Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Defining 'Punishment' in Megan's Law: Artway v. Attorney General of New Jersey

Defining 'Punishment' in Megan's Law: Artway v. Attorney General of New Jersey

Date: Apr 13, 1996
Defining 'Punishment' in Megan's Law: Artway v. Attorney General of New Jersey Introduction In the landmark case Alexander A. Artway v. The Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, decided on...
Direct Purchaser Rule Reinforced in McCarthy v. Recordex Service, Inc.

Direct Purchaser Rule Reinforced in McCarthy v. Recordex Service, Inc.

Date: Apr 5, 1996
Direct Purchaser Rule Reinforced in McCarthy v. Recordex Service, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Mary Ruth McCarthy et al. v. Recordex Service, Inc. et al., the United States Court of...
Authority of the Bureau of Prisons in Sentence Computation: Chambers v. Hollands

Authority of the Bureau of Prisons in Sentence Computation: Chambers v. Hollands

Date: Apr 5, 1996
Authority of the Bureau of Prisons in Sentence Computation: Chambers v. Hollands Introduction Kim Chambers, an inmate at the United States Penitentiary-Allenwood in White Deer, Pennsylvania, filed a...
Miramax Licensing Practices and Antitrust Implications: A Comprehensive Analysis of Orson, Inc. v. Miramax Film Corp.

Miramax Licensing Practices and Antitrust Implications: A Comprehensive Analysis of Orson, Inc. v. Miramax Film Corp.

Date: Apr 2, 1996
Miramax Licensing Practices and Antitrust Implications: A Comprehensive Analysis of Orson, Inc. v. Miramax Film Corp. Introduction The case of Orson, Inc., D/B/A Roxy Screening Rooms v. Miramax Film...
Holbrook v. Lykes Bros.: Broadening the Scope of Expert Testimony Under Federal Rule 702

Holbrook v. Lykes Bros.: Broadening the Scope of Expert Testimony Under Federal Rule 702

Date: Mar 22, 1996
Holbrook v. Lykes Bros.: Broadening the Scope of Expert Testimony Under Federal Rule 702 Introduction In the landmark case of Grace A. Holbrook, Administratrix of the Estate of John P. Holbrook v....
Defining Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Context of Juror Misconduct: Analysis of Government of the Virgin Islands v. William Weatherwax

Defining Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Context of Juror Misconduct: Analysis of Government of the Virgin Islands v. William Weatherwax

Date: Mar 14, 1996
Defining Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Context of Juror Misconduct: Analysis of Government of the Virgin Islands v. William Weatherwax Introduction The case of Government of the Virgin...
Affirmation of 'Stay Put' Provision under IDEA in Drinker v. Colonial School District

Affirmation of 'Stay Put' Provision under IDEA in Drinker v. Colonial School District

Date: Mar 13, 1996
Affirmation of 'Stay Put' Provision under IDEA in Drinker v. Colonial School District Introduction The case of Drinker v. Colonial School District, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Discharge of Unlisted Creditors in No-Asset Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Cases: Analysis of Judd v. Wolfe

Discharge of Unlisted Creditors in No-Asset Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Cases: Analysis of Judd v. Wolfe

Date: Mar 12, 1996
Discharge of Unlisted Creditors in No-Asset Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Cases: Analysis of Judd v. Wolfe Introduction The case of Susan Judd v. Lawrence Wolfe, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Angst v. Royal Maccabees Life Insurance: Jurisdictional Considerations and Rule 19 Implications

Affirmation of Dismissal in Angst v. Royal Maccabees Life Insurance: Jurisdictional Considerations and Rule 19 Implications

Date: Feb 21, 1996
Affirmation of Dismissal in Angst v. Royal Maccabees Life Insurance: Jurisdictional Considerations and Rule 19 Implications Introduction The case of Robert Angst v. Royal Maccabees Life Insurance...
Eleventh Amendment Immunity in ADEA Claims Against State Employment Agencies

Eleventh Amendment Immunity in ADEA Claims Against State Employment Agencies

Date: Feb 17, 1996
Eleventh Amendment Immunity in ADEA Claims Against State Employment Agencies Introduction The case of Robert J. Blanciak et al. v. Allegheny Ludlum Corporation et al. addressed a pivotal question in...
Reconsideration of Judicial Vacatur in Rohrbach v. AT&T Nassau Metals Corp.

Reconsideration of Judicial Vacatur in Rohrbach v. AT&T Nassau Metals Corp.

Date: Feb 16, 1996
Reconsideration of Judicial Vacatur in Rohrbach v. AT&T Nassau Metals Corp. Introduction The case of Sharon Rohrbach, et al. v. AT&T Nassau Metals Corp., et al. (915 F. Supp. 712, 1996), adjudicated...
Limits of Diversity Jurisdiction and Proper Removal of Territorial Eminent Domain Cases: An Analysis of Trustees of the Long Bay Trust v. Leo Francis et al.

Limits of Diversity Jurisdiction and Proper Removal of Territorial Eminent Domain Cases: An Analysis of Trustees of the Long Bay Trust v. Leo Francis et al.

Date: Feb 8, 1996
Limits of Diversity Jurisdiction and Proper Removal of Territorial Eminent Domain Cases: An Analysis of Trustees of the Long Bay Trust v. Leo Francis et al. Introduction Trustees of the Long Bay...
Reversing Rooker-Feldman and Younger: A New Precedent in Challenging Judicial Gag Orders

Reversing Rooker-Feldman and Younger: A New Precedent in Challenging Judicial Gag Orders

Date: Feb 2, 1996
Reversing Rooker-Feldman and Younger: A New Precedent in Challenging Judicial Gag Orders Introduction The case FOCUS, (For Our Children's Ultimate Safety), a Citizens' Advocacy Group; Jacqueline...
Affirmation of Dismissal Due to Lack of Specific Personal Jurisdiction in Vetrotex CertainTeed Corp. v. Consolidated Fiber Glass Products Co.

Affirmation of Dismissal Due to Lack of Specific Personal Jurisdiction in Vetrotex CertainTeed Corp. v. Consolidated Fiber Glass Products Co.

Date: Jan 27, 1996
Affirmation of Dismissal Due to Lack of Specific Personal Jurisdiction in Vetrotex CertainTeed Corp. v. Consolidated Fiber Glass Products Co. Introduction The case of Vetrotex CertainTeed Corporation...
Limitations on ADA Applicability to State Prisons Confirmed in Little v. Lycoming County

Limitations on ADA Applicability to State Prisons Confirmed in Little v. Lycoming County

Date: Jan 19, 1996
Limitations on ADA Applicability to State Prisons Confirmed in Little v. Lycoming County Introduction In the case of Joyce D. Little v. Lycoming County, No. 4: CV-95-399, adjudicated by the United...
Clarifying Fiduciary Duties under ERISA: Third Circuit Vacates Unisys Summary Judgment on Prudence and Diversification Claims

Clarifying Fiduciary Duties under ERISA: Third Circuit Vacates Unisys Summary Judgment on Prudence and Diversification Claims

Date: Jan 5, 1996
Clarifying Fiduciary Duties under ERISA: Third Circuit Vacates Unisys Summary Judgment on Prudence and Diversification Claims Introduction The case of In re: Unisys Savings Plan Litigation (74 F.3d...
Jurisdictional Boundaries for Trustee Actions in Bankruptcy Cases: Torkelsen v. Maggio

Jurisdictional Boundaries for Trustee Actions in Bankruptcy Cases: Torkelsen v. Maggio

Date: Jan 5, 1996
Jurisdictional Boundaries for Trustee Actions in Bankruptcy Cases: Torkelsen v. Maggio Introduction Torkelsen v. Maggio, 72 F.3d 1171 (3d Cir. 1996), is a pivotal case in bankruptcy law that...
Recognizing Attendant Care as Allowable Expense Under Pennsylvania No-Fault Act

Recognizing Attendant Care as Allowable Expense Under Pennsylvania No-Fault Act

Date: Dec 30, 1995
Recognizing Attendant Care as Allowable Expense Under Pennsylvania No-Fault Act Introduction Travelers Insurance Company v. Lisa Ann Obusek, 72 F.3d 1148 (3d Cir. 1995), is a pivotal case addressing...
Reversing Judgment as a Matter of Law in Fourth Amendment Illegal Entry and Excessive Force Claims: Bodine v. Warwick et al.

Reversing Judgment as a Matter of Law in Fourth Amendment Illegal Entry and Excessive Force Claims: Bodine v. Warwick et al.

Date: Dec 27, 1995
Reversing Judgment as a Matter of Law in Fourth Amendment Illegal Entry and Excessive Force Claims: Bodine v. Warwick et al. Introduction Bodine v. Warwick et al. is a pivotal case decided by the...
Discretionary Standards in Federal Interpleader Actions: Insights from NYLife Distributors, Inc. v. The Adherence Group, Inc.

Discretionary Standards in Federal Interpleader Actions: Insights from NYLife Distributors, Inc. v. The Adherence Group, Inc.

Date: Dec 22, 1995
Discretionary Standards in Federal Interpleader Actions: Insights from NYLife Distributors, Inc. v. The Adherence Group, Inc. Introduction NYLife Distributors, Inc. v. The Adherence Group, Inc., 72...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert