unisys Corporation (32 F.3d 768, 3d Cir. 1994), the United States Court...
United States v. Reilly and Dowd: Admissibility of Radiotelegrams and False Declarations

United States v. Reilly and Dowd: Admissibility of Radiotelegrams and False Declarations

Date: Jul 29, 1994
United States v. Reilly and Dowd: Admissibility of Radiotelegrams and False Declarations Introduction In the case of United States of America v. William P. Reilly, Appellant and United States of...
Fraud in Execution Defense in Collective Bargaining: Third Circuit's Ruling in United Mine Workers v. Fawn Mining Corporation

Fraud in Execution Defense in Collective Bargaining: Third Circuit's Ruling in United Mine Workers v. Fawn Mining Corporation

Date: Jul 26, 1994
Fraud in Execution Defense in Collective Bargaining: Third Circuit's Ruling in United Mine Workers v. Fawn Mining Corporation Introduction The case of JOSEPH P. CONNORS, SR.; DONALD E. PIERCE; et al....
Establishing Reverse Confusion as a Basis for Trademark Infringement under the Lanham Act: Fisons Horticulture, Inc. v. Vigoro Industries, Inc.

Establishing Reverse Confusion as a Basis for Trademark Infringement under the Lanham Act: Fisons Horticulture, Inc. v. Vigoro Industries, Inc.

Date: Jul 23, 1994
Establishing Reverse Confusion as a Basis for Trademark Infringement under the Lanham Act: Fisons Horticulture, Inc. v. Vigoro Industries, Inc. Introduction The case of Fisons Horticulture, Inc. v....
San Filippo v. Rutgers University: Retaliatory Dismissal and First Amendment Protections

San Filippo v. Rutgers University: Retaliatory Dismissal and First Amendment Protections

Date: Jul 22, 1994
San Filippo v. Rutgers University: Retaliatory Dismissal and First Amendment Protections Introduction San Filippo v. Rutgers University is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Reinstatement of PBGC’s Claims: A New Precedent on Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Reinstatement of PBGC’s Claims: A New Precedent on Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Date: Jul 16, 1994
Reinstatement of PBGC’s Claims: A New Precedent on Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution Introduction The case Gustav A. Adams; Andrew F. Dopkins; and Robert Malcolm, Deceased, by His Executrix Lillian...
Preclusive Role of §8-319(d) in Preventing Premature Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissals

Preclusive Role of §8-319(d) in Preventing Premature Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissals

Date: Jul 8, 1994
Preclusive Role of §8-319(d) in Preventing Premature Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissals Introduction The case of ALA, Inc., A Maryland Corporation; Larry H. Schatz, an individual residing in, and a citizen of,...
Affirmation of Limited Duty for Business Invitees and Enforcement of Rule 15(c) in Amendment of Complaints

Affirmation of Limited Duty for Business Invitees and Enforcement of Rule 15(c) in Amendment of Complaints

Date: Jul 7, 1994
Affirmation of Limited Duty for Business Invitees and Enforcement of Rule 15(c) in Amendment of Complaints Introduction In the case of Sidney Lundy; Claire Lundy, Appellants, v. Adamar of New Jersey,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert