Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Defendants' Joinder in Drug and Firearm Offenses: An Analysis of United States v. Ke (397 F.3d 173)

Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Defendants' Joinder in Drug and Firearm Offenses: An Analysis of United States v. Ke (397 F.3d 173)

Date: Feb 12, 2005
Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Defendants' Joinder in Drug and Firearm Offenses: An Analysis of United States v. Ke (397 F.3d 173) Introduction In the appellate case United States of America...
Legal Custody and Derivative Citizenship: Bagot v. Ashcroft

Legal Custody and Derivative Citizenship: Bagot v. Ashcroft

Date: Feb 12, 2005
Legal Custody and Derivative Citizenship: Bagot v. Ashcroft Introduction The case of Odiri Nkofi Bagot v. John Ashcroft, James Ziglar, Kenneth Elwood serves as a pivotal judicial examination of the...
Application of Laches Doctrine in False Advertising Claims under the Lanham Act: Santana Products Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.

Application of Laches Doctrine in False Advertising Claims under the Lanham Act: Santana Products Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.

Date: Feb 10, 2005
Application of Laches Doctrine in False Advertising Claims under the Lanham Act Introduction The case of Santana Products Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc. serves as a pivotal precedent in the...
Third Circuit Reverses District Court on Batson Violation and Equitable Tolling in Curtis Brinson Habeas Corpus Case

Third Circuit Reverses District Court on Batson Violation and Equitable Tolling in Curtis Brinson Habeas Corpus Case

Date: Feb 9, 2005
Third Circuit Reverses District Court on Batson Violation and Equitable Tolling in Curtis Brinson Habeas Corpus Case Introduction The case of Curtis Brinson v. Donald Vaughn et al., decided by the...
Threshold for Proving Ethnic and Religious Persecution in Asylum: An Analysis of Lie v. Ashcroft

Threshold for Proving Ethnic and Religious Persecution in Asylum: An Analysis of Lie v. Ashcroft

Date: Feb 8, 2005
Threshold for Proving Ethnic and Religious Persecution in Asylum: An Analysis of Lie v. Ashcroft Introduction Imelda Laurencia Lie, Soyono Liem Andre, Yulius Suyono, Petitioners v. John Ashcroft,...
Fair Debt Collections Practices Act Applied to Municipal Debt Collection: PIPER v. PORTNOFF LAW ASSOCIATES

Fair Debt Collections Practices Act Applied to Municipal Debt Collection: PIPER v. PORTNOFF LAW ASSOCIATES

Date: Feb 1, 2005
Fair Debt Collections Practices Act Applied to Municipal Debt Collection: PIPER v. PORTNOFF LAW ASSOCIATES Introduction In PIPER v. PORTNOFF LAW ASSOCIATES, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in §1983 Prison Suicide Case: Establishing the Threshold for 'Deliberate Indifference'

Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in §1983 Prison Suicide Case: Establishing the Threshold for 'Deliberate Indifference'

Date: Jan 29, 2005
Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in §1983 Prison Suicide Case: Establishing the Threshold for 'Deliberate Indifference' Introduction The case of Patricia A. Woloszyn v. County of Lawrence et...
Third Circuit Reinforces Proper Application of Lodestar Method in Attorneys' Fee Awards: In re Rite Aid Corp. Securities Litigation

Third Circuit Reinforces Proper Application of Lodestar Method in Attorneys' Fee Awards: In re Rite Aid Corp. Securities Litigation

Date: Jan 27, 2005
Third Circuit Reinforces Proper Application of Lodestar Method in Attorneys' Fee Awards: In re Rite Aid Corp. Securities Litigation Introduction The case of IN RE RITE AID CORPORATION SECURITIES...
Reimbursement Obligations of Non-Profit Employers Not Classified as Excise Taxes Under Bankruptcy Code

Reimbursement Obligations of Non-Profit Employers Not Classified as Excise Taxes Under Bankruptcy Code

Date: Jan 25, 2005
Reimbursement Obligations of Non-Profit Employers Not Classified as Excise Taxes Under Bankruptcy Code Introduction In the case of In re: United Healthcare System, Inc., Debtor, the United States...
Defining Specific Intent in Torture Claims under the Convention Against Torture: In Napoleon B. Auguste v. Department of Homeland Security

Defining Specific Intent in Torture Claims under the Convention Against Torture: In Napoleon B. Auguste v. Department of Homeland Security

Date: Jan 21, 2005
Defining Specific Intent in Torture Claims under the Convention Against Torture: In Napoleon B. Auguste v. Department of Homeland Security Introduction In the landmark case of Napoleon Bonaparte...
Enhanced Obligations for Defense Counsel in Diminished Capacity Defenses: Jacobs v. Horn

Enhanced Obligations for Defense Counsel in Diminished Capacity Defenses: Jacobs v. Horn

Date: Jan 21, 2005
Enhanced Obligations for Defense Counsel in Diminished Capacity Defenses: Jacobs v. Horn Introduction Daniel Jacobs v. Martin Horn, 395 F.3d 92 (3d Cir. 2005), is a pivotal case in the realm of...
Clarifying 'Testimonial Evidence': Third Circuit's Interpretation Post-Crawford in United States v. Hendricks et al.

Clarifying 'Testimonial Evidence': Third Circuit's Interpretation Post-Crawford in United States v. Hendricks et al.

Date: Jan 15, 2005
Clarifying 'Testimonial Evidence': Third Circuit's Interpretation Post-Crawford in United States v. Hendricks et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Craig M. Hendricks et al.,...
Clarifying the Interstate Commerce Element in Federal Arson Under 18 U.S.C. § 844(i): The Davies Decision

Clarifying the Interstate Commerce Element in Federal Arson Under 18 U.S.C. § 844(i): The Davies Decision

Date: Jan 14, 2005
Clarifying the Interstate Commerce Element in Federal Arson Under 18 U.S.C. § 844(i): The Davies Decision Introduction In United States v. Todd R. Davies, 394 F.3d 182 (2005), the United States Court...
DeFoy v. McCullough: Federal Habeas Relief Accessible Without State Mandamus Exhaustion in Parole Denial Cases Involving Fifth Amendment Claims

DeFoy v. McCullough: Federal Habeas Relief Accessible Without State Mandamus Exhaustion in Parole Denial Cases Involving Fifth Amendment Claims

Date: Jan 5, 2005
DeFoy v. McCullough: Federal Habeas Relief Accessible Without State Mandamus Exhaustion in Parole Denial Cases Involving Fifth Amendment Claims Introduction DeFoy v. McCullough is a pivotal case...
Enhanced Pleading Standards for Securities Fraud Class Actions: Insights from California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Chubb Corporation

Enhanced Pleading Standards for Securities Fraud Class Actions: Insights from California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Chubb Corporation

Date: Dec 31, 2004
Enhanced Pleading Standards for Securities Fraud Class Actions: Insights from California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Chubb Corporation Introduction The case of California Public Employees'...
Procedural Default Exception for Brady Violations Established in Slutzker v. Johnson

Procedural Default Exception for Brady Violations Established in Slutzker v. Johnson

Date: Dec 30, 2004
Procedural Default Exception for Brady Violations Established in Slutzker v. Johnson Introduction Slutzker v. Johnson, 393 F.3d 373 (3d Cir. 2004), is a pivotal case in the realm of federal habeas...
Affirming the Timely Raising of AEDPA's Statute of Limitations Defense Sua Sponte in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions

Affirming the Timely Raising of AEDPA's Statute of Limitations Defense Sua Sponte in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Dec 30, 2004
Affirming the Timely Raising of AEDPA's Statute of Limitations Defense Sua Sponte in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions 1. Introduction The case of Curtis Long v. Harry Wilson, Superintendent,...
Defining 'Public Conveyance' and 'Regular Passenger Service' in Insurance Policies: Analysis of J.C. Penney Life Insurance Co. v. Pilosi

Defining 'Public Conveyance' and 'Regular Passenger Service' in Insurance Policies: Analysis of J.C. Penney Life Insurance Co. v. Pilosi

Date: Dec 29, 2004
Defining 'Public Conveyance' and 'Regular Passenger Service' in Insurance Policies: Analysis of J.C. Penney Life Insurance Co. v. Pilosi Introduction The case of J.C. Penney Life Insurance Company v....
Affirmation of Third Circuit: Invalidating Successorship-Based Health Benefit Assignments under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act

Affirmation of Third Circuit: Invalidating Successorship-Based Health Benefit Assignments under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act

Date: Dec 24, 2004
Affirmation of Third Circuit: Invalidating Successorship-Based Health Benefit Assignments under the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act Introduction The case of USX Corporation and U.S. Steel...
Procedural Default and the Actual Innocence Exception: A Comprehensive Analysis of George Johnson v. S.A.

Procedural Default and the Actual Innocence Exception: A Comprehensive Analysis of George Johnson v. S.A.

Date: Dec 23, 2004
Procedural Default and the Actual Innocence Exception: A Comprehensive Analysis of George Johnson v. Stevens (392 F.3d 551) Introduction George Johnson v. Stevens, adjudicated by the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert