Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Second Circuit Establishes Six-Year Statute of Limitations for MSP Private Actions, Aligning with False Claims Act

Second Circuit Establishes Six-Year Statute of Limitations for MSP Private Actions, Aligning with False Claims Act

Date: Jun 21, 2001
Second Circuit Establishes Six-Year Statute of Limitations for MSP Private Actions, Aligning with False Claims Act Introduction The case of Manning v. Utilities Mutual Insurance Co., Inc. serves as a...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prison Litigation: Insights from Marvin v. Goord

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prison Litigation: Insights from Marvin v. Goord

Date: Jun 20, 2001
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prison Litigation: Insights from Marvin v. Goord Introduction Mark Marvin v. Glenn Goord is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Clarifying Arbitrability in NASD Arbitration: Insights from John Hancock v. Stors, Inc.

Clarifying Arbitrability in NASD Arbitration: Insights from John Hancock v. Stors, Inc.

Date: Jun 19, 2001
Clarifying Arbitrability in NASD Arbitration: Insights from John Hancock Life Insurance Company v. Stors, Inc. Introduction The case of John Hancock Life Insurance Company, Signator Investors, Inc....
Second Circuit Clarifies AEDPA’s One-Year Limitations on Federal Habeas Petitions

Second Circuit Clarifies AEDPA’s One-Year Limitations on Federal Habeas Petitions

Date: Jun 16, 2001
Second Circuit Clarifies AEDPA’s One-Year Limitations on Federal Habeas Petitions Introduction The case of Qabail Hizbullahankhamon v. Hans Walker represents a significant interpretation of the...
Exclusion of Expert Testimony in Habeas Corpus Relief: Washington v. Schriver Analysis

Exclusion of Expert Testimony in Habeas Corpus Relief: Washington v. Schriver Analysis

Date: Jun 16, 2001
Exclusion of Expert Testimony in Habeas Corpus Relief: Washington v. Schriver Analysis Introduction Washington v. Schriver, 255 F.3d 45 (2d Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case addressing the constitutional...
New Precedent on Public Pension Eligibility for Re-employed State Employees

New Precedent on Public Pension Eligibility for Re-employed State Employees

Date: Jun 15, 2001
New Precedent on Public Pension Eligibility for Re-employed State Employees Introduction In the landmark case of Timothy J. Connolly v. H. Carl McCall et al., the United States Court of Appeals for...
Zarvela v. Artuz: Second Circuit's Framework for Mixed Habeas Corpus Petitions Under AEDPA

Zarvela v. Artuz: Second Circuit's Framework for Mixed Habeas Corpus Petitions Under AEDPA

Date: Jun 15, 2001
Zarvela v. Artuz: Second Circuit's Framework for Mixed Habeas Corpus Petitions Under AEDPA Introduction Victor Zarvela v. Christopher Artuz, 254 F.3d 374 (2d Cir. 2001), is a seminal case in the...
Second Circuit Reiterates Need for Explicit Ruling on Race-Neutral Justifications in Batson Challenges

Second Circuit Reiterates Need for Explicit Ruling on Race-Neutral Justifications in Batson Challenges

Date: Jun 9, 2001
Second Circuit Reiterates Need for Explicit Ruling on Race-Neutral Justifications in Batson Challenges 1. Introduction In the appellate case of Edwin Galarza v. John P. Keane, the United States Court...
Limitation of Counsel of Choice: A Harmless Error in Lainfiesta v. Artuz

Limitation of Counsel of Choice: A Harmless Error in Lainfiesta v. Artuz

Date: Jun 9, 2001
Limitation of Counsel of Choice: A Harmless Error in Lainfiesta v. Artuz Introduction Lainfiesta v. Artuz, 253 F.3d 151 (2d Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case addressing the extent of a defendant's Sixth...
Hugo Boss Fashions v. Federal Insurance: Defining 'Trademarked Slogan' and Insurer's Duty to Defend

Hugo Boss Fashions v. Federal Insurance: Defining 'Trademarked Slogan' and Insurer's Duty to Defend

Date: Jun 9, 2001
Hugo Boss Fashions v. Federal Insurance: Defining 'Trademarked Slogan' and Insurer's Duty to Defend Introduction In Hugo Boss Fashions, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company, the United States Court of...
Enhancing Retaliation Claims under Title VII: Insights from Cifra v. GE and Lockheed Martin

Enhancing Retaliation Claims under Title VII: Insights from Cifra v. GE and Lockheed Martin

Date: Jun 8, 2001
Enhancing Retaliation Claims under Title VII: Insights from Cifra v. GE and Lockheed Martin Introduction The case of Kathleen M. Cifra v. General Electric Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation,...
Broad Arbitration Clauses Encompass Collateral Claims: Insights from Louis Dreyfus Negoce S.A. v. Blystad Shipping Trading Inc.

Broad Arbitration Clauses Encompass Collateral Claims: Insights from Louis Dreyfus Negoce S.A. v. Blystad Shipping Trading Inc.

Date: Jun 8, 2001
Broad Arbitration Clauses Encompass Collateral Claims: Insights from Louis Dreyfus Negoce S.A. v. Blystad Shipping Trading Inc. Introduction The case of Louis Dreyfus Negoce S.A. v. Blystad Shipping...
Rodriguez v. Mitchell: Establishing the Distinction Between Rule 60(b) Motions and Successive Habeas Petitions

Rodriguez v. Mitchell: Establishing the Distinction Between Rule 60(b) Motions and Successive Habeas Petitions

Date: Jun 7, 2001
Rodriguez v. Mitchell: Establishing the Distinction Between Rule 60(b) Motions and Successive Habeas Petitions Introduction Robert Rodriguez v. Mitchell, 252 F.3d 191 (2d Cir. 2001), is a landmark...
Reversal of Hostile Work Environment Claim Based on Hearsay: Leibovitz v. NYC Transit Authority

Reversal of Hostile Work Environment Claim Based on Hearsay: Leibovitz v. NYC Transit Authority

Date: Jun 7, 2001
Reversal of Hostile Work Environment Claim Based on Hearsay: Leibovitz v. New York City Transit Authority, 252 F.3d 179 Introduction The case of Diane Leibovitz v. New York City Transit Authority...
Preliminary Injunction Standards in Health Insurance Coverage Cases: Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc.

Preliminary Injunction Standards in Health Insurance Coverage Cases: Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc.

Date: Jun 6, 2001
Preliminary Injunction Standards in Health Insurance Coverage Cases: Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc. Introduction In Nickolas Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for...
Second Circuit Reaffirms Importance of Causal Connection in First Amendment Retaliation Claims

Second Circuit Reaffirms Importance of Causal Connection in First Amendment Retaliation Claims

Date: Jun 5, 2001
Second Circuit Reaffirms Importance of Causal Connection in First Amendment Retaliation Claims Introduction The case of Lynn Gorman-Bakos and Rodney Bakos v. Cornell Cooperative Extension of...
Yak v. Bank Brussels Lambert: Reassessing Employee Benefits Waivers in Consultancy Agreements

Yak v. Bank Brussels Lambert: Reassessing Employee Benefits Waivers in Consultancy Agreements

Date: Jun 2, 2001
Yak v. Bank Brussels Lambert: Reassessing Employee Benefits Waivers in Consultancy Agreements Introduction The case of Patricia Yak v. Bank Brussels Lambert, BBL (USA) Holdings Inc., and Dominiek...
Pleading Standards in Securities Fraud: Second Circuit's Analysis in In re Scholastic Corp. Securities Litigation

Pleading Standards in Securities Fraud: Second Circuit's Analysis in In re Scholastic Corp. Securities Litigation

Date: Jun 2, 2001
Pleading Standards in Securities Fraud: Second Circuit's Analysis in In re Scholastic Corp. Securities Litigation Introduction The case of In re Scholastic Corporation Securities Litigation (252 F.3d...
Affirmation of Voided Wholly Unsecured Residential Lien Under 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2)

Affirmation of Voided Wholly Unsecured Residential Lien Under 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2)

Date: Jun 1, 2001
Affirmation of Voided Wholly Unsecured Residential Lien Under 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2) Introduction The case of In re Richard J. Pond and Lorrie A. Pond, Debtors, brought before the United States Court...
Affirmation of Title VII Discrimination Standards: Evidence Sufficiency and Punitive Damages in Zimmermann v. AFSC

Affirmation of Title VII Discrimination Standards: Evidence Sufficiency and Punitive Damages in Zimmermann v. AFSC

Date: Jun 1, 2001
Affirmation of Title VII Discrimination Standards: Evidence Sufficiency and Punitive Damages in Zimmermann v. Associates Financial Services Corporation Introduction The case of Deborah Zimmermann v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert