Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Temporary Disabilities Not Covered under ADA: McDonald v. Pennsylvania

Temporary Disabilities Not Covered under ADA: McDonald v. Pennsylvania

Date: Aug 5, 1995
Temporary Disabilities Not Covered under ADA: McDonald v. Pennsylvania Introduction In the landmark case Bonita McDonald v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare, Polk Center, 62...
Faragalli v. PaineWebber: Defining the Accrual of Arbitration Actions and Waiver under the Federal Arbitration Act

Faragalli v. PaineWebber: Defining the Accrual of Arbitration Actions and Waiver under the Federal Arbitration Act

Date: Aug 5, 1995
Faragalli v. PaineWebber: Defining the Accrual of Arbitration Actions and Waiver under the Federal Arbitration Act Introduction The case of Shelldon Chaiken, Lee H. Lovejoy, Anthony Presogna, Kevin...
Third Circuit Establishes Stricter Standards for Reasonable Suspicion and Detention Length in Traffic Stop Cases

Third Circuit Establishes Stricter Standards for Reasonable Suspicion and Detention Length in Traffic Stop Cases

Date: Aug 4, 1995
Third Circuit Establishes Stricter Standards for Reasonable Suspicion and Detention Length in Traffic Stop Cases Introduction In George Karnes v. Thomas Skrutski, in His Individual Capacity; Edward...
Enhanced Requirements for Vaughn Indexes in FOIA Proceedings: Davin v. United States Department of Justice, FBI

Enhanced Requirements for Vaughn Indexes in FOIA Proceedings: Davin v. United States Department of Justice, FBI

Date: Aug 2, 1995
Enhanced Requirements for Vaughn Indexes in FOIA Proceedings: Davin v. United States Department of Justice, FBI Introduction The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) serves as a cornerstone for...
Riley v. Taylor: Expanding the Scope for Amending Habeas Corpus Petitions in Capital Cases

Riley v. Taylor: Expanding the Scope for Amending Habeas Corpus Petitions in Capital Cases

Date: Jul 28, 1995
Riley v. Taylor: Expanding the Scope for Amending Habeas Corpus Petitions in Capital Cases Introduction Riley William Rileyv. v. Stanley W. Taylor and M. Jane Brady is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Clarifying Jurisdictional Principles in Jones Act Claims: Neely v. Club Med Management Services

Clarifying Jurisdictional Principles in Jones Act Claims: Neely v. Club Med Management Services

Date: Jul 27, 1995
Clarifying Jurisdictional Principles in Jones Act Claims: Neely v. Club Med Management Services Introduction Neely v. Club Med Management Services, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Clarifying Equity Calculation under Bankruptcy Code §362(d)(2): Third Circuit Reverses District Court in Re: Indian Palms Associates, Ltd.

Clarifying Equity Calculation under Bankruptcy Code §362(d)(2): Third Circuit Reverses District Court in Re: Indian Palms Associates, Ltd.

Date: Jul 26, 1995
Clarifying Equity Calculation under Bankruptcy Code §362(d)(2): Third Circuit Reverses District Court in Re: Indian Palms Associates, Ltd. Introduction The case of In re Indian Palms Associates, Ltd....
Tolling of Statute of Limitations in Class Actions: Insights from Nelson v. County of Allegheny

Tolling of Statute of Limitations in Class Actions: Insights from Nelson v. County of Allegheny

Date: Jul 19, 1995
Tolling of Statute of Limitations in Class Actions: Insights from Nelson v. County of Allegheny Introduction In the landmark case Nelson v. County of Allegheny, the United States Court of Appeals for...
New Precedent on ADA Burden of Proof and Discovery Compliance Established in Newman v. GHS Osteopathic

New Precedent on ADA Burden of Proof and Discovery Compliance Established in Newman v. GHS Osteopathic

Date: Jul 18, 1995
New Precedent on ADA Burden of Proof and Discovery Compliance Established in Newman v. GHS Osteopathic Introduction The case of Jeffrey B. Newman v. GHS Osteopathic, Inc., Parkview Hospital Division...
Strengthening Prisoners’ Rights: The Bieregu v. Reno Decision on Legal Mail Handling

Strengthening Prisoners’ Rights: The Bieregu v. Reno Decision on Legal Mail Handling

Date: Jul 12, 1995
Strengthening Prisoners’ Rights: The Bieregu v. Reno Decision on Legal Mail Handling Introduction In Bieregu v. Reno, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed a pivotal...
Delaware County Community College v. McDaniels: Procedural Due Process in Employment Termination

Delaware County Community College v. McDaniels: Procedural Due Process in Employment Termination

Date: Jul 12, 1995
Delaware County Community College v. McDaniels: Procedural Due Process in Employment Termination Introduction In the landmark case of Delaware County Community College v. Frank McDaniels, the United...
Breach of Fiduciary Duty under ERISA: Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefit Litigation

Breach of Fiduciary Duty under ERISA: Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefit Litigation

Date: Jun 29, 1995
Breach of Fiduciary Duty under ERISA: Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefit Litigation Introduction The case, In Re Unisys Corp. Retiree Medical Benefit "ERISA" Litigation, adjudicated by the United...
Clarifying ERISA Retirement Benefits: Unisys Corp Case Affirms Employer's Right to Terminate 'Lifetime' Medical Benefits through Clear Reservations of Rights

Clarifying ERISA Retirement Benefits: Unisys Corp Case Affirms Employer's Right to Terminate 'Lifetime' Medical Benefits through Clear Reservations of Rights

Date: Jun 29, 1995
Clarifying ERISA Retirement Benefits: Unisys Corp Case Affirms Employer's Right to Terminate 'Lifetime' Medical Benefits through Clear Reservations of Rights Introduction The case of In re Unisys...
Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court's Sanctions Against FE B for Bad Faith Representation in Chapter 11 Proceedings

Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court's Sanctions Against FE B for Bad Faith Representation in Chapter 11 Proceedings

Date: Jun 23, 1995
Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court's Sanctions Against FE B for Bad Faith Representation in Chapter 11 Proceedings Introduction In the case of Fellheimer, Eichen Braverman, P.C. v. Charter Technologies,...
Admissibility of Technical Lay Opinion Testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 701: Insights from Asplundh Manufacturing Division v. Benton Harbor Engineering

Admissibility of Technical Lay Opinion Testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 701: Insights from Asplundh Manufacturing Division v. Benton Harbor Engineering

Date: Jun 21, 1995
Admissibility of Technical Lay Opinion Testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 701: Insights from Asplundh Manufacturing Division v. Benton Harbor Engineering Introduction In the landmark case of...
ERISA Preemption Limited to Benefit Denial, Not Quality of Care: Analysis of Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare

ERISA Preemption Limited to Benefit Denial, Not Quality of Care: Analysis of Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare

Date: Jun 20, 1995
ERISA Preemption Limited to Benefit Denial, Not Quality of Care: Analysis of Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare Introduction In the landmark case of Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc., the United States Court of...
Expanding the Boundaries of "Unfair Competition" in Insurance Coverage: Granite State Ins. Co. v. Aamco Trans. Inc.

Expanding the Boundaries of "Unfair Competition" in Insurance Coverage: Granite State Ins. Co. v. Aamco Trans. Inc.

Date: Jun 10, 1995
Expanding the Boundaries of "Unfair Competition" in Insurance Coverage: Granite State Ins. Co. v. Aamco Trans. Inc. Introduction The case Granite State Insurance Company v. Aamco Transmissions, Inc....
Federal Kemper v. Horowitz: Third Circuit Clarifies Attachment Standards for Insurance Policies under Pennsylvania Law

Federal Kemper v. Horowitz: Third Circuit Clarifies Attachment Standards for Insurance Policies under Pennsylvania Law

Date: Jun 8, 1995
Federal Kemper v. Horowitz: Third Circuit Clarifies Attachment Standards for Insurance Policies under Pennsylvania Law Introduction The case of Dona W. Horowitz, individually and as co-executrix of...
Comprehensive Commentary on AFFILIATED MANUFACTURERS, INC. v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA: Reevaluating Rule 408 in Settlement Negotiations

Comprehensive Commentary on AFFILIATED MANUFACTURERS, INC. v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA: Reevaluating Rule 408 in Settlement Negotiations

Date: Jun 7, 1995
Reevaluating Rule 408 in Settlement Negotiations: A Comprehensive Commentary on AFFILIATED MANUFACTURERS, INC. v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA Introduction The case of Affiliated Manufacturers, Inc....
Ensuring Impartiality in Social Security Disability Hearings: The Ventura v. Shalala Decision

Ensuring Impartiality in Social Security Disability Hearings: The Ventura v. Shalala Decision

Date: Jun 6, 1995
Ensuring Impartiality in Social Security Disability Hearings: The Ventura v. Shalala Decision Introduction The case of Stephen R. Ventura v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.