Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Second Circuit Establishes Review Standards for Corroboration in Asylum Claims: Pinel-Gomez v. Garland

Second Circuit Establishes Review Standards for Corroboration in Asylum Claims: Pinel-Gomez v. Garland

Date: Nov 3, 2022
Second Circuit Establishes Review Standards for Corroboration in Asylum Claims: Pinel-Gomez v. Garland Introduction The case of Mauricio Dagoberto Pinel-Gomez, J. L. P-E. v. Merrick B. Garland,...
2nd Circuit Affirms 'One Central Reason' Standard for Withholding of Removal Claims

2nd Circuit Affirms 'One Central Reason' Standard for Withholding of Removal Claims

Date: Nov 2, 2022
2nd Circuit Affirms 'One Central Reason' Standard for Withholding of Removal Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Xavier Pucha Quituizaca v. Merrick B. Garland, decided on November 1, 2022,...
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Clarified in Hansen v. Miller: Implications for Fraud and Collateral Estoppel Claims

Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Clarified in Hansen v. Miller: Implications for Fraud and Collateral Estoppel Claims

Date: Oct 29, 2022
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Clarified in Hansen v. Miller: Implications for Fraud and Collateral Estoppel Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Joan Hansen v. Matthew Miller et al. (52 F.4th 96,...
Forced Choice Between Employment and Political Activity Constitutes Adverse Employment Action Under NY Labor Law § 201-d

Forced Choice Between Employment and Political Activity Constitutes Adverse Employment Action Under NY Labor Law § 201-d

Date: Oct 28, 2022
Forced Choice Between Employment and Political Activity Constitutes Adverse Employment Action Under NY Labor Law § 201-d Introduction In the landmark case William Gunnar Truitt v. Salisbury Bank and...
Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Title VII Failure-to-Train and Hostile Work Environment Claims

Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Title VII Failure-to-Train and Hostile Work Environment Claims

Date: Oct 21, 2022
Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Title VII Failure-to-Train and Hostile Work Environment Claims Introduction In the case of Jean-Claude Tassy v. Pete Buttigieg, Secretary of Transportation, the...
Second Circuit Sets New Precedent on Primary Jurisdiction and Worker Protections in COVID-19 Context

Second Circuit Sets New Precedent on Primary Jurisdiction and Worker Protections in COVID-19 Context

Date: Oct 19, 2022
Second Circuit Sets New Precedent on Primary Jurisdiction and Worker Protections in COVID-19 Context Introduction In the landmark case of Derrick Palmer et al. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al. (51 F.4th...
Affirmation of Waiver Doctrine in Ineffective Assistance Claims: United States v. Graham

Affirmation of Waiver Doctrine in Ineffective Assistance Claims: United States v. Graham

Date: Oct 15, 2022
Affirmation of Waiver Doctrine in Ineffective Assistance Claims: United States v. Graham Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Jacqueline Graham, 51 F.4th 67 (2d Cir. 2022), the...
New Precedent on Choice-of-Law in International Bond Transactions: PDVSA v. MUFG Union Bank

New Precedent on Choice-of-Law in International Bond Transactions: PDVSA v. MUFG Union Bank

Date: Oct 14, 2022
New Precedent on Choice-of-Law in International Bond Transactions: PDVSA v. MUFG Union Bank Introduction The case of Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA) v. MUFG Union Bank, N.A., decided by the...
Right of Publicity Claims Preempted by Copyright Act: Insights from Melendez v. Sirius XM Radio

Right of Publicity Claims Preempted by Copyright Act: Insights from Melendez v. Sirius XM Radio

Date: Oct 5, 2022
Right of Publicity Claims Preempted by Copyright Act: Insights from Melendez v. Sirius XM Radio Introduction The case of John Edward Melendez v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc. (50 F.4th 294) adjudicated by...
Clarifying Service Requirements in Confirmation of Foreign Arbitral Awards: CME v. CVG Ferrominera Orinoco

Clarifying Service Requirements in Confirmation of Foreign Arbitral Awards: CME v. CVG Ferrominera Orinoco

Date: Oct 4, 2022
Clarifying Service Requirements in Confirmation of Foreign Arbitral Awards: CME v. CVG Ferrominera Orinoco Introduction In the landmark case of Commodities & Minerals Enterprise Ltd. v. CVG...
Reaffirming the Purchaser-Seller Rule: Menora Mivtachim v. Frutarom Industries

Reaffirming the Purchaser-Seller Rule: Menora Mivtachim v. Frutarom Industries

Date: Oct 1, 2022
Reaffirming the Purchaser-Seller Rule: Menora Mivtachim v. Frutarom Industries Introduction The case of Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd. and others v. Frutarom Industries Ltd. et al. ([54 F.4th...
Application of Qualified Immunity in Combined Police Use of Force: McKinney v. City of Middletown

Application of Qualified Immunity in Combined Police Use of Force: McKinney v. City of Middletown

Date: Sep 27, 2022
Application of Qualified Immunity in Combined Police Use of Force: McKinney v. City of Middletown Introduction In McKinney v. City of Middletown, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...
Qualified Immunity Upholds Regulatory Official's Persuasive Government Speech: Insights from NRA v. Vullo

Qualified Immunity Upholds Regulatory Official's Persuasive Government Speech: Insights from NRA v. Vullo

Date: Sep 23, 2022
Qualified Immunity Upholds Regulatory Official's Persuasive Government Speech: Insights from NRA v. Vullo Introduction The case of National Rifle Association of America v. Maria T. Vullo (49 F.4th...
Notice and Opportunity to Be Heard Required for Sua Sponte Dismissal under STONE v. POWELL

Notice and Opportunity to Be Heard Required for Sua Sponte Dismissal under STONE v. POWELL

Date: Sep 21, 2022
Notice and Opportunity to Be Heard Required for Sua Sponte Dismissal under STONE v. POWELL Introduction The case of Jamel Ethridge v. Earl Bell, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Transfer-Induced Unavailability of Administrative Remedies Under PLRA: Romano v. Ulrich

Transfer-Induced Unavailability of Administrative Remedies Under PLRA: Romano v. Ulrich

Date: Sep 16, 2022
Transfer-Induced Unavailability of Administrative Remedies Under PLRA: Romano v. Ulrich Introduction Anthony Romano, a prisoner in New York, initiated a federal lawsuit alleging excessive force under...
Second Circuit Clarifies Probate Exception in Diversity Jurisdiction: McKie v. Kornegay

Second Circuit Clarifies Probate Exception in Diversity Jurisdiction: McKie v. Kornegay

Date: Sep 16, 2022
Second Circuit Clarifies Probate Exception in Diversity Jurisdiction: McKie v. Kornegay Introduction The case of Christopher McKie v. Charles Kornegay is a pivotal decision by the United States Court...
Arbitration Agreements in Online Banking: Insights from Zachman v. Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union

Arbitration Agreements in Online Banking: Insights from Zachman v. Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union

Date: Sep 15, 2022
Arbitration Agreements in Online Banking: Insights from Zachman v. Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union Introduction The case of Nicole Zachman v. Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union (HVCU) addresses...
Intertwined Claims and Reasonable Attorney's Fees under the FLSA: Holick v. Cellular Sales

Intertwined Claims and Reasonable Attorney's Fees under the FLSA: Holick v. Cellular Sales

Date: Sep 8, 2022
Intertwined Claims and Reasonable Attorney's Fees under the FLSA: Holick v. Cellular Sales Introduction In the landmark case of Jan P. Holick, Jr., et al. v. Cellular Sales of New York, LLC, Cellular...
Navient Corp. Class Action Settlement: Implications for Rule 23(b)(2) Certification and Cy Pres Awards

Navient Corp. Class Action Settlement: Implications for Rule 23(b)(2) Certification and Cy Pres Awards

Date: Sep 8, 2022
Navient Corp. Class Action Settlement: Implications for Rule 23(b)(2) Certification and Cy Pres Awards Introduction The case of Kathryn Hyland et al. v. Navient Corporation, Navient Solutions LLC...
Reaffirmation of Substantial Evidence Standard and Treating Physician Rule in SSA Disability Claims: Rucker v. Kijakazi

Reaffirmation of Substantial Evidence Standard and Treating Physician Rule in SSA Disability Claims: Rucker v. Kijakazi

Date: Sep 7, 2022
Reaffirmation of Substantial Evidence Standard and Treating Physician Rule in SSA Disability Claims: Rucker v. Kijakazi Introduction In the landmark case Jessica RUCKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert