Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Arbitrary Interference with Parental Rights: The Third Circuit's Decision in Croft v. Westmoreland County

Arbitrary Interference with Parental Rights: The Third Circuit's Decision in Croft v. Westmoreland County

Date: Jan 7, 1997
Arbitrary Interference with Parental Rights: The Third Circuit's Decision in Croft v. Westmoreland County Introduction The case of Henry L. Croft, Jr.; Carol Croft, individually and as parents and...
Sanctions Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 11: Insights from Gerald Zuk v. Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute

Sanctions Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 11: Insights from Gerald Zuk v. Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute

Date: Jan 1, 1997
Sanctions Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 11: Insights from Gerald Zuk v. Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute Introduction The case of Gerald Zuk v. Eastern Pennsylvania...
Representation of Corporate Defendants and Valid Waiver of Counsel: Insights from United States v. John Cocivera

Representation of Corporate Defendants and Valid Waiver of Counsel: Insights from United States v. John Cocivera

Date: Dec 27, 1996
Representation of Corporate Defendants and Valid Waiver of Counsel: Insights from United States v. John Cocivera Introduction The case of United States of America v. John Cocivera et al., adjudicated...
Legislative Immunity and Executive Actions in 42 U.S.C. §1983: Carver et al v. Foerster and Allegheny County

Legislative Immunity and Executive Actions in 42 U.S.C. §1983: Carver et al v. Foerster and Allegheny County

Date: Dec 13, 1996
Legislative Immunity and Executive Actions in 42 U.S.C. §1983: Carver et al v. Foerster and Allegheny County Introduction In the landmark case Phyllis Carver; Thomas Fox; April Moore; Roberta Rudolph...
Ensuring Consistent Jury Verdicts and Appropriate Jury Instructions in Civil Rights Litigation: An Analysis of Mosley v. Wilson

Ensuring Consistent Jury Verdicts and Appropriate Jury Instructions in Civil Rights Litigation: An Analysis of Mosley v. Wilson

Date: Dec 12, 1996
Ensuring Consistent Jury Verdicts and Appropriate Jury Instructions in Civil Rights Litigation: An Analysis of Mosley v. Wilson Introduction The case of James Mosley v. Joseph Wilson, et al. presents...
New Rock Asset Partners: Third Circuit Establishes Supplemental Jurisdiction After RTC Dismissal under FIRREA

New Rock Asset Partners: Third Circuit Establishes Supplemental Jurisdiction After RTC Dismissal under FIRREA

Date: Dec 11, 1996
New Rock Asset Partners: Third Circuit Establishes Supplemental Jurisdiction After RTC Dismissal under FIRREA Introduction New Rock Asset Partners, L.P. v. Preferred Entity Advancements, Inc.; DAML...
Reputation-Plus Requirement Under Section 1983: Analysis of Ersek v. Township of Springfield

Reputation-Plus Requirement Under Section 1983: Analysis of Ersek v. Township of Springfield

Date: Dec 10, 1996
Reputation-Plus Requirement Under Section 1983: Analysis of Ersek v. Township of Springfield Introduction Ellen Ersek v. Township of Springfield, Delaware County is a pivotal case that examines the...
Philbin v. Trans Union: Clarifying Plaintiff's Burden in FCRA Negligence Claims

Philbin v. Trans Union: Clarifying Plaintiff's Burden in FCRA Negligence Claims

Date: Dec 7, 1996
Philbin v. Trans Union: Clarifying Plaintiff's Burden in FCRA Negligence Claims Introduction The case of James R. Philbin, Jr. v. Trans Union Corporation; TRW Credentials (101 F.3d 957) adjudicated...
Perception of Disability in ADA Claims: Analysis of Olson v. GE Astrospace

Perception of Disability in ADA Claims: Analysis of Olson v. GE Astrospace

Date: Dec 6, 1996
Perception of Disability in ADA Claims: Analysis of Olson v. GE Astrospace Introduction Olson v. General Electric Astrospace is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Third Circuit Upholds HHS's Authority to Impose Private Consumer Interest Rates on State Debts

Third Circuit Upholds HHS's Authority to Impose Private Consumer Interest Rates on State Debts

Date: Dec 5, 1996
Third Circuit Upholds HHS's Authority to Impose Private Consumer Interest Rates on State Debts Introduction The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. United States...
Exemptions Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Madden v. Myers

Exemptions Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Madden v. Myers

Date: Dec 4, 1996
Exemptions Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Madden v. Myers Introduction The case of Ronald Madden v. Kevin Myers, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Security Clearance Revocation and Standing: Insights from Stehney v. Perry

Security Clearance Revocation and Standing: Insights from Stehney v. Perry

Date: Dec 4, 1996
Security Clearance Revocation and Standing: Insights from Stehney v. Perry Introduction Stehney v. Perry is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in...
Berryman v. Morton: Defining Effective Assistance of Counsel under Strickland and AEDPA Amendments

Berryman v. Morton: Defining Effective Assistance of Counsel under Strickland and AEDPA Amendments

Date: Nov 15, 1996
Berryman v. Morton: Defining Effective Assistance of Counsel under Strickland and AEDPA Amendments Introduction In the landmark case of EarL Berryman v. Willis Morton, the United States Court of...
Clarifying Pretext and Burden-Shifting in Employment Discrimination: Sheridan v. DuPont

Clarifying Pretext and Burden-Shifting in Employment Discrimination: Sheridan v. DuPont

Date: Nov 15, 1996
Clarifying Pretext and Burden-Shifting in Employment Discrimination: Sheridan v. DuPont Introduction Sheridan v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Company is a pivotal case in employment discrimination law,...
Attorney's Fees Post-Remand under 28 U.S.C. §1447(c): Mint v. Educational Testing Service

Attorney's Fees Post-Remand under 28 U.S.C. §1447(c): Mint v. Educational Testing Service

Date: Nov 15, 1996
Attorney's Fees Post-Remand under 28 U.S.C. §1447(c): Mint v. Educational Testing Service Introduction In the case of Jeffrey A. Mints v. Educational Testing Service (ETS), decided on November 14,...
Proper Issuance of Summons Essential for Personal Jurisdiction: Ayres v. Jacobs Crumplar

Proper Issuance of Summons Essential for Personal Jurisdiction: Ayres v. Jacobs Crumplar

Date: Nov 2, 1996
Proper Issuance of Summons Essential for Personal Jurisdiction: Ayres v. Jacobs Crumplar Introduction Caroline P. Ayres v. Jacobs Crumplar, P.A., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Apportioned Liability and Set-Off for Settling Insurers in Excess Liability Claims: Koppers Co. v. Jackson and Companies

Apportioned Liability and Set-Off for Settling Insurers in Excess Liability Claims: Koppers Co. v. Jackson and Companies

Date: Oct 29, 1996
Apportioned Liability and Set-Off for Settling Insurers in Excess Liability Claims: Koppers Company, Inc. v. Jackson and Companies Introduction Koppers Company, Inc. v. Jackson and Companies, decided...
Strict Enforcement of Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Moscato v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Strict Enforcement of Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Moscato v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Date: Oct 23, 1996
Strict Enforcement of Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Moscato v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Introduction Moscato v. Federal Bureau of Prisons is a seminal case adjudicated by the United...
Admissibility of Sexual Assault Evidence as Motive in Kidnapping: United States v. Nopporn Sriyuth

Admissibility of Sexual Assault Evidence as Motive in Kidnapping: United States v. Nopporn Sriyuth

Date: Oct 19, 1996
Admissibility of Sexual Assault Evidence as Motive in Kidnapping: United States v. Nopporn Sriyuth Introduction United States of America v. Nopporn Sriyuth (98 F.3d 739), adjudicated by the United...
Santana v. United States: Clarifying PLRA Applicability to Habeas Corpus Petitions

Santana v. United States: Clarifying PLRA Applicability to Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Oct 19, 1996
Santana v. United States: Clarifying PLRA Applicability to Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction Ernesto Santana v. United States of America, 98 F.3d 752 (3d Cir. 1996), is a pivotal case that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert