Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Third Circuit Adopts 'Interest/Contacts' Approach Over Lex Loci Contractus for Insurance Choice of Law

Third Circuit Adopts 'Interest/Contacts' Approach Over Lex Loci Contractus for Insurance Choice of Law

Date: Mar 16, 2007
Third Circuit Adopts 'Interest/Contacts' Approach Over Lex Loci Contractus for Insurance Choice of Law 1. Introduction In the landmark case of Scott Hammersmith v. TIG Insurance Company, 480 F.3d 220...
Rinick v. United States: Affirming the Subjective Knowledge Requirement for Obstruction of Justice Enhancement

Rinick v. United States: Affirming the Subjective Knowledge Requirement for Obstruction of Justice Enhancement

Date: Mar 14, 2007
Rinick v. United States: Affirming the Subjective Knowledge Requirement for Obstruction of Justice Enhancement Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. William Rinick, the...
Affirmation of Reasonableness Standard in Supervised Release Revocations: United States v. Bungar

Affirmation of Reasonableness Standard in Supervised Release Revocations: United States v. Bungar

Date: Mar 6, 2007
Affirmation of Reasonableness Standard in Supervised Release Revocations: United States v. Bungar Introduction United States v. Ronald Bungar, 478 F.3d 540 (3d Cir. 2007), is a pivotal appellate...
Kibinda v. Attorney General of the United States: Upholding Strict Standards for Asylum and CAT Relief

Kibinda v. Attorney General of the United States: Upholding Strict Standards for Asylum and CAT Relief

Date: Feb 21, 2007
Kibinda v. Attorney General of the United States: Upholding Strict Standards for Asylum and CAT Relief Introduction Valerio Fortunato Tuali Kibinda, a native of Cabinda, Angola, contested the denial...
Revisiting the Warrant Requirement: Insights from Antonio D. Watson et al. v. Abington Township et al.

Revisiting the Warrant Requirement: Insights from Antonio D. Watson et al. v. Abington Township et al.

Date: Feb 17, 2007
Revisiting the Warrant Requirement: Insights from Antonio D. Watson et al. v. Abington Township et al. Introduction The case of Antonio D. Watson; Tony Tix, Inc.; Gerald W. Kelly; Just Jerry's Inc.,...
Third Circuit Clarifies the Scope of Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution Claims

Third Circuit Clarifies the Scope of Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution Claims

Date: Feb 15, 2007
Third Circuit Clarifies the Scope of Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution Claims Introduction The case of Gamal Johnson v. Parole Agent David Knorr (No. 05-5029), adjudicated by the United States...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment under Dragonetti Act: Necessity of Expert Testimony in Legal Malpractice Claims

Affirmation of Summary Judgment under Dragonetti Act: Necessity of Expert Testimony in Legal Malpractice Claims

Date: Feb 15, 2007
Affirmation of Summary Judgment under Dragonetti Act: Necessity of Expert Testimony in Legal Malpractice Claims Introduction In the case of Christopher Schmidt, D.O., Appellant v. J. Craig Currie,...
Third Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Rehabilitation Act Disability Discrimination Case

Third Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Rehabilitation Act Disability Discrimination Case

Date: Feb 8, 2007
Third Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Rehabilitation Act Disability Discrimination Case Introduction In the case of Richard M. Wishkin v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, the United States...
Clarifying Due Process in Sentencing Enhancements: Analysis of United States v. Grier

Clarifying Due Process in Sentencing Enhancements: Analysis of United States v. Grier

Date: Feb 6, 2007
Clarifying Due Process in Sentencing Enhancements: Analysis of United States v. Grier Introduction United States of America v. Sean Michael Grier (475 F.3d 556, Third Circuit, 2007) presents a...
Third Circuit Upholds Congressional Abrogation of Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity Under ADA Title II in Public Education Context

Third Circuit Upholds Congressional Abrogation of Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity Under ADA Title II in Public Education Context

Date: Feb 2, 2007
Third Circuit Upholds Congressional Abrogation of Eleventh Amendment Sovereign Immunity Under ADA Title II in Public Education Context Introduction The case of Kathleen Bowers v. The National...
Rehabilitation Act Exhaustion Requirements Affirmed as Prudential, and Procedural Due Process in Private Employment with Government Influence

Rehabilitation Act Exhaustion Requirements Affirmed as Prudential, and Procedural Due Process in Private Employment with Government Influence

Date: Jan 30, 2007
Rehabilitation Act Exhaustion Requirements Affirmed as Prudential, and Procedural Due Process in Private Employment with Government Influence Introduction In the case of John Wilson; Frank Kryjer;...
Clear Repudiation Rule Determines Accrual Date for Non-Fiduciary ERISA Claims

Clear Repudiation Rule Determines Accrual Date for Non-Fiduciary ERISA Claims

Date: Jan 30, 2007
Clear Repudiation Rule Determines Accrual Date for Non-Fiduciary ERISA Claims Introduction Paul Miller v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company and Resorts International Hotel is a pivotal case...
Third Circuit Establishes Strict Standards for Applying Social Security Guidelines in Presence of Nonexertional Limitations: Poulos v. Commissioner

Third Circuit Establishes Strict Standards for Applying Social Security Guidelines in Presence of Nonexertional Limitations: Poulos v. Commissioner

Date: Jan 25, 2007
Third Circuit Establishes Strict Standards for Applying Social Security Guidelines in Presence of Nonexertional Limitations: Poulos v. Commissioner Introduction Poulos v. Commissioner of Social...
Mandatory Consecutive Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): Analysis of United States v. Michael Walker

Mandatory Consecutive Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): Analysis of United States v. Michael Walker

Date: Jan 17, 2007
Mandatory Consecutive Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c): Analysis of United States v. Michael Walker Introduction In United States v. Michael Walker, 473 F.3d 71 (3rd Cir. 2007), the United States...
Affirmation of Jurisdictional Bar under the False Claims Act: Atkinson v. PA Shipbuilding Co.

Affirmation of Jurisdictional Bar under the False Claims Act: Atkinson v. PA Shipbuilding Co.

Date: Jan 13, 2007
Affirmation of Jurisdictional Bar under the False Claims Act: Atkinson v. PA Shipbuilding Co. Introduction The case of UNITED STATES of America, ex rel., Paul E. ATKINSON; Eugene Schorsch v. PA...
Younger Abstention Applied to Chancery Court Proceedings: Brooks-McCollum v. State of Delaware

Younger Abstention Applied to Chancery Court Proceedings: Brooks-McCollum v. State of Delaware

Date: Jan 12, 2007
Younger Abstention Applied to Chancery Court Proceedings: Brooks-McCollum v. State of Delaware Introduction In the case of Cathy D. Brooks-McCollum v. State of Delaware, the United States Court of...
Third Circuit Refines Application of 'Unreasonably Dangerous' in Strict Product Liability: Insights from Moyer v. United Dominion Industries

Third Circuit Refines Application of 'Unreasonably Dangerous' in Strict Product Liability: Insights from Moyer v. United Dominion Industries

Date: Jan 10, 2007
Third Circuit Refines Application of 'Unreasonably Dangerous' in Strict Product Liability: Insights from Moyer v. United Dominion Industries Introduction In the landmark case of Moyer v. United...
Adoption of 'Willful Blindness' Standard for Government Acquiescence under CAT: Silva-Rengifo v. Attorney General

Adoption of 'Willful Blindness' Standard for Government Acquiescence under CAT: Silva-Rengifo v. Attorney General

Date: Jan 10, 2007
Adoption of 'Willful Blindness' Standard for Government Acquiescence under CAT: Silva-Rengifo v. Attorney General Introduction Carlos Silva-Rengifo v. Attorney General of the United States is a...
Strict Enforcement of FTCA Presentment Requirements Affirmed in Medina v. City of Philadelphia

Strict Enforcement of FTCA Presentment Requirements Affirmed in Medina v. City of Philadelphia

Date: Jan 6, 2007
Strict Enforcement of FTCA Presentment Requirements Affirmed in Medina v. City of Philadelphia Introduction The case of Carmen Medina v. City of Philadelphia, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban...
Defining a Single Drug Conspiracy with Multiple Objectives and Evidentiary Standards: Insights from United States v. Sherman Bobb

Defining a Single Drug Conspiracy with Multiple Objectives and Evidentiary Standards: Insights from United States v. Sherman Bobb

Date: Dec 29, 2006
Defining a Single Drug Conspiracy with Multiple Objectives and Evidentiary Standards: Insights from United States v. Sherman Bobb Introduction United States v. Sherman Bobb is a significant appellate...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert