Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Equitable Tolling Affirmed for §1640(e) Claims under TILA

Equitable Tolling Affirmed for §1640(e) Claims under TILA

Date: Sep 23, 1998
Equitable Tolling Affirmed for §1640(e) Claims under TILA Introduction In the landmark case of Ramadan v. Chase Manhattan Corporation; Hyundai Motor Finance Co., decided by the United States Court of...
Per Se Group Boycotts under the Sherman Act: Insights from Rossi v. Standard Roofing, Inc.

Per Se Group Boycotts under the Sherman Act: Insights from Rossi v. Standard Roofing, Inc.

Date: Sep 10, 1998
Per Se Group Boycotts under the Sherman Act: Insights from Rossi v. Standard Roofing, Inc. Introduction Joseph Rossi; Rossi Florence Corp.; Rossi Roofing, Inc., Apellants v. Standard Roofing, Inc.;...
Third Circuit Affirms Law of the Case Doctrine in Fourth Amendment Seizure Analysis: Ramona Africa v. City of Philadelphia

Third Circuit Affirms Law of the Case Doctrine in Fourth Amendment Seizure Analysis: Ramona Africa v. City of Philadelphia

Date: Sep 10, 1998
Third Circuit Affirms Law of the Case Doctrine in Fourth Amendment Seizure Analysis: Ramona Africa v. City of Philadelphia Introduction The case of Ramona Africa v. City of Philadelphia revisits the...
Strict Scrutiny Applied to Durational Residency in Welfare Benefits: Maldonados v. Pennsylvania

Strict Scrutiny Applied to Durational Residency in Welfare Benefits: Maldonados v. Pennsylvania

Date: Sep 10, 1998
Strict Scrutiny Applied to Durational Residency in Welfare Benefits: Maldonados v. Pennsylvania Introduction The case of Maldonados v. Pennsylvania presents a pivotal constitutional challenge against...
Enforceability of Teaming Agreements Under Pennsylvania Contract Law: Insights from ATACS Corporation v. Trans World Communications

Enforceability of Teaming Agreements Under Pennsylvania Contract Law: Insights from ATACS Corporation v. Trans World Communications

Date: Sep 9, 1998
Enforceability of Teaming Agreements Under Pennsylvania Contract Law: Insights from ATACS Corporation v. Trans World Communications Introduction The case of ATACS Corporation; AIRTACS Corporation v....
Reimbursement Conditions on Supervised Release: Insights from United States v. Curtis Evans

Reimbursement Conditions on Supervised Release: Insights from United States v. Curtis Evans

Date: Sep 4, 1998
Reimbursement Conditions on Supervised Release: Insights from United States v. Curtis Evans Introduction United States v. Curtis Evans, 155 F.3d 245 (3d Cir. 1998), is a pivotal appellate decision...
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in Business Torts: IMO Industries Inc. v. Kiekert AG

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in Business Torts: IMO Industries Inc. v. Kiekert AG

Date: Sep 4, 1998
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in Business Torts: IMO Industries Inc. v. Kiekert AG Introduction The case of IMO Industries Inc. v. Kiekert AG addresses a pivotal issue in the realm of personal...
Reaffirming the Limits of Outrageous Government Conduct and the Sanctity of Plea Agreements: An Analysis of United States v. Angela Nolan-Cooper

Reaffirming the Limits of Outrageous Government Conduct and the Sanctity of Plea Agreements: An Analysis of United States v. Angela Nolan-Cooper

Date: Sep 3, 1998
Reaffirming the Limits of Outrageous Government Conduct and the Sanctity of Plea Agreements: An Analysis of United States v. Angela Nolan-Cooper Introduction In United States of America v. Angela...
Affirmation of RICO Claim Dismissal and Limits on Aiding and Abetting Liability: Rolo v. City Investing Co.

Affirmation of RICO Claim Dismissal and Limits on Aiding and Abetting Liability: Rolo v. City Investing Co.

Date: Sep 1, 1998
Affirmation of RICO Claim Dismissal and Limits on Aiding and Abetting Liability: Rolo v. City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust Introduction In the landmark case Rolo v. City Investing Company...
Enhancing Inmate First Amendment Protections: Insights from Abu-Jamal v. Price

Enhancing Inmate First Amendment Protections: Insights from Abu-Jamal v. Price

Date: Aug 26, 1998
Enhancing Inmate First Amendment Protections: Insights from Abu-Jamal v. Price Introduction The case of Mumia Abu-Jamal v. James Price, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...
Limitations on Appellate Review of Remand Orders under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d): Insights from Feidt v. CBS Corporation

Limitations on Appellate Review of Remand Orders under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d): Insights from Feidt v. CBS Corporation

Date: Aug 25, 1998
Limitations on Appellate Review of Remand Orders under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d): Insights from Feidt v. CBS Corporation Introduction In the case of Gerald E. Feidt, Jr.; Arlene Feidt, his wife v. Owens...
Expansion of ADA Title III Protections to Medical Staff Privileges: Menkowitz v. Pottstown Memorial Medical Center

Expansion of ADA Title III Protections to Medical Staff Privileges: Menkowitz v. Pottstown Memorial Medical Center

Date: Aug 25, 1998
Expansion of ADA Title III Protections to Medical Staff Privileges: Menkowitz v. Pottstown Memorial Medical Center Introduction In the landmark case Menkowitz v. Pottstown Memorial Medical Center,...
Vouching and Prosecutorial Conduct: Analysis of United States v. Walker (3d Cir. 1998)

Vouching and Prosecutorial Conduct: Analysis of United States v. Walker (3d Cir. 1998)

Date: Aug 20, 1998
Vouching and Prosecutorial Conduct: Analysis of United States v. Walker (3d Cir. 1998) Introduction United States of America v. Robert Walker is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Retroactive Termination of Vested Judicial Benefits: A Comprehensive Analysis of LARSEN v. SENATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

Retroactive Termination of Vested Judicial Benefits: A Comprehensive Analysis of LARSEN v. SENATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date: Aug 12, 1998
Retroactive Termination of Vested Judicial Benefits: A Comprehensive Analysis of LARSEN v. SENATE OF PENNSYLVANIA Introduction Rolf Larsen v. Senate of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is a pivotal...
Res Judicata and Arbitration Under the FAA: Analysis of Hancock v. Olick

Res Judicata and Arbitration Under the FAA: Analysis of Hancock v. Olick

Date: Aug 11, 1998
Res Judicata and Arbitration Under the FAA: Analysis of Hancock v. Olick Introduction John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, John Hancock Distributors, Inc., and Larry Carter (Appellants)...
Invalid Waiver of Counsel and Habeas Corpus: Establishing New Standards in Henderson v. Frank

Invalid Waiver of Counsel and Habeas Corpus: Establishing New Standards in Henderson v. Frank

Date: Aug 7, 1998
Invalid Waiver of Counsel and Habeas Corpus: Establishing New Standards in Henderson v. Frank Introduction The case of John Kenneth Henderson, Appellant v. Frederick Frank, Superintendent; Thomas W....
Reinterpreting "Crime of Violence": Third Circuit Sets New Precedent in Royce v. Hahn

Reinterpreting "Crime of Violence": Third Circuit Sets New Precedent in Royce v. Hahn

Date: Aug 6, 1998
Reinterpreting "Crime of Violence": Third Circuit Sets New Precedent in Royce v. Hahn Introduction Case: Zuliken S. Royce v. John E. Hahn, Warden Court: United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit...
Determining "Genuineness" in Trademark Infringement: Iberia Foods Corp. v. Rolando Romeo, Jr.

Determining "Genuineness" in Trademark Infringement: Iberia Foods Corp. v. Rolando Romeo, Jr.

Date: Jul 31, 1998
Determining "Genuineness" in Trademark Infringement: Iberia Foods Corp. v. Rolando Romeo, Jr. Introduction Iberia Foods Corp. v. Rolando Romeo, Jr. D/B/A Rol-Rom Foods, adjudicated by the United...
Ripeness Doctrine Affirmed in Workers' Compensation Act Challenge

Ripeness Doctrine Affirmed in Workers' Compensation Act Challenge

Date: Jul 31, 1998
Ripeness Doctrine Affirmed in Workers' Compensation Act Challenge Introduction In the case of Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, American Federation of Teachers, Local 3, AFL-CIO; Local 22,...
Establishing Precedent on Venue Transfer under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a): Tischio v. Bontex, Inc.

Establishing Precedent on Venue Transfer under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a): Tischio v. Bontex, Inc.

Date: Jul 24, 1998
Establishing Precedent on Venue Transfer under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a): Tischio v. Bontex, Inc. Introduction Patricia S. Tischio filed a civil action against Bontex, Inc., along with James C. Kostelni and...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert