Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Enhanced Standards for Admitting Prior Convictions and Interpreting Codes in Drug-Related Cases: United States v. Garcia

Enhanced Standards for Admitting Prior Convictions and Interpreting Codes in Drug-Related Cases: United States v. Garcia

Date: May 18, 2002
Enhanced Standards for Admitting Prior Convictions and Interpreting Codes in Drug-Related Cases: United States v. Garcia Introduction United States of America v. Carlos Garcia (291 F.3d 127) is a...
Title VII's Applicability to Dual-Status Military-Civilian Employees Affirmed in Luckett v. Bure

Title VII's Applicability to Dual-Status Military-Civilian Employees Affirmed in Luckett v. Bure

Date: May 18, 2002
Title VII's Applicability to Dual-Status Military-Civilian Employees Affirmed in Luckett v. Bure Introduction In Luckett v. Bure, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed...
Lifting of Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy: Insights from Bogdanovich v. Schneiderman et al.

Lifting of Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy: Insights from Bogdanovich v. Schneiderman et al.

Date: May 16, 2002
Lifting of Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy: Insights from Bogdanovich v. Schneiderman et al. Introduction The federal appellate case In re Peter Bogdanovich Louise Hoogstraten Bogdanovich, Debtors, 292...
Defendant’s Right to Presence in Jury Pre-Screening and Waiver – Cohen v. Senkowski

Defendant’s Right to Presence in Jury Pre-Screening and Waiver – Cohen v. Senkowski

Date: May 14, 2002
Defendant’s Right to Presence in Jury Pre-Screening and Waiver – Cohen v. Senkowski Introduction Gary F. Cohen, a pediatrician, was convicted of multiple felony sexual abuse charges in Suffolk...
Affirmation of 'Stay Put' Provision under IDEA: Board of Education v. Ste

Affirmation of 'Stay Put' Provision under IDEA: Board of Education v. Ste

Date: May 14, 2002
Affirmation of 'Stay Put' Provision under IDEA: Board of Education v. Ste Introduction In Board of Education of the Pawling Central School District v. Ste, 290 F.3d 476 (2002), the United States...
Summary Judgment in Al v. Fulton Jr.: Establishing Limits on § 1983 Claims Post-Conviction

Summary Judgment in Al v. Fulton Jr.: Establishing Limits on § 1983 Claims Post-Conviction

Date: May 10, 2002
Summary Judgment in Al v. Fulton Jr.: Establishing Limits on § 1983 Claims Post-Conviction Introduction Alvin Fulton Jr. ("Fulton"), acting pro se, appealed the dismissal of his claims against Laurie...
Federal Jurisdiction and Rule 11 Sanctions in Arbitration Awards: Insights from Perpetual Securities, Inc. v. Tang & Chen

Federal Jurisdiction and Rule 11 Sanctions in Arbitration Awards: Insights from Perpetual Securities, Inc. v. Tang & Chen

Date: May 10, 2002
Federal Jurisdiction and Rule 11 Sanctions in Arbitration Awards: Insights from Perpetual Securities, Inc. v. Tang & Chen Introduction The case Perpetual Securities, Inc. v. Julie Tang and Hua Yu...
Establishing Limits of FDCPA: Kropelnicki v. Siegel and Strumpf

Establishing Limits of FDCPA: Kropelnicki v. Siegel and Strumpf

Date: May 9, 2002
Establishing Limits of FDCPA: Kropelnicki v. Siegel and Strumpf Introduction In the appellate case Laura Kropelnicki v. Hal Siegel and Linda Strumpf, decided on May 8, 2002, the United States Court...
Determining Copyright Authorship and Originality in Software: Medforms v. Healthcare Management Solutions

Determining Copyright Authorship and Originality in Software: Medforms v. Healthcare Management Solutions

Date: May 8, 2002
Determining Copyright Authorship and Originality in Software: Medforms v. Healthcare Management Solutions Introduction The case of Medforms, Inc. v. Healthcare Management Solutions, Inc. revolves...
Equitable Tolling and Proper Defendant Standing in ERISA Disability Claims: Chapman v. ChoiceCare

Equitable Tolling and Proper Defendant Standing in ERISA Disability Claims: Chapman v. ChoiceCare

Date: Apr 30, 2002
Equitable Tolling and Proper Defendant Standing in ERISA Disability Claims: Chapman v. ChoiceCare Introduction Cheryl Chapman v. ChoiceCare Long Island Term Disability Plan is a pivotal case...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under the IDEA: Insights from Polera v. Board of Education

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under the IDEA: Insights from Polera v. Board of Education

Date: Apr 30, 2002
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under the IDEA: Insights from Polera v. Board of Education Introduction Polera v. Board of Education of the Newburgh Enlarged City School District is a landmark...
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Reinforced in Phifer v. City of New York

Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Reinforced in Phifer v. City of New York

Date: Apr 20, 2002
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Reinforced in Phifer v. City of New York Introduction Phifer v. City of New York, 289 F.3d 49 (2d Cir. 2002), marks a significant application of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine...
District Courts Cannot Deny Summary Judgment for Lack of Record Citations Without Prior Notice

District Courts Cannot Deny Summary Judgment for Lack of Record Citations Without Prior Notice

Date: Apr 18, 2002
District Courts Cannot Deny Summary Judgment for Lack of Record Citations Without Prior Notice Introduction In the landmark case of Amnesty America v. Town of West Hartford, 288 F.3d 467 (2d Cir....
Strict Contract Interpretation Affirmed in Omni Quartz v. CVS Corp.

Strict Contract Interpretation Affirmed in Omni Quartz v. CVS Corp.

Date: Apr 17, 2002
Strict Contract Interpretation Affirmed in Omni Quartz v. CVS Corporation Introduction The case of Omni Quartz, Ltd. v. CVS Corporation and Revco D.S., Inc. represents a pivotal moment in contract...
Second Circuit Upholds § 841's Constitutionality in Apprendi Context

Second Circuit Upholds § 841's Constitutionality in Apprendi Context

Date: Apr 13, 2002
Second Circuit Upholds § 841's Constitutionality in Apprendi Context Introduction In the landmark case United States v. Herbie Noel, decided on April 12, 2002, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Establishing Standards for In-Court Eyewitness Identifications in Habeas Corpus Cases: KENNAUGH v. MILLER

Establishing Standards for In-Court Eyewitness Identifications in Habeas Corpus Cases: KENNAUGH v. MILLER

Date: Apr 13, 2002
Establishing Standards for In-Court Eyewitness Identifications in Habeas Corpus Cases: KENNAUGH v. MILLER Introduction KENNAUGH v. MILLER is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Hallwood Realty Partners v. Gotham Partners: Affirmation of §13(d) Limitations on Private Damages and Group Formation

Hallwood Realty Partners v. Gotham Partners: Affirmation of §13(d) Limitations on Private Damages and Group Formation

Date: Apr 12, 2002
Hallwood Realty Partners v. Gotham Partners: Affirmation of §13(d) Limitations on Private Damages and Group Formation Introduction Hallwood Realty Partners, L.P. v. Gotham Partners, L.P. is a pivotal...
Reaffirmation of the 'Dangerously Near' Standard for Attempted Assault and Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) in Organized Criminal Enterprises

Reaffirmation of the 'Dangerously Near' Standard for Attempted Assault and Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) in Organized Criminal Enterprises

Date: Apr 10, 2002
Reaffirmation of the 'Dangerously Near' Standard for Attempted Assault and Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) in Organized Criminal Enterprises Introduction The case of United States of America v....
Limitations on In Forma Pauperis Appeals for Represented Litigants: Fridman v. City of New York

Limitations on In Forma Pauperis Appeals for Represented Litigants: Fridman v. City of New York

Date: Apr 6, 2002
Limitations on In Forma Pauperis Appeals for Represented Litigants: Fridman v. City of New York Introduction In the case of Mikhail Fridman v. The City of New York et al. (195 F. Supp. 2d 534, United...
Affirmation of Non-Employee Status Under Title VII and Enforcement of Election-of-Remedies Provisions

Affirmation of Non-Employee Status Under Title VII and Enforcement of Election-of-Remedies Provisions

Date: Apr 4, 2002
Affirmation of Non-Employee Status Under Title VII and Enforcement of Election-of-Remedies Provisions Introduction The case of Alexandra York v. Association of the Bar of the City of New York et al....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert