Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

EFT Funds in Intermediary Banks Recognized as 'Property' for Maritime Attachment under Admiralty Rule B(1)

EFT Funds in Intermediary Banks Recognized as 'Property' for Maritime Attachment under Admiralty Rule B(1)

Date: Nov 7, 2002
EFT Funds in Intermediary Banks Recognized as 'Property' for Maritime Attachment under Admiralty Rule B(1) Introduction The case of Winter Storm Shipping, Ltd. v. TPI et al. (310 F.3d 263, Second...
Reinforcing the Employee Choice Doctrine: Second Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Lucente v. IBM

Reinforcing the Employee Choice Doctrine: Second Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Lucente v. IBM

Date: Nov 5, 2002
Reinforcing the Employee Choice Doctrine: Second Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Lucente v. IBM Introduction The case of Edward E. Lucente vs. International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)...
Gitten v. United States: Clarifying Procedures for Successive Collateral Attacks under Rule 60(b)

Gitten v. United States: Clarifying Procedures for Successive Collateral Attacks under Rule 60(b)

Date: Nov 2, 2002
Gitten v. United States: Clarifying Procedures for Successive Collateral Attacks under Rule 60(b) Introduction Maurice Carl Gitten, a pro se litigant from Otisville, NY, found himself entangled in a...
Second Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Disability Insurance Breach of Contract Case

Second Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Disability Insurance Breach of Contract Case

Date: Oct 30, 2002
Second Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment in Disability Insurance Breach of Contract Case Introduction In Louise M. Harris v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, 310 F.3d 73, the United...
Requirement for Complete Certificate of Appealability in Habeas Corpus Appeals: Insights from El v. Artuz

Requirement for Complete Certificate of Appealability in Habeas Corpus Appeals: Insights from El v. Artuz

Date: Oct 26, 2002
Requirement for Complete Certificate of Appealability in Habeas Corpus Appeals: Insights from El v. Artuz Introduction In the landmark case of El v. Artuz, decided by the United States Court of...
Extending Creditor Standing in Bankruptcy Fraud Cases: In re HOUSECRAFT Industries USA, Inc.

Extending Creditor Standing in Bankruptcy Fraud Cases: In re HOUSECRAFT Industries USA, Inc.

Date: Oct 25, 2002
Extending Creditor Standing in Bankruptcy Fraud Cases: In re HOUSECRAFT Industries USA, Inc. Introduction The case of In re HOUSECRAFT Industries USA, Inc. (310 F.3d 64) adjudicated by the United...
Limitation of INA §242(f) in Stay Pending Appeal: Analysis of Mohammed v. Reno

Limitation of INA §242(f) in Stay Pending Appeal: Analysis of Mohammed v. Reno

Date: Oct 25, 2002
Limitation of INA §242(f) in Stay Pending Appeal: Analysis of Mohammed v. Reno Introduction The case of Haniff Mohammed v. Reno addresses significant issues surrounding the issuance of a stay of...
Broad Arbitration Clauses Encompass Fraudulent Inducement: ACE Capital Re Overseas Ltd. v. Central United Life Insurance Co.

Broad Arbitration Clauses Encompass Fraudulent Inducement: ACE Capital Re Overseas Ltd. v. Central United Life Insurance Co.

Date: Oct 19, 2002
Broad Arbitration Clauses Encompass Fraudulent Inducement: ACE Capital Re Overseas Ltd. v. Central United Life Insurance Co. Introduction In the case of ACE Capital Re Overseas Ltd. v. Central United...
Enforceability of Collateral Attack Waivers in Plea Agreements: Frederick v. Warden

Enforceability of Collateral Attack Waivers in Plea Agreements: Frederick v. Warden

Date: Oct 19, 2002
Enforceability of Collateral Attack Waivers in Plea Agreements: Frederick v. Warden Introduction Frederick v. Warden, Lewisburg Correctional Facility, 308 F.3d 192 (2d Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case...
Interpreting War Exclusion Clauses: Second Circuit's Analysis in International Multifoods Corp. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.

Interpreting War Exclusion Clauses: Second Circuit's Analysis in International Multifoods Corp. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.

Date: Oct 18, 2002
Interpreting War Exclusion Clauses: Second Circuit's Analysis in International Multifoods Corp. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. Introduction The case of International Multifoods Corporation v....
Reaffirming Liberal Pleading Standards for Eighth Amendment Claims: PHELPS v. KAPNOLAS

Reaffirming Liberal Pleading Standards for Eighth Amendment Claims: PHELPS v. KAPNOLAS

Date: Oct 18, 2002
Reaffirming Liberal Pleading Standards for Eighth Amendment Claims: PHELPS v. KAPNOLAS Introduction In PHELPS v. KAPNOLAS, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed critical...
Strict Scrutiny Applied in Police Officer Transfers: Equal Protection Violation Affirmed

Strict Scrutiny Applied in Police Officer Transfers: Equal Protection Violation Affirmed

Date: Oct 18, 2002
Strict Scrutiny Applied in Police Officer Transfers: Equal Protection Violation Affirmed Introduction In the landmark case of Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc. v. City...
Clear Communication Requirements for Debt Validation Notices under FDCPA

Clear Communication Requirements for Debt Validation Notices under FDCPA

Date: Oct 17, 2002
Clear Communication Requirements for Debt Validation Notices under FDCPA Introduction The case Carmen McStay v. I.C. System, Inc., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit...
Defining Successive Habeas Petitions Under AEDPA: An Analysis of James v. Walsh

Defining Successive Habeas Petitions Under AEDPA: An Analysis of James v. Walsh

Date: Oct 16, 2002
Defining Successive Habeas Petitions Under AEDPA: An Analysis of James v. Walsh Introduction Ronnie James, a paroled prisoner, challenging the administration of his sentence, engaged the judicial...
Class Certification in Fraud Claims: Material Uniformity Requirement Established in Moore v. PaineWebber

Class Certification in Fraud Claims: Material Uniformity Requirement Established in Moore v. PaineWebber

Date: Oct 11, 2002
Class Certification in Fraud Claims: Material Uniformity Requirement Established in Moore v. PaineWebber Introduction In the landmark case Robert L. Moore and Jeannette S. Parry v. PaineWebber, Inc.,...
Defining Limited Resentencing and Law of the Case: Insights from United States v. Carlo Donato

Defining Limited Resentencing and Law of the Case: Insights from United States v. Carlo Donato

Date: Oct 10, 2002
Defining Limited Resentencing and Law of the Case: Insights from United States v. Carlo Donato Introduction In the case of United States v. Carlo Donato, decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Second Circuit Affirms ERISA's Written Instrument Requirement: Implications for Employee Benefit Plans

Second Circuit Affirms ERISA's Written Instrument Requirement: Implications for Employee Benefit Plans

Date: Oct 8, 2002
Second Circuit Affirms ERISA's Written Instrument Requirement: Implications for Employee Benefit Plans Introduction In the landmark case of Raymond Feifer, Nicholas Pocchia, and Edwin Molina v....
Proper Procedural Compliance for State Motions Under AEDPA: Insights from PRATT v. GREINER

Proper Procedural Compliance for State Motions Under AEDPA: Insights from PRATT v. GREINER

Date: Oct 5, 2002
Proper Procedural Compliance for State Motions Under AEDPA: Insights from PRATT v. GREINER Introduction The case of Shawn Pratt v. Charles Greiner, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Requiring Conspicuous Notice and Unambiguous Assent for Clickwrap Arbitration Clauses: Insights from SPECHT v. NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORP.

Requiring Conspicuous Notice and Unambiguous Assent for Clickwrap Arbitration Clauses: Insights from SPECHT v. NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORP.

Date: Oct 2, 2002
Requiring Conspicuous Notice and Unambiguous Assent for Clickwrap Arbitration Clauses: Insights from SPECHT v. NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORP. Introduction The landmark case SPECHT v. NETSCAPE...
Patel v. Searles: Affirming the Constitutional Right to Intimate Association under § 1983

Patel v. Searles: Affirming the Constitutional Right to Intimate Association under § 1983

Date: Oct 1, 2002
Patel v. Searles: Affirming the Constitutional Right to Intimate Association under § 1983 Introduction In Patel v. Searles, 305 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2002), the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert