Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Reversing Prisco: Enhanced Appellate Jurisdiction on Immunity Claims in Land Use Zoning Cases

Reversing Prisco: Enhanced Appellate Jurisdiction on Immunity Claims in Land Use Zoning Cases

Date: Oct 19, 1994
Reversing Prisco: Enhanced Appellate Jurisdiction on Immunity Claims in Land Use Zoning Cases Introduction Frank E. Acierno v. Philip Cloutier et al., decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
NDPA and FSC Liability for Concerted Actions Against Free-Rider Dealers: A New Antitrust Precedent

NDPA and FSC Liability for Concerted Actions Against Free-Rider Dealers: A New Antitrust Precedent

Date: Oct 13, 1994
NDPA and FSC Liability for Concerted Actions Against Free-Rider Dealers: A New Antitrust Precedent Introduction The legal landscape surrounding antitrust laws saw a significant development in the...
Third Circuit Affirms the Reasonable Expectations Doctrine in Insurance Coverage Disputes

Third Circuit Affirms the Reasonable Expectations Doctrine in Insurance Coverage Disputes

Date: Oct 8, 1994
Third Circuit Affirms the Reasonable Expectations Doctrine in Insurance Coverage Disputes Introduction In the landmark case of Bensalem Township v. International Surplus Lines Insurance Company; Crum...
Defining Prejudice to the Government in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motions: Insights from United States v. Nahodil

Defining Prejudice to the Government in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motions: Insights from United States v. Nahodil

Date: Oct 5, 1994
Defining Prejudice to the Government in 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motions: Insights from United States v. Nahodil Introduction United States of America v. David L. Nahodil, 36 F.3d 323 (3d Cir. 1994), is a...
Non-Enforceability of Informal Towing Policies Under the Fourteenth Amendment: Piecknick Towing v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Non-Enforceability of Informal Towing Policies Under the Fourteenth Amendment: Piecknick Towing v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Date: Oct 1, 1994
Non-Enforceability of Informal Towing Policies Under the Fourteenth Amendment: Piecknick Towing v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Introduction Fred Piecknick, Dorothy Piecknick, and Dan Piecknick...
Strict Adherence to Procedural Safeguards in Appeals: Third Circuit Rules Against New Issues in City of Philadelphia v. Harris et al.

Strict Adherence to Procedural Safeguards in Appeals: Third Circuit Rules Against New Issues in City of Philadelphia v. Harris et al.

Date: Sep 30, 1994
Strict Adherence to Procedural Safeguards in Appeals: Third Circuit Rules Against New Issues in City of Philadelphia v. Harris et al. Introduction The case of Martin Harris et al. v. The City of...
Complete Preemption Doctrine Affirmed in Goepel v. National Postal Mail Handlers Union

Complete Preemption Doctrine Affirmed in Goepel v. National Postal Mail Handlers Union

Date: Sep 28, 1994
Complete Preemption Doctrine Affirmed in Goepel v. National Postal Mail Handlers Union Introduction The case of Marilyn Goepel; Ronald Goepel v. National Postal Mail Handlers Union serves as a...
Establishing Proper Venue Based on Substantial Connection: Insights from Cottman Transmission Systems v. Martino and Trans One II, Inc.

Establishing Proper Venue Based on Substantial Connection: Insights from Cottman Transmission Systems v. Martino and Trans One II, Inc.

Date: Sep 21, 1994
Establishing Proper Venue Based on Substantial Connection: Insights from Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc. v. Martino and Trans One II, Inc. Introduction Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc. v....
Admission of Hostile Work Environment Evidence in Employment Discrimination Cases: Glass v. PECO

Admission of Hostile Work Environment Evidence in Employment Discrimination Cases: Glass v. PECO

Date: Sep 9, 1994
Admission of Hostile Work Environment Evidence in Employment Discrimination Cases: Glass v. Philadelphia Electric Company Introduction Harold Glass, a long-term employee of the Philadelphia Electric...
Harold S. ALSTON v. STATE of Delaware: Limiting the Scope of Anticipatory Invocation of Miranda Rights

Harold S. ALSTON v. STATE of Delaware: Limiting the Scope of Anticipatory Invocation of Miranda Rights

Date: Sep 8, 1994
Harold S. ALSTON v. STATE of Delaware: Limiting the Scope of Anticipatory Invocation of Miranda Rights Introduction The case of Harold S. ALSTON v. STATE of Delaware (34 F.3d 1237) adjudicated by the...
Judicial Authority in Gambling Loss Claims: Greate Bay Hotel Casino v. Leonard H. Tose

Judicial Authority in Gambling Loss Claims: Greate Bay Hotel Casino v. Leonard H. Tose

Date: Sep 7, 1994
Judicial Authority in Gambling Loss Claims: Greate Bay Hotel Casino v. Leonard H. Tose Introduction The case of Greate Bay Hotel Casino, D/B/A Sands Hotel, Casino Country Club v. Leonard H. Tose...
Establishing Standards for Expert Testimony in Toxic Tort Cases: Insights from In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation

Establishing Standards for Expert Testimony in Toxic Tort Cases: Insights from In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation

Date: Sep 1, 1994
Establishing Standards for Expert Testimony in Toxic Tort Cases: Insights from In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation Introduction The landmark decision in In re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB Litigation,...
Redefining 'Willful and Malicious Injury' under Bankruptcy Code: In re Dominick P. Conte

Redefining 'Willful and Malicious Injury' under Bankruptcy Code: In re Dominick P. Conte

Date: Aug 31, 1994
Redefining 'Willful and Malicious Injury' under Bankruptcy Code: In re Dominick P. Conte Introduction The case of In re Dominick P. Conte, 33 F.3d 303 (1994), presents a pivotal interpretation of the...
Renner v. Lanard Toys Ltd.: Clarifying the 'Stream of Commerce' Theory in Personal Jurisdiction

Renner v. Lanard Toys Ltd.: Clarifying the 'Stream of Commerce' Theory in Personal Jurisdiction

Date: Aug 26, 1994
Renner v. Lanard Toys Ltd.: Clarifying the 'Stream of Commerce' Theory in Personal Jurisdiction Introduction The case of David J. Renner and Darcy L. Renner v. Lanard Toys Limited adjudicated by the...
Jurisdictional Clarity in Postal Service Litigation: Insights from Licata v. United States Postal Service

Jurisdictional Clarity in Postal Service Litigation: Insights from Licata v. United States Postal Service

Date: Aug 25, 1994
Jurisdictional Clarity in Postal Service Litigation: Insights from Licata v. United States Postal Service Introduction The case of Stephen B. Licata v. United States Postal Service, decided by the...
Enhancing ERISA Litigation: Standards for Awarding Attorneys' Fees in McPherson v. Employees' Pension Plan

Enhancing ERISA Litigation: Standards for Awarding Attorneys' Fees in McPherson v. Employees' Pension Plan

Date: Aug 24, 1994
Enhancing ERISA Litigation: Standards for Awarding Attorneys' Fees in McPherson v. Employees' Pension Plan Introduction The legal landscape governing the awarding of attorneys' fees in Employee...
Limits on Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege in Insurance Coverage Litigation

Limits on Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege in Insurance Coverage Litigation

Date: Aug 18, 1994
Limits on Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege in Insurance Coverage Litigation Introduction The case of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. and Armour Pharmaceutical Company v. The Home Indemnity Company...
Corporate Fiduciary Obligations Under ERISA: Insights from Curcio v. John Hancock

Corporate Fiduciary Obligations Under ERISA: Insights from Curcio v. John Hancock

Date: Aug 18, 1994
Corporate Fiduciary Obligations Under ERISA: Insights from Curcio v. John Hancock Introduction The case of Marita L. Curcio; The Estate of Frederick Curcio, III v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance...
Federal Appellate Jurisdiction in Concurrent Litigation: Insights from Trent v. Dial Medical

Federal Appellate Jurisdiction in Concurrent Litigation: Insights from Trent v. Dial Medical

Date: Aug 13, 1994
Federal Appellate Jurisdiction in Concurrent Litigation: Insights from Trent v. Dial Medical Introduction The case of Earl Trent, et al. v. Dial Medical of Florida, Inc., et al. (33 F.3d 217)...
Clarifying the Shifting Burden in Age Discrimination Cases: McKenna v. Pacific Rail Service

Clarifying the Shifting Burden in Age Discrimination Cases: McKenna v. Pacific Rail Service

Date: Aug 12, 1994
Clarifying the Shifting Burden in Age Discrimination Cases: McKenna v. Pacific Rail Service Introduction The case of McKenna et al. v. Pacific Rail Service, decided by the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert