Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Chen v. Ashcroft: Defining Asylum Eligibility for Unmarried Partners under Coercive Population Control Programs

Chen v. Ashcroft: Defining Asylum Eligibility for Unmarried Partners under Coercive Population Control Programs

Date: Aug 21, 2004
Chen v. Ashcroft: Defining Asylum Eligibility for Unmarried Partners under Coercive Population Control Programs Introduction The case of Cai Luan Chen v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United...
Third Circuit Affirms Permissible Admission of Redacted Co-Defendant Statements in Habeas Corpus under Bruton Standard: Priester v. Vaughn

Third Circuit Affirms Permissible Admission of Redacted Co-Defendant Statements in Habeas Corpus under Bruton Standard: Priester v. Vaughn

Date: Aug 20, 2004
Third Circuit Affirms Permissible Admission of Redacted Co-Defendant Statements in Habeas Corpus under Bruton Standard: Priester v. Vaughn Introduction The case of Barry Priester v. Donald T. Vaughn;...
Rule 60(b) Motions as Successive Habeas Petitions Under AEDPA: Insights from Pridgen v. Shannon

Rule 60(b) Motions as Successive Habeas Petitions Under AEDPA: Insights from Pridgen v. Shannon

Date: Aug 20, 2004
Rule 60(b) Motions as Successive Habeas Petitions Under AEDPA: Insights from Pridgen v. Shannon Introduction The case of James Mario Pridgen v. Shannon; The District Attorney of the County of...
Reclassification of Graduate Medical Education Costs: Precedent from Mercy Catholic Medical Center v. Thompson

Reclassification of Graduate Medical Education Costs: Precedent from Mercy Catholic Medical Center v. Thompson

Date: Aug 19, 2004
Reclassification of Graduate Medical Education Costs: Precedent from Mercy Catholic Medical Center v. Thompson Introduction MERCY CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant v. TOMMY G. THOMPSON, SECRETARY OF...
Clarifying 'Property' under Due Process: Pappas v. City of Lebanon Establishes Threshold for Entitlement

Clarifying 'Property' under Due Process: Pappas v. City of Lebanon Establishes Threshold for Entitlement

Date: Aug 17, 2004
Clarifying 'Property' under Due Process: Pappas v. City of Lebanon Establishes Threshold for Entitlement Introduction George C. Pappas v. City of Lebanon, et al. (331 F. Supp. 2d 311, United States...
Affirmation of Broad Discovery in Bad Faith Insurance Litigation: Saldí v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Co.

Affirmation of Broad Discovery in Bad Faith Insurance Litigation: Saldí v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Co.

Date: Aug 14, 2004
Affirmation of Broad Discovery in Bad Faith Insurance Litigation: Saldí v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Co. Introduction Saldí v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Co. is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Justofin v. MetLife: Third Circuit Clarifies Burden of Proof in Life Insurance Policy Amendments

Justofin v. MetLife: Third Circuit Clarifies Burden of Proof in Life Insurance Policy Amendments

Date: Aug 13, 2004
Justofin v. MetLife: Third Circuit Clarifies Burden of Proof in Life Insurance Policy Amendments 1. Introduction In the pivotal case of Justofin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, the United...
Fielder v. Varnner: Third Circuit Clarifies Federal Habeas Statute of Limitations

Fielder v. Varnner: Third Circuit Clarifies Federal Habeas Statute of Limitations

Date: Aug 10, 2004
Fielder v. Varnner: Third Circuit Clarifies Federal Habeas Statute of Limitations Introduction Anthony Fielder v. Benjamin Varnner, District Attorney of County of Philadelphia, et al. is a pivotal...
Stale Administrative Records and Their Effect on Asylum Claims: Insights from Berishaj v. Ashcroft

Stale Administrative Records and Their Effect on Asylum Claims: Insights from Berishaj v. Ashcroft

Date: Aug 6, 2004
Stale Administrative Records and Their Effect on Asylum Claims: Insights from Berishaj v. Ashcroft Introduction Berishaj v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 314 (3rd Cir. 2004), is a significant appellate decision...
Actual Innocence as a Gateway to Habeas Corpus Relief: Hubbard v. Pinchak

Actual Innocence as a Gateway to Habeas Corpus Relief: Hubbard v. Pinchak

Date: Aug 6, 2004
Actual Innocence as a Gateway to Habeas Corpus Relief: Hubbard v. Pinchak Introduction Hubbard v. Pinchak, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on August 5, 2004,...
Clarifying 'Possession in Furtherance' under 18 U.S.C. §924(c): Analysis of United States v. Sparrow (371 F.3d 851)

Clarifying 'Possession in Furtherance' under 18 U.S.C. §924(c): Analysis of United States v. Sparrow (371 F.3d 851)

Date: Aug 4, 2004
Clarifying 'Possession in Furtherance' under 18 U.S.C. §924(c): Analysis of United States v. Sparrow (371 F.3d 851) Introduction United States of America v. Gaylord Sparrow, 371 F.3d 851 (3d Cir....
Affirmation of Rational Basis Standard and Supplemental Jurisdiction Limits in Educational Extracurricular Claims – Da v. d ANGSTADT (2004)

Affirmation of Rational Basis Standard and Supplemental Jurisdiction Limits in Educational Extracurricular Claims – Da v. d ANGSTADT (2004)

Date: Jul 30, 2004
Affirmation of Rational Basis Standard and Supplemental Jurisdiction Limits in Educational Extracurricular Claims – Da v. d ANGSTADT (2004) Introduction Da v. d ANGSTADT and Barbara Angstadt, Parents...
Third Circuit Affirms Strict Criteria for Ex Parte Seizure under the Trademark Counterfeiting Act

Third Circuit Affirms Strict Criteria for Ex Parte Seizure under the Trademark Counterfeiting Act

Date: Jul 29, 2004
Third Circuit Affirms Strict Criteria for Ex Parte Seizure under the Trademark Counterfeiting Act Introduction In Lorillard Tobacco Company v. Bisan Food Corp., 377 F.3d 313 (3d Cir. 2004), the...
Credibility Determinations in Asylum Cases: Insights from He Chun Chen v. Ashcroft

Credibility Determinations in Asylum Cases: Insights from He Chun Chen v. Ashcroft

Date: Jul 27, 2004
Credibility Determinations in Asylum Cases: Insights from He Chun Chen v. Ashcroft Introduction The case of He Chun Chen, a/k/a He Zhong Chen v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States...
Grandfather Clause Applicability in Wendell Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act: Khodara Environmental v. Marion Blakey

Grandfather Clause Applicability in Wendell Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act: Khodara Environmental v. Marion Blakey

Date: Jul 22, 2004
Grandfather Clause Applicability in Wendell Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act: Khodara Environmental v. Marion Blakey Introduction Khodara Environmental, Inc., General Partner, on behalf of...
Federal Preemption of State Common Law Claims in PMA-Regulated Medical Devices: A Detailed Commentary on Horn v. Thoratec Corp.

Federal Preemption of State Common Law Claims in PMA-Regulated Medical Devices: A Detailed Commentary on Horn v. Thoratec Corp.

Date: Jul 21, 2004
Federal Preemption of State Common Law Claims in PMA-Regulated Medical Devices: A Detailed Commentary on Horn v. Thoratec Corp. Introduction In Barbara E. Horn v. Thoratec Corporation, 376 F.3d 163...
Immunity of Union-Attorneys Under 29 U.S.C. § 185(b): An Analysis of Gisela Carino v. Marc Stefan

Immunity of Union-Attorneys Under 29 U.S.C. § 185(b): An Analysis of Gisela Carino v. Marc Stefan

Date: Jul 20, 2004
Immunity of Union-Attorneys Under 29 U.S.C. § 185(b): An Analysis of Gisela Carino v. Marc Stefan Introduction The case of Gisela Carino v. Marc Stefan, Esq; Butsavage Associates, LLC presents a...
Application of Rooker-Feldman Doctrine to §1983 Claims in Custody Disputes: Marran v. Montgomery County

Application of Rooker-Feldman Doctrine to §1983 Claims in Custody Disputes: Marran v. Montgomery County

Date: Jul 16, 2004
Application of Rooker-Feldman Doctrine to §1983 Claims in Custody Disputes: Marran v. Montgomery County Introduction Marran v. Montgomery County Office of Children and Youth is a pivotal case...
Due Process Violation in Sentencing: United States v. Eakman Establishes Enhanced Section 2255 Relief Standards

Due Process Violation in Sentencing: United States v. Eakman Establishes Enhanced Section 2255 Relief Standards

Date: Jul 13, 2004
Due Process Violation in Sentencing: United States v. Eakman Establishes Enhanced Section 2255 Relief Standards Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Samuel L. Eakman, Jr.,...
Establishing Broker Duty to Third-Party Surety Bond Obligees

Establishing Broker Duty to Third-Party Surety Bond Obligees

Date: Jun 25, 2004
Establishing Broker Duty to Third-Party Surety Bond Obligees Introduction The case of Highlands Insurance Company f/k/a Highlands Insurance Group, Inc. v. Hobbs Group, LLC; Robert Markel; Nissan...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert