Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Inquiry Notice and Time-Bar in Securities Class Actions: DeBenedictis v. Merrill Lynch

Inquiry Notice and Time-Bar in Securities Class Actions: DeBenedictis v. Merrill Lynch

Date: Jun 19, 2007
Inquiry Notice and Time-Bar in Securities Class Actions: DeBenedictis v. Merrill Lynch Introduction The case of Thomas J. DeBenedictis v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. addresses critical issues in...
Equitable Tolling of Statute of Limitations in New Jersey Personal Injury Cases: Jaworowski v. Ciasulli

Equitable Tolling of Statute of Limitations in New Jersey Personal Injury Cases: Jaworowski v. Ciasulli

Date: Jun 19, 2007
Equitable Tolling of Statute of Limitations in New Jersey Personal Injury Cases: Jaworowski v. Ciasulli Introduction Andrzej Jaworowski, a resident of New York, initiated a personal injury lawsuit...
Establishing the "Reasonable Likelihood" Standard for Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Soriba Fadiga v. Attorney General USA

Establishing the "Reasonable Likelihood" Standard for Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Soriba Fadiga v. Attorney General USA

Date: Jun 16, 2007
Establishing the "Reasonable Likelihood" Standard for Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Soriba Fadiga v. Attorney General USA Introduction The case of Soriba Fadiga v. Attorney...
Facial Discrimination of Methadone Clinics Under ADA and Rehabilitation Act: New Directions Treatment Services v. City of Reading

Facial Discrimination of Methadone Clinics Under ADA and Rehabilitation Act: New Directions Treatment Services v. City of Reading

Date: Jun 16, 2007
Facial Discrimination of Methadone Clinics Under ADA and Rehabilitation Act: New Directions Treatment Services v. City of Reading Introduction The case of New Directions Treatment Services, et al. v....
Clarifying the 'Natural Environment' Requirement under Part C of the IDEA: M. v. Delaware County Office of Mental Health and Mental Retardation

Clarifying the 'Natural Environment' Requirement under Part C of the IDEA: M. v. Delaware County Office of Mental Health and Mental Retardation

Date: Jun 16, 2007
Clarifying the 'Natural Environment' Requirement under Part C of the IDEA: M. v. Delaware County Office of Mental Health and Mental Retardation Introduction The case of Andrew M.; Deirdre M., on...
Determining Trust Citizenship for Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Emerald Investors Trust v. Gaunt Parsippany Partners

Determining Trust Citizenship for Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Emerald Investors Trust v. Gaunt Parsippany Partners

Date: Jun 14, 2007
Determining Trust Citizenship for Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Emerald Investors Trust v. Gaunt Parsippany Partners Introduction The case of Emerald Investors Trust v. Gaunt Parsippany...
Contemporaneous Exchange Defense in Preferential Transfers: In re Hechinger Investment Company of Delaware, Inc.

Contemporaneous Exchange Defense in Preferential Transfers: In re Hechinger Investment Company of Delaware, Inc.

Date: Jun 8, 2007
Contemporaneous Exchange Defense in Preferential Transfers: In re Hechinger Investment Company of Delaware, Inc. Introduction The appellate case, In re Hechinger Investment Company of Delaware, Inc.,...
Limiting Conditions of Supervised Release: Insights from United States v. Voelker

Limiting Conditions of Supervised Release: Insights from United States v. Voelker

Date: Jun 6, 2007
Limiting Conditions of Supervised Release: Insights from United States v. Voelker Introduction United States v. Daniel Voelker, 489 F.3d 139 (3d Cir. 2007), represents a pivotal case in the realm of...
Refining the 'Records Compiled for Law Enforcement Purposes' Test under FOIA Exemption 7: Insights from Abdelfattah v. DHS

Refining the 'Records Compiled for Law Enforcement Purposes' Test under FOIA Exemption 7: Insights from Abdelfattah v. DHS

Date: May 31, 2007
Refining the 'Records Compiled for Law Enforcement Purposes' Test under FOIA Exemption 7: Insights from Abdelfattah v. DHS Introduction Osama Abdelfattah v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security,...
Issue Preclusion in SIPA Claims and Limitations on Rule 41(g) Remedies: Analysis of Peloro v. United States

Issue Preclusion in SIPA Claims and Limitations on Rule 41(g) Remedies: Analysis of Peloro v. United States

Date: May 30, 2007
Issue Preclusion in SIPA Claims and Limitations on Rule 41(g) Remedies: Analysis of Peloro v. United States Introduction Peloro v. United States of America, 488 F.3d 163 (3d Cir. 2007), presents a...
Demand Futility in Shareholders' Derivative Actions: Rhoda Kanter v. Ti

Demand Futility in Shareholders' Derivative Actions: Rhoda Kanter v. Ti

Date: May 26, 2007
Demand Futility in Shareholders' Derivative Actions: Rhoda Kanter v. Ti Introduction In the case of Rhoda Kanter v. Ti, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on May...
Limitation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Enforcing IDEA and Section 504 Rights: A.Reversal of Matula in Light of Rancho Palos Verdes

Limitation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Enforcing IDEA and Section 504 Rights: A.Reversal of Matula in Light of Rancho Palos Verdes

Date: May 25, 2007
Limitation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Enforcing Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Section 504 Rights: A Reversal of Matula in Light of Rancho Palos Verdes Introduction In the...
Ensuring Substantial Evidence and Procedural Fairness in Social Security Disability Appeals: The Bordes Precedent

Ensuring Substantial Evidence and Procedural Fairness in Social Security Disability Appeals: The Bordes Precedent

Date: May 19, 2007
Ensuring Substantial Evidence and Procedural Fairness in Social Security Disability Appeals: The Bordes Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of Pauline Bordes v. Commissioner of Social...
Accrual of Statute of Limitations in ERISA Claims: Insights from Jakimas et al. v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.

Accrual of Statute of Limitations in ERISA Claims: Insights from Jakimas et al. v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.

Date: May 15, 2007
Accrual of Statute of Limitations in ERISA Claims: Insights from Jakimas et al. v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. Introduction Jakimas et al. v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. is a significant appellate decision...
Voting and Representation Rights of U.S. Territories: Analysis of Ballentine v. United States

Voting and Representation Rights of U.S. Territories: Analysis of Ballentine v. United States

Date: May 11, 2007
Voting and Representation Rights of U.S. Territories: Analysis of Ballentine v. United States Introduction The case of Krim M. Ballentine v. United States, decided by the United States Court of...
Plain Error Standard Applied to Untimely Objections in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: NARA v. FRANK

Plain Error Standard Applied to Untimely Objections in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: NARA v. FRANK

Date: May 9, 2007
Plain Error Standard Applied to Untimely Objections in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: NARA v. FRANK Introduction Joseph Nara, the appellant, was convicted of first-degree murder for the deaths of his...
Limiting ERISA §510 Remedies to Equitable Relief under §502(a)(3): Indi v. AT&T Corp.

Limiting ERISA §510 Remedies to Equitable Relief under §502(a)(3): Indi v. AT&T Corp.

Date: May 3, 2007
Limiting ERISA §510 Remedies to Equitable Relief under §502(a)(3): Indi v. AT&T Corp. Introduction In the case of Indi v. AT&T Corp., the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit...
Affirmative Act Requirement in State-Created Danger Claims Under §1983

Affirmative Act Requirement in State-Created Danger Claims Under §1983

Date: May 1, 2007
Affirmative Act Requirement in State-Created Danger Claims Under §1983 Introduction The case Zi Z. Ye; Yu Zhen Cao v. United States of America addresses the complexities surrounding the state-created...
Appointment of Counsel for Indigent Civil Litigants: Insights from Gordon v. Gonzalez

Appointment of Counsel for Indigent Civil Litigants: Insights from Gordon v. Gonzalez

Date: May 1, 2007
Appointment of Counsel for Indigent Civil Litigants: Insights from Gordon v. Gonzalez Introduction The case of Juken Washington Gordon v. N. Gonzalez et al. addresses the critical issue of whether an...
Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: Analysis of James v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: Analysis of James v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

Date: Apr 28, 2007
Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: Analysis of James v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections Introduction The case of Tyrone P. James v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (230 F....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert