Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Pamintuan v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital: Upholding HCQIA Immunity and Dismissing Racial Discrimination Claims

Pamintuan v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital: Upholding HCQIA Immunity and Dismissing Racial Discrimination Claims

Date: Sep 22, 1999
Pamintuan v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital: Upholding HCQIA Immunity and Dismissing Racial Discrimination Claims Introduction The case of Elvira Pamintuan, M.D. v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital was...
Complete ERISA Preemption Clarified in Bauman v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.

Complete ERISA Preemption Clarified in Bauman v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.

Date: Sep 17, 1999
Complete ERISA Preemption Clarified in Bauman v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc. Introduction The case of Bauman v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc. before the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit serves...
Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Proceedings: NRG Energy v. Manus Corporation

Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Proceedings: NRG Energy v. Manus Corporation

Date: Sep 14, 1999
Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Proceedings: NRG Energy v. Manus Corporation Introduction The case IN RE O'Brien Environmental Energy, Inc., Debtor Manus Corporation v. NRG Energy, Inc. (Third...
Ceverilo Chambers v. United States: Affirming the Non-Mootness of Property Return Motions Under Rule 41(e) After Government Disposal

Ceverilo Chambers v. United States: Affirming the Non-Mootness of Property Return Motions Under Rule 41(e) After Government Disposal

Date: Sep 14, 1999
Ceverilo Chambers v. United States: Affirming the Non-Mootness of Property Return Motions Under Rule 41(e) After Government Disposal Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Ceverilo...
Third Circuit Establishes Good Faith Exception for Anticipatory Search Warrants in Child Pornography Cases

Third Circuit Establishes Good Faith Exception for Anticipatory Search Warrants in Child Pornography Cases

Date: Sep 9, 1999
Third Circuit Establishes Good Faith Exception for Anticipatory Search Warrants in Child Pornography Cases Introduction United States of America v. Ray Donald Loy (191 F.3d 360) is a pivotal case...
Iadimarco v. Runyon: Establishing Prima Facie in Reverse Discrimination Cases

Iadimarco v. Runyon: Establishing Prima Facie in Reverse Discrimination Cases

Date: Sep 9, 1999
Iadimarco v. Runyon: Establishing Prima Facie in Reverse Discrimination Cases Introduction Charles A. Iadimarco v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Prima Facie Gender Discrimination Under Title VII: Replacement Without Class Requirement

Prima Facie Gender Discrimination Under Title VII: Replacement Without Class Requirement

Date: Sep 8, 1999
Prima Facie Gender Discrimination Under Title VII: Replacement Without Class Requirement Introduction In the case of PATRICIA M. PIVIROTTO v. INNOVATIVE SYSTEMS, INC., decided by the United States...
Limits on Contingent Fees and Trustee Liability under Pennsylvania Law Established in Dardovitch v. Haltzman

Limits on Contingent Fees and Trustee Liability under Pennsylvania Law Established in Dardovitch v. Haltzman

Date: Sep 8, 1999
Limits on Contingent Fees and Trustee Liability under Pennsylvania Law Established in Dardovitch v. Haltzman Introduction Dardovitch v. Haltzman, Esquire is a landmark case decided by the United...
Third Circuit Establishes New Precedent on Fraudulent Transfers and Upholds Presumption Against Reverse Piercing of Corporate Veil in Bankruptcy Cases

Third Circuit Establishes New Precedent on Fraudulent Transfers and Upholds Presumption Against Reverse Piercing of Corporate Veil in Bankruptcy Cases

Date: Sep 4, 1999
Third Circuit Establishes New Precedent on Fraudulent Transfers and Upholds Presumption Against Reverse Piercing of Corporate Veil in Bankruptcy Cases Introduction The case of In re: Eric J....
Third Circuit Establishes "Sufficiently Younger" Standard in ADEA RIF Cases

Third Circuit Establishes "Sufficiently Younger" Standard in ADEA RIF Cases

Date: Sep 1, 1999
Third Circuit Establishes "Sufficiently Younger" Standard in ADEA Reduction-in-Force Cases Introduction The case of Donald Showalter v. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) addresses...
Bald Eagle & South Butler County School Districts v. Keystone Financial: RICO Claims Barred by PSLRA

Bald Eagle & South Butler County School Districts v. Keystone Financial: RICO Claims Barred by PSLRA

Date: Sep 1, 1999
Bald Eagle & South Butler County School Districts v. Keystone Financial: RICO Claims Barred by PSLRA Introduction The case of Bald Eagle Area School District; South Butler County School District v....
Third Circuit: Potential Witnesses Have Standing under 42 U.S.C. §1985; Attorney-Client Relationships Excluded from Conspiracy

Third Circuit: Potential Witnesses Have Standing under 42 U.S.C. §1985; Attorney-Client Relationships Excluded from Conspiracy

Date: Aug 27, 1999
Third Circuit: Potential Witnesses Have Standing under 42 U.S.C. §1985; Attorney-Client Relationships Excluded from Conspiracy Introduction The case of John J. Heffernan v. Robert W. Hunter, et al....
Enhancing Conspiracy Liability Through Buyer-Seller Relationships and Expert Testimony Limits: Insights from United States v. Gibbs

Enhancing Conspiracy Liability Through Buyer-Seller Relationships and Expert Testimony Limits: Insights from United States v. Gibbs

Date: Aug 27, 1999
Enhancing Conspiracy Liability Through Buyer-Seller Relationships and Expert Testimony Limits: Insights from United States v. Gibbs Introduction The case of United States of America v. Terrence Gibbs...
Third Circuit: Potential Witnesses Have Standing under 42 U.S.C. §1985; Attorney-Client Relationships Excluded from Conspiracy

Third Circuit: Potential Witnesses Have Standing under 42 U.S.C. §1985; Attorney-Client Relationships Excluded from Conspiracy

Date: Aug 27, 1999
Third Circuit: Potential Witnesses Have Standing under 42 U.S.C. §1985; Attorney-Client Relationships Excluded from Conspiracy Introduction The case of John J. Heffernan v. Robert W. Hunter, et al....
Third Circuit Establishes Criteria for IDEA Tuition and IEE Reimbursement, Rejecting Equitable Limitations on Reimbursement

Third Circuit Establishes Criteria for IDEA Tuition and IEE Reimbursement, Rejecting Equitable Limitations on Reimbursement

Date: Aug 26, 1999
Third Circuit Establishes Criteria for IDEA Tuition and IEE Reimbursement, Rejecting Equitable Limitations on Reimbursement Introduction In the case of Warren G. and Grant G. by and through their...
Establishing Private Right of Action Under Title VI's Disparate Impact Regulations in Public Education Funding

Establishing Private Right of Action Under Title VI's Disparate Impact Regulations in Public Education Funding

Date: Aug 26, 1999
Establishing Private Right of Action Under Title VI's Disparate Impact Regulations in Public Education Funding Introduction The case of Powell et al. v. Ridge et al., decided by the United States...
Waiver of Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Hull v. Kyler Decision

Waiver of Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Hull v. Kyler Decision

Date: Aug 24, 1999
Waiver of Procedural Default in Habeas Corpus: Insights from Hull v. Kyler Introduction Hull v. Kyler, a pivotal decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in 1999,...
Manufacturers of Raw Fertilizer Products Not Liable for Terrorist Misuse: Port Authority of New York and New Jersey v. Arcadian Corp. et al.

Manufacturers of Raw Fertilizer Products Not Liable for Terrorist Misuse: Port Authority of New York and New Jersey v. Arcadian Corp. et al.

Date: Aug 19, 1999
Manufacturers of Raw Fertilizer Products Not Liable for Terrorist Misuse: Port Authority of New York and New Jersey v. Arcadian Corp. et al. Introduction The case of Port Authority of New York and...
Defining Disability Under ADA and Employer’s Interactive Process: Insights from TAYLOR v. PHOENIXVILLE SCHOOL DISTrict

Defining Disability Under ADA and Employer’s Interactive Process: Insights from TAYLOR v. PHOENIXVILLE SCHOOL DISTrict

Date: Aug 19, 1999
Defining Disability Under ADA and Employer’s Interactive Process: Insights from TAYLOR v. PHOENIXVILLE SCHOOL DISTrict Introduction The case of Katherine L. TAYLOR v. PHOENIXVILLE SCHOOL DISTrict...
Procedural Barriers to Collateral Challenges in Guilty Plea Cases: Insights from United States v. Marlon Garth

Procedural Barriers to Collateral Challenges in Guilty Plea Cases: Insights from United States v. Marlon Garth

Date: Aug 17, 1999
Procedural Barriers to Collateral Challenges in Guilty Plea Cases: Insights from United States v. Marlon Garth Introduction The case of United States v. Marlon Garth, adjudicated by the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert