Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Strict Standards for Motions for Reconsideration Affirmed in Wimbs v. City of Pittsburgh

Strict Standards for Motions for Reconsideration Affirmed in Wimbs v. City of Pittsburgh

Date: Dec 30, 1998
Strict Standards for Motions for Reconsideration Affirmed in Wimbs v. City of Pittsburgh Introduction In the case of Wimbs v. City of Pittsburgh, decided on December 29, 1998, the United States...
Mondzelewski v. Pathmark Stores: Expanding Retaliation Claims Under the ADA

Mondzelewski v. Pathmark Stores: Expanding Retaliation Claims Under the ADA

Date: Dec 24, 1998
Mondzelewski v. Pathmark Stores: Expanding Retaliation Claims Under the ADA Introduction The case of Joseph A. Mondzelewski and Rebecca Mondzelewski v. Pathmark Stores, Inc. and Supermarkets General...
Qualified Immunity in Malicious Prosecution Claims: Insights from Torres v. McLaughlin

Qualified Immunity in Malicious Prosecution Claims: Insights from Torres v. McLaughlin

Date: Dec 16, 1998
Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal concerns or representation, please consult a qualified attorney. Qualified...
Abbott v. Latshaw: Clarifying State Action and Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims

Abbott v. Latshaw: Clarifying State Action and Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims

Date: Dec 12, 1998
Abbott v. Latshaw: Clarifying State Action and Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims Introduction In Mark Abbott v. Laurie J. Latshaw et al. (164 F.3d 141, 1998), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Remand Affirmed Due to Insufficient Consideration of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Determination

Remand Affirmed Due to Insufficient Consideration of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Determination

Date: Dec 8, 1998
Remand Affirmed Due to Insufficient Consideration of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Determination Introduction The case of Karen C. Oldrati v. Kenneth S. Apfel addresses crucial...
Affirmation of Forfeiture: Establishing Boundaries on the Right to Counsel in Sentencing

Affirmation of Forfeiture: Establishing Boundaries on the Right to Counsel in Sentencing

Date: Dec 4, 1998
Affirmation of Forfeiture: Establishing Boundaries on the Right to Counsel in Sentencing Introduction The case of United States of America v. Michael K. Leggett, 162 F.3d 237 (3d Cir. 1998), presents...
Equitable Subordination and Fiduciary Duty Breach in Bankruptcy: Citicorp Venture Capital Ltd. v. Committee of Creditors

Equitable Subordination and Fiduciary Duty Breach in Bankruptcy: Citicorp Venture Capital Ltd. v. Committee of Creditors

Date: Nov 25, 1998
Equitable Subordination and Fiduciary Duty Breach in Bankruptcy: Citicorp Venture Capital Ltd. v. Committee of Creditors Introduction The case of CITICORP VENTURE CAPITAL, LTD. v. COMMITTEE OF...
Limitations on Parental Representation under the IDEA: Collinsgru v. Palmyra Board of Education

Limitations on Parental Representation under the IDEA: Collinsgru v. Palmyra Board of Education

Date: Nov 24, 1998
Limitations on Parental Representation under the IDEA: Collinsgru v. Palmyra Board of Education Introduction In the landmark case of Robert Collinsgru; Maura Collinsgru, on behalf of their son,...
Seizure in Pretrial Restrictions: New Third Circuit Precedent on Malicious Prosecution

Seizure in Pretrial Restrictions: New Third Circuit Precedent on Malicious Prosecution

Date: Nov 24, 1998
Seizure in Pretrial Restrictions: New Third Circuit Precedent on Malicious Prosecution Introduction In the landmark case Gallo v. City of Philadelphia, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affymetrix v. Synteni: Criteria for Forum Transfer in Patent Infringement Cases

Affymetrix v. Synteni: Criteria for Forum Transfer in Patent Infringement Cases

Date: Nov 19, 1998
Affymetrix v. Synteni: Criteria for Forum Transfer in Patent Infringement Cases Introduction The case of Affymetrix, Inc. v. Synteni, Inc. and Incyte Pharmaceuticals, Inc. centers around the...
Strengthening Prima Facie Requirements for Constructive Discharge Under ADEA: Connors v. Chrysler Financial

Strengthening Prima Facie Requirements for Constructive Discharge Under ADEA: Connors v. Chrysler Financial

Date: Nov 18, 1998
Strengthening Prima Facie Requirements for Constructive Discharge Under ADEA: Connors v. Chrysler Financial Introduction Connors v. Chrysler Financial Corporation is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Enhancing Sentencing for Charity Fraud and Abuse of Trust: Analysis of United States v. Bennett

Enhancing Sentencing for Charity Fraud and Abuse of Trust: Analysis of United States v. Bennett

Date: Nov 17, 1998
Enhancing Sentencing for Charity Fraud and Abuse of Trust: Analysis of United States v. Bennett Introduction The case of United States of America v. John G. Bennett, Jr., adjudicated by the United...
Third Circuit Establishes Imminent Danger Exception to 'Three Strikes' Rule under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g)

Third Circuit Establishes Imminent Danger Exception to 'Three Strikes' Rule under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g)

Date: Nov 14, 1998
Third Circuit Establishes Imminent Danger Exception to 'Three Strikes' Rule under 28 U.S.C. §1915(g) Introduction Henry Gibbs, Jr., a prisoner at the State Correctional Institute at Somerset, filed a...
Class Action Certification Denied in Medical Monitoring Claims Against Tobacco Giants

Class Action Certification Denied in Medical Monitoring Claims Against Tobacco Giants

Date: Nov 13, 1998
Class Action Certification Denied in Medical Monitoring Claims Against Tobacco Giants Introduction In the landmark case William Barnes et al. v. The American Tobacco Company et al., adjudicated by...
Application of Brecht's Harmless Error Standard to Doyle Violations: Third Circuit Upholds Hassine's Conviction

Application of Brecht's Harmless Error Standard to Doyle Violations: Third Circuit Upholds Hassine's Conviction

Date: Nov 10, 1998
Application of Brecht's Harmless Error Standard to Doyle Violations: Third Circuit Upholds Hassine's Conviction Introduction In the case of Victor Hassine v. Charles Zimmerman, the United States...
Limitation of Magistrate Judges' Authority in Remanding Cases: U.S. Healthcare v. Hoyt

Limitation of Magistrate Judges' Authority in Remanding Cases: U.S. Healthcare v. Hoyt

Date: Oct 28, 1998
Limitation of Magistrate Judges' Authority in Remanding Cases: U.S. Healthcare v. Hoyt Introduction In the landmark case In re: U.S. Healthcare, 159 F.3d 142 (3d Cir. 1998), the United States Court...
Overturned Convictions and Probable Cause in Section 1983 Malicious Prosecution: Montgomery v. De Simone

Overturned Convictions and Probable Cause in Section 1983 Malicious Prosecution: Montgomery v. De Simone

Date: Oct 17, 1998
Overturned Convictions and Probable Cause in Section 1983 Malicious Prosecution: Montgomery v. De Simone Introduction Montgomery v. De Simone, 159 F.3d 120 (3d Cir. 1998), is a pivotal case...
Economic Substance Doctrine Reinforced in ACM Partnership v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Economic Substance Doctrine Reinforced in ACM Partnership v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Date: Oct 14, 1998
Economic Substance Doctrine Reinforced in ACM Partnership v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction The case of ACM Partnership, Southampton-Hamilton Company, Tax Matters Partner, Appellant v....
Limits on Motions for Reargument in Patent Claim Construction: Insights from Schering Corp. v. Amgen Inc.

Limits on Motions for Reargument in Patent Claim Construction: Insights from Schering Corp. v. Amgen Inc.

Date: Oct 10, 1998
Limits on Motions for Reargument in Patent Claim Construction: Insights from Schering Corp. v. Amgen Inc. Introduction The case of Schering Corporation and Biogen, Inc. v. Amgen Inc., decided on...
Enhanced Scrutiny of Asylum Credibility Findings: Senathirajah v. INS

Enhanced Scrutiny of Asylum Credibility Findings: Senathirajah v. INS

Date: Oct 10, 1998
Enhanced Scrutiny of Asylum Credibility Findings: Senathirajah v. INS Introduction The case of Chenthilkumaran Senathirajah v. Immigration Naturalization Service (INS) represents a pivotal moment in...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert