Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Interpretation of Ambiguous Anesthesia Exclusion Favors Insured: Medical Protective Co. v. Watkins

Interpretation of Ambiguous Anesthesia Exclusion Favors Insured: Medical Protective Co. v. Watkins

Date: Nov 27, 1999
Interpretation of Ambiguous Anesthesia Exclusion Favors Insured: Medical Protective Co. v. Watkins Introduction Medical Protective Company v. Watkins et al. is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Establishing Standards for Contract Assignments and Collective Bargaining Agreements in Bankruptcy: Third Circuit's Landmark Ruling

Establishing Standards for Contract Assignments and Collective Bargaining Agreements in Bankruptcy: Third Circuit's Landmark Ruling

Date: Nov 25, 1999
Establishing Standards for Contract Assignments and Collective Bargaining Agreements in Bankruptcy: Third Circuit's Landmark Ruling Introduction The case of American Flint Glass Workers Union,...
Reinforcement of Burden of Proof in CERCLA and Spill Act Liability Claims

Reinforcement of Burden of Proof in CERCLA and Spill Act Liability Claims

Date: Nov 23, 1999
Reinforcement of Burden of Proof in CERCLA and Spill Act Liability Claims Introduction In the case of New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. PPG Industries, Inc. et al., the United States Court of Appeals...
Schurr v. Resorts International: Affirmative Action Plans Must Serve a Remedial Purpose Under Title VII

Schurr v. Resorts International: Affirmative Action Plans Must Serve a Remedial Purpose Under Title VII

Date: Nov 13, 1999
Schurr v. Resorts International: Affirmative Action Plans Must Serve a Remedial Purpose Under Title VII Introduction Karl C. Schurr, a white male light and sound technician, filed a lawsuit against...
Third Circuit Limits Telecommunications Act Preemption: Upholds Local Zoning Authority Against Exclusionary Practices

Third Circuit Limits Telecommunications Act Preemption: Upholds Local Zoning Authority Against Exclusionary Practices

Date: Nov 9, 1999
Third Circuit Limits Telecommunications Act Preemption: Upholds Local Zoning Authority Against Exclusionary Practices Introduction The case of APT Pittsburgh Limited Partnership v. Penn Township...
Establishing Reliability in Expert Testimony: IN RE TMI Litigation Commentary

Establishing Reliability in Expert Testimony: IN RE TMI Litigation Commentary

Date: Nov 3, 1999
Establishing Reliability in Expert Testimony: IN RE TMI Litigation Commentary Introduction The case of In Re: TMI Litigation examines the complexities arising from the aftermath of the Three Mile...
Ford Motor Company v. Iwanowa: Dismissal of Forced Labor Claims Due to Statute of Limitations and Nonjusticiability Under the Alien Tort Claims Act

Ford Motor Company v. Iwanowa: Dismissal of Forced Labor Claims Due to Statute of Limitations and Nonjusticiability Under the Alien Tort Claims Act

Date: Oct 29, 1999
Ford Motor Company v. Iwanowa: Dismissal of Forced Labor Claims Due to Statute of Limitations and Nonjusticiability Under the Alien Tort Claims Act Introduction In the case of Elsa Iwanowa v. Ford...
Prioritization of Unsecured Creditors Over Retirement Plan Repayments in Bankruptcy: In Re Anes and Tierney

Prioritization of Unsecured Creditors Over Retirement Plan Repayments in Bankruptcy: In Re Anes and Tierney

Date: Oct 28, 1999
Prioritization of Unsecured Creditors Over Retirement Plan Repayments in Bankruptcy: In Re Anes and Tierney Introduction The case In Re Luisa V. Anes; In Re Robert Tierney and Beverly Tierney v....
Strict Enforcement of AEDPA's Statute of Limitations: Insights from Jones v. Morton

Strict Enforcement of AEDPA's Statute of Limitations: Insights from Jones v. Morton

Date: Oct 26, 1999
Strict Enforcement of AEDPA's Statute of Limitations: Insights from Jones v. Morton Introduction The case of Ronald Jones v. Willis Morton, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
AEDPA Gatekeeping and Retroactivity: United States v. Kevin Roberson

AEDPA Gatekeeping and Retroactivity: United States v. Kevin Roberson

Date: Oct 15, 1999
AEDPA Gatekeeping and Retroactivity: United States v. Kevin Roberson Introduction The case of United States of America v. Kevin Roberson serves as a pivotal decision in understanding the application...
Conspiracies Cannot Base Solely on FDCA Violations: Third Circuit Sets Precedent in Orthopedic Device Litigation

Conspiracies Cannot Base Solely on FDCA Violations: Third Circuit Sets Precedent in Orthopedic Device Litigation

Date: Oct 8, 1999
Conspiracies Cannot Base Solely on FDCA Violations: Third Circuit Sets Precedent in Orthopedic Device Litigation Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in the case In...
Ambiguity in Promotional Contest Offers: Pacitti v. Macy's Establishes Precedent

Ambiguity in Promotional Contest Offers: Pacitti v. Macy's Establishes Precedent

Date: Oct 6, 1999
Ambiguity in Promotional Contest Offers: Pacitti v. Macy's Establishes Precedent Introduction Joanna Pacitti, a Minor, by Joseph Pacitti, and Stella Pacitti, Her Parents and Guardians, Appellants v....
Non-reviewability of Remand Orders and Strict Criteria for Colorado River Abstention: Insights from Spring City Corp. v. American Buildings Co.

Non-reviewability of Remand Orders and Strict Criteria for Colorado River Abstention: Insights from Spring City Corp. v. American Buildings Co.

Date: Oct 5, 1999
Non-reviewability of Remand Orders and Strict Criteria for Colorado River Abstention: Insights from Spring City Corp. v. American Buildings Co. Introduction The case of Spring City Corporation,...
Third Circuit Clarifies "Advertising Injury" in Insurance Coverage: No Defense for Trade Secret Theft in Product Advertising

Third Circuit Clarifies "Advertising Injury" in Insurance Coverage: No Defense for Trade Secret Theft in Product Advertising

Date: Oct 1, 1999
Third Circuit Clarifies "Advertising Injury" in Insurance Coverage: No Defense for Trade Secret Theft in Product Advertising Introduction The case of The Frog, Switch Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. The...
Indefinite Detention of Excludable Aliens: Insights from CHI THON NGO A/K/A DAVID LAM v. INS

Indefinite Detention of Excludable Aliens: Insights from CHI THON NGO A/K/A DAVID LAM v. INS

Date: Sep 25, 1999
Indefinite Detention of Excludable Aliens: Insights from CHI THON NGO A/K/A DAVID LAM v. INS Introduction The case of Chi Thon Ngo A/K/A David Lam versus the Immigration and Naturalization Service...
Affirmation of Reasonable Restrictions on Videotaping Public Meetings: Whiteland Woods v. Township of West Whiteland

Affirmation of Reasonable Restrictions on Videotaping Public Meetings: Whiteland Woods v. Township of West Whiteland

Date: Sep 24, 1999
Affirmation of Reasonable Restrictions on Videotaping Public Meetings Introduction The case of Whiteland Woods, L.P. v. Township of West Whiteland addresses the balancing act between the public's...
Pamintuan v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital: Upholding HCQIA Immunity and Dismissing Racial Discrimination Claims

Pamintuan v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital: Upholding HCQIA Immunity and Dismissing Racial Discrimination Claims

Date: Sep 22, 1999
Pamintuan v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital: Upholding HCQIA Immunity and Dismissing Racial Discrimination Claims Introduction The case of Elvira Pamintuan, M.D. v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital was...
Complete ERISA Preemption Clarified in Bauman v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.

Complete ERISA Preemption Clarified in Bauman v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.

Date: Sep 17, 1999
Complete ERISA Preemption Clarified in Bauman v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc. Introduction The case of Bauman v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit serves...
Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Proceedings: NRG Energy v. Manus Corporation

Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Proceedings: NRG Energy v. Manus Corporation

Date: Sep 14, 1999
Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Proceedings: NRG Energy v. Manus Corporation Introduction The case IN RE O'Brien Environmental Energy, Inc., Debtor Manus Corporation v. NRG Energy, Inc. (Third...
Ceverilo Chambers v. United States: Affirming the Non-Mootness of Property Return Motions Under Rule 41(e) After Government Disposal

Ceverilo Chambers v. United States: Affirming the Non-Mootness of Property Return Motions Under Rule 41(e) After Government Disposal

Date: Sep 14, 1999
Ceverilo Chambers v. United States: Affirming the Non-Mootness of Property Return Motions Under Rule 41(e) After Government Disposal Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Ceverilo...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert