Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Causation in Securities Fraud: Insights from Lorraine Grace v. Genser

Establishing Causation in Securities Fraud: Insights from Lorraine Grace v. Genser

Date: Aug 26, 2000
Establishing Causation in Securities Fraud: Insights from Lorraine Grace v. Genser Introduction The case of Lorraine Grace, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Oliver R. Grace, et al. v....
Second Circuit Establishes No Exhaustion Requirement for Excessive Force Claims Under PLRA

Second Circuit Establishes No Exhaustion Requirement for Excessive Force Claims Under PLRA

Date: Aug 25, 2000
Second Circuit Establishes No Exhaustion Requirement for Excessive Force Claims Under PLRA Introduction In Ronald Nussle v. Willette, Correction Officer, and Porter, Correction Officer, 224 F.3d 95...
Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Employment Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Weinstock v. Columbia University

Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Employment Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Weinstock v. Columbia University

Date: Aug 24, 2000
Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Employment Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Weinstock v. Columbia University Introduction The case of Shelley Weinstock v. Columbia University, 224 F.3d 33 (2d...
Second Circuit Limits CERCLA Cost Recovery: Gussack Realty Co. v. Xerox Corporation

Second Circuit Limits CERCLA Cost Recovery: Gussack Realty Co. v. Xerox Corporation

Date: Aug 23, 2000
Second Circuit Limits CERCLA Cost Recovery: Gussack Realty Co. v. Xerox Corporation Introduction The case of Gussack Realty Company and General Bearing Corporation v. Xerox Corporation addressed...
Special Needs Doctrine in Parole Searches Affirmed: United States v. Grimes

Special Needs Doctrine in Parole Searches Affirmed: United States v. Grimes

Date: Aug 22, 2000
Special Needs Doctrine in Parole Searches Affirmed: United States v. Grimes Introduction In the appellate case United States of America v. Charles Grimes (225 F.3d 254), the United States Court of...
Collateral Estoppel in Excessive Force Claims: Sullivan v. Gagnier

Collateral Estoppel in Excessive Force Claims: Sullivan v. Gagnier

Date: Aug 22, 2000
Collateral Estoppel in Excessive Force Claims: Sullivan v. Gagnier Introduction Eugene K. Sullivan and Thedis Beverly Sullivan v. Officer Damon C. Gagnier and Town of DeWitt, New York (225 F.3d 161,...
Revisiting the 'Open and Obvious' Doctrine: Foreseeability and Duty of Care in Michalski v. The Home Depot, Inc.

Revisiting the 'Open and Obvious' Doctrine: Foreseeability and Duty of Care in Michalski v. The Home Depot, Inc.

Date: Aug 22, 2000
Revisiting the 'Open and Obvious' Doctrine: Foreseeability and Duty of Care in Michalski v. The Home Depot, Inc. Introduction In Michalski v. The Home Depot, Inc., 225 F.3d 113 (2d Cir. 2000), the...
Broad Interpretation of 'Accident' and Allocation of Liability in Environmental Pollution Insurance Claims: Olin Corp. v. Insurance Company of North America

Broad Interpretation of 'Accident' and Allocation of Liability in Environmental Pollution Insurance Claims: Olin Corp. v. Insurance Company of North America

Date: Aug 18, 2000
Broad Interpretation of 'Accident' and Allocation of Liability in Environmental Pollution Insurance Claims: Olin Corp. v. Insurance Company of North America Introduction In the landmark case Olin...
Affirmation of RICO Murder Convictions and Jury Selection Procedures in United States v. Feliciano et al.

Affirmation of RICO Murder Convictions and Jury Selection Procedures in United States v. Feliciano et al.

Date: Aug 17, 2000
Affirmation of RICO Murder Convictions and Jury Selection Procedures in United States v. Feliciano et al. Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Ruben Feliciano, Ronald Pagan, and...
Material Alteration and Manufacturer Liability: Insights from WHITE v. ABCO ENGINEERING CORP.

Material Alteration and Manufacturer Liability: Insights from WHITE v. ABCO ENGINEERING CORP.

Date: Aug 16, 2000
Material Alteration and Manufacturer Liability: Insights from WHITE v. ABCO ENGINEERING CORP. Introduction The case of KENNETH E. WHITE v. ABCO ENGINEERING CORP. revolves around a tragic workplace...
Adverse Effect Interpretation under IDEA for Academically Gifted Students with Emotional-Behavioral Disabilities

Adverse Effect Interpretation under IDEA for Academically Gifted Students with Emotional-Behavioral Disabilities

Date: Aug 16, 2000
Adverse Effect Interpretation under IDEA for Academically Gifted Students with Emotional-Behavioral Disabilities Introduction The case of J.D. v. Pawlet School District et al. presents a pivotal...
Hostile Work Environment Recognized Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981: Comprehensive Analysis of Whidbee & Tranquille v. Garzarelli Food Specialties

Hostile Work Environment Recognized Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981: Comprehensive Analysis of Whidbee & Tranquille v. Garzarelli Food Specialties

Date: Aug 15, 2000
Hostile Work Environment Recognized Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981: Comprehensive Analysis of Whidbee & Tranquille v. Garzarelli Food Specialties 1. Introduction In Whidbee & Tranquille v. Garzarelli Food...
ERISA Attorney's Fees and Sanctions: Second Circuit Reverses Defendant's Fee Award and Adjusts Sanctions in Salovaara v. Eckert

ERISA Attorney's Fees and Sanctions: Second Circuit Reverses Defendant's Fee Award and Adjusts Sanctions in Salovaara v. Eckert

Date: Aug 10, 2000
ERISA Attorney's Fees and Sanctions: Second Circuit Reverses Defendant's Fee Award and Adjusts Sanctions in Salovaara v. Eckert Introduction Salovaara v. Eckert, 222 F.3d 19 (2d Cir. 2000), presents...
Application of AEDPA's Section 2254(d) in NRRMDD Recommitment: Francis S. v. Stone

Application of AEDPA's Section 2254(d) in NRRMDD Recommitment: Francis S. v. Stone

Date: Aug 10, 2000
Application of AEDPA's Section 2254(d) in NRRMDD Recommitment: Francis S. v. Stone Introduction The case of Francis S. v. Stone, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...
Notice and Opportunity to Be Heard Required Before Sua Sponte Dismissal of AEDPA-Timed Habeas Petitions

Notice and Opportunity to Be Heard Required Before Sua Sponte Dismissal of AEDPA-Timed Habeas Petitions

Date: Aug 10, 2000
Notice and Opportunity to Be Heard Required Before Sua Sponte Dismissal of AEDPA-Timed Habeas Petitions Introduction The case of Victor Acosta; Miguel Rivera; Dennis Acevedo; Dana Mozell v. C. Artuz,...
BROWN v. CITY OF ONEONTA: Balancing Racial Descriptions in Police Investigations with Equal Protection and Fourth Amendment Rights

BROWN v. CITY OF ONEONTA: Balancing Racial Descriptions in Police Investigations with Equal Protection and Fourth Amendment Rights

Date: Aug 9, 2000
BROWN v. CITY OF ONEONTA: Balancing Racial Descriptions in Police Investigations with Equal Protection and Fourth Amendment Rights Introduction BROWN v. CITY OF ONEONTA, 221 F.3d 329 (2d Cir. 2000),...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Securities Fraud Class Action: IN RE CARTER-WALLACE, Inc. Securities Litigation

Affirmation of Dismissal in Securities Fraud Class Action: IN RE CARTER-WALLACE, Inc. Securities Litigation

Date: Aug 8, 2000
Affirmation of Dismissal in Securities Fraud Class Action: IN RE CARTER-WALLACE, Inc. Securities Litigation Introduction In the landmark case In Re: Carter-Wallace, Inc. Securities Litigation, the...
Federal Court Jurisdiction in Vacating Arbitration Awards: Greenberg v. Bear Stearns

Federal Court Jurisdiction in Vacating Arbitration Awards: Greenberg v. Bear Stearns

Date: Aug 8, 2000
Federal Court Jurisdiction in Vacating Arbitration Awards: Greenberg v. Bear Stearns Introduction Howard Greenberg v. Bear, Stearns Co., et al. is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Clarifying Sanction Standards for Attorneys: Insights from Revson v. Cinque Cinque

Clarifying Sanction Standards for Attorneys: Insights from Revson v. Cinque Cinque

Date: Aug 5, 2000
Clarifying Sanction Standards for Attorneys: Insights from Revson v. Cinque Cinque Introduction The case of Rommy Revson v. Cinque Cinque, P.C., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Revson v. Cinque Cinque P.C.: Clarifying Attorney Fee Arrangements and Contract Ambiguity

Revson v. Cinque Cinque P.C.: Clarifying Attorney Fee Arrangements and Contract Ambiguity

Date: Aug 5, 2000
Revson v. Cinque Cinque P.C.: Clarifying Attorney Fee Arrangements and Contract Ambiguity Introduction The case of Rommy Revson v. Cinque Cinque, P.C. (221 F.3d 59, 2d Cir., 2000) centers on a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert