Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Disallowance of Attorneys' Fees for Public Relations Efforts in Contempt Proceedings: Insights from Halderman v. Pennhurst State School Hospital

Disallowance of Attorneys' Fees for Public Relations Efforts in Contempt Proceedings: Insights from Halderman v. Pennhurst State School Hospital

Date: Mar 3, 1995
Disallowance of Attorneys' Fees for Public Relations Efforts in Contempt Proceedings: Insights from Halderman v. Pennhurst State School Hospital Introduction The case of Halderman v. Pennhurst State...
Section 301 LMRA Does Not Preempt State Contract and Tort Claims Independent of Collective Bargaining Agreements

Section 301 LMRA Does Not Preempt State Contract and Tort Claims Independent of Collective Bargaining Agreements

Date: Mar 1, 1995
Section 301 LMRA Does Not Preempt State Contract and Tort Claims Independent of Collective Bargaining Agreements Introduction In the case of Trans Penn Wax Corporation; Astor Wax Corporation; ABI...
Finality in Remand Orders: Non-Reviewable under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d)

Finality in Remand Orders: Non-Reviewable under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d)

Date: Feb 25, 1995
Finality in Remand Orders: Non-Reviewable under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) Introduction The appellate case of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Ward Trucking...
Clarifying ADEA Compliance in Severance Agreements: Analysis of John DiBiase v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation

Clarifying ADEA Compliance in Severance Agreements: Analysis of John DiBiase v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation

Date: Feb 17, 1995
Clarifying ADEA Compliance in Severance Agreements: Analysis of John DiBiase v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation Introduction In John DiBiase v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation, the United States Court...
Gromans v. Township of Manalapan: Appellate Clarifications on Excessive Force and State Action under § 1983

Gromans v. Township of Manalapan: Appellate Clarifications on Excessive Force and State Action under § 1983

Date: Feb 17, 1995
Gromans v. Township of Manalapan: Appellate Clarifications on Excessive Force and State Action under § 1983 Introduction In the landmark case of Gromans v. Township of Manalapan, the United States...
Third Circuit Reaffirms Likelihood of Confusion Standard in Product Configuration Trade Dress Infringement

Third Circuit Reaffirms Likelihood of Confusion Standard in Product Configuration Trade Dress Infringement

Date: Feb 16, 1995
Third Circuit Reaffirms Likelihood of Confusion Standard in Product Configuration Trade Dress Infringement Introduction In the landmark case of VERSA PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC., APPELLEE, v. BIFOLD...
Enforcement of Consent Decrees and Civil Contempt: Insights from Martin v. City of Philadelphia

Enforcement of Consent Decrees and Civil Contempt: Insights from Martin v. City of Philadelphia

Date: Feb 16, 1995
Enforcement of Consent Decrees and Civil Contempt: Insights from Martin v. City of Philadelphia Introduction The case of Martin Harris et al. v. The City of Philadelphia centers on a class-action...
Limits of §1983 Claims in Federal Prisons: Qualified Immunity and Verbal Threats in MacLean v. Secor and McNabb

Limits of §1983 Claims in Federal Prisons: Qualified Immunity and Verbal Threats in MacLean v. Secor and McNabb

Date: Feb 15, 1995
Limits of §1983 Claims in Federal Prisons: Qualified Immunity and Verbal Threats in MacLean v. Secor and McNabb Introduction John Arthur MacLean v. T.J. Secor and Pat McNabb is a pivotal case decided...
State Law Supersedes Federal Common Law in Termination of Public Contracts: Insights from Linan-Faye Constr. Co. v. Housing Authority of Camden

State Law Supersedes Federal Common Law in Termination of Public Contracts: Insights from Linan-Faye Constr. Co. v. Housing Authority of Camden

Date: Feb 14, 1995
State Law Supersedes Federal Common Law in Termination of Public Contracts: Insights from Linan-Faye Constr. Co. v. Housing Authority of Camden Introduction The case of Linan-Faye Construction Co.,...
Tabas Estate v. Tabas: Affirming RICO’s Applicability in Prolonged Internal Business Fraud Schemes

Tabas Estate v. Tabas: Affirming RICO’s Applicability in Prolonged Internal Business Fraud Schemes

Date: Feb 14, 1995
Tabas Estate v. Tabas: Affirming RICO’s Applicability in Prolonged Internal Business Fraud Schemes Introduction Tabas Estate v. Tabas et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Inactive Corporations and Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from MIDLANTIC NATIONAL BANK v. Hansen

Inactive Corporations and Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from MIDLANTIC NATIONAL BANK v. Hansen

Date: Feb 14, 1995
Inactive Corporations and Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from MIDLANTIC NATIONAL BANK v. Hansen Introduction MIDLANTIC NATIONAL BANK, Apellee, v. E.F. Hansen, Jr.; G. Eileen Hansen; Hansen Bancorp,...
Enhancing Sovereign Immunity Protections: Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. Poltonowicz

Enhancing Sovereign Immunity Protections: Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. Poltonowicz

Date: Feb 10, 1995
Enhancing Sovereign Immunity Protections: Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. Poltonowicz Introduction Beneficial Consumer Discount Company ("Beneficial") appealed a decision from the United States...
Third Circuit Clarifies Preemption under Medical Devices Amendments: Express Warranties and Fraud Claims Remain Actionable

Third Circuit Clarifies Preemption under Medical Devices Amendments: Express Warranties and Fraud Claims Remain Actionable

Date: Feb 8, 1995
Third Circuit Clarifies Preemption under Medical Devices Amendments: Express Warranties and Fraud Claims Remain Actionable Introduction In the landmark case of Nina Michael, Appellant, v. Shiley,...
Judicial Scrutiny on Grid Utilization in Disability Claims: Jesurum v. Secretary of HHS

Judicial Scrutiny on Grid Utilization in Disability Claims: Jesurum v. Secretary of HHS

Date: Feb 7, 1995
Judicial Scrutiny on Grid Utilization in Disability Claims: Jesurum v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Introduction The case of Gisela Jesurum v. Secretary of the United States Department of...
Petrucelli v. Bohringer Ratzinger: Expanding Judicial Discretion in Service of Process under Rule 4(m)

Petrucelli v. Bohringer Ratzinger: Expanding Judicial Discretion in Service of Process under Rule 4(m)

Date: Feb 2, 1995
Petrucelli v. Bohringer Ratzinger: Expanding Judicial Discretion in Service of Process under Rule 4(m) Introduction Petrucelli v. Bohringer Ratzinger, GmbH Ausdereitungsanlagen et al. is a pivotal...
ADA Title II Mandate for Integrated Care Settings: Analysis of ADAPT v. Snider

ADA Title II Mandate for Integrated Care Settings: Analysis of ADAPT v. Snider

Date: Feb 1, 1995
ADA Title II Mandate for Integrated Care Settings: Analysis of ADAPT v. Snider Introduction In the landmark case ADAPT v. Snider, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed...
Limitations on Remand Under 28 U.S.C. §1441(c): Third Circuit Clarifies Jurisdictional Boundaries

Limitations on Remand Under 28 U.S.C. §1441(c): Third Circuit Clarifies Jurisdictional Boundaries

Date: Feb 1, 1995
Limitations on Remand Under 28 U.S.C. §1441(c): Third Circuit Clarifies Jurisdictional Boundaries Introduction The case of Borough of West Mifflin and Wayne F. Evan v. Gary L. Lancaster, adjudicated...
Zehrbach and Mervis v. United States: Overruling DiLoreto's Per Se Reversal Rule in Bankruptcy Fraud Proceedings

Zehrbach and Mervis v. United States: Overruling DiLoreto's Per Se Reversal Rule in Bankruptcy Fraud Proceedings

Date: Jan 24, 1995
Zehrbach and Mervis v. United States: Overruling DiLoreto's Per Se Reversal Rule in Bankruptcy Fraud Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Darus H. Zehrbach and...
Clarifying Burden of Proof in ADEA Age Discrimination Cases: Miller v. CIGNA

Clarifying Burden of Proof in ADEA Age Discrimination Cases: Miller v. CIGNA

Date: Jan 24, 1995
Clarifying Burden of Proof in ADEA Age Discrimination Cases: Miller v. CIGNA Introduction Miller v. CIGNA Corporation; The Insurance Company of North America, 47 F.3d 586 (3d Cir. 1995), is a pivotal...
Supplemental Jurisdiction Limits in FLSA Cases: Lyon v. Whisman Associates

Supplemental Jurisdiction Limits in FLSA Cases: Lyon v. Whisman Associates

Date: Jan 20, 1995
Supplemental Jurisdiction Limits in FLSA Cases: Lyon v. Whisman Associates Introduction In the landmark case of Patricia A. Lyon v. James A. Whisman; Whisman Associates, P.A., decided on January 19,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert